Even at the age of 6 years old...we are still athletically superior

[Mask the Embiid]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1166057206720208898




stay mad

[Prometheus]

Hey at least you used the qualifier "athletically" this time. So you're still a divisive asshole, but at least you're not lying.

[MrFonzworth]

Not mad. Enjoy the CTE while 6 year old Asians are fluent in multiple languages:cheers:

[dude77]

wtf would you have your 6 yr old doing this shit ? god damn people are ****ing stupid

[theballerFKA Ace]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1166057206720208898




stay mad

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/bc/a8/57/bca857ad044a2f2bd506f448f42a5612.gif

[MaxFly]

https://twitter.com/i/status/1166057206720208898




stay mad

CTE

[stalkerforlife]

Same for whites being mentally superior.

And as you can see, the mental advantage is far more important.

[diamenz]

Same for whites being mentally superior.

And as you can see, the mental advantage is far more important.

pretty sure aznz take that title.

[Vino24]

pretty sure aznz take that title.
Then why isn

[aj1987]

CTE
From one of the comments:

Injury is more likely to occur in youth flag football than in youth tackle football. Severe injuries and concussions were not significantly different between leagues. Concussion was more likely to occur during games than during practice. Players in the sixth or seventh grade were more likely to suffer a concussion than were younger players.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

As that person said, it's not really physically possible to inflict any real damage when the kids are that small.

[diamenz]

[QUOTE=Vino24]Then why isn

[Shogon]

If you accept that there are athletic genetic differences, you must accept that there are intellectual genetic differences.

And yes, asians are smarter than whites.

However, I'm pretty sure that whites are more spatially aware, they're more athletic, and they have much higher levels of empathy.

People in China literally run people over repeatedly after accidentally hitting them with their cars... because it's cheaper.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9h0mNzjSIk

[Patrick Chewing]

But at no point are you mentally superior.

[MaxFly]

From one of the comments:

Injury is more likely to occur in youth flag football than in youth tackle football. Severe injuries and concussions were not significantly different between leagues. Concussion was more likely to occur during games than during practice. Players in the sixth or seventh grade were more likely to suffer a concussion than were younger players.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

As that person said, it's not really physically possible to inflict any real damage when the kids are that small.

The problem as described by Dr. Bennet Omalu, who discovered CTE, is not simply concussions, but really the sub-concussive hits that players experience. That study relies on injuries as the key data point, but injuries aren't the only issue. Here is an excerpt from a discussion with Ann McKee, who is the director of the Boston University CTE Center.


KP: Are kids younger than 14 more at risk for brain injuries than adults?

A.M.: That’s an important question. Kids’ brains are developing. Their heads are a larger part of their body, and their necks are not as strong as adults’ necks. So kids may be at a greater risk of head and brain injuries than adults.

KP: Should those kids play tackle football?

A.M.: No. I would advise kids not to play any sports, such as tackle football, where they are exposed to repeated blows to the head.

KP: Are you a sports fan?

A.M.: Yes, I was a gymnast and played volleyball growing up in Wisconsin. My three children played soccer and lacrosse. I grew up as a Green Bay Packers fan. I am not against sports. We want kids to play sports, but we want them to be safe.

[tpols]

pretty sure aznz take that title.


They are mechanically smarter but lack social nuance.

[Im so nba'd out]

That little kid doesnt even know he's at a huge disadvantage automatically :(


age and wisdom sadly will have to teach him the cold hard truth... "mommy why is everyone faster than me?"


damn shame

[tpols]

That little kid doesnt even know he's at a huge disadvantage automatically :(


age and wisdom sadly will have to teach him the cold hard truth... "mommy why is everyone faster than me?"


damn shame


And the reverse will be seen when they enter the classroom.

[Im so nba'd out]

And the reverse will be seen when they enter the classroom.
Whatever you have to tell yourself to cope :roll:

[tpols]

Whatever you have to tell yourself to cope :roll:


My friend making it in professional athletics is 1 in a million.

Making it to a 6 figure corporate gig is very common.

