PDA

View Full Version : Lakers have a worse record w/o Lonzo than they do w/o LBJ despite same # of games



AirTupac
03-07-2019, 09:49 PM
The Lakers now have a worse record without Lonzo Ball than they do without LeBron James in the same number of games


So far they are 5-13 and counting without Lonzo Ball

They were 6-12 without LeBron back when he missed 18 games

Just an interesting stat i noticed

Hamtaro CP3KDKG
03-07-2019, 09:55 PM
14-32 since hes been drafted too

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=461620&page=2

i was tracking this february started

coin24
03-07-2019, 10:35 PM
lavar was right .. lonzo is more important to the lakers than bran:roll: :roll: :roll:

Mr. Jabbar
03-07-2019, 10:36 PM
Lavar is a fckn BOSS :roll: :roll:

bladefd
03-07-2019, 10:36 PM
Lonzo's defense alone may be worth keeping him long-term. He has more value than both Kuzma & Ingram because he gives you everything but shooting. He has begun feeling more comfortable driving into paint more too after putting on like 15 pounds of muscle over the summer.

He needs to further improve his conditioning like Steph Curry did after coming into the nba. These injuries need to stop because he needs to be out there to build some semblance of consistency.

Don't trade him, Magic. I hope to hold onto Lonzo, Hart and Wagner. Everyone else is open game, but if Pels want the latter 2, take 'em.

72-10
03-08-2019, 12:16 AM
:lol

Walk on Water
03-08-2019, 12:42 AM
lavar was right .. lonzo is more important to the lakers than bran:roll: :roll: :roll:


Yup

bison
03-08-2019, 01:21 AM
So the lakers are only very slightly less atrocious without bron than without lonzo. The only thing you proved here is the lakers still ****ing suck without bron you ****ing idiot. Do you even read your own posts, dipshit?

AirTupac
03-08-2019, 01:21 AM
lavar was right .. lonzo is more important to the lakers than bran:roll: :roll: :roll:


so true :roll: :roll: :roll:

TheCorporation
03-08-2019, 02:38 AM
So the lakers are only very slightly less atrocious without bron than without lonzo. The only thing you proved here is the lakers still ****ing suck without bron you ****ing idiot. Do you even read your own posts, dipshit?

:roll: :eek:

imdaman99
03-08-2019, 02:50 AM
You guys celebrating this stat? :lol guess what, celebrate on ISH because ESPN ain't reporting this. Don't know if anyone else is either

MrFonzworth
03-08-2019, 02:51 AM
Just dropped LeBron out of the top 20. Welcome Lonzo Ball.

Mr.GOAT2408
03-08-2019, 06:16 AM
Clearly the most valuable player on the team so this does not surprise me

Vino24
03-08-2019, 06:40 AM
What are the Lakers +/- numbers with LeBron on and off the court?

knicksman
03-08-2019, 06:46 AM
So the lakers are only very slightly less atrocious without bron than without lonzo. The only thing you proved here is the lakers still ****ing suck without bron you ****ing idiot. Do you even read your own posts, dipshit?

still tho, jordan was winning at the age of 34 while lebron isnt even better than a sophomore.:lol

LAmbruh
03-08-2019, 06:54 AM
What are the Lakers +/- numbers with LeBron on and off the court?
https://i.postimg.cc/3JcFg7bq/dgthjfgjkkjk.png