View Full Version : The West is WEAK
StrongLurk
05-20-2019, 11:47 PM
Honestly, the West has not been a strong conference since KD joined the Warriors in 2017.
Warriors are down Cousins, KD, and Iggy for this last game and they still beat their competition in the WCF (SWEPT overall).
The West is Weak.
talkingconch
05-20-2019, 11:48 PM
No
The Iron Fist
05-20-2019, 11:49 PM
Doesn
StrongLurk
05-20-2019, 11:49 PM
No
Only when the Warriors have had injuries have other teams had a chance...
FKAri
05-20-2019, 11:49 PM
They were good last year. This year it's a shit show though.
talkingconch
05-20-2019, 11:49 PM
Only when the Warriors have had injuries have other teams had a chance...
Its just that the Warriors have talent better than the rest of the league, its not that the West is Weak. If they were playing in the East?...They would 12-1 there way to the finals. the Spurs (as the 8th seed) > whatever team was 8th in the East
sammichoffate
05-20-2019, 11:50 PM
Lol, almost every team needed 50 wins to get in you wanker
StrongLurk
05-20-2019, 11:51 PM
Its just that the Warriors have talent better than the rest of the league, its not that the West is Weak. If they were playing in the East?...They would 12-1 there way to the finals. the Spurs (as the 8th seed) > whatever team was 8th in the East
The East is weak as well...the West doesn't do any better against the Warriors.
DocSlam
05-20-2019, 11:55 PM
Clippers are tough. They just don't have enough consistent shooting. They play defense and they rebound.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 09:46 AM
It's been weak for a while
I agree
fiddy
05-21-2019, 10:14 AM
It's been weak for a while
I agree
We're talking about the present, TheGayporation.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 10:16 AM
Clippers had to win 48 games to get the 8th seed.
Detroit made the playoffs with 41.
Wally450
05-21-2019, 10:29 AM
When your champion wins the conference 5 straight times, what does that say about the conference?
superduper
05-21-2019, 10:39 AM
LeGOAT missed the playoffs in the weakest West in the last 20 years. Imagine if Bran was in the peak Wild Wild West :roll:
FKAri
05-21-2019, 10:40 AM
Clippers had to win 48 games to get the 8th seed.
Detroit made the playoffs with 41.
No one cares about 40 win teams. What matters is the 76ers and Celtics > Blazers
Wa88iors
05-21-2019, 10:41 AM
Honestly, the West has not been a strong conference since KD joined the Warriors in 2017.
Warriors are down Cousins, KD, and Iggy for this last game and they still beat their competition in the WCF (SWEPT overall).
The West is Weak.
:dancin : Trollin'....trollin', trolling down the river....
:violin:
And1AllDay
05-21-2019, 10:43 AM
Warriors only competition in 5 years has been from the East :eek:
The 17' Warriors 12-0'd the weak west but luckily the thicc east was able to stop that freight train from going 16-0 for another landslide record.
In 2015 the East without Kyrie or Love was able to win 2 games
In 2016 well yeah you know :pimp:
In 2017 see above
In 2019 we see their path to Finals is Clippers, Rockets, and Blazers
:wtf:
Gileraracer
05-21-2019, 10:45 AM
The West is WEAK - what does this say about LeMissedPlayoffs?
ImKobe
05-21-2019, 10:47 AM
No one cares about 40 win teams. What matters is the 76ers and Celtics > Blazers
Blazers, Clippers, Spurs & Nuggets could have beat the Sixers, Raptors or Celtics in a series. Rockets would be favorites against Milwaukee. Nuggets - Bucks would also be a tough match-up.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 10:48 AM
No one cares about 40 win teams. What matters is the 76ers and Celtics > Blazers
Celtics are dysfunctional. Philly is heavily dependent on Embids health and they have their own chemistry issues.
I see no reason to think they would beat Portland in a series.
Indian guy
05-21-2019, 10:48 AM
This idiot never fails to outdo his prior stupid thread :facepalm
It took 48 wins just to make the playoffs in the West. 2 legit powerhouses at the top of the conference in GS and Houston. 14 of the 15 teams were genuinely competitive teams that you would have to play well against to beat. Which is simply unheard of.