Set your priorities straight before you end up at BK

[Raymone]

Who's we, fat boy?

[Prometheus]

My friend making it in professional athletics is 1 in a million.

Making it to a 6 figure corporate gig is very common.

Set your priorities straight before you end up at BK

He already works at BK.

And his boss is white.

He has a rough day at work, thinks about his white boss going home to a better life than he has, and so he makes these threads.

You know it, I know it, and he definitely knows it.

[Wally450]

Bet that white boy went on to score a TD the next play and won his team the game.

[Trollsmasher]

there's a 20% likelihood of the black kid being dead in 12 years

[Patrick Chewing]

there's a 80% likelihood of the black kid being dead or behind bars in 12 years


Fixed.

[Vino24]

i didn't say china.

i'm not chinese.

*hands the L to u*
They have the most Asian people. By comparison most other Asian countries are 3rd world. I was helping you out

[Vino24]

White people have the ultimate combination. Book smarts, street smarts and athletics.

[Trollsmasher]

White people have the ultimate combination. Book smarts, street smarts and athletics.
the LeBron of races:applause:

[aj1987]

The problem as described by Dr. Bennet Omalu, who discovered CTE, is not simply concussions, but really the sub-concussive hits that players experience. That study relies on injuries as the key data point, but injuries aren't the only issue. Here is an excerpt from a discussion with Ann McKee, who is the director of the Boston University CTE Center.
Do you understand basic physics? 6 years olds, no matter what, are not capable of inflicting that sort of damage. They do not have the required momentum. I have nephews, who, as kids, took tumbles all the time. It's pretty much the same. Both are on pace to get into Ivy League schools. Didn't affect them, one bit. Not to mention the fact that they had injuries where they broke their noses, etc..

Again, I posted actual research which when into it. You're using an opinion as your argument.

From my article, which was ACTUAL RESEARCH:

When it comes to concussions, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.067% chance of a kid getting a concussion.

When it comes to serious injuries, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.14% chance of a serious injury.

Injuries in general, for 8-13 year old kids, was 0.26%.

The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%.

Again, this is not a small sample size. This is a sample size of 44,164 kids who played tackle football. Flag football pretty much doubles the injury rate though. Something which is still negligible.


As I said, kids at their ages (the ones posted in the twitter link) are not even remotely close to being able to hit hard enough to inflict actual damage. Basic physics and biology.

Please go through this article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

[scuzzy]

Muslim brotherhood hold this W

[iamgine]

Yeah football when you're a kid is fine. This also applies to MMA and boxing/kickboxing.

When you start getting that grown man strength is when it becomes dangerous.

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

Muslim brotherhood hold this W

:rockon: :rockon: :rockon: :rockon:

[tpols]

Do you understand basic physics? 6 years olds, no matter what, are not capable of inflicting that sort of damage. They do not have the required momentum. I have nephews, who, as kids, took tumbles all the time. It's pretty much the same. Both are on pace to get into Ivy League schools. Didn't affect them, one bit. Not to mention the fact that they had injuries where they broke their noses, etc..

Again, I posted actual research which when into it. You're using an opinion as your argument.

From my article, which was ACTUAL RESEARCH:

When it comes to concussions, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.067% chance of a kid getting a concussion.

When it comes to serious injuries, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.14% chance of a serious injury.

Injuries in general, for 8-13 year old kids, was 0.26%.

The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%.

Again, this is not a small sample size. This is a sample size of 44,164 kids who played tackle football. Flag football pretty much doubles the injury rate though. Something which is still negligible.


As I said, kids at their ages (the ones posted in the twitter link) are not even remotely close to being able to hit hard enough to inflict actual damage. Basic physics and biology.

Please go through this article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/


Normally they don't, but that kid did. he laid him out.

and while little kids dont hit as hard, their brains are far more malleable and prone to damage.

it would be impossible to truly measure long term effect.

the younger you are, if you incur a major injury, the worse the butterfly effect will be.

[TheMan]

Crazy how each race has its positives and negatives...a couple examples.

