So Twitter just suspended me...

[Patrick Chewing]

And in the link they provided me, I can dispute the suspension.

In the space used to dispute my suspension I just wrote: "F*ck you guys!"


Then in the field where they ask for my name, I just wrote: "F*ck you, that's my name!"


I'll let you guys know what transpires from this. Would be hilarious if they permanently banned/deleted my account.



I'm the real ANTIFA.

[imdaman99]

When did you become such a gangsta? I thought you were a normal guy once, but now you belong on r/iamverybadass

[DoctorP]

of course . you're clearly retarded

[RRR3]

We have to know why they banned you, Chew. Don't leave out the juicy details.

[Patrick Chewing]

I'm fighting for free speech here, fellas. You may not like what I have to say, but that's okay. Being silenced is one of the worst things that can happen in a supposed free society.


Hate speech or any speech you disagree with IS free speech. If we keep going down this path, we're going to create a society that will be afraid to show dissent and disagree with a popular opinion. Reminds me of certain society from the 30's and 40's over in Europe.

[msbutthurt]

Did reply to a liberal communist and say "I disagree"?



That will get you banned every time.

[DoctorP]

I'm fighting for free speech here, fellas. You may not like what I have to say, but that's okay. Being silenced is one of the worst things that can happen in a supposed free society.


Hate speech or any speech you disagree with IS free speech. If we keep going down this path, we're going to create a society that will be afraid to show dissent and disagree with a popular opinion. Reminds me of certain society from the 30's and 40's over in Europe.

https://media.tenor.com/images/4975be9f909bc97f8917791f0778a832/tenor.gif

[Patrick Chewing]

We have to know why they banned you, Chew. Don't leave out the juicy details.

It just so happened to be a comment I made a few days ago in reaction to an ANTIFA douchebag punching a guy in the CHOP zone. I said something to the effect that the guy that got hit should have bashed the dude's face in.

[RRR3]

Did reply to a liberal communist and say "I disagree"?



That will get you banned every time.
This is literally impossible. Communists cannot be liberals.

[RRR3]

It just so happened to be a comment I made a few days ago in reaction to an ANTIFA douchebag punching a guy in the CHOP zone. I said something to the effect that the guy that got hit should have bashed the dude's face in.
I support your right to say that, but twitter is a private company and they do have the right to suspend you under the current system we have.

[ArbitraryWater]

They suspended me for 24 hrs for saying „are you retarded“ to someone.

That is, as long as I remove the comment. I haven‘t.

But its not visible anyway.

So they just make it humiliating on the person having to „remove“ the tweet.

[Long Duck Dong]

They can take your voice but they can't take your heart. Better to be banned than follow Nazi guidelines.

Twitter is lucky you are not a leftist. You might burn their headquarters to the ground otherwise :oldlol: And it would be all in the name of civil rights

[DoctorP]

twitter sucks. full of bots and retards. it's like the rest of the internet.

[Kblaze8855]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

[LoneyROY7]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

Damn. Big facts.

[RRR3]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.
Rat poison.

[ArbitraryWater]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

You really love re-iterating this point about your precious „private companies“ which nowadays pose as political platforms, right?

[Manny98]

They're silencing OP just like they did with David Icke and other truth speakers :facepalm

[Shogon]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

There's a lot of truth to this, however, the world has changed in 2020. Technology has shifted significantly and the platform that these companies offer is completely unrivaled in the rest of society. You know it, and I know it.

Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc... have a disproportionate impact on society for every day people to voice their opinions. This didn't exist in this fashion in the past... and now these companies are essentially choosing what they believe is true and what is not which is widely consumed. These platforms collectively are consumed by the public more than any other venue. It's a problem.

I agree with you in part, but I disagree with you in part. I don't have an easy answer. I'm not sure there is one.

There's more nuance here than you're leading on because... you want to troll or whatever it is, IDK.

[Patrick Chewing]

You really love re-iterating this point about your precious „private companies“ which nowadays pose as political platforms, right?

He reminds us constantly.

And yet that's not even the point. Twitter can do whatever the hell it wants. Doesn't make it right.


Twitter should really start to worry about will they even be around in 10 years. Their gestapo-like tactics do get tiring.

