Why is the Celtics of the 80's and Spurs of the 00's considered a Dynasty?

[PWB15]

In order to be considered a Dynasty don't you have to

1. Repeat

2. Threepeat

2. Win 3 out of 4?

3. Win 4 out of 5?



When did the 80's Celtics do that? They won in 81, 84, and 86. And went to the Finals in 85, and 87 which made them one of the top teams of the decade. The same with the Spurs of the 00's. They won in 03, 05, and 07 which not include a repeat at all and didn't go to any other Finals during that decade. So that made the Spurs ONE of the top teams of that decade. Agree or Disagree?

[SouBeachTalents]

You really didn't need to make the same exact thread again bruh

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=465248

[PWB15]

You really didn't need to make the same exact thread again bruh

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?t=465248


Someone said the 80's Celtics today LOL

[NBAGOAT]

no calling the 90s rockets or even the 11-14 heat a dynasty and the 80s celtics or 00s spurs not one is asinine. As uncommon as a sentiment as it is here, making finals or even conference finals and winning rs games has value.