Asians are the smartest but are the least attractive to other races, the women have asses like teen boys and the Azn bros have tooth picks down there...otoh, black women have ass for days, black dudes have the biggest dongs but some of those brothas that live in the African bush are not much smarter than apes.

[tpols]

Crazy how each race has its positives and negatives...a couple examples.

Asians are the smartest but are the least attractive to other races, the women have asses like teen boys and the Azn bros have tooth picks down there...otoh, black women have ass for days, black dudes have the biggest dongs but some of those brothas that live in the African bush are not much smarter than apes.


jeesus mate.

:roll:

does that make you consider that intelligence is inversely correlated with prominent physical sexual features?

is that why aliens look how they do with huge heads and small bodies?

[Prometheus]

Crazy how each race has its positives and negatives...a couple examples.

Asians are the smartest but are the least attractive to other races, the women have asses like teen boys and the Azn bros have tooth picks down there...otoh, black women have ass for days, black dudes have the biggest dongs but some of those brothas that live in the African bush are not much smarter than apes.

:facepalm

You can not be seriously suggesting that black women are more attractive than Asian women.

[Vino24]

:facepalm

You can not be seriously suggesting that black women are more attractive than Asian women.
There are grey areas for both. Obviously mixed women are better than pure

[Mask the Embiid]

Notice how not one white person tried to come up with an actual rebuttal... cause deep down....dey know (echo)

https://media.giphy.com/media/l46CbUJPXiDPEkJcA/giphy.gif

[Prometheus]

Notice how not one white person tried to come up with an actual rebuttal... cause deep down....dey know (echo)

https://media.giphy.com/media/l46CbUJPXiDPEkJcA/giphy.gif

Yeah buddy, we are on a basketball forum after all.

Everyone knows black athletes > other race athletes. It's funny that you think anyone cares :lol

[Vino24]

Notice how not one white person tried to come up with an actual rebuttal... cause deep down....dey know (echo)

https://media.giphy.com/media/l46CbUJPXiDPEkJcA/giphy.gif
All those black athletes helped Africa rise as the greatest continent in the oh wait :yaohappy:

[TheMan]

:facepalm

You can not be seriously suggesting that black women are more attractive than Asian women.
Butts? Black women maul Azn chicks, not contest. Facially? While there are beautiful black women, Azn women tend to have softer looking faces which is more pleasing to a man's eyes but where the problem lies is that Azns are as flat as an ironing board in general. What I mean be Azns are the Far East ones, just to be clear.

[Prometheus]

Butts? Black women maul Azn chicks, not contest. Facially? While there are beautiful black women, Azn women tend to have softer looking faces which is more pleasing to a man's eyes but where the problem lies is that Azns are as flat as an ironing board in general. What I mean be Azns are the Far East ones, just to be clear.

I'm not personally much into Asians, but I have read poll results where they rank #1 for fetishes among Americans.

Black women are easily the most unattractive females of any race. That's just my opinion, but it's not just by a little. White women, east Asians, middle eastern, latinas, even Indian women are all more attractive by far. Black women have too much testosterone, their legs are weird, nappy hair, noses too big. Nope.

[TheMan]

I'm not personally much into Asians, but I have read poll results where they rank #1 for fetishes among Americans.

Black women are easily the most unattractive females of any race. That's just my opinion, but it's not just by a little. White women, east Asians, middle eastern, latinas, even Indian women are all more attractive by far. Black women have too much testosterone, their legs are weird, nappy hair, noses too big. Nope.
Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.

[Vino24]

Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.
Which is odd because latinas and black women are the two most overweight groups. Yet people overlook latinas psycho attitudes

[Prometheus]

Yeah, amongst white American dudes, they have Azn women as their top pick.

I've seen worldwide polls where Latinas are the most sought after in online dating sites though, followed by Eastern European women. Azn chicks come in third and you're right, black women usually come in last.

Latinas >>> IMHO. Just the most beautiful features.

[MrFonzworth]

Crazy how each race has its positives and negatives...a couple examples.

