Why should Lebron get credit for being on MJ's level if he win 4th ring w/ Kawhi/AD??

[3ball]

Durant is gone from the Warriors so there's no superteams out there...

AD/Kawhi is sheer stacking the deck, and btw - 4 rings in 17 years < 6 in 15 (6 in 11 full seasons)

So how could a ring with AD/Kawhi compare to any of MJ's with far weaker casts? .. and how does 4 rings compare to 6? it's impossible

[Gus Hemmingway]

Because Kawhi and AD are basically Pippen and Rodman


Did MJ get credit for his 1996-1998 rings?

[SouBeachTalents]

3ball SHOOK :oldlol:

[Wally450]

Dude is spending his whole life defending MJ over LeBron.

[RealSkipBayless]

Nobody is going to put Lebron over MJ. Why are you so insecure?

[NBAGOAT]

Kareem

[scuzzy]

Breaking: Brandon Ingraham

[3ball]

Because Kawhi and AD are basically Pippen and Rodman


Did MJ get credit for his 1996-1998 rings?
Rodman was nowhere near AD at any point in his career, let alone at 36 years old getting 4/8 for the entire 97' playoffs (wasn't even the starter in 98' PO)

Kawhi is obviously better than pippen, especially 2nd three-peat pippen that averaged 17 on 40.8% in the 96-98' playoffs

So no

[bigkingsfan]

He's already a better GM in one offseason.

[Meticode]

3ball shooting those airballs like usual.

[Gus Hemmingway]

Rodman was nowhere near AD at any point in his career, let alone at 36 years old getting 4/8 for the entire 97' playoffs (wasn't even the starter in 98' PO)

Kawhi is obviously better than pippen, especially 2nd three-peat pippen that averaged 17 on 40.8% in the 96-98' playoffs

So no


If LeBron gets more than 4 rebounds and 2 assists in the Finals then the ring is automatically worth more than MJ's 1998 ring :confusedshrug:

[Da_Realist]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=8e3Eq4QvMvc

[PWB15]

Because Kawhi and AD are basically Pippen and Rodman


Did MJ get credit for his 1996-1998 rings?

Im convinced you are a ****ing retard. How the **** is Kawhi Pippen and already beat Lebron and won a title with no superstars???/

[3ball]

If LeBron gets more than 4 rebounds and 2 assists in the Finals then the ring is automatically worth more than MJ's 1998 ring :confusedshrug:
No because the 98' Finals required a level of clutch and timely scoring that we've only ever seen from MJ (a record 38% of his teams points with the most daggars and clutch we've ever seen)

Lebron would have to average 34 in an 82 pace series, but only Kobe/MJ were skilled enough to average over 30 in a below-90 pace Finals

[red1]

OP is the definition of obsessed.

[3ball]

OP is the definition of obsessed.
That's the response of a guy that now realizes the obvious - mj > Lebron - after arguing tooth and nail that Lebron was better prior to the 19' debacle

[Hey Yo]

No because the 98' Finals required a level of clutch and timely scoring that we've only ever seen from MJ (a record 38% of his teams points with the most daggars and clutch we've ever seen)

Lebron would have to average 34 in an 82 pace series, but only Kobe/MJ were skilled enough to average over 30 in a below-90 pace Finals
Against a team whose 2nd and 3rd option avg 10ppg and a team total of 54 points in game 3.

[Replay32]

It's a trip that all these Lebron haters are so shook. Just says how great a player they think he is. Even if the Lakers have AD, Lebron and KL, they still have to go out there and play the games. Championships aren't guaranteed.

[red1]

That's the response of a guy that now realizes the obvious - mj > Lebron - after arguing tooth and nail that Lebron was better prior to the 19' debacle
you're an idiot and a liar. I've had MJ over lebron literally the last 10 years. when you factor everything else, mj is a better shooter and his jumpshot was reliable, so that makes him better period.



meanwhile your delusional ass thinks MJ's stacked bulls teams were equivalent to the mike brown cavaliers supporting roster - it's shit like this that makes you our village idiot :roll:

[StrongLurk]

LeGoatTM