[Long Duck Dong]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

We don't think they should be forced to follow free speech rules, it's their company, however we are perfectly within our right to point out their obvious hypocrisy

Most people on the right have happy fulfilling lives. Everyone knows, from companies, to social media, to the government, that people on the right have thicker skin and get less outraged and triggered by minor stuff, which is why they appease the left because they won't receive the same backlash from the right like they do from the left. The left has too much time on their hands and are ready to go to war for the most minor of perceived slights or what they think is injustice (which they see everywhere they look)

[ArbitraryWater]

There's a lot of truth to this, however, the world has changed in 2020. Technology has shifted significantly and the platform that these companies offer is completely unrivaled in the rest of society. You know it, and I know it.

Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc... have a disproportionate impact on society for every day people to voice their opinions. This didn't exist in this fashion in the past... and now these companies are essentially choosing what they believe is true and what is not which is widely consumed. These platforms collectively are consumed by the public more than any other venue. It's a problem.

I agree with you in part, but I disagree with you in part. I don't have an easy answer. I'm not sure there is one.

There's more nuance here than you're leading on because... you want to troll or whatever it is, IDK.

Bingo.

Not being given a voice on Twitter or another huge platform, means having significantly less of a voice.

You are not allowed to engage in mass discourse anymore.

And since you those platforms make a lot of money, they should carry some responsibility of being at least neutral.

[Proctor]

Any adult who uses Twitter (or Facebook for that matter) is mentally ill. This is your opportunity to finally go outside. Embrace it.

[RRR3]

We don't think they should be forced to follow free speech rules, it's their company, however we are perfectly within our right to point out their obvious hypocrisy

Most people on the right have happy fulfilling lives. Everyone knows, from companies, to social media, to the government, that people on the right have thicker skin and get less outraged and triggered by minor stuff, which is why they appease the left because they won't receive the same backlash from the right like they do from the left. The left has too much time on their hands and are ready to go to war for the most minor of perceived slights or what they think is injustice (which they see everywhere they look)
Members of the blue team and the red team are equally sensitive about different things. You would realize this if you weren’t a diehard supporter of the red team.

[Kblaze8855]

You really love re-iterating this point about your precious „private companies“ which nowadays pose as political platforms, right?

The people posting messages make it political. It remains someone else’s property. It’s political. It’s jokes. It’s memes. It’s celeb gossip. It’s an idea....and you have no right to police it. You have a right to have your own. How right wingers so often talking about slippery slopes don’t see the greater threat to liberty from the government telling you to follow free speech laws on your own property is crazy to me.

[Kblaze8855]

There's a lot of truth to this, however, the world has changed in 2020. Technology has shifted significantly and the platform that these companies offer is completely unrivaled in the rest of society. You know it, and I know it.

Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc... have a disproportionate impact on society for every day people to voice their opinions. This didn't exist in this fashion in the past... and now these companies are essentially choosing what they believe is true and what is not which is widely consumed. These platforms collectively are consumed by the public more than any other venue. It's a problem.

I agree with you in part, but I disagree with you in part. I don't have an easy answer. I'm not sure there is one.

There's more nuance here than you're leading on because... you want to troll or whatever it is, IDK.


Now it seems it falls to the liberal to defend the free market. Twilight zone shit.

There was no twitter or reddit or whatever...then the internet provided thousands of options and the market gave several disproportionate power. I will not use being better than a gang of shitty startups that came along with them against a big private company. They have the exact share of the market that the people of this country and the world gave them of their free will because of them doing an excellent job.

Start conservative Twitter. Hell many people already did. If they don’t support it enough for its revenue to justify expansion....tell me why that isn’t the free market at work.

[Real Men Wear Green]

About time someone told Chewing to shut up.

[Kblaze8855]

He reminds us constantly.

And yet that's not even the point. Twitter can do whatever the hell it wants. Doesn't make it right.


Twitter should really start to worry about will they even be around in 10 years. Their gestapo-like tactics do get tiring.

Yet another point....

Twitter might NOT be around....because their power is the people who choose them. Their platform is nothing without the free market deciding to use it. How long since you signed onto MySpace?

You wanna make the rules make a better platform the people choose.

It happens. It’s gonna keep happening.

Who ever heard of tik tok? Then it’s a direct line to every 16 year old on the planet.

Your role is to do better than them or support those trying. Not to go big government and police the right of private business to decide who they cater to.

