Log in

View Full Version : How has Clinton's security clearance not been revoked?



UK2K
09-30-2016, 09:53 AM
Cause if I had done what she did, I wouldn't have my clearance. Also, I'd be in jail.


A security clearance may be revoked at any time. There are 13 guidelines that are common to all agencies of the federal government that are used to determine eligibility for a clearance and to determine if an existing clearance ought to be revoked. There is an appeals process which varies with the employment status of the individual.

The Defense Security Service has this to say about the process of using the 13 Adjudication Guidelines:

The adjudication process is the careful weighing of a number of variables known as the whole-person concept. All available, reliable information about the person, past and present, favorable and unfavorable, is considered in reaching a clearance determination.


Guideline E: Personal conduct
Refusing to cooperate with the clearance investigation, refusing to complete requested paperwork, refusing testing. Associating with known criminals, adverse reports from past employers, neighbors or friends. Providing false information or concealing information from investigators.
Strike 1


Guideline K: Security violations
“Unauthorized disclosure of classified information.” Deliberate security violations. Multiple violations. Negligence.
Strike 2


Guideline M: Misuse of information technology systems
Illegal or unauthorized access to a computer system. Unauthorized actions to alter, restrict or deny access to systems. Unauthorized removal of software or hardware from systems, or adding unauthorized software or hardware to systems
Strike 3.

So... she did all three of these things, yet she still has her access? How can that be?

NumberSix
09-30-2016, 02:34 PM
The entire FBI investigation was a fraud.

UK2K
09-30-2016, 02:43 PM
The entire FBI investigation was a fraud.

I would be charged if I stuck a flash drive in the siprnet. Craziness.

NumberSix
09-30-2016, 02:51 PM
I would be charged if I stuck a flash drive in the siprnet. Craziness.
You literally have people using the phrase "cover up" and asking people on reddit how to destroy evidence after said evidence was under subpoena. You have people who have been given immunity be proven to have given the FBI dishonest testimony and no actionable information. You have intentional obstruction of justice all over the place.

The FBI investigation was a joke. The entire point was to give everybody immunity and sweep it under the rug.

ItsMillerTime
09-30-2016, 03:08 PM
Don't know why this surprises people. The Feds stick up for their own. Had this been another secretary of state, the same thing would have happened.

Stop living in your 2 party system sham of a world.

UK2K
09-30-2016, 03:13 PM
You literally have people using the phrase "cover up" and asking people on reddit how to destroy evidence after said evidence was under subpoena. You have people who have been given immunity be proven to have given the FBI dishonest testimony and no actionable information. You have intentional obstruction of justice all over the place.

The FBI investigation was a joke. The entire point was to give everybody immunity and sweep it under the rug.

It's just amazing to me that after this long... Nobody has simply asked the question.

I mean, maybe it's just me, but that would be the very first question I asked.

Nick Young
09-30-2016, 03:36 PM
The law does not apply to the Queen of Death.

FillJackson
09-30-2016, 05:41 PM
Cause if I had done what she did, I wouldn't have my clearance. Also, I'd be in jail.




Strike 1


Strike 2


Strike 3.

So... she did all three of these things, yet she still has her access? How can that be?

Zero of those things apply to her. It's pretty simple really.

UK2K
09-30-2016, 05:50 PM
Zero of those things apply to her. It's pretty simple really.
Clearly... no laws apply to her.

Terahite
09-30-2016, 06:46 PM
Shooktards avoiding this thread like the plague.

Someone in her camp needs to answer for this. Hello?