Iran just fired Rockets attacking U.S. Troops

[Patrick Chewing]

Did this guy answer my question yet?? I see a lot of fluff and bluster.

[~primetime~]

[QUOTE=warriorfan]YOU weren

[~primetime~]

Twitter didn't exist under previous presidents. I don't really blame Trump - I blame social media.

A lot of people see Trump as pushback against attacks on conservatives and conservative lifestyle and I can definitely see that. Calling republicans racist and sexist isn't something that's been around as long as Trump's been president.

They've always been called backwards by the mainstream culture - just watch any Bill Maher/Colbert/Daily show during the bush era and you'll see what I mean.
Its not Trumps fault its Twitters? Obama had a Twitter account his entire tenure.... how come he wasn't tweeting memes of him body slamming his opponents? Or calling out the "insane right" for making everything bad? There are literally 1000 tweets Trump posted that had Obama made it would have made media outlet go into cardiac arrest.

[CelticBaller]

I don

[~primetime~]

It isnt on CNN either.

Trump can change laws, sign bills, build walls, create tariffs, bomb world leaders, etc.

CNN is just a fcking channel you can turn off if you don't like it.

[qrich]

Its not Trumps fault its Twitters? Obama had a Twitter account his entire tenure.... how come he wasn't tweeting memes of him body slamming his opponents? Or calling out the "insane right" for making everything bad? There are literally 1000 tweets Trump posted that had Obama made it would have made media outlet go into cardiac arrest.

You mean the cardiac arrest with the travel ban the left had that Barry begun?

Or the kids in cages pictures used under Barry but the media tried to blame Trump?

Keep trying Brodie

[warriorfan]

I'm barely in here homey, you must be confusing me with someone else.



That said, it is common sense that the country is consumed with politics right now... anyone saying that isn't projecting anything other than reality.

Alright, just to let you know you are starting to sound like the Obama birthers.

[Phong]

It isnt on CNN either.

Trump can change laws, sign bills, build walls, create tariffs, bomb world leaders, etc.

CNN is just a fcking channel you can turn off if you don't like it. No division on CNN? You mean the same CNN that pushed the fake story about the students from Covington Catholic school and had to settle out of court? The same CNN that passed the debate questions to the Clinton campaign in advance? The same CNN that constantly had to retract stories about Trump and fire their "elite investigative journalists unit"? :oldlol:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/05/business/media/cnn-retraction-trump-scaramucci.html

[~primetime~]

CNN, not innocent... theyre up on the pyramid somewhere in all this

But Trump is at the top of the pyramid

[~primetime~]

At the heart of all this drama...is our President

If he calls out a football player for kneeling....we all fight about kneeling for the next month

[Patrick Chewing]

My question still not answered. :confusedshrug:

[DoctorP]

did they fire Houston Rockets?


BOOM

[n00bie]

If the Vice President was a general in a militant group that trains terrorists and had killed a bunch of Iranian personnel and had plans to attack more then yeah, they'd be justified in defending their people.

Stupid comparison from a stupid poster.

Hate to burst your bubble but the U.S. Military has killed more civilians than ANY terrorist group / country.

You're living in a fantasy world. Do you still believe in Santa Clause?

[diamenz]

trump derangement syndrome - it works BOTH ways, gais.

[LostCause]

This seems like a pretty easy question to answer - look at Trump's net worth since becoming president. It's gone down.

Which does not at all refute whether or not Trump has used his presidency for personal interests


Did this guy answer my question yet?? I see a lot of fluff and bluster.

Easy. Now that we established you won't run to typical cornered talking points:


Prior to President Trump’s run for president, his properties were not a major destination for political events. Yet, in the years since, these events and other visits by political groups have exploded, resulting in a windfall for the Trump Organization. President Trump’s businesses have raked in almost $6 million since his inauguration. So far this year, they have been paid $1.1 million by political groups. Before President Trump ran for president, his businesses were never paid more than $100,000 by political groups in any single year, going back at least as far as 2002.

Now explain to the class how that has no personal gain for Trump. Additionally, this will be the 3rd time I highlight this page:
https://www.citizensforethics.org/2000-trump-conflicts-of-interest-counting/

and this one
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bolton-trump-turkey-foreign-policy/2019/11/12/id/941306/

So lets hear you refute these as being false. Otherwise I think it's safe to assume you're unable to and just carrying on a pointless discussion to save face

[Patrick Chewing]

Ahh yes,

[bladefd]

[QUOTE=Patrick Chewing]Ahh yes,

[andgar923]

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/08/iran-revenge-plans-bigger-than-missile-strikes-suleimani-retaliation/

[QUOTE]The assassination of Maj. Gen. Qassem Suleimani, perhaps the second most powerful person in Iran behind Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, will reverberate in the Middle East and beyond for years, and perhaps decades. But the immediate consequences, several U.S. intelligence officials say privately, will be clear: more deaths, and some of them American. Tuesday

[Phong]

https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/08/iran-revenge-plans-bigger-than-missile-strikes-suleimani-retaliation/

Again, ya’ll can go ahead call me names, but almost every analyst and expert agree Trump f*cked up.I like how the article says "several US intelligence officials" (who of course are anonymous), then the author of the article mentions that he talked to half a dozen, which is six, former analysts. Somehow six became "almost every analyst and expert" in your mind. Six = almost every?

My source tells me that all the experts in the world are saying privately that you're a paranoid doofus. :confusedshrug:

Look at your avatar. You're obsessed. :facepalm

[qrich]

[QUOTE=andgar923]https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/01/08/iran-revenge-plans-bigger-than-missile-strikes-suleimani-retaliation/



Again, ya

[andgar923]

I like how the article says "several US intelligence officials" (who of course are anonymous), then the author of the article mentions that he talked to half a dozen, which is six, former analysts. Somehow six became "almost every analyst and expert" in your mind. Six = almost every?

My source tells me that all the experts in the world are saying privately that you're a paranoid doofus. :confusedshrug:

Look at your avatar. You're obsessed. :facepalm
You think this is the only source?

I can bombard this board with multiple experts, ex CIA and other government officials but it won

[Phong]

[QUOTE=andgar923]You think this is the only source?

I can bombard this board with multiple experts, ex CIA and other government officials but it won

[andgar923]

Go ahead. Do it. I love seeing how obsessed you are. Let it consume every minute of your day.

I hope your bombardment is more effective than Iran's. #WW3 :oldlol:
Cute