The West was better than EVER in its history this season.
ErhnamDjinn
05-21-2019, 10:54 AM
Clippers are tough. They just don't have enough consistent shooting. They play defense and they rebound.
I like the way the clips are built they just need maybe 1 or 2 more pcs. to compete.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 11:39 AM
Warriors only competition in 5 years has been from the East :eek:
The 17' Warriors 12-0'd the weak west but luckily the thicc east was able to stop that freight train from going 16-0 for another landslide record.
In 2015 the East without Kyrie or Love was able to win 2 games
In 2016 well yeah you know :pimp:
In 2017 see above
In 2019 we see their path to Finals is Clippers, Rockets, and Blazers
:wtf:
Yikes :eek:
tontoz
05-21-2019, 11:49 AM
Last year GS had only 1 sweep, in the Finals. Houston took them to 7 games.
kuniva_dAMiGhTy
05-21-2019, 11:53 AM
GSW are just that good.
Want to know how tough the west is? Ask Lebron.
aj1987
05-21-2019, 11:58 AM
GSW are just that good.
Want to know how tough the west is? Ask Lebron.
The Blazers are trash bro. Heck, the Lakers would've definitely taken these Warriors to 6.
kuniva_dAMiGhTy
05-21-2019, 12:03 PM
The Blazers are trash bro. Heck, the Lakers would've definitely taken these Warriors to 6.
Most teams under these rules will look like trash vs GSW.
There are a few exceptions though.
I think Milwaukee has enough shooting and length to make the finals competitive. Their defense is great as well.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 12:06 PM
Last year GS had only 1 sweep, in the Finals. Houston took them to 7 games.
2015?
2016?
2017?
:lol
dunksby
05-21-2019, 12:07 PM
Clippers are dogged and the Rockets are a perennial finals team in the east, it's only the Blazers who shat the bed, if Jokic had a consistent 2nd option the WCF would have been a whole different story.
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 12:15 PM
This idiot never fails to outdo his prior stupid thread :facepalm
It took 48 wins just to make the playoffs in the West. 2 legit powerhouses at the top of the conference in GS and Houston. 14 of the 15 teams were genuinely competitive teams that you would have to play well against to beat. Which is simply unheard of.
The West was better than EVER in its history this season.
Hell no :roll:
tontoz
05-21-2019, 12:26 PM
2015?
2016?
2017?
:lol
The West wins more games than the east literally every year.
2017 Boston led the east with 53 wins :oldlol:
2016 The Spurs won 10 more games than the Cavs (who led the east) but finished 2nd in the West.
2015 Brooklyn made the playoffs with 38 wins. :lol
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 12:29 PM
We just saw the WCF opponent get swept by a team missing Durant/Cousins and Iggy for game 4...that's WEAK.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 12:33 PM
We just saw the WCF opponent get swept by a team missing Durant/Cousins and Iggy for game 4...that's WEAK.
That doesn't mean Portland wouldn't have beaten the dysfunctional Celtics and Sixers.
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 12:42 PM
That doesn't mean Portland wouldn't have beaten the dysfunctional Celtics and Sixers.
Basically Durant ruined the integrity of the league.
All Durant had to do was not compete against the Warriors for the Warriors to have zero challengers.
Imagine if Kobe joined the early 2000 Spurs after losing to them in the playoffs...
bullettooth
05-21-2019, 01:00 PM
What kind of bullshit thread is this? The West is weak? So weak the GLOAT couldn't even make the playoffs?
Where's LeBron.. shouldn't he be on his way to a 9th finals appearance??
tontoz
05-21-2019, 01:00 PM
Basically Durant ruined the integrity of the league.
All Durant had to do was not compete against the Warriors for the Warriors to have zero challengers.
Imagine if Kobe joined the early 2000 Spurs after losing to them in the playoffs...
If you want to say Durant made a btch move I agree.
But he started in the west and stayed in the west, which is the stronger conference and has been for a long time.