Asians are the smartest but are the least attractive to other races, the women have asses like teen boys and the Azn bros have tooth picks down there...otoh, black women have ass for days, black dudes have the biggest dongs but some of those brothas that live in the African bush are not much smarter than apes.
Asians are objectively the most attractive race for both males and females, it's been scientifically proven and they blow all the other races out the water with the poll results as well.

[TheMan]

Latinas >>> IMHO. Just the most beautiful features.
The thing with Latinas is that they by and large are a product of a mixture of three races, White, Native American and African...so they have a little of each race and when the right combo happens, ay mamacita!

Having said that and since all my life I've been surrounded by all kinds of Latinas, Mexican, Puerto Rican, Venezuelan, Colombian, Cuban etc, their exoticness is normal to me so I'm more fascinated by Eastern European chicks, Russians, Hungarians, Ukrainians, Czechs, Romanians etc...they get me hard but don't tell my wife :lol

[TheMan]

Asians are objectively the most attractive race for both males and females, it's been scientifically proven and they blow all the other races out the water with the poll results as well.:oldlol:

Says the Asian dude but whatever :cheers:

You might want to check how many international beauty pageants the Azn fam has vs the Latina fam for starters...

[MrFonzworth]

:oldlol:

Says the Asian dude but whatever :cheers:

You might want to check how many international beauty pageants the Azn fam has vs the Latina fam for starters...
Uhm since 2000 the Asians were responsible for 24 of the Big 4 beauty pageant winners.

2 of the last 3 Miss Internationals has been Asian. The current Miss Universe and Miss Earth winners are Asian:confusedshrug:

Latinas are a close 2nd however, and no one else is even close to them after that:cheers:

[TheMan]

Uhm since 2000 the Asians were responsible for 24 of the Big 4 beauty pageant winners.

2 of the last 3 Miss Internationals has been Asian. The current Miss Universe and Miss Earth winners are Asian:confusedshrug:

Latinas are a close 2nd however, and no one else is even close to them after that:cheers:
Link?

I honestly don't recall Azns dominating beauty pageants like you say...and by Azn I mean the Far East ones, are you including India for example? Far as I remember, Venezuela had the most winners and nobody else were close to matching them.

[MrFonzworth]

Link?

I honestly don't recall Azns dominating beauty pageants like you say...and by Azn I mean the Far East ones, are you including India for example? Far as I remember, Venezuela had the most winners and nobody else were close to matching them.
Yes Indians are included, they are Asian. Why would they be excluded?

[warriorfan]

Yes Indians are included, they are Asian. Why would they be excluded?

Yikes...big time blunder in your Racial Draft

[Prometheus]

Yes Indians are included, they are Asian. Why would they be excluded?

Well if you're actually including all of Asia, then they should have the most winners since Asia is like 67% of the global population.

Most people use "Asian" as shorthand for East Asian though. Indians look completely different.

Indian men are by far the ugliest men btw. They got some nice women though.

By FAR the ugliest men.

[scuzzy]

mix Blasian chicks are hot af

[Patrick Chewing]

mix Blasian chicks are hot af


This is true. Black and Asian almost always produces a good-looking combination. Better than Black and White.

[MrFonzworth]

Yikes...big time blunder in your Racial Draft
I'm normally the first person to egg on the street shitters, but they do have some of the most pleasing to the eye women, as well as producing the most doctors of any country, they provide more to the globe than, say, any latino country.


Well if you're actually including all of Asia, then they should have the most winners since Asia is like 67% of the global population.

Most people use "Asian" as shorthand for East Asian though. Indians look completely different.

Indian men are by far the ugliest men btw. They got some nice women though.

By FAR the ugliest men.
According to my extensive research into the subject, that's incorrect. Many African and South American countries produce uglier men than India.

Hrithik Roshan is cut from the same cloth as Brad Pitt. Then you have all of the Khans, Barun Sobti, Ranbir Kootr, etc.

Find me some men from Ghana, Cameroon, or Suriname that have better looks than these people and I will concede.