Maybe take the route of conservatives on the internet being a suspect class and go for protections like gays from discrimination but I suspect 50 people have tried that and been laughed out of a courtroom. It’s worth a google though.

[~primetime~]

Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, etc... have a disproportionate impact on society for every day people to voice their opinions.
Unless you are a celeb or public figure, most people don't actually have a voice on these platforms...for an "everyday person" getting noticed by the masses takes a viral tweet which requires a ton of luck.

[Kblaze8855]

Here you go....Parker. Conservative minded free speech based social media to replace Facebook and Twitter. Millions of users.

Support it. Other do the same....more as revenue. Better servers. More employees. Bigger names move to it.

Thats the fix. Not trying to make free speech means what it never did. I was told wiping your ass with the constitution was the lefts job.

[Shogon]

Now it seems it falls to the liberal to defend the free market. Twilight zone shit.

There was no twitter or reddit or whatever...then the internet provided thousands of options and the market gave several disproportionate power. I will not use being better than a gang of shitty startups that came along with them against a big private company. They have the exact share of the market that the people of this country and the world gave them of their free will because of them doing an excellent job.

Start conservative Twitter. Hell many people already did. If they don’t support it enough for its revenue to justify expansion....tell me why that isn’t the free market at work.

It's pretty easy... none of these companies made their political viewpoints a part of their growth to power. Sure, the free market could take them down over the long run, but the damage done to society in the mean time... lol.

All that aside? We don't even have a free market anyways because of all the useful idiots on both sides of the aisle in Washington along with a largely ignorant populace that are constantly interested in increasing the scope of the federal government. The bigger the government gets, the less free the market is.

If you think google's role in society is just that of a private company, or that anything I've said is untrue... we have nothing left to discuss because you aren't interested in being honest.

[Kblaze8855]

Know what’s funny? This conservative free speech startup social media is having problems....enforcing its free speech crushing rules.




John Matze, CEO of Parler, a buzzy Twitter clone for conservatives, has a message for users trying to test the boundaries of the service’s free speech ethos: Free speech has its limits.Posting pictures of fecal matter is prohibited, he wrote this week after seeing far too much fecal matter. He also reminded users that they can’t post pornography, like a digitally altered picture that went viral, showing a naked President Trump getting a spray tan. And obscene usernames are forbidden—free speech be damned.
Over the past few months, a growing number of conservatives who feel unfairly censored by Twitter (https://fortune.com/company/twitter/) and Facebook (https://fortune.com/company/facebook/) have flocked to the friendlier pixels of Parler. President Trump, Sen. Ted Cruz, and Fox News commentator Sean Hannity, along with conservative media organizations like Breitbart News and the Washington Examiner, have all joined recently.
But as the number of users climbs above 1 million, Parler is coming to terms with just how complicated policing the service can be. Despite the supposed hands-off philosophy, Matze is increasingly hands-on—much like Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and, to a lesser extent, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who steps in reluctantly. “As soon as the press started picking up, we had a ton of violations,” says Matze. “We had a queue of over 7,000 violations, and we only had three people” to police the entire site




Seems it’s hard to have rules and not crush “free speech”....when people are idiots.

[Kblaze8855]

It's pretty easy... none of these companies made their political viewpoints a part of their growth to power. Sure, the free market could take them down over the long run, but the damage done to society in the mean time... lol.

All that aside? We don't even have a free market anyways because of all the useful idiots on both sides of the aisle in Washington along with a largely ignorant populace that are constantly interested in increasing the scope of the federal government. The bigger the government gets, the less free the market is.

If you think google's role in society is just that of a private company, or that anything I've said is untrue... we have nothing left to discuss because you aren't interested in being honest.

When you think everything you say is facts and not open to discussion you don’t need to speak to me anyway. Half of your points involves some version of “I’m right even if you don’t accept it” be it basketball or over here. If you’re just here to post supposedly irrefutable facts you aren’t open to discuss I don’t know why you bother talking at all. Maybe just make a topic stating your facts every now and then and leave it alone if you accept no other points of view as even worth discussing.

[ArbitraryWater]

Unless you are a celeb or public figure, most people don't actually have a voice on these platforms...for an "everyday person" getting noticed by the masses takes a viral tweet which requires a ton of luck.

