PDA

View Full Version : Past players who would fit better in today



RRR3
05-28-2019, 05:20 PM
Throw some names out.


Obviously 3PT shooting bigs stand out, but who else?


Steve Nash is a good one.

bullettooth
05-28-2019, 05:21 PM
Mahmoud Abdul Rauf

NBAGOAT
05-28-2019, 05:27 PM
mark price, laimbeer, and glen rice. A defensive rim protector who's just asked to rebound and/or catch lobs like mutombo might be more useful offensively honestly

imdaman99
05-28-2019, 05:29 PM
My main man Mahmoud Abdul Rauf :banana: was ahead of his time

Jasper
05-28-2019, 05:32 PM
jon mackloglin (spelling)

1971 championship team of the Bucks had a heII of a stroke.

bullettooth
05-28-2019, 05:34 PM
My main man Mahmoud Abdul Rauf :banana: was ahead of his time

Meant to say that guy in my previous post.

Also, Drazen Petrovic

LostCause
05-28-2019, 05:37 PM
Reggie Miller’s impact would be immense today, which considering how crazy good his offensive impact was for his time, says a lot about how effective he was

Birds another easy one. His career would be longer, too

RRR3
05-28-2019, 05:38 PM
Petrovic is a good call. In his last two seasons before his untimely death, dude put up 20.6 PPG while shooting 44.4% from 3 (3.4 attempts per game) and 22.3 PPG while shooting 44.9% from 3 (2.4 attempts per game). I know he’s widely considered one of the GOAT shooters so imagine him with modern volume for 3PTers.

HoopologyPhD
05-28-2019, 05:46 PM
Sam Perkins

Proctor
05-28-2019, 05:47 PM
Michael Redd

paksat
05-28-2019, 05:51 PM
gilbert arenas

3ball
05-28-2019, 06:21 PM
.
From Nylon Calculas



The difference between many good and great teams — and, indeed, many good and great players — is what they do in the last five seconds of the shot clock when the plan breaks down. Even the most prepared teams will run into those situations, particularly against great defenses. The deeper a team gets in the 24-second shot clock, the more difficult it becomes for that team to find layup and three-point opportunities, and the ability to knock down the mid-range jumper thus becomes king.

https://the-cauldron.com/lost-art-the-mid-range-jumper-64b64fa0f081


So midrange is king in all eras - it's the true skill of the game - everyone in prior eras would thrive today because they were superior midrange players and 2-point shot-makers overall.. then they'd simply add threes to their game, like everyone but the brokest of jumpshooters do

Also, ball movement works better against spacing, so the lack of spacing in prior eras created an expectation of players to take their man 1-on-1 and make contested shots.. These shots are forbidden today since the spacing exists to more effectively move the ball, but they were the standard in prior eras

The contested shooting required of unspaced courts required everyone to develop their own individually-unique way of shot-making - i.e. no one plays like Kareem, Jamaal Wilkes, or Magic.. or Bird or McAdoo or English - otoh, today's game has various versions of Klay Thompson - 3-D robots

RRR3
05-28-2019, 06:23 PM
Shut the hell up 3Ball take your agenda elsewhere

Sakkreth
05-28-2019, 06:26 PM
Sabonis. I think he was goat level player anyways if not for injuries. But even then, Jokic is broken down and old Sabonis lite. That's crazy.

dazzer87
05-28-2019, 06:27 PM
Craig Hodges

3ball
05-28-2019, 06:32 PM
Shut the hell up 3Ball take your agenda elsewhere
You asked which players from prior eras would fit better today

I said everyone

because mid-range is always king and prior eras were mid-range and 2-point specialists.. they would find the midrange MORE open today than ever before, and would add the 3-point shot like everyone else has

Then I provided data showing that "the deeper a team gets in the 24-second shot clock, the more difficult it becomes for that team to find layup and three-point opportunities, and the ability to knock down the mid-range jumper thus becomes king."

This demonstrates that the mid-range kings of prior eras would dominate today's spaced out game because mid-range is always the most valuable shot as the shot clock winds down, and today's midrange is more open than ever (defenders must guard the 3-pt line).

So i answered your question, but all the backup I provided must've thrown you off

TheCorporation
05-28-2019, 06:34 PM
You asked which players from prior eras would fit better today

I said everyone

because mid-range is always king and prior eras were mid-range and 2-point specialists

Then I provided data showing that "the deeper a team gets in the 24-second shot clock, the more difficult it becomes for that team to find layup and three-point opportunities, and the ability to knock down the mid-range jumper thus becomes king."