FKAri
05-21-2019, 01:09 PM
Last year GS had only 1 sweep, in the Finals. Houston took them to 7 games.
West definitely > East last year. No argument there (unless I'm swinging off of LeGOAT's nut sack {which I often am}). But I stand by my comment about the Blazers this year.
Naero
05-21-2019, 01:57 PM
It speaks more reflectively about the Warriors than it does about their intraconference competition; I don't see how that's far-fetched to believe, considering they've vanquished their Finals competition just as convincingly as, if not more than, everyone they faced en route to it.
Many of you somehow continue to undercredit this dynasty, who even great teams
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 02:21 PM
What kind of bullshit thread is this? The West is weak? So weak the GLOAT couldn't even make the playoffs?
Where's LeBron.. shouldn't he be on his way to a 9th finals appearance??
Yes the West is weak.
The conference is FULL of pretenders besides the obvious Warriors.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 02:27 PM
Basically Durant ruined the integrity of the league.
All Durant had to do was not compete against the Warriors for the Warriors to have zero challengers.
Imagine if Kobe joined the early 2000 Spurs after losing to them in the playoffs...
Bingo
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 02:28 PM
The West wins more games than the east literally every year.
2017 Boston led the east with 53 wins :oldlol:
2016 The Spurs won 10 more games than the Cavs (who led the east) but finished 2nd in the West.
2015 Brooklyn made the playoffs with 38 wins. :lol
You are obviously missing my clearly Illustrated point. The only time the Warriors faced resistance was against eastern team during those three years
2015, 2016, 2017
tontoz
05-21-2019, 02:29 PM
Yes the West is weak.
The conference is FULL of pretenders besides the obvious Warriors.
Why does the West win more games than the East every year?
252-198 this year.
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 02:33 PM
Why does the West win more games than the East every year?
252-198 this year.
Did I say the something to the contrary?
bullettooth
05-21-2019, 02:35 PM
Did I say the something to the contrary?
Stop trolling.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 02:39 PM
You are obviously missing my clearly Illustrated point. The only time the Warriors faced resistance was against eastern team during those three years
2015, 2016, 2017
:facepalm
2015
The Cavs lasted 5 games. I don't see that as resistance. Houston lasted 5 and Memphis lasted 6.
I will concede Warriors had luck on their side that year with other teams having injuries.
2016
7 game series against OKC they easily could have lost. I think that counts as resistance.
They didn't sweep anyone that year.
They lost the Finals with a hobbled Curry and suspended Green.
2017
They lost only 1 game in the postseason. They got no resistance from anyone.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 02:40 PM
Did I say the something to the contrary?
You said the West is weak. What does that make the East since they were dominated?
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 02:47 PM
You said the West is weak. What does that make the East since they were dominated?
You are stating the obvious. What people don't want to admit is that the West is weak as well IN RELATION TO COMPETING WITH THE WARRIORS.
It's been a one team league for a long time now.
I do believe however that Raptors and Bucks are > The Blazers.
ArbitraryWater
05-21-2019, 02:49 PM
There are 2 great teams: GSW, HOU
Utah comes next.
Rest is trash. Honestly. No factors. A peaky OKC is relevant, but no one else.
ArbitraryWater
05-21-2019, 02:50 PM
No one cares about 40 win teams. What matters is the 76ers and Celtics > Blazers
bingo.
Top heavyness matters.
East's 3 and 4 >>> West's 3
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 02:55 PM
:facepalm
2015
The Cavs lasted 5 games. I don't see that as resistance. Houston lasted 5 and Memphis lasted 6.
I will concede Warriors had luck on their side that year with other teams having injuries.
2016
7 game series against OKC they easily could have lost. I think that counts as resistance.
They didn't sweep anyone that year.
They lost the Finals with a hobbled Curry and suspended Green.
2017
They lost only 1 game in the postseason. They got no resistance from anyone.
:lol uhh What is this Backwards Day?
2015: first off the series went 6 games. Secondly, LeBron was without his number two and number three option and still stretched it to six games.