Its about being allowed to engage in public discourse. And when most of that discourse is happening on platforms like twitter, they should do their best to allow everyone to chime in. Regardless of it obviously being their good right to ban someone.

[~primetime~]

Its about being allowed to engage in public discourse. And when most of that discourse is happening on platforms like twitter, they should do their best to allow everyone to chime in. Regardless of it obviously being their good right to ban someone.

It is not hard to find right wing opinions on Twitter. I mean fck probably half the tweets on there are the left and right bickering at each other.

[~primetime~]

Know what’s funny? This conservative free speech startup social media is having problems....enforcing its free speech crushing rules.


Seems it’s hard to have rules and not crush “free speech”....when people are idiots.
Yes ultimately a platform where everyone is free to say ANYTHING and silence nothing...troll/be racist/spread ridiculous theories/pics of fecal matter/etc...that will never be able to make it as a main-stream platform...that will never be appealing to the masses.

[Shogon]

When you think everything you say is facts and not open to discussion you don’t need to speak to me anyway. Half of your points involves some version of “I’m right even if you don’t accept it” be it basketball or over here. If you’re just here to post supposedly irrefutable facts you aren’t open to discuss I don’t know why you bother talking at all. Maybe just make a topic stating your facts every now and then and leave it alone if you accept no other points of view as even worth discussing.


I'm right even if you don't accept it.

[ralph_i_el]

Start conservative Twitter. Hell many people already did. If they don’t support it enough for its revenue to justify expansion....tell me why that isn’t the free market at work.

They keep trying this, but then they outright ban libs/leftists, which tells me it has nothing to do with free speech to them.

[Shogon]

They keep trying this, but then they outright ban libs/leftists, which tells me it has nothing to do with free speech to them.

I doubt those people doing the banning are touting free speech... and if they are, they're stupid.

[VictorMosquito]

https://pasteboard.co/JfZTJ2L.png

[Cleverness]

And in the link they provided me, I can dispute the suspension.

In the space used to dispute my suspension I just wrote: "F*ck you guys!"


Then in the field where they ask for my name, I just wrote: "F*ck you, that's my name!"


I'll let you guys know what transpires from this. Would be hilarious if they permanently banned/deleted my account.



I'm the real ANTIFA.

Twitter and Google/YouTube are biased against conservative views.

I'm not sure that gov't intervention is going to make things any better; I just wish those publishers/platforms would just come out of the closet and stop pretending they don't have their own political agendas baked into their algorithms and moderators.

[Whoah10115]

Twitter and Google/YouTube are biased against conservative views.

I'm not sure that gov't intervention is going to make things any better; I just wish those publishers/platforms would just come out of the closet and stop pretending they don't have their own political agendas baked into their algorithms and moderators.

Yeah or maybe not being inclusive of all people is what now passes for conservative.

[Cleverness]

Yeah or maybe not being inclusive of all people is what now passes for conservative.

Not all people. Just people who don't share the same political agenda.

[msbutthurt]

Any adult who uses Twitter (or Facebook for that matter) is mentally ill. This is your opportunity to finally go outside. Embrace it.



So athletes and actors.

[Shooter]

Amazing to me that small government conservatives think private companies should be forced to follow free speech rules applied to the government. Nobody has to let you use their business platform for your purposes. Your freedoms entitle you to make your own twitter. Not to use theirs any way you want. If you do a decent job you can then place your rules on it....

Youre owed a voice. Not anyone else’s platform.

Wrong.

You ate teetering on "discrimination" now. What about the company forced to bake wedding cakes for the gays when it was their own business and they didnt want to?

[highwhey]

tbh, they probably did it bc you're a creep

[Shooter]

tbh, they probably did it bc you're a creep

:lol

[ralph_i_el]

Wrong.

You ate teetering on "discrimination" now. What about the company forced to bake wedding cakes for the gays when it was their own business and they didnt want to?

Sexual orientation is a protected legal class, political orientation isn't. You choose your political orientation, and most people belief your sexual preferences are inherent. Generally protected classes are things you don't choose (Gender, Race) or things specifically mentioned in the Constitution (Religion).

[ralph_i_el]

Twitter and Google/YouTube are biased against conservative views.

I'm not sure that gov't intervention is going to make things any better; I just wish those publishers/platforms would just come out of the closet and stop pretending they don't have their own political agendas baked into their algorithms and moderators.