This demonstrates that the mid-range kings of prior eras would dominate today's spaced out game because mid-range is always the most valuable shot as the shot clock winds down, and today's midrange is more open than ever (defenders must guard the 3-pt line).

So i answered your question, but all the backup I provided must've thrown you off

Why is MJ's VORP #2 all time

https://i.postimg.cc/vH5N6YJQ/Vorp559028471907.jpg

bullettooth
05-28-2019, 06:35 PM
Why is MJ's VORP #2 all time

https://i.postimg.cc/vH5N6YJQ/Vorp559028471907.jpg

http://i68.tinypic.com/23h86lh.jpg

3ball
05-28-2019, 06:38 PM
Why is MJ's VORP #2 all time

https://i.postimg.cc/vH5N6YJQ/Vorp559028471907.jpg
^^^ that's based on games played.. he loses all the rate of domination stats (PER, WS/48, PPG, SPG, OREB, usage, ORtg)

And he reduces teammates' vorp to get his vorp

He also has shit teamwork and a figured-out brand of ball (see Giannis this year)

RRR3
05-28-2019, 06:46 PM
Thanks for ruining my thread you obsessed weirdos.

TheCorporation
05-28-2019, 06:47 PM
^^^ that's based on games played.. he loses all the rate of domination stats (PER, WS/48, PPG, SPG, OREB, usage, ORtg)

And he reduces teammates' vorp to get his vorp

He also has shit teamwork and a figured-out brand of ball (see Giannis this year)

Wow so LeBron played more games, eh? How is that? :lol

More than Kareem? Interesting...

TheCorporation
05-28-2019, 06:48 PM
Thanks for ruining my thread you obsessed weirdos.

Sorry G :cheers: I'll stop. Had to clap 1ball's cheeks really quick

Nice little quickie

90sgoat
05-28-2019, 06:50 PM
Small point guards from the 90s:

Mark Price
Dana Barros
That black muslim
John Stockton
Tim Hardaway
Mookie Blaylock
etc
etc

Someone like Tim Hardaway would probably average 25+ with his speed and dribbling. We already saw in RunTMC in GSW, which is basically what most teams play like. He would be an instant star.

Mark Price would be like a rich man's Steve Nash, which means multiple MVPs. 50-40-90 shooter, very skilled in the PnR and a very good defender.

Christian Laettner could also dominate as a small ball 5.

bullettooth
05-28-2019, 06:53 PM
Small point guards from the 90s:

Mark Price
Dana Barros
That black muslim
John Stockton
Tim Hardaway
Mookie Blaylock
etc
etc

Someone like Tim Hardaway would probably average 25+ with his speed and dribbling. We already saw in RunTMC in GSW, which is basically what most teams play like. He would be an instant star.

Mark Price would be like a rich man's Steve Nash, which means multiple MVPs. 50-40-90 shooter, very skilled in the PnR and a very good defender.

Christian Laettner could also dominate as a small ball 5.

:roll:

NBAGOAT
05-28-2019, 07:05 PM
Small point guards from the 90s:

Mark Price
Dana Barros
That black muslim
John Stockton
Tim Hardaway
Mookie Blaylock
etc
etc

Someone like Tim Hardaway would probably average 25+ with his speed and dribbling. We already saw in RunTMC in GSW, which is basically what most teams play like. He would be an instant star.

Mark Price would be like a rich man's Steve Nash, which means multiple MVPs. 50-40-90 shooter, very skilled in the PnR and a very good defender.

Christian Laettner could also dominate as a small ball 5.

lol mark price isnt nash as a passer or a ball handler and maybe even worse as a shooter(nash's prime in phx is ridiculous) and very little suggests he was a very good defender even if he was likely better than nash. He's a poor man's nash.

He would definitely fit well in the era today and is extremely good. However people were crazy calling him better than Curry and saying he's better than nash is silly too

Phoenix
05-28-2019, 07:12 PM
lol mark price isnt nash as a passer or a ball handler and maybe even worse as a shooter(nash's prime in phx is ridiculous) and very little suggests he was a very good defender even if he was likely better than nash. He's a poor man's nash.

He would definitely fit well in the era today and is extremely good. However people were crazy calling him better than Curry and saying he's better than nash is silly too

Nash himself would probably be better today than back in 2005. His MVP ascension kicked off at the same time the perimeter defensive rules changed, and it's just snowballed into what we have today.

Phenith
05-28-2019, 07:14 PM
Sheed

Phoenix
05-28-2019, 07:17 PM
Garnett would be better today.

NBAGOAT
05-28-2019, 07:19 PM
Nash himself would probably be better today than back in 2005. His MVP ascension kicked off at the same time the perimeter defensive rules changed, and it's just snowballed into what we have today.

d'antoni and nash are both on record saying he would be putting up more 3's. Little scary with how good a shooter he is.

