Lakers just told lue to go f*ck hkmself

[kennethgriffen]

lakers end discussions with him for the new coaching job


bran getting traded 100%


:roll:

[And1AllDay]

Is he good can we get him

[Smoke117]

lakers end discussions with him for the new coaching job


bran getting traded 100%


:roll:


OP jizzing in his pants at the thought right now

[PickernRoller]

OP jizzing in his pants at the thought right now

Why shouldn't he u lil druk fakkit?

[kennethgriffen]

Why shouldn't he u lil druk fakkit?

yeah its pretty much common sense. if lebron left i'd drop the raptors with or without kawhi's services and stroll back into lakerland on monday like george costanza when he pretended he never quit in the first place



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IW78swzn_Bs

[bladefd]

I don't think Lue is right choice anyways. Good riddance from consideration.

I just don't know who we go after next. It certainly has to be a strong personality..

[dazzer87]

Lebron not going to be happy about this......:roll:

[qrich]

Huh?

Lue told the Lakers to **** off when they tried to dictate his staff while not willing to work on contract length.

Lakers front office is done...they have Kurt and Linda Rambis making decisions...Bron thinking he's still the shit...Ingram with his injuries...Zo isn't happy.

This is worse than the post-Shaq/pre-Pau days.

[Smoke117]

Huh?

Lue told the Lakers to **** off when they tried to dictate his staff while not willing to work on contract length.

Lakers front office is done...they have Kurt and Linda Rambis making decisions...Bron thinking he's still the shit...Ingram with his injuries...Zo isn't happy.

This is worse than the post-Shaq/pre-Pau days.

He was most upset about not getting a 5 year contract. They only wanted to give him 3 to coincide with LeBron.

[qrich]

He was most upset about not getting a 5 year contract. They only wanted to give him 3 to coincide with LeBron.
Even with a 5-year deal, Lue wasn't going to sign unless he was able to handpick his staff. He didn't want Kidd there, period.

He knew with Kidd on the staff, the FO would fire him without hesitation since they want Kidd, but prima donna Bran wants Lue.

In all reality, the Lakers should be trying to get a package put together to ship LeBron out.

[kennethgriffen]

Huh?

Lue told the Lakers to **** off when they tried to dictate his staff while not willing to work on contract length.

Lakers front office is done...they have Kurt and Linda Rambis making decisions...Bron thinking he's still the shit...Ingram with his injuries...Zo isn't happy.

This is worse than the post-Shaq/pre-Pau days.


i dunno if you know how applying for jobs works. but the people interviewing you have final say on whether or not you get what you want


the lakers told lue to f*ck off with his demands. not the other way around... lue wasn't interviewing the lakers

[qrich]

i dunno if you know how applying for jobs works. but the people interviewing you have final say on whether or not you get what you want


the lakers told lue to f*ck off with his demands. not the other way around... lue wasn't interviewing the lakers
Keep trying to save face bruh.

Lakers were looking for reasons not to hire Lue, and would have used any reason to make sure he wasn't there.

You don't think it's interesting that Kidd went from a must on the assistant staff, and now, isn't even considered by most reporters to be a top 3 guy for the job?

[GimmeThat]

a team that went 163-329 in the last 6 seasons just told the coach they interviewed to "go f*ck hkmself" and you are making a thread about it?

[kennethgriffen]

Keep trying to save face bruh.

Lakers were looking for reasons not to hire Lue, and would have used any reason to make sure he wasn't there.

You don't think it's interesting that Kidd went from a must on the assistant staff, and now, isn't even considered by most reporters to be a top 3 guy for the job?


if the lakers didn't want lue they'd just have not interviewed him. are you assuming the lakers are so afraid of lebron that they felt it was necessary to make it look as if they were following through with his demands and didn't want blame if lue didn't end up getting hired?


its people like you who are causing this drama within the organization and forcing jeanie to think about trading lebron.


lebron doesn't run the lakers. jeanie nearly traded his ass already.


the fact is the lakers gave an ultimatum because they knew lebron would be gone in 3 years ( possibly 2 ) ... why give a 5 year contract to a guy thats just gonna be lebrons yes man


you don't have any clue what you're talking about. go to bed

[qrich]

Please show me your source for nearly trading his ass. Now, keep in mind, for someone to be nearly traded, there would be an offer from another team and not just an internal discussion of doing so.

And yes, Lakers FO obviously does feel as if they need to appease Bron, while, simultaneously trying to develop the youth, they already ****ed up on.

But it's okay bruv, I understand you do nothing but visualize Kobe's sack everytime you post.

