Will Westbrook win a Ring?

[AirTupac]

Yes/No?

No.

:(

[PeroAntic]

lol

[Kblaze8855]

If we only count rings as best player?

It would be wise to bet against every hall of famer winning a ring.

We talk so much shit on people we perceive as the type you won

[AirTupac]

[QUOTE=Kblaze8855]If we only count rings as best player?

It would be wise to bet against every hall of famer winning a ring.

We talk so much shit on people we perceive as the type you won

[Dray n Klay]

Will Ingram score more than 30 points once this season? :wtf:

[GreatHILL]

not with oklahoma city

[Bronbron23]

No. I like Westbrooks drive,Hart and competitiveness but the boy plays dumb as hell

[Rocket]

He will never win a ring as the main player.

If he ever signed somewhere and became a selfless player instead of a stat hogging selfish player he may win a ring as a third or fourth option.

In other words, no he will never win a ring.

[SaltyMeatballs]

Nope, not with his style of play

[BarberSchool]

No.
Ball dominant players with first-round-tier efficiency, rarely lead teams to conference play, and almost never to finals, or finals victory.

[PickernRoller]

I was almost sure if he ever met Bran again Westbrook would have his first FMVP but alas Bran moved West.

[theaussieguy]

If we only count rings as best player?

It would be wise to bet against every hall of famer winning a ring.

We talk so much shit on people we perceive as the type you won’t win with them as best player and just ignore that most of the best players from any time aren’t gonna lead a team to a title.

Just aren’t enough to go around.

Agreed. It takes a special kind of mental and power to be able to win rings consistently. MJ and Kobe obviously had it, just sociopathic levels of 'GIMME GIMME', and even Lebron to some extent too although in a less admirable way.

Most of these great players are not sociopathic enough to inflict their will on an entire organisation in an attempt to completely destroy and humiliate their opponents and therefore will always be at great mercy to the natural entropy of things. So much of basketball success comes down to rotten luck in regards to roster health come playoffs and god knows what else, only the very best have been able to consistently overcome these hurdles. Then you obviously get teams like the Spurs who handle entropy in the form of an extremely strong cohesion and community from the very upper echelons of management all the way down to the grass roots organisations that surround and sustain it. Very wholesome, but most teams do not posses this and are obviously relegated to purely seeking superstar talent in their quest for a ring.