ESPN Top 200 Rankings are BACK! #200-151

[scuzzy]

2016-2017 Here we go!

http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/nbarank151200/nbarank-players-151-200

[MMM]

they have way too many rookies in their top 200 and it really becomes a crap shoot when we are talking about top 200 because what realistically separates most of these players from 150 - 200

[SpaceJam]

lmao they really had Tyson Chandler as the 63rd best player in the league last year?

[ScalsFan21]

Ugh... Monta and Roberson to me both are top 150 (Ellis really re-dedicated himself to basketball in the offseason and I think we'll see a lot of that now that he's finally on a team that can actually compete to go reasonably far in the playoffs).

But it's hard to take any ESPN rank serious... I just find it funny that it looks like they release these things 50 at a time, as if their rankings are THAT prestigious. :lol And then some people eat it up and treat this crap like the end-all be-all.

[ScalsFan21]

they have way too many rookies in their top 200 and it really becomes a crap shoot when we are talking about top 200 because what realistically separates most of these players from 150 - 200

Another good point... ranking past the top maybe 15 or so guys really gets much more situational. In the hundreds it's impossible, waste of time really.

[Bosnian Sajo]

Lou Will is way too low...there aren't 197 players in the league better than him.

[Nash]

1.Lee
2.Brawn
3.Ray
4.Mone
5.James