3ball
05-28-2019, 07:21 PM
:rolleyes:

3ball
05-28-2019, 07:22 PM
Fuc.king everybody jfc

Today's game is the beginner game - spacing, freedom of movement, hands-off defense, open paint

Previous eras was the advanced game - no spacing, no freedom to of movement, hand-checking, physicality, crowded paint.

TheCorporation
05-28-2019, 07:26 PM
Fuc.king everybody jfc

Today's game is the beginner game - spacing, freedom of movement, hands-off defense, open paint

Previous eras was the advanced game - no spacing, no freedom to of movement, hand-checking, physicality, crowded paint

The land of make believe

https://i.postimg.cc/1R6MHTXS/PessimisticLeftCowbird-size_restricted.gif

Sorry for these:

https://i.postimg.cc/52pLFfYT/Ker_levell.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/ZqR9sXnB/hjklhjkl.jpg

https://i.postimg.cc/nz43C3NT/90s_spacing.png

https://pics.me.me/mj-was-out-there-literally-playing-against-mechanics-how-did-45744311.png

LostCause
05-28-2019, 09:36 PM
Thanks for ruining my thread you obsessed weirdos.

I actually laughed when I read this :roll:

Sportal
05-28-2019, 10:32 PM
Michael Beasley.. being considered a "Tweener" was hard on him.. too small to defend PF, too slow to defend SF. Dude could score.

jstern
05-28-2019, 11:04 PM
Chris Jackson. He would be a superstar in this era. Unfortunately had to play in the 90s with hand checking.

Big164
05-28-2019, 11:28 PM
Barkley
KJ
Miller
Wilt
Mahmoud Abdul Rauf
Jerry West

Bawkish
05-29-2019, 01:44 AM
Allen Iverson

Gougou
05-29-2019, 02:03 AM
Yao Ming, 7'6 tall center will crush small lineups!

G-train
05-29-2019, 03:54 AM
Bob Netolicky

Wally450
05-29-2019, 09:35 AM
Michael Redd

Bingo. First name that came to my mind.

Phoenix
05-29-2019, 10:01 AM
d'antoni and nash are both on record saying he would be putting up more 3's. Little scary with how good a shooter he is.

Sure. For perspective he was putting up 4-5 a game from 2005 to 2007. That doesn't even qualify as a 'volume' 3point shooter by 2019 standards.

tontoz
05-29-2019, 06:38 PM
Not sure why anyone would mention Nash. He played in this era.He just retired 5 years ago.

I would give another vote for Price. He took 5 3s a game way back in 1990. He had a very quick release, could stop on a dime and launch at any time. Ahead of his time but like a lot of small guards back then got beat up and didn't last long.

Gotterdammerung
05-29-2019, 06:58 PM
I'd pick Bob McAdoo. Dude was several generations ahead of his time.

AirFederer
05-29-2019, 06:59 PM
Lebron

Dat stiff arm :bowdown:

Wally450
05-29-2019, 07:17 PM
I was thinking about this thread and listening to guys saying you need to be able to shoot 3's to succeed in this league. Draymond Green shoots terribly from 3 as an undersized PF. How is he able to be so successful in todays game?

Just shows that you don't need to be able to shoot the 3 to be successful.

3ball
05-29-2019, 07:30 PM
I was thinking about this thread and listening to guys saying you need to be able to shoot 3's to succeed in this league. Draymond Green shoots terribly from 3 as an undersized PF. How is he able to be so successful in todays game?

Just shows that you don't need to be able to shoot the 3 to be successful.


Kawhi won the ECF with 34% threes on 5 attempts..

MJ won 92 and 93 Finals w/ 41% on 4.3 attempts

and 39% on 3.8 attempts in 93' playoffs overall.. or 35.2% on 2.2 attempts in,85-93' playoffs

so MJ already shot better than Kawhi while winning rings...

He simply didn't give a shit about threes so he didn't practice them and the attempts weren't there in the regular season - but he wasn't going to shoot bad when it mattered, or lose because he wasn't shooting threes well enough..

So MJ was a better mid-range shooting, better 3-point shooting, and better scoring and clutch version of Kawhi..

sammichoffate
05-29-2019, 09:40 PM
Antoine Walker, Rasheed Wallace, Dennis Rodman, Nick Van Exel, Chris Mullin, Reggie Miller, Mitch Richmond, Peja Stojakovic

Bronbron23
05-29-2019, 09:51 PM
Pretty much every perimeter player ever. The rules and style of play favor the perimeter players much more than years past