Log in

View Full Version : Lakers 3-3 in games Bran missed and Kuzma played



Hamtaro CP3KDKG
01-10-2019, 01:46 AM
Lost in Sacramento on the gamewinner when they were dominating most of the game, fluke loss

in the OKC 7pt loss Kuzma got injured at halftime and didnt return

very close to being 5-1 TBH:biggums: :applause:

Marchesk
01-10-2019, 01:52 AM
Kuzma confirmed as modern day Bill Russell

And1AllDay
01-10-2019, 01:53 AM
3-5 without Bron so a 31 win pace

So still worse than last years 35 wins.

Thanks for playing

LoneyROY7
01-10-2019, 01:56 AM
Makes sense. Kuzma is their clear number #2 option...not some "next Pippen" who is only capable of scoring 25+ once in 30 games.

kennethgriffen
01-10-2019, 01:57 AM
should be an allstar this year

And1AllDay
01-10-2019, 02:04 AM
should be an allstar this year

Stop
making
predictions
please

JohnMax
01-10-2019, 02:07 AM
should be an allstar this year

should be only allstar on lakers. bran will have missed too many games to qualify for allstar game by the time he comes back.

ImKobe
01-10-2019, 02:10 AM
Makes sense. Kuzma is their clear number #2 option...not some "next Pippen" who is only capable of scoring 25+ once in 30 games.

Kuzma is the next Kobe

he was like 38/0/0 at one point in the game

that's mamba mentality :pimp:

Hamtaro CP3KDKG
01-10-2019, 02:10 AM
should be an allstar this year

KD, Davis, Bran, Jokic, George, Kuzma, Adams as West frontcourt players:applause: :applause:

Steph, Har_en, Lillard, Demar to round out the guards:applause:

100grandman
01-10-2019, 02:35 AM
1 star

Hamtaro CP3KDKG
01-10-2019, 02:38 AM
1 star

Lakers 0-2 without Kuzma babyboi

thats a 0 win pace:biggums:

Dray n Klay
01-10-2019, 02:55 AM
Meltdown babyboi

ShawkFactory
01-10-2019, 03:23 AM
The Hawks went 5-1 from December 18th through the 29th

MrFonzworth
01-10-2019, 04:16 AM
Lakers 0-2 without Kuzma babyboi

thats a 0 win pace:biggums:
:biggums:

How is he not the MVP frontrunner? Is the media avoiding this stat? :biggums:

Gileraracer
01-10-2019, 04:29 AM
Stop that!!! :mad:



LEBRON. HAS. NO. HELP. !!!!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad:

Akrazotile
01-10-2019, 04:29 AM
I'm literally the second person in this thread.

And1AllDay
01-10-2019, 04:46 PM
Stop that!!! :mad:



LEBRON. HAS. NO. HELP. !!!!!!! :mad: :mad: :mad:

Pretty close to a 55-win pace Pippen did without Jordan
Pretty close indeed

superduper
01-10-2019, 04:47 PM
3-5 without Bron so a 31 win pace

So still worse than last years 35 wins.

Thanks for playing

ignoring all context as usual who's shocked

#Bran

superduper
01-10-2019, 04:47 PM
Lakers 0-2 without Kuzma babyboi

thats a 0 win pace:biggums:

Why hasn't any Bran stan replied to this?

Nash
01-10-2019, 05:25 PM
Imagine if they managed to win 55 games without him!

aj1987
01-10-2019, 06:09 PM
Kuzma is the next Kobe

he was like 38/0/0 at one point in the game

that's mamba mentality :pimp:
And like Brick, Kuz is gonna need a top 5 GOAT in LeBron (Shaqin Brick's case) to carry him to a title.


OP, how many retarded threads are you gonna make? You're turning out to be worse than the resident dumbass AirTupac.

And1AllDay
01-10-2019, 07:54 PM
Imagine if they managed to win 55 games without him!

Wow could any team be that stacked to lose their best player and still win 55 games? :eek: :eek:

Just imagine it, a team so stacked they could lose their best player and still win 55 is that even possible?

E_Stamkos
01-10-2019, 08:46 PM
Wow could any team be that stacked to lose their best player and still win 55 games? :eek: :eek:

Just imagine it, a team so stacked they could lose their best player and still win 55 is that even possible?

They were still a good team of course but what happened when the games actually mattered, they got worked in the playoffs in the second round.

What happened the following year? The team that was 2 years removed from being a champion was reduced to a .500 record with 70 percent of the season having been played until MJ returned.

