View Full Version : Hitlery Sold Ambassadorial Positions
HarryCallahan
10-05-2016, 11:56 PM
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/e6f5086df092279fdb48b3c1ba18aa8fe92a4718cf39fd45fc 43f3fbc9e117c5.jpg
https://media.8ch.net/file_store/f5c5a91f4b5c7f2048706b0a21236c76bda11385b3f18c7e22 6e489a482560b5.jpg
November 4 2008: Obama wins presidency, and will appoint HRC as Sec. of State
January 1 2009: Brent Hardt was given the position of Charg
poido123
10-06-2016, 12:25 AM
Not to piss on your parade, but we have been talking about this for at leas a couple of days...
Notice how the democrats and shills here completely ignore it?
They have no answers for this :oldlol:
HarryCallahan
10-06-2016, 12:36 AM
Not to piss on your parade, but we have been talking about this for at leas a couple of days...
Notice how the democrats and shills here completely ignore it?
They have no answers for this :oldlol:
Not to piss on yours, but not this particular item and threads filled with "Assange gonna end hillary 2nite" "fvcking assange trolled us!" "lol dems shook" don't count as discussion. I have provided detailed analysis of the timeline of events and links to emails discussing it.
Now, back to the discussion.
What positions do we think Hitlery would've sold as PotUS?
poido123
10-06-2016, 06:01 AM
Not to piss on yours, but not this particular item and threads filled with "Assange gonna end hillary 2nite" "fvcking assange trolled us!" "lol dems shook" don't count as discussion. I have provided detailed analysis of the timeline of events and links to emails discussing it.
Now, back to the discussion.
What positions do we think Hitlery would've sold as PotUS?
She would be using the donor's money to pay off key media figures for her smear campaign/bias and she would of bought off or blackmailed director Comey in the FBI to not prosecute her.
I think the fact that some very mysterious deaths happening to people who have dirt on her would be enough to scare these people into complying to her demands.
If the whole truth came out on Hillary, I think even the democrats on ISh would be shocked.
dunksby
10-06-2016, 06:04 AM
Correct if I'm wrong, but I don't think ever in the US history have there been two such shitty excuses of human beings and presidential candidates competing for the White House.
HarryCallahan
10-06-2016, 06:31 AM
Correct if I'm wrong, but I don't think ever in the US history have there been two such shitty excuses of human beings and presidential candidates competing for the White House.
04 was much worse
poido123
10-06-2016, 06:33 AM
Correct if I'm wrong, but I don't think ever in the US history have there been two such shitty excuses of human beings and presidential candidates competing for the White House.
All I say is to give Trump a chance.
We already know the shitstorm we will get with Hillary.
Nick Young
10-06-2016, 11:51 AM
The Dems are giving her a free pass on this, for whatever reason. Probably because it implicates Obama. He is the one who officially appointed many of these Ambassadors to their positions.
Funktion
10-06-2016, 12:35 PM
Wealthy folks have been getting named Ambassador to certain countries or their native homeland since the beginning of time. Nothing new to see here.
HarryCallahan
10-06-2016, 09:44 PM
Wealthy folks have been getting named Ambassador to certain countries or their native homeland since the beginning of time. Nothing new to see here.
The evidence laid out in the OP corroborates that he paid for the position
Patrick Chewing
10-06-2016, 09:52 PM
The Dems are giving her a free pass on this, for whatever reason. Probably because it implicates Obama. He is the one who officially appointed many of these Ambassadors to their positions.
I hate the fact that Obama has become untouchable simply because he is Black.
Nick Young
10-06-2016, 10:15 PM
Democratic voters are big on moral superiority. Many are self righteous. They will never admit that their party is corrupt and they backed the wrong horse.
They would rather double down and deny reality then admit they were wrong.
poido123
10-06-2016, 10:43 PM
Democratic voters are big on moral superiority. Many are self righteous. They will never admit that their party is corrupt and they backed the wrong horse.
They would rather double down and deny reality then admit they were wrong.
Thats essentially it right there.
They are treating this election like a loyalty to a sports team.
No rationality, no conscience, just blind support.
HarryCallahan
10-07-2016, 01:02 AM
Thats essentially it right there.
They are treating this election like a loyalty to a sports team.
No rationality, no conscience, just blind support.
This is why I was so supportive of Jim Webb. Now, there are many things I disagree with Webb about, but he is a strong leader with a character beyond reproach. Was a republican who left the party due to the completely unconstitutional Iraq war. People really need to "de-camp" so to speak. Every thing is so partisan right now.
poido123
10-07-2016, 02:11 AM
This is why I was so supportive of Jim Webb. Now, there are many things I disagree with Webb about, but he is a strong leader with a character beyond reproach. Was a republican who left the party due to the completely unconstitutional Iraq war. People really need to "de-camp" so to speak. Every thing is so partisan right now.
I would of rather Pence at this point.
But I will support Trump to lead America out of the establishment stranglehold, and into a fresh new invigorated nationalism.
The world has to avoid Hillary, at all costs.
She has already declared war on russia is she becomes president, because of the alleged hacking against her.
Dresta
10-07-2016, 08:55 AM
This is why I was so supportive of Jim Webb. Now, there are many things I disagree with Webb about, but he is a strong leader with a character beyond reproach. Was a republican who left the party due to the completely unconstitutional Iraq war. People really need to "de-camp" so to speak. Every thing is so partisan right now.
Jim Webb vs. Rand Paul would've actually been an election with two candidates who weren't complete shite. Instead, the parties have both picked the most polarising people they could find. Nation is hopelessly divided, and I can't see it improving. We're in the American period of Marius and Sulla now.
nathanjizzle
10-07-2016, 09:37 AM
wow what a bitch. still better than ripping off small contractors out of their time and money.
HarryCallahan
10-07-2016, 10:56 AM
Jim Webb vs. Rand Paul would've actually been an election with two candidates who weren't complete shite. Instead, the parties have both picked the most polarising people they could find. Nation is hopelessly divided, and I can't see it improving. We're in the American period of Marius and Sulla now.
Yeah, Rand was my guy but y'know... Iowa was disappointing. I guess the field was too strong for a repeat of his Paps win in '12
wow what a bitch. still better than ripping off small contractors out of their time and money.
It absolutely is not. If someone deceives contractors they are liable to small claims, if someone sells influence at high levels of government they are only liable insofar as the same high levels of government are willing to prosecute them. which Director Comey has proven they are not.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.