2016: you're an idiot for even trying to bring this one up :lol this is only playoff series they've lost in five years so don't be a complete retard.
2017: 12-0 verse Western teams.
Western teams played 12 games with 0 wins. The East got one win after 3 games. Not sure how much more explaining this needs?
tontoz
05-21-2019, 03:13 PM
:lol uhh What is this Backwards Day?
2015: first off the series went 6 games. Secondly, LeBron was without his number two and number three option and still stretched it to six games.
2016: you're an idiot for even trying to bring this one up :lol this is only playoff series they've lost in five years so don't be a complete retard.
2017: 12-0 verse Western teams.
Western teams played 12 games with 0 wins. The East got one win after 3 games. Not sure how much more explaining this needs?
You are going to have to define what you mean by "resistance".
Is a 5 game series considered resistance? 6 games? 7 games?
It seems like you have different criteria for teams in the East vs West. You count a 5 game series as resistance when facing the East but a 6 or 7 game series against the West doesn't count as resistance.
Looks a bit inconsistent.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 03:15 PM
You are stating the obvious. What people don't want to admit is that the West is weak as well IN RELATION TO COMPETING WITH THE WARRIORS.
It's been a one team league for a long time now.
I do believe however that Raptors and Bucks are > The Blazers.
That doesn't mean the West is weak. It just means the Warriors are great and I agree.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 03:17 PM
You are going to have to define what you mean by "resistance".
Is a 5 game series considered resistance? 6 games? 7 games?
It seems like you have different criteria for teams in the East vs West.
Jesus, really?
Did the Warriors face more resistance from the west or the east in the following three years:
2015, 2016, 2017
Yes of course we both know the answer but you're just trolling
tontoz
05-21-2019, 03:19 PM
Jesus, really?
Did the Warriors face more resistance from the west or the east in the following three years:
2015, 2016, 2017
Yes of course we both know the answer but you're just trolling
Maybe I should step aside and let you argue with yourself.
The only time the Warriors faced resistance was against eastern team during those three years
2015, 2016, 2017
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 03:55 PM
Maybe I should step aside and let you argue with yourself.
Did the Warriors face more resistance from the west or the east in the following three years:
2015, 2016, 2017
Yes of course we both know the answer but you're just trolling
tontoz
05-21-2019, 03:58 PM
Did the Warriors face more resistance from the west or the east in the following three years:
2015, 2016, 2017
Yes of course we both know the answer but you're just trolling
:oldlol:
Originally Posted by TheCorporation
The only time the Warriors faced resistance was against eastern team during those three years
2015, 2016, 2017
3ball
05-21-2019, 04:05 PM
the only time a bunch of KNOWN weak teams won a conference and got crushed in the Finals was when AI, Kidd, Lebron, and Dwight made the Finals with weak teams between 2001-2009 and got destroyed in the Finals..
There's never been another time where a bunch of teams that everyone knew were weak, made the Finals and got smashed (confirming their weakness and the conference's)
But even though a strong team wasn't needed to make the Finals, lebron's couldn't make it in 09 and 10', and stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs in the weak conference... Now that he's gone, we're back to non-star teams winning the East as Kawhi and Giannis don't have any superstar teammates like lebron had the last 8 years
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 04:06 PM
the only time a bunch of KNOWN weak teams won a conference and got crushed in the Finals was when AI, Kidd, Lebron, and Dwight made the Finals with weak teams between 2001-2009 and got destroyed in the Finals..
There's never been another time where a bunch of teams that everyone knew were weak, made the Finals and got smashed (confirming their weakness and the conference's)
But even though a strong team wasn't needed to make the Finals, lebron's couldn't make it in 09 and 10', and stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs in the weak conference... Now we're back to non-star teams winning the East as Kawhi and Giannis don't have any super star teammates like lebron had the last 8 years
Anyone missing? :lol
https://i.postimg.cc/25VW4wJ5/Screenshot-20190521-130250-Instagram.jpg
3ball
05-21-2019, 04:08 PM
Anyone missing? :lol
https://i.postimg.cc/25VW4wJ5/Screenshot-20190521-130250-Instagram.jpg
:confusedshrug:.... MJ almost matched that in 3 game series
:oldlol:
How many 40 ppg series for any of those guys? I'll wait
Spurs m8
05-21-2019, 04:08 PM
The West isn't weak, the Warriors are just too strong you moron hahahha
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 04:11 PM
the only time a bunch of KNOWN weak teams won a conference and got crushed in the Finals was when AI, Kidd, Lebron, and Dwight made the Finals with weak teams between 2001-2009 and got destroyed in the Finals..
