Log in

View Full Version : There are still people out there who think the Warriors are not the GOAT Team



1987_Lakers
05-20-2019, 11:51 PM
Just look what they just did without Durant. With him, they are the GOAT team and it's not even close.

StrongLurk
05-20-2019, 11:52 PM
The people who don't think these Warriors are GOAT are simply haters, or old bitter losers still living in the past :lol

72-10
05-21-2019, 12:01 AM
How Could They Be They're Way Over The Salary Cap And They Don't Follow The Rules Of Basketball On The Court. They're Frauds.

1987_Lakers
05-21-2019, 12:02 AM
The people who don't think these Warriors are GOAT are simply haters, or old bitter losers still living in the past :lol

Agree.

SouBeachTalents
05-21-2019, 12:02 AM
How Could They Be They're Way Over The Salary Cap And They Don't Follow The Rules Of Basketball On The Court. They're Frauds.
https://media1.tenor.com/images/e35cca1e2f3600cc14dabd5cfc72a9e9/tenor.gif

1987_Lakers
05-21-2019, 12:05 AM
This series kind of makes me wonder how successful they would have been if they never signed Durant. They probably still win in 2017, not sure about 2018, but regardless this postseason showed that even without Durant they are title contenders.

RRR3
05-21-2019, 12:05 AM
How Could They Be They're Way Over The Salary Cap And They Don't Follow The Rules Of Basketball On The Court. They're Frauds.
Username checks out.

NBAGOAT
05-21-2019, 12:15 AM
A 14.4 srs when healthy in 2017 while coasting a little compared to 16 which is almost a point better than the 96 bulls. Still had 10.4 without Durant for 19 games and coasting a little which is an all time great mark. I don’t care too much that they dropped the last two regular seasons because they had no reason to care but when healthy, still pretty dominant

scuzzy
05-21-2019, 12:16 AM
aka nostalgic Ordan stans :lol

72-10
05-21-2019, 12:20 AM
This series kind of makes me wonder how successful they would have been if they never signed Durant. They probably still win in 2017, not sure about 2018, but regardless this postseason showed that even without Durant they are title contenders.
kind of makes me wonder how you know about basketball, or if you've played it. THEX WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE THE HOME COURT ADVANTAGE IF THEY HAD TO PLAY HONEST. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY'D DO WELL AGAINST AN ACTUALLY PHYSICAL DEFENSE LIKE THE BULLS. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY HAD THE CAP SPACE FOR DURANT AND COUSINS. NO ONE WHO HAS PLAYED THE GAME RESPECTS THIS TEAM.

SouBeachTalents
05-21-2019, 12:21 AM
kind of makes me wonder how you know about basketball, or if you've played it. THEX WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE THE HOME COURT ADVANTAGE IF THEY HAD TO PLAY HONEST. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY'D DO WELL AGAINST AN ACTUALLY PHYSICAL DEFENSE LIKE THE BULLS. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY HAD THE CAP SPACE FOR DURANT AND COUSINS. NO ONE WHO HAS PLAYED THE GAME RESPECTS THIS TEAM.
Durant and Cousins aren't even playing, no need to meltdown :lol

StrongLurk
05-21-2019, 12:22 AM
I'm still shocked Curry ever became this good. I know it's been 5 years now...but when he was at Davidson...you just couldn't imagine this guy possibly being the best player in the league and leading one of the most dominant dynasties of all time...

How the F did Curry get this good??????

1987_Lakers
05-21-2019, 12:24 AM
kind of makes me wonder how you know about basketball, or if you've played it. THEX WOULDN'T EVEN HAVE THE HOME COURT ADVANTAGE IF THEY HAD TO PLAY HONEST. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY'D DO WELL AGAINST AN ACTUALLY PHYSICAL DEFENSE LIKE THE BULLS. WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY HAD THE CAP SPACE FOR DURANT AND COUSINS. NO ONE WHO HAS PLAYED THE GAME RESPECTS THIS TEAM.

The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.

And1AllDay
05-21-2019, 12:29 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.

Ouch :oldlol:

FKAri
05-21-2019, 12:31 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.
The 96 Bulls went 72-10 and one of their losses was TO one of those expansion teams :oldlol:

RRR3
05-21-2019, 12:34 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.
:roll:

72-10
05-21-2019, 12:42 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.
you have exposed that you have never played basketball.
I don't have the time to explain all the ways in which the Warriors are frauds.

72-10
05-21-2019, 12:42 AM
:roll:
why do you post here?

And1AllDay
05-21-2019, 12:43 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.

Yikes
:oldlol:

RRR3
05-21-2019, 12:45 AM
why do you post here?
Why do you?

To rant about the “good old days” of contested long twos?

1987_Lakers
05-21-2019, 12:50 AM
you have exposed that you have never played basketball.
I don't have the time to explain all the ways in which the Warriors are frauds.

You are the same guy that thought the NBA had a short 3 point line for only 2 seasons during the 90's. I had to correct you and show you it was 3 seasons.



A good chunk? Only two years was the line even shortened, and Miller has 11 seasons shooting .399 or better from 3, not to mention clutch shooting moments that Klay doesn't have.


It was three years where the NBA 3 point line was shortened, 95, 96 & 97.



You're wrong; it was two years, not three.


[QUOTE=1987_Lakers]The fact that you still think it's two years is hilarious. Since you are a little slow I will show you proof that the NBA did indeed shortened the 3 point line for three seasons...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-point_field_goal#History

[I]For three seasons beginning in 1994

SpaceJam
05-21-2019, 03:18 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.

:roll: :roll: :roll:

scuzzy
05-21-2019, 03:33 AM
The Bulls in '96 played against a bunch of expansion teams and with a short 3 point line. That is not honest basketball.
https://media.giphy.com/media/fDzM81OYrNjJC/giphy.gif

nayte
05-21-2019, 05:54 AM
I don't really care but all teams were playing at the same line. Not sure how u act like the bulls werw the only team with that benifit.seems kinda weird

Bronbron23
05-21-2019, 08:00 AM
Just look what they just did without Durant. With him, they are the GOAT team and it's not even close.
Thing is there not that much better with kd. They need him for the finals and that's it. There definitely one of the goat teams but to say there the hands down goat team is just stupid. This is a weak era they haven't faced any teams close to the goat teams in the past. 2000 and 80'a lakers, 80's Celtics and 80's bulls would all give them trouble. Duncan prime spurs team would give them a go too.
a rockets team with a washed up hurt Chris Paul took them to 7 last year. No reason why these teams couldn't do the same or better