YouTube is one of the more conservative platforms. A lot of money is spent by right wing groups to get guys like Ben Shapiro advertised and recommended to users.

[Shooter]

Sexual orientation is a protected legal class, political orientation isn't. You choose your political orientation, and most people belief your sexual preferences are inherent. Generally protected classes are things you don't choose (Gender, Race) or things specifically mentioned in the Constitution (Religion).

You're missing the point.

Do businesses (bakeries and twitter) get to make their own rules or dont they?

[Whoah10115]

You're missing the point.

Do businesses (bakeries and twitter) get to make their own rules or dont they?

No, you're missing the point. You can't refuse people on the basis of any of those things. Otherwise, you have something like...

Segregation.


Uhh, duh.

[warriorfan]

On the topic of free market private companies and social media platforms. The reason why all successful social media is left leaning is because....kids! Any extremely successful social media is going to be driven by the younger generation which will always tend to be more liberal. So there will never be a Pepsi to Twitters Coca Cola. (With Pepsi being the platform of the majority of conservatives. The way it all plays out, there isn’t going to be a real rival for twitter and Facebook, there is going to be more biased censorship towards conservative content on these platforms. And the lasting effect of this is our popular culture being gradually accumulated to these views. By these views I mean extreme sensitivity to the point where it’s borderline censorship. Now these values have started permeating throughout our culture and now are turning into the new norm. Now big companies need to follow in step with these values or fear for their financial ruin. Now we have privatized the act of censorship. This doesn’t make it okay. And it’s disingenuous for people to play a “free market, you don’t like it? deal with it” game.

[SATAN]

Twitter only did you a favor. That and Facebook are shit. Damn attention whores. Talking to people in real life is often MUCH different.

[Kblaze8855]

On the topic of free market private companies and social media platforms. The reason why all successful social media is left leaning is because....kids! Any extremely successful social media is going to be driven by the younger generation which will always tend to be more liberal. So there will never be a Pepsi to Twitters Coca Cola. (With Pepsi being the platform of the majority of conservatives. The way it all plays out, there isn’t going to be a real rival for twitter and Facebook, there is going to be more biased censorship towards conservative content on these platforms. And the lasting effect of this is our popular culture being gradually accumulated to these views. By these views I mean extreme sensitivity to the point where it’s borderline censorship. Now these values have started permeating throughout our culture and now are turning into the new norm. Now big companies need to follow in step with these values or fear for their financial ruin. Now we have privatized the act of censorship. This doesn’t make it okay. And it’s disingenuous for people to play a “free market, you don’t like it? deal with it” game.


Censorship has always been privatized. That’s the only way it’s ever been legal in the way you mean. It’s the only way it should. The government shouldn’t be telling anyone what they can say within the usual safety limits of terroristic threats and common sense. You come to my platform be it a stage I own or a forum and rant on a subject I don’t like...you can gtfo. And if I come to your church and start telling my beliefs to people not interested they can tell me to gtfo. And that’s exactly how it’s supposed to be. I have no freedom of speech on your property. That’s why hate groups generally schedule rallies on public property the government can’t censor them on and not in say....civic centers who would have the right to deny them(if they choose).

Can you find private companies to host a hate group? Sure. But you damn sure can’t force them. You can force the government to allow you to assemble and talk. The constitution demands it. The constitution doesn’t demand you give your platform be it a room in your house, a stage on your theater, your church, or your website over to people you think are nuts.

You can’t be law and order except on the laws you don’t like. Have a problem with it get up 66 percent of Congress and 38 state houses. But you can’t. The process of making changes on that scale was intentionally made near impossible so only near universally accepted things could get enough support.

[Kblaze8855]

Stripping non government properties of the ability to control who can access them? Shiiiiiit.

You would have BLM trolls infiltrating and totally taking out alt right sites in days. ISH would literally be one guy making 200 Lebron topics a day. There would be gore and disgusting shit in every third link on YouTube. You might as well eliminate child protections. If you can’t ban me for being inappropriate on your platform trolls would destroy all internet discussion instead of just some of it.

There are still pro confederate sites where they can peacefully discuss “heritage” because they can ban people who don’t like it. I promise you that shit is trolled into the dust in 45 minutes. And big church forums in some cases. Pro guns sites and forums would be rendered useless by the anti gun people in days.