[GimmeThat]

if the lakers didn't want lue they'd just have not interviewed him. are you assuming the lakers are so afraid of lebron that they felt it was necessary to make it look as if they were following through with his demands and didn't want blame if lue didn't end up getting hired?


its people like you who are causing this drama within the organization and forcing jeanie to think about trading lebron.


lebron doesn't run the lakers. jeanie nearly traded his ass already.


the fact is the lakers gave an ultimatum because they knew lebron would be gone in 3 years ( possibly 2 ) ... why give a 5 year contract to a guy thats just gonna be lebrons yes man


you don't have any clue what you're talking about. go to bed

no? this isn't where I find out the reasons as to Lue being unqualified for the position?

unless Lue put in a no-termination clause, wait, doesn't that mean Lue told Lakers to go f*ck tkmself

[GreatHILL]

monty owned the lakers :lol

[kennethgriffen]

Please show me your source for nearly trading his ass. Now, keep in mind, for someone to be nearly traded, there would be an offer from another team and not just an internal discussion of doing so.

And yes, Lakers FO obviously does feel as if they need to appease Bron, while, simultaneously trying to develop the youth, they already ****ed up on.

But it's okay bruv, I understand you do nothing but visualize Kobe's sack everytime you post.


lol@ thinking if jeanie put lebron on the block there "might not be any offers"

and


https://lakersoutsiders.com/2019/03/14/jeanie-buss-trade-lebron-james-anthony-davis/

https://fadeawayworld.net/2019/03/14/jeanie-buss-considered-trading-lebron-james-after-anthony-davis-trade-leaks/

https://ca.sports.yahoo.com/news/report-trading-le-bron-james-crossed-jeanie-buss-mind-amid-lakers-trade-talk-leaks-052535127.html

https://www.onlinegambling.com/news/2019/03/lakers-owner-jeanie-buss-almost-traded-lebron-james-rich-paul-agent/

https://lebronwire.usatoday.com/2019/03/14/rumor-jeanie-buss-mended-fences-with-rich-paul-thought-about-trading-lebron/

https://www.complex.com/sports/2019/03/lakers-jeanie-buss-reportedly-considered-trading-lebron-james-over-rich-paul


theres thousands more

when almost every news outlet says it... theres validity to it


oh yeah and don't look now but

https://lebronwire.usatoday.com/2019/05/08/rumor-people-close-to-jeanie-buss-telling-her-to-trade-lebron-james/

https://thespun.com/nba/theres-now-talk-of-lebron-james-getting-traded-by-the-lakers

[qrich]

Internal discussion =/= nearly traded

[Smoke117]

Even with a 5-year deal, Lue wasn't going to sign unless he was able to handpick his staff. He didn't want Kidd there, period.

He knew with Kidd on the staff, the FO would fire him without hesitation since they want Kidd, but prima donna Bran wants Lue.

In all reality, the Lakers should be trying to get a package put together to ship LeBron out.

lmfao...imagine actually wanting Jason Kidd. Love seeing the lakers like this. :oldlol:

[kennethgriffen]

no? this isn't where I find out the reasons as to Lue being unqualified for the position?

unless Lue put in a no-termination clause, wait, doesn't that mean Lue told Lakers to go f*ck tkmself


again.. no... because the lakers are the ones giving the interview


if you demand 5 years and the lakers end discussions with you... they told YOU to f*ck off



you see... the lakers control contract discussions. not the other way around. do you actually think lue put his phone on silent or told his agent to say he wasn't there?

:roll:

[GimmeThat]

again.. no... because the lakers are the ones giving the interview


if you demand 5 years and the lakers end discussions with you... they told YOU to f*ck off



you see... the lakers control contract discussions. not the other way around. do you actually think lue put his phone on silent or told his agent to say he wasn't there?

:roll:

is 5 years a standard request when it comes to coaching contracts? what's the average length of the current practice, just curious

[kennethgriffen]

is 5 years a standard request when it comes to coaching contracts? what's the average length of the current practice, just curious


for most hirings its 5 years but lues a yes man for lebron. nothing more. he would be useless going forward after lebron leaves.. if anything a 2 year contract would have been more accurate considering lebron can opt out

[GimmeThat]

for most hirings its 5 years but lues a yes man for lebron. nothing more. he would be useless going forward after lebron leaves.. if anything a 2 year contract would have been more accurate considering lebron can opt out

so you're saying after discussions in length, Lakers withheld information regarding the standard practice and didn't raise such issue from the get go?

[kennethgriffen]

so you're saying after discussions in length, Lakers withheld information regarding the standard practice and didn't raise such issue from the get go?


no because

1. you never discuss contract length until after you determine the person is suited for the job


and

2. the length of a coaching contract has no guarantees. just because something is common doesn't mean its a guarantee. you should never go into a job interview assuming any form of entitlement. all you can do is sell yourself and hope for the best

[GimmeThat]

no because

1. you never discuss contract length until after you determine the person is suited for the job


and

2. the length of a coaching contract has no guarantees. just because something is common doesn't mean its a guarantee. you should never go into a job interview assuming any form of entitlement. all you can do is sell yourself and hope for the best

so you're a robot and has no priority

virgin alert

[kennethgriffen]

so you're a robot and has no priority

virgin alert


i have a daughter and posted more pics with women on ISH than everyone else combined

are you new here?

