View Full Version : Which player put up better stats in their 30
Gus Hemmingway
11-03-2019, 02:53 PM
LeBron at 30:
25/7/7 regular season
30/10/8 playoffs
LeBron at 31:
25/7/7 regular season
26/8/8 playoffs
LeBron at 32:
26/8/8 regular season
30/9/7 playoffs
LeBron at 33:
27/9/7 regular season
34/9/9 playoffs
LeBron at 34:
27/9/8 regular season
LeBron at 35:
26/10/7
DoctorP
11-03-2019, 02:58 PM
https://media.giphy.com/media/WeoIzoPthwm64/giphy.gif
he'll be back
https://media.tenor.com/images/132eaadfc756ac885bedc4add3ce6c78/tenor.gif
Ghost1
11-03-2019, 03:00 PM
can u share bran's playoff stats at age 34? thanks
DoctorP
11-03-2019, 03:00 PM
can u share bran's playoff stats at age 35? thanks
:lol
Gus Hemmingway
11-03-2019, 03:13 PM
can u share bran's playoff stats at age 34? thanks
Same as Kobe
Bronbron23
11-03-2019, 03:46 PM
LeBron at 30:
25/7/7 regular season
30/10/8 playoffs
LeBron at 31:
25/7/7 regular season
26/8/8 playoffs
LeBron at 32:
26/8/8 regular season
30/9/7 playoffs
LeBron at 33:
27/9/7 regular season
34/9/9 playoffs
LeBron at 34:
27/9/8 regular season
LeBron at 35:
26/10/7
Mj by a mile. Same stats pretty much except he has 2 more chips 2 more fmvp's, 2 more mvp's, 3 more scoring titles and 3 more first team all defensive teams.
It's mj and it's not even close
superduper
11-03-2019, 04:09 PM
Oh look its the daily Brannie oozing insecurity thread part 1 of 32 :oldlol:
AlternativeAcc.
11-03-2019, 05:14 PM
Mj by a mile. Same stats pretty much except he has 2 more chips 2 more fmvp's, 2 more mvp's, 3 more scoring titles and 3 more first team all defensive teams.
It's mj and it's not even close
He said stats, not inflated ring count because of extremely weak era
Keep up moron
Bronbron23
11-03-2019, 05:43 PM
He said stats, not inflated ring count because of extremely weak era
Keep up moron
Hahaha your pathetic dude. Your gonna Talk about inflation. This is the biggest stat inflation era ever. Nothing against lebron. He's my favorite player in this era but mj crushes him if we're comparing there 30's. Comparing them in there 20's is much closer.
Manny98
11-03-2019, 05:59 PM
Hahaha your pathetic dude. Your gonna Talk about inflation.
This is the biggest stat inflation era ever. Nothing against lebron. He's my favorite player in this era but mj crushes him if we're comparing there 30's. Comparing them in there 20's is much closer.
No it isn't the late 80s were easily more inflated, your just upset that LeBron at 35 > MJ at 35 and It's not particularly close
Bronbron23
11-03-2019, 06:27 PM
No it isn't the late 80s were easily more inflated, your just upset that LeBron at 35 > MJ at 35 and It's not particularly close
Well mj didn't play at 35 so I'll concede that because LeBron is still pretty sick this year and we don't know what would have happened if mj didn't retire in 1998. The debate wasn't 35 though it was 30's and mj as ive already shown is easily ahead of LeBron.
And it's not even close
SouBeachTalents
11-03-2019, 06:29 PM
Well mj didn't play at 35 so I'll concede that because LeBron is still pretty sick this year and we don't know what would have happened if mj didn't retire in 1998. The debate wasn't 35 though it was 30's and mj as ive already shown is easily ahead of LeBron.
And it's not even close
Jordan was 35 in '98
Bronbron23
11-03-2019, 06:35 PM
Jordan was 35 in '98
Half the season yeah. That dosnt help your guys case though. Mj in 97-98 won a chip, a MVP, scoring title, first team defence and a fmvp. LeBron won't do any of that.
Manny98
11-03-2019, 06:42 PM
Well mj didn't play at 35 so I'll concede that because LeBron is still pretty sick this year and we don't know what would have happened if mj didn't retire in 1998. The debate wasn't 35 though it was 30's and mj as ive already shown is easily ahead of LeBron.
And it's not even close
Regular season MJ was better
But LeBron in the playoffs from 16-18 was definitely better than second 3-peat MJ statistically
Bronbron23
11-03-2019, 09:08 PM
Regular season MJ was better
But LeBron in the playoffs from 16-18 was definitely better than second 3-peat MJ statistically
Statistically yeah sure but comparing stats now to stats 30 years ago is pointless. The game is just way to different. Regardless if you think it's different for better or worse it's just not the same. They also played in different systems. LeBron wouldn't have the stats he got if he played under Phil Jackson in the triangle. He just wouldn't. Anyone who says he would dosnt know the game. This is why stats are important but not the end all and be all. Accomplishments, chips and the eye test matter just as much and when you look at those mj is a bit better. Especially in there 30's.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.