There's never been another time where a bunch of teams that everyone knew were weak, made the Finals and got smashed (confirming their weakness and the conference's)
But even though a strong team wasn't needed to make the Finals, lebron's couldn't make it in 09 and 10', and stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs in the weak conference... Now that he's gone, we're back to non-star teams winning the East as Kawhi and Giannis don't have any superstar teammates like lebron had the last 8 years
1. MJ
2. Kareem
3. Lebronze
This order is the law of the universe. Simply physics.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 04:11 PM
Fair point. First round was 5 games in Jordan's day.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 04:11 PM
1. MJ
2. Kareem
3. Lebronze
This order is the law of the universe. Simply physics.
Swap LordBron and Fraudon and you have a deal
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 04:13 PM
:confusedshrug:.... MJ almost matched that in 3 game series
:oldlol:
How many 40 ppg series for any of those guys? I'll wait
Rebs?
Assists?
Steals?
Blocks?
And should we even mention defense :eek:
MJ was a scorer thats it
LostCause
05-21-2019, 04:20 PM
Rebs?
Assists?
Steals?
Blocks?
And should we even mention defense :eek:
MJ was a scorer thats it
Scorer with higher defensive impact and success, career accolades, awards and reputation than Bronny Bron :lol
Do mention it. You won't be mentioning much for your boy though
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 04:22 PM
Swap LordBron and Fraudon and you have a deal
Relax
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 04:37 PM
Relax
Im relaxed
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 04:55 PM
Im relaxed
Jordan > Lebron
bullettooth
05-21-2019, 04:56 PM
Rebs?
Assists?
Steals?
Blocks?
And should we even mention defense :eek:
MJ was a scorer thats it
https://i.postimg.cc/Gt7KCvCg/lebron-stats-or-rings.gif
StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 05:24 PM
https://i.postimg.cc/Gt7KCvCg/lebron-stats-or-rings.gif
Lebron has both...this doesn't make sense.
aj1987
05-21-2019, 05:26 PM
Most teams under these rules will look like trash vs GSW.
There are a few exceptions though.
I think Milwaukee has enough shooting and length to make the finals competitive. Their defense is great as well.
I'm not saying the West is trash, but the Blazers are beyond awful. The Sixers or even the freaking Nets would've played better against the Warriors. Lillard and CJ are god awful defenders and if they are cold, they bring nothing to the table. Neither of them are adept passers/playmakers.
As I said, the Lakers would've given them a tougher time than the Blazers.
TheCorporation
05-21-2019, 05:28 PM
https://i.postimg.cc/Gt7KCvCg/lebron-stats-or-rings.gif
Do I need to find that pic again :(
FKAri
05-21-2019, 05:32 PM
Do I need to find that pic again :(
https://i.postimg.cc/C5MF1xc3/bran2.gif
:cheers:
NBAGOAT
05-21-2019, 05:37 PM
I'm not saying the West is trash, but the Blazers are beyond awful. The Sixers or even the freaking Nets would've played better against the Warriors. Lillard and CJ are god awful defenders and if they are cold, they bring nothing to the table. Neither of them are adept passers/playmakers.
As I said, the Lakers would've given them a tougher time than the Blazers.
i disagree with the nets. I mean d'angelo is just as bad on defense and they're hugely reliant on him and dinwiddie and levert. He may be a better playmaker but he's not a top tier one.