[LostCause]

Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They’re fetishized for being submissive and small, which a lot of men and especially incels find attractive since it means they can “dominate” them

But I’ve lived and generally been around thousands of Asians and I just don’t find them that great. Especially Chinese women. I think if some of you visit China you’d change your mind really quick after seeing what the average Asian woman looks like. Not to mention they absolutely age the worst

Latinas are easily at the top. I agree with whoever said that as they mix the best of everything really. Bodies that can compete with black women, long hair like white women, they’re submissive assuming you can show them you’re not a pushover though even then they have a little sass and attitude that can be sexy, and they don’t age as bad as Asians. The accents and language just puts the cherry on top

I have black women over white women. Though by white women I mean typical Caucasian American women and African American women. The features of black women just beat white women imo, though I do like blue or green eyes (Not as much as Hazel though, GOAT eye color imo)

[MrFonzworth]

[QUOTE=LostCause]Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They

[TheMan]

I'm normally the first person to egg on the street shitters, but they do have some of the most pleasing to the eye women, as well as producing the most doctors of any country, they provide more to the globe than, say, any latino country.

Meh, who cares, there's no shortage of doctors. And we produce some of the best talent in the arts and futbol, last 4 of 5 Oscars were won by Mexican directors, we produced Carlos Santana, one of the GOAT guitarists. Name any Indian American who is infuential in any art form in the US...maybe M Knight Shyamalan but whens the last time he did something decent, oh and Kumar lol

Messi, Maradona and Pele belong to the Latino Fam...Latinos dominate baseball...so India is decent in cricket, who GAF :lol


According to my extensive research into the subject, that's incorrect. Many African and South American countries produce uglier men than India.

Hrithik Roshan is cut from the same cloth as Brad Pitt. Then you have all of the Khans, Barun Sobti, Ranbir Kootr, etc.

Find me some men from Ghana, Cameroon, or Suriname that have better looks than these people and I will concede.
Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:

[LostCause]

Asians age the worst? :roll::roll::roll:

What a troll post. You can't just say "vist China you will know what i mean" China is massive. That's like saying "go to USA you will know what i mean" after going to some shit city in texas where the average broad is 220 lbs and lives in a trailer. If you go to Nanning Guangxi there's 40 year olds that look 25. If you go a little east to Yuling there's 40 year olds that's been eating dog since 25.

They absolutely age the worst. I don

[MrFonzworth]

Meh, who cares, there's no shortage of doctors. And we produce some of the best talent in the arts and futbol, last 4 of 5 Oscars were won by Mexican directors, we produced Carlos Santana, one of the GOAT guitarists.

Messi, Maradona and Pele belong to the Latino Fam...India can't produce a decent movie if its existence depended on it.


Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:
Fair enough, I'm not giving enough credit to South America. I completely overlooked the world's sport, but the point still stands with India vs. Africa though.

[Manny98]

We are the best :banana:

[red1]

kids :facepalm

[MrFonzworth]

[QUOTE=LostCause]They absolutely age the worst. I don

[TheMan]

White women age the worst easily. Asians dont age at all compared to them. Where did you go in China? I used to travel there a lot and I've never once covere d a mile in distance without seeing a woman I wouldn't mind shagging exclusively for the rest of my life.
You simply prefer Asian women because you're Asian and thats cool.

You gotta admit though, as Prometheus pointed out, Asia is home to almost 70% of the world's population OTOH Latin America is home to almost 9%. Huuuge difference, yet LA by size of their population is the GOAT in beauty pageant winners and internationally known models and hot Hollywood actresses...:rockon:

[Prometheus]

[QUOTE=LostCause]Ehh Asian women are more hype than reality imo. They

[LostCause]

So much about this post is excessively cringe.

I have a hard time believing any men DON'T find submissiveness attractive in a woman. If you don't like to lay it down and completely dominate her, then you're probably kind of a p*ssy yourself. Most (like 99% of) women want exactly that anyway. Unless you're talking about dominance in all areas of life, I guess I'm just talking about the bedroom.