:lol

[GimmeThat]

i have a daughter and posted more pics with women on ISH than everyone else combined

are you new here?

:lol

odd what comes out of your mind when you're told to go f*ck ykmself

[kennethgriffen]

odd what comes out of your mind when you're told to go f*ck ykmself


are you drunk

[34-24 Footwork]

Huh?

Lue told the Lakers to **** off when they tried to dictate his staff while not willing to work on contract length.

Lakers front office is done...they have Kurt and Linda Rambis making decisions...Bron thinking he's still the shit...Ingram with his injuries...Zo isn't happy.

This is worse than the post-Shaq/pre-Pau days.

At LEAST we made the playoffs. That ain't happening with Lebron...

[Phoenix]

The flipside being reported this morning( First things first) is Lue rejected the premise that the Lakers were hiring him 'to coach Lebron, not specifically the Lakers' hence the 3 year contract( which aligns with Lebron having 3 years left on his deal).

In any event, wherever the truth lies, what a shitshow this has turned out to be.

[sd3035]

OP jizzing in his pants at the thought right now

I would be if I were a laker fan too

Apart from bringing ref rigs with him, Lebald brings nothing to the table

Nobody even wants to collude with him these days

[Wally450]

I thought OP retired?

[Jasper]

bron has a no trade clause

Lue was the fit , but Lakers were to cheap

/

[coin24]

bron has a no trade clause

Lue was the fit , but Lakers were to cheap

/



No he doesn't, and Lue is a shit coach

[BallsOut]

Lakers top 3 coaching candidates:

1) Jason Kidd
2) Phil Jackson
3) Kobe Bryant

Those are the three guys who can son LeBron.

[Axe]

I'm glad nobody ever is favoring ty lue in this board. We all know he's a terrible coach. :lol

[light]

I'm glad nobody ever is favoring ty lue in this board. We all know he's a terrible coach. :lol

He has one thing over every other coach, though. Zero fear of LeBron. He will call out LeBron and criticize him in front of the team and not give a f-ck. If he suspects LeBron is holding back, or if he doesnt like LeBron's body language, he will harshly call him out - and literally no other coach has ever done that with him.

So think about LeBron's incredible playoff runs from 2016 to 2018 under Lue, and know that Ty Lue actually had something to do with that by being the only coach that can prod him with absolute honesty.

Lue can do that because him and LeBron are very close and LeBron knows Lue would never criticize him if it wasnt true. Sometimes the criticism was hard for Bron to accept (like at the half of a game 7) but he took it and did better.

So he's basically the LeBron whisperer.

Apart from that the guy had the most artistic lineups (I call them artistic, others would probably call them bizarre) and he was great on inbounds plays, which was common praise when he was in CLE.

[Axe]

He has one thing over every other coach, though. Zero fear of LeBron. He will call out LeBron and criticize him in front of the team and not give a f-ck. If he suspects LeBron is holding back, or if he doesnt like LeBron's body language, he will harshly call him out - and literally no other coach has ever done that with him.

So think about LeBron's incredible playoff runs from 2016 to 2018 under Lue, and know that Ty Lue actually had something to do with that by being the only coach that can prod him with absolute honesty.

Lue can do that because him and LeBron are very close and LeBron knows Lue would never criticize him if it wasnt true. Sometimes the criticism was hard for Bron to accept (like at the half of a game 7) but he took it and did better.

So he's basically the LeBron whisperer.

Apart from that the guy had the most artistic lineups (I call them artistic, others would probably call them bizarre) and he was great on inbounds plays, which was common praise when he was in CLE.
Lol bran only carried him to 3-straight finals appearances so it's not surprising if you're going to think that he's any good. :oldlol:

When bran left for the lakers in 2018, see what happened? The cavs became a former shell of themselves and lue got fired after the cavs went 0-6 in the first six games of the last season. Now the scrub is an assistant coach for the lakers' crosstown rivals, the la clippers.

Also in 2018, it didn't feel like he's one during their last postseason run together. He just allowed the pacers and celtics to take them to two separate grueling 7-game series, with the latter team missing two key pieces in hayward and irving but were still able to take a 2-0 lead in the ecf.

Then lue did nothing at all to avoid a sweep from the cavs' fourth rematch against the warriors, his third one versus them. Also in a regular season game, he allowed the raptors to blow them out for a total of 34 points. If that's not incompetence, then I don't know what it is.

The only reason why lue gets praised is because he's involved as the first coach to have led the cavaliers to their first chip in history but when you look outside of that, there is nothing exceptional at all about this man.