Denver likely would've given the warriors more trouble but still lose clearly. I like jokic's chances of having a great series which should be enough to win a game. The Blazers have never matched up well with GS, even pre KD.
bullettooth
05-21-2019, 05:39 PM
https://i.postimg.cc/C5MF1xc3/bran2.gif
:cheers:
6 finals losses negates that and you know it.
You're so desperate, you lie to yourself.
tontoz
05-21-2019, 05:43 PM
The blazers had double digits leads in the last three games. Last night went to OT. Let's not pretend these games were a cakewalk.
Spurs m8
05-21-2019, 05:44 PM
Lebron has both...this doesn't make sense.
He could have more rings than Jordan if he didn't sacrifice rings for stats.
Fvck, you're a daft cvnt hahahah
3ball
05-21-2019, 05:45 PM
We all know if LeBron were on either of those teams, you'd be hyping the SHIT out of them :lol
Middleton/Lopez/Bledsoe/Mirotic or Lowry/Siakam/Gasol/Ibaka would then become stacked rosters. We'd see dozens of threads about how Middleton or Siakam were better than Pippen. You ain't fooling anybody
^^^ But that's what you're ignoring - we can't say "if" because he already failed to do what Giannis is doing in 09' and 10'..
he had his chance with non-star, 60-win, 1 seeds........ and failed twice, quitting in 10'... so he stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs..
That's why you can't say "if", as if we can just replace guys here and there willy nilly.. Lebron HAD his chance and failed, so he stacked the deck for 8 years - but now he's gone, and order is restored with 1-star teams romping to the Finals like Lebron failed to do in 09' and 10'
A star cast hasn't been needed to win the East since 98', except for Lebron's sabatoge from 11-18', and a couple other more one-off or two-off instances
Unfortunately, people ignore these facts, and are then shocked when the West exposed him..
.
NBAGOAT
05-21-2019, 05:46 PM
the west was like a better 16 east this year but also had some bad luck. Hou should've done better than the rs because of injuries but were still considered a heavyweight so it's fine. Hou is obviously better than the 16 raptors still so rs win total isnt a big deal. I dont really feel that way about the other teams however even though 3 had 50+ and 3 more were around that total. It's all subjective however. You think OKC will one day figure it out with their big 3, people certainly predicted them to be great
The East was like a worst 16 west with the top tier teams but poor depth outside the top 4. even with the poor showing bos had, I think I take them over portland especially without nurkic. Obviously philly arent as good as the thunder and mil isnt as dominant as gs was but there's a similar hierarchy
FKAri
05-21-2019, 05:47 PM
6 finals losses negates that and you know it.
You're so desperate, you lie to yourself.
Making the Finals will never negate anything. No matter how weak a conference is. :oldlol:
3ball
05-21-2019, 05:55 PM
Making the Finals will never negate anything. No matter how weak a conference is. :oldlol:
Giannis is making the Finals with a non-star, 1 seed - Lebron failed to do this in 09' and 10', so he stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs
but now he's gone, and order is restored with 1-star teams romping to the Finals like Lebron failed to do in 09' and 10'
A star cast hasn't been needed to win the East since 98', except for Lebron's sabatoge from 11-18', and a couple one-off or two-off instances
Unfortunately, people ignore these facts, and then are shocked when the West exposed him..
bullettooth
05-21-2019, 05:55 PM
Making the Finals will never negate anything. No matter how weak a conference is. :oldlol:
Why do you lie?
tontoz
05-21-2019, 05:57 PM
Making the Finals will never negate anything. No matter how weak a conference is. :oldlol:
I typically try to stay out of this nonsense but I really don't get how making the finals and losing is worse than losing in earlier rounds.
:confusedshrug:
aj1987
05-21-2019, 05:58 PM
i disagree with the nets. I mean d'angelo is just as bad on defense and they're hugely reliant on him and dinwiddie and levert. He may be a better playmaker but he's not a top tier one.
Denver likely would've given the warriors more trouble but still lose clearly. I like jokic's chances of having a great series which should be enough to win a game. The Blazers have never matched up well with GS, even pre KD.
Did you watch the series? Lillard, at times, was either scarred to take the shot, or he was just trigger happy. Dude put his low IQ on display for the whole world. Lost a ton of respect for him.