You

[JEFFERSON MONEY]

Indian Men and Indian Women are being severely underrated in this thread, but then again this is ISH.

Spiritually (if you've visited India you'd know how spiritual and blessed this country is---tombs of saints, birthplace of dharmic religions, lots of meditators and ascetics etc..), technologically, mathematically (Ramanujan), historically (centuries of civilization), culturally, food-wise (some of the most creative cuisine in the world), dancing-wise (there's a guy named Prabhu Deva who is as good as Michael Jackson), art-wise, poetry-wise, musical instruments, positions of power, warrior-wise (see Nepali Gurkhas or Mughal warriors, or the people who fought against Alexander, or the Ghazis of Pakistan or the Cholas), in building civilization, in doing a lot with a little (i.e. FoB immigrants making it in Silicon Valley), moral-wise (some of the nicest, humble, hardworking people on the face of the planet), virtue-wise, in keeping strong family ties---they are up there.

Black's creative ability being underrated. Songhai empire, Mali empire, Nubian Empire, many many musicians, many brilliant minds.

[LostCause]

White women age the worst easily. Asians dont age at all compared to them. Where did you go in China? I used to travel there a lot and I've never once covere d a mile in distance without seeing a woman I wouldn't mind shagging exclusively for the rest of my life.

White women theres so much variation because some of the best looking older women I know are white, , but generally speaking I can see your point

Most of my time there was in Beijing, but on another occasion I stayed in Shenzhen which I actually enjoyed better

[Im so nba'd out]

The craziest thing you said is black women over white women. I don't even think black dudes feel that way. It's been proven that black women have more testosterone than white women.

So you like your women less submissive and with more testosterone? You very well might be gay.
Actually most of us do.... Just like most white men prefer white women over Latinas and most Asian women prefer Asian men over white men



but all 3 of these groups have a stigma...

[NBAGOAT]

seriously some borderline uncomfortable points being thrown out here but yes mixed race women tend to be pretty attractive

[JohnnySic]

This is true. Black and Asian almost always produces a good-looking combination. Better than Black and White.
White/Asian and Black/Asian both tend to produce good results.

White/Black, not so much.

[aj1987]

Normally they don't, but that kid did. he laid him out.

and while little kids dont hit as hard, their brains are far more malleable and prone to damage.

it would be impossible to truly measure long term effect.

the younger you are, if you incur a major injury, the worse the butterfly effect will be.
If those kids were under 2 years old, what you said would be 100% true. Since they're not, it's not even close to being correct. As for the rest of your post... :oldlol:


Lol, I have a Bollywood channel in my cable package and no bruh, the typical Indian dude is way the fukk uglier than the typical Latino dude, no contest :oldlol:
South American and African are by FAR the ugliest in the entire world. It's not even remotely close.

[warriorfan]

Thanks AJ. We really needed that.

[aj1987]

Thanks AJ. We really needed that.
Following me around like my lap bitch, you crack addicted basement dwelling loser. :oldlol:

[Proctor]

Thanks AJ. We really needed that.
:roll: :roll: :roll:

[MaxFly]

Do you understand basic physics? 6 years olds, no matter what, are not capable of inflicting that sort of damage. They do not have the required momentum. I have nephews, who, as kids, took tumbles all the time. It's pretty much the same. Both are on pace to get into Ivy League schools. Didn't affect them, one bit. Not to mention the fact that they had injuries where they broke their noses, etc..

Again, I posted actual research which when into it. You're using an opinion as your argument.

From my article, which was ACTUAL RESEARCH:

When it comes to concussions, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.067% chance of a kid getting a concussion.

When it comes to serious injuries, for 8-13 year old kids, there was a 0.14% chance of a serious injury.

Injuries in general, for 8-13 year old kids, was 0.26%.

The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%.

Again, this is not a small sample size. This is a sample size of 44,164 kids who played tackle football. Flag football pretty much doubles the injury rate though. Something which is still negligible.


As I said, kids at their ages (the ones posted in the twitter link) are not even remotely close to being able to hit hard enough to inflict actual damage. Basic physics and biology.