If you cant ban jerks what’s to stop the left or the right from spamming every opposing group off the internet? Have you any idea how quickly a social media post could get people mobilized to destroy all discussion on a site or forum if people didn’t like you?

Cancel culture would wipe out your fan sites and forums.

You cannot remove the ability to police your online property and keep the internet as a place to talk about anything more interesting than baking. And trolls would eventually destroy that too just for fun. A reddit would be dedicated to “Operation freedom of speech” just to find and render inoperable opposing viewpoints on the internet.

Adding censorship protections online would serve only to legitimize mob censorship the way you think it’s already done but would soon remember today as the golden era.

You would go back to sending emails. Be the only space safe from mobs of cancel culture.

Think about it for a moment and you may realize....

The ability to censor it to your liking and keep the trolls out is what allowed the rise of social media and forums to begin with. Without it trolls and more recently cancel culture would destroy every opposing view and make it impossible for normal people to have a conversation.

Think it’s bad now. Wait till the trolls are unleashed and KNOW you can’t stop them.

It would be the end of all internet discussion.

Censorship is the only way talking to people on the internet works long term. You just take the shit people don’t want on their platform and put it on yours. That’s the only way it works.

Gun nuts get their safe space, the right gets one, and so does the left. The right is just annoyed the free market empowered the left in some ways they don’t like. But with 150 million of them the only reason conservative sites can’t reach that level is them deciding to be part of the lefts existing platforms.

Give one of these right wing sites 90 million users and see how quick Trump gets that to 200 just off opposing trolls wanting to reply to him. Build something.

But they won’t. They keep getting on FB and Twitter empowering them and complaining that they have power over them. If the right lacks the discipline to delete leftist apps and not give sites add revenue they have nobody to blame but themselves for the continued power gap. You don’t need social media. None of us had it till recently.

Stop. Use alternatives till they are viable.

But they won’t. And that’s shows how seriously they really take it.

[coin24]

Get off Facebook and twitter

[Kblaze8855]

Get off Facebook and twitter


That is exactly the solution.

Its Like those people who come onto ISH and say athletes make too much money as if they can’t figure how they get it when you buy cable packages with their networks, watch their ads, give them crazy internet presence off easily tracked mentions, and get your kids their jersey and shoes. Wheres the money gonna go if not to them?

Having a presence on sites you consider leftist is giving them the power you wish they didn’t abuse. How do adults not figure that out?

Might be 300-500 million international right wingers with internet access worldwide daily. Right wing twitter could become a force. But it isn’t. And there’s nobody to blame but the right wingers too afraid to be briefly reduced in audience for a while as it builds up.

They are part of the same free market giving facebook this power....but complaining how they use it. They have the 2 and 2 but just don’t seem to understand how it’s also 4....

You guys are discipline and a few months from having right wing social media become a force. All it takes is Trump and maybe 50 million of his backers to go and enough liberals would follow just to argue and troll.

Theres your ad revenue to get it serious. Get the best people on the technical side and make it work.

But here we are.

Fighting over space on an internet that has near infinite room to expand.

[Patrick Chewing]

KBlaze writing novels over here

[ralph_i_el]

You're missing the point.

Do businesses (bakeries and twitter) get to make their own rules or dont they?

A bakery or Twitter cannot ban you for being gay, a woman, a Muslim, an 80 year old, or a Croatian. They can ban you for your political opinion. That's literally just the law.

[Kblaze8855]

KBlaze writing novels over here


Im quarantined(likely for nothing). By which I mean....



https://youtu.be/x3Z55yd_frQ



Start your own shit don’t complain what others do with theirs. That’s America.

[highwhey]

Im quarantined(likely for nothing). By which I mean....



https://youtu.be/x3Z55yd_frQ



Start your own shit don’t complain what others do with theirs. That’s America.

:roll:

[tpols]

I'm right even if you don't accept it.

you rock a bowl cut homie.

Fall back.

[Patrick Chewing]

Account permanently suspended :oldlol:



Flew too close to the sun

[RRR3]

Don’t keep us in suspense, Chewy. What did you say?

[Patrick Chewing]

Don’t keep us in suspense, Chewy. What did you say?

http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?481690-So-Twitter-just-suspended-me&p=14040524&viewfull=1#post14040524