And1AllDay
01-11-2019, 12:07 PM
They were still a good team of course but what happened when the games actually mattered, they got worked in the playoffs in the second round.


Wait so are you saying that there actually was a team so stacked they lost there best player and still won 55 games? :eek:

Just imagine it, a team so stacked they lost their best player and still won 55 is that even possible? Are you sure any star had a steam so stacked?

Cavs went from 50 to 17 (pace)
Heat went from 54 to 37

Has any team gone down only 2 wins after the #1 option leaves? Does anyone know? :confusedshrug:

ArbitraryWater
01-11-2019, 12:09 PM
Why hasn't any Bran stan replied to this?

even non bron stans have replied :biggums:

ImKobe
01-11-2019, 12:10 PM
Wait so are you saying that there actually was a team so stacked they lost there best player and still won 55 games? :eek:

Just imagine it, a team so stacked they lost their best player and still won 55 is that even possible? Are you sure any star had a steam so stacked?

Cavs went from 50 to 17 (pace)
Heat went from 54 to 37

Has any team gone down only 2 wins after the #1 option leaves? Does anyone know? :confusedshrug:

They didn't just "lose" Jordan, they replaced him with Kukoc and Kerr :lol

That team went from an elite offense to average, but scraped enough close wins together to pull off 55 wins, despite their SRS being cut in half (from 6 to below 3).

tamaraw08
01-11-2019, 12:33 PM
Lost in Sacramento on the gamewinner when they were dominating most of the game, fluke loss

in the OKC 7pt loss Kuzma got injured at halftime and didnt return

very close to being 5-1 TBH:biggums: :applause:

how many teams aside from OKC had a winning record again?:confusedshrug:

Hey Yo
01-11-2019, 12:39 PM
They didn't just "lose" Jordan, they replaced him with Kukoc and Kerr :lol

That team went from an elite offense to average, but scraped enough close wins together to pull off 55 wins, despite their SRS being cut in half (from 6 to below 3).
MJ's replacement in the starting lineup was 6th round pick journeyman Pete Myers who was out of the league for 2yrs prior to signing back on with Chicago that season.

LOL @ listing Kerr. He was just as big of a journeyman as Myers was at the time.

Kukoc was a rookie who started 8gms all season.

Either the Bulls were still a great team or the league was still watered down as fvck. Which was it?

And1AllDay
01-11-2019, 12:57 PM
MJ's replacement in the starting lineup was 6th round pick journeyman Pete Myers who was out of the league for 2yrs prior to signing back on with Chicago that season.

LOL @ listing Kerr. He was just as big of a journeyman as Myers was at the time.

Kukoc was a rookie who started 8gms all season.

Either the Bulls were still a great team or the league was still watered down as fvck. Which was it?

Wow
what
a
post

:eek:

scuzzy
01-11-2019, 01:02 PM
3-5 is big time for Kobe Stan’s

They camped watching that brand of mediocrity for half of Bryants career without Shaq

Their excitement is understandable

ImKobe
01-11-2019, 02:02 PM
MJ's replacement in the starting lineup was 6th round pick journeyman Pete Myers who was out of the league for 2yrs prior to signing back on with Chicago that season.

LOL @ listing Kerr. He was just as big of a journeyman as Myers was at the time.

Kukoc was a rookie who started 8gms all season.

Either the Bulls were still a great team or the league was still watered down as fvck. Which was it?

Like I said, they won a bunch of close games that year as Pippen, Grant & Armstrong all increased their workload. They were nothing but a .500 team in '95 once Grant left, but were 13 - 4 with a rusty ass MJ that hadn't played ball for over a year.

kuniva_dAMiGhTy
01-11-2019, 02:09 PM
MJ's replacement in the starting lineup was 6th round pick journeyman Pete Myers who was out of the league for 2yrs prior to signing back on with Chicago that season.

LOL @ listing Kerr. He was just as big of a journeyman as Myers was at the time.

Kukoc was a rookie who started 8gms all season.

Either the Bulls were still a great team or the league was still watered down as fvck. Which was it?

So without Jordan, Chicago lost in the semifinals against a team they beat every year WITH him.

That's your grand point here? :oldlol:

34-24 Footwork
01-11-2019, 07:55 PM
So without Jordan, Chicago lost in the semifinals against a team they beat every year WITH him.

That's your grand point here? :oldlol:

ether

Smoke117
01-11-2019, 08:04 PM
So without Jordan, Chicago lost in the semifinals against a team they beat every year WITH him.

That's your grand point here? :oldlol:

They lost that series because of a bullshit call, though.