Please go through this article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

I'm sorry, I missed this... I'm not citing opinion (https://www.aafp.org/news/health-of-the-public/20180126subconcussivecte.html). I'm citing experts who both discovered CTE and specialize in studying CTE and other brain injuries.


"Based on everything we know about CTE, Flag Football Under 14 makes overwhelming scientific sense," said Lee Goldstein, M.D., Ph.D., associate professor at Boston University School of Medicine and College of Engineering and principal investigator for the Brain study, in the release. "We will never prevent CTE by focusing on concussions. Any meaningful prevention campaign has to focus on preventing all hits to the head, including subconcussive impacts."

I'm not sure if you read my post, but I specifically noted that subconcussive hits were the real concern, not simply concussions. (https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/01/18/study-repeated-head-hits-concussions-cte)

[QUOTE]A Boston University study released Thursday provided scientific evidence that repeated hits to the head, even those that do not produce concussion or concussion-like symptoms, can lead to the degenerative brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE).

[B]"We've had an inkling that subconcussive hits

[aj1987]

I'm sorry, I missed this... I'm not citing opinion (https://www.aafp.org/news/health-of-the-public/20180126subconcussivecte.html). I'm citing experts who both discovered CTE and specialize in studying CTE and other brain injuries.

I'm not sure if you read my post, but I specifically noted that subconcussive hits were the real concern, not simply concussions. (https://www.si.com/nfl/2018/01/18/study-repeated-head-hits-concussions-cte)

So while the research you mentioned dwells on concussions and observable injuries, the research has moved beyond that. Also, I'm glad your nephews are doing well, but signs and symptoms of brain degeneration don't generally and necessarily present in young people in their late teens and early twenties. The concern isn't that kids are going to struggle early in life because they played football when they were kids. The concern is that while the subconcussive hits they receive when they are young don't produce any noticeable damage when they are young, those repeated hits will set them up for challenges when they are older.
From the article you cited:

"Researchers examined the postmortem brains of four male athletes ages 17-18..."

Also, unless I'm completely misunderstanding your source, those brains were obtained from kids who passed away a day to four months. I wonder what their actual injuries were.

We're talking about youth football. Not JV or Varsity football.

"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

[MaxFly]

From the article you cited:

"Researchers examined the postmortem brains of four male athletes ages 17-18..."

Also, unless I'm completely misunderstanding your source, those brains were obtained from kids who passed away a day to four months. I wonder what their actual injuries were.


CTE develops over time. It requires repeated hits over time of both a concusive and subconcussive nature for brains to have and show the plaque buildup.


"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

We don't reliably measure sub concussive hits as injuries because they don't present as injuries on the field. The damage from those sorts of hits isn't perceptible, and they add up over time.

[aj1987]

CTE develops over time. It requires repeated hits over time of both a concusive and subconcussive nature for brains to have and show the plaque buildup.
Again, go back and read what I posted. We're talking about 6 year olds here. Also, try going through the research that I posted.



We don't reliably measure sub concussive hits as injuries because they don't present as injuries on the field. The damage from those sorts of hits isn't perceptible, and they add up over time.
Except for that fact that we do.

Read:

"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

So, there's a 0.27% chance of ANY injury in youth football.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

[MaxFly]

Again, go back and read what I posted. We're talking about 6 year olds here. Also, try going through the research that I posted.



Except for that fact that we do.

Read:

"The risk of actual injury for both tackle and flag football is a whopping 0.27%."

So, there's a 0.27% chance of ANY injury in youth football.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

Ok, so how do we measure sub-concussive hits. What scale do they use as an assessment when there is no noticeable dizziness or disorientation from a hit.

[aj1987]

Ok, so how do we measure sub-concussive hits. What scale do they use as an assessment when there is no noticeable dizziness or disorientation from a hit.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

READ. It really isn't that long.