FKAri
05-21-2019, 05:59 PM
Giannis is making the Finals with a non-star, 1 seed - Lebron failed to do this in 09' and 10', so he stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs
but now he's gone, and order is restored with 1-star teams romping to the Finals like Lebron failed to do in 09' and 10'
A star cast hasn't been needed to win the East since 98', except for Lebron's sabatoge from 11-18', and a couple one-off or two-off instances
Unfortunately, people ignore these facts, and then are shocked when the West exposed him..
1-star team? Is basketball really so black and white to you? 76ers are a multiple star team. As are the Raptors. And yet the Bucks are primed to get into the Finals.
3ball
05-21-2019, 05:59 PM
I typically try to stay out of this nonsense but I really don't get how making the finals and losing is worse than losing in earlier rounds.
:confusedshrug:
It isn't worse, it's just worse than winning the Finals
making the Finals is just winning the conference finals.. it's a whole nother level to win the championship
And btw, it can be perceived as worse if you're a high seed and get swept by record amount or if you lose as the favorite.. Anytime you get destroyed or upset with a Finals team, you deserve heat
SpaceJam2
05-21-2019, 06:00 PM
It isn't worse, it's just worse than winning the Finals
9 Finals is just 9 conference finals wins.. it's a whole nother level to win the championship
Why did MJ only make it to the Finals 6 times :(
All the other top 10 players made it more times.
NBAGOAT
05-21-2019, 06:04 PM
Did you watch the series? Lillard, at times, was either scarred to take the shot, or he was just trigger happy. Dude put his low IQ on display for the whole world. Lost a ton of respect for him.
eh he's always had bad shot selection and made more than most. I'm taking him over d'angelo all day however lol
3ball
05-21-2019, 06:15 PM
1-star team? Is basketball really so black and white to you? 76ers are a multiple star team. As are the Raptors. And yet the Bucks are primed to get into the Finals.
Middleton is worse than Mo Williams and Jamison by every metric - they're all low level all-stars... Varejao was all-defense in 2010, so he's greater than 19' Ibaka or whatever role player you named
And you're splitting hairs on word choice, so I'll define what I'm saying
By "star", I mean "superstar", as in HOF-level (i.e. high HOF probability on bballref)
Only a biased person would consider Middleton a star or superstar like Love or Bosh were, let alone Wade or Kyrie
Middleton and Lowry aren't superstars - Wade, Love, Kyrie, Bosh are and likely HOF's
1-star team? Is basketball really so black and white to you? 76ers are a multiple star team. As are the Raptors. And yet the Bucks are primed to get into the Finals.
Again, Giannis is making the Finals with a non-superstar, 1 seed - Lebron failed to do this in 09' and 10', so he stacked the deck from 11-18' to ensure Finals runs
but now he's gone, and order is restored with 1-star teams romping to the Finals like Lebron failed to do in 09' and 10'
A star cast hasn't been needed to win the East since 98', except for Lebron's sabatoge from 11-18', and a couple one-off or two-off instances
Unfortunately, people ignore these facts, and then are shocked when the West exposed him..
aj1987
05-21-2019, 06:16 PM
eh he's always had bad shot selection and made more than most. I'm taking him over d'angelo all day however lol
Yeah, no shit, but I'm saying that the Nets would've given them (Warriors) more competition than the shitty Blazers. As a team.
SouBeachTalents
05-21-2019, 06:21 PM
I typically try to stay out of this nonsense but I really don't get how making the finals and losing is worse than losing in earlier rounds.
:confusedshrug:
They're legit trying to argue that it's worse to win a trash conference than it is to lose to a team from that said conference. The argument is so retarded it's beyond comprehension :lol
Big164
05-21-2019, 06:23 PM
LeGOAT missed the playoffs in the weakest West in the last 20 years. Imagine if Bran was in the peak Wild Wild West :roll:
This
E_Stamkos
05-21-2019, 07:01 PM
Im relaxed
Is your butthole relaxed though?
<3
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.