"Contact injuries were defined as any injury sustained due to impact with another player, regardless of whether the injury occurred while playing flag or tackle football. An injury was considered noncontact if it occurred without an external force exhibited by another player, such as those experienced during a running drill. An injury was considered severe if it resulted in a concussion, fracture, or ligament tear. All other injuries were considered nonsevere. The leagues encouraged their teams to use the International Consensus Statement Guidelines for Sport-Related Concussion."

In short, even sprains, tears, and other possible non-contact relates injuries are considered overall.

Including all those, the probability of a kid injuring himself was .27%.

Among those injuries, 27%-35% of the injuries were fractures.

Another quote:

"...sprains, strains, and contusions, have suffered from more variability in reporting, with 9% to 69% of reported injuries being sprains, strains, and contusions."


Supporting my initial statement:

"Players in grades 7 and 8 have almost twice the injury risk when compared with players in grades 4, 5, and 6."

"[I] In studies in which athlete-exposures were measured, the injury risk in older and more experienced athletes could be attributed to the more experienced players

[nightlight]

As I said in my initial post, it's basic science.
You're a moron. There's nothing scientific about cherrypicking to support your predetermined conclusion.

[aj1987]

You're a moron. There's nothing scientific about cherrypicking to support your predetermined conclusion.
Cherrypicking? What was I cherrypicking, you braindead subhuman ****? :confusedshrug:

[MaxFly]

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

READ. It really isn't that long.

"Contact injuries were defined as any injury sustained due to impact with another player, regardless of whether the injury occurred while playing flag or tackle football. An injury was considered noncontact if it occurred without an external force exhibited by another player, such as those experienced during a running drill. An injury was considered severe if it resulted in a concussion, fracture, or ligament tear. All other injuries were considered nonsevere. The leagues encouraged their teams to use the International Consensus Statement Guidelines for Sport-Related Concussion."

In short, even sprains, tears, and other possible non-contact relates injuries are considered overall.

Including all those, the probability of a kid injuring himself was .27%.

Among those injuries, 27%-35% of the injuries were fractures.


So I'm going to ask you again more directly. I'm just looking for a yes or no.

When a player gets hit during the course of a game, and gets up without showing signs of dizziness, disorientation, or any other injury, including a sprain, tear or fracture, is any injury recorded?

[MrFonzworth]

This thread is about Asian women. Why are you talking about brain damage?

[aj1987]

So I'm going to ask you again more directly. I'm just looking for a yes or no.

When a player gets hit during the course of a game, and gets up without showing signs of dizziness, disorientation, or any other injury, including a sprain, tear or fracture, is any injury recorded?
:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm

Since you obviously can't or won't read, yes.

[MaxFly]

:facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm :facepalm

Since you obviously can't or won't read, yes.

No, I read. Maybe I missed something.

What injury is reported when a player suffers no noticeable injury and does not suffer from any dizziness or disorientation after a hit. So a player takes a good hit on 2nd down, but pops right back up and is ready for 3rd down right away. What injury do people on the sidelines record?

[Pushxx]

wtf would you have your 6 yr old doing this shit ? god damn people are ****ing stupid

I know what the **** how are there this many parents that don't give a **** about their children?

[aj1987]

No, I read. Maybe I missed something.

What injury is reported when a player suffers no noticeable injury and does not suffer from any dizziness or disorientation after a hit. So a player takes a good hit on 2nd down, but pops right back up and is ready for 3rd down right away. What injury do people on the sidelines record?
Why don't you email them and ask them?

Here's the link to the article:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5305025/

I PROVED my statement to be a fact. Now, you can either hold the L and move on continue with shifting the goalposts.

[sd3035]

If you accept that there are athletic genetic differences, you must accept that there are intellectual genetic differences.

And yes, asians are smarter than whites.

However, I'm pretty sure that whites are more spatially aware, they're more athletic, and they have much higher levels of empathy.

People in China literally run people over repeatedly after accidentally hitting them with their cars... because it's cheaper.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9h0mNzjSIk


Asians are not smarter, they just score better on math tests because they're forced to study like 7 hours per day outside of regular school

Asians are a close seconds behind whites though