What if AD gets Pippen stats in these playoffs (17.6 on 40% or 20 or 48%).......

[3ball]

does anyone think Lebron can win with AD doing that?

doesn't this prove that you guys are lying or delusional by saying defense makes up for bad offense?.... because AD is a superior defender than Pippen ever was, but we know that lebron will get destroyed if AD plays like Pippen offensively.

so this is another 3ball exposure of lebron lies (just like the arguments of "longevity", "73-wins", "8 straight ECF" and "pippen was passing leader" - ALL EXPOSED

lebron is trying to brainwash people into thinking he's goat, and Americans with their bottom-level education (#40 among developed nations) goes for it hook line and sinker... think for yourselves people... don't believe anything you see on TV by the so-called experts - they are NOT experts and got shitty educations.

No one had to brainwash people with false arguments that Jordan was goat .. everyone just knew he was (and still do)

carry on

[Axe]

1-9

[Shooter]

What about 91-93 Finals Pippen?

21/9/7/2/1 on 46%

[Shooter]

1-9

[MrFonzworth]

Mr. 1-9 is bringing up education statistics now:oldlol:

Reach harder little girl

[SouBeachTalents]

https://live.staticflickr.com/8765/29001572216_98dbc80a4d_z.jpg

[Roundball_Rock]

https://live.staticflickr.com/8765/29001572216_98dbc80a4d_z.jpg

:roll: :roll: :roll:

[HBK_Kliq_2]

Lebron is old and looking at a playoff picture of Rockets, Clippers, Bucks. I doubt he makes it through all of that. He better pray that Kawhi is tired by West finals or he's finished. Already claiming its his "revenge" year, we will see about that when Kawhi is putting up 35PPG 65% TS on him.

[Roundball_Rock]

Notice we never see the scoring posted for the second options on the other team? It's because they know comparing John Starks, Terry Porter, Rik Smits or John Stockton scoring 9.7 won't look so great for the agenda. It was a rare series where the other side's second scorer got to 20 PPG--sometimes the other team's first option failed to do so as well.

[Axe]

When your team's defense sucks so much that other opposing scorers or options never post more than 15 ppg. :confusedshrug:

Now just imagine that number rising up to at least 25 ppg once they played against good defense, giving your team much better chances of winning against the opposing team.

[3ball]

Notice we never see the scoring posted for the second options on the other team? It's because they know comparing John Starks, Terry Porter, Rik Smits or John Stockton scoring 9.7 won't look so great for the agenda. It was a rare series where the other side's second scorer got to 20 PPG--sometimes the other team's first option failed to do so as well.
many guys outscored pippen - you're just ignoring them... :confusedshrug:

x-man in the 92' ECSF... Willis in the 93' first round.. dumars or Isiah in 90' ECF .. a hobbled worthy was outscoring Pippen thru 3 games in 91' before he got hurt in game 4.... Newman and G Wilkins outscored pippen easily in 89' 2nd round... Nance and price in 89' first round.... that's tons

and tons of guys from 95-98 (Juwan Howard, Larry Johnson, Penny (twice), Schrempf, Payton, hardaway, and more... pippen averaged 17.6 on 40.8 for entire 96-98 playoffs.. THERE'S NO DEFENDING THAT)

and again, pippen's efficiency was always horrible - so like you guys always say - he scored more because he shot more with horrific efficiency - a 3rd or 4th option scorer that was forced to be #2 option

and finally, the bulls' third option basically ALWAYS got destroyed.. it wasn't close.... so mj carried a weak-scoring 2nd option and no 3rd option... and his 2nd option was LAST in clutch

[Axe]

https://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media/image/upload/bzaflp0rp3bmcdh6noxn.gif

[Shooter]

many guys outscored pippen - you're just ignoring them... :confusedshrug:

x-man in the 92' ECSF... Willis in the 93' first round.. dumars or Isiah in 90' ECF .. a hobbled worthy was outscoring Pippen thru 3 games in 91' before he got hurt in game 4.... Newman and G Wilkins outscored pippen easily in 89' 2nd round... Nance and price in 89' first round.... that's tons

and tons of guys from 95-98 (Juwan Howard, Larry Johnson, Penny (twice), Schrempf, Payton, hardaway, and more... pippen averaged 17.6 on 40.8 for entire 96-98 playoffs.. THERE'S NO DEFENDING THAT)

and again, pippen's efficiency was always horrible - so like you guys always say - he scored more because he shot more with horrific efficiency - a 3rd or 4th option scorer that was forced to be #2 option

and finally, the bulls' third option basically ALWAYS got destroyed.. it wasn't close.... so mj carried a weak-scoring 2nd option and no 3rd option... and his 2nd option was LAST in clutch

BREAKING NEWS: MJ is only a mediocre playmaker plus takes all the shots, wonders why teammates are scoring less points :lol

[SATAN]

1-9

[Roundball_Rock]

Here is the scoring data for the Bulls' ECF's/Finals #2 options:

1991: Dumars 13, Worthy 19
1992: Daughtery 18, Porter 16
1993: Starks 15, Johnson 17
1996: Penny 26, Kemp 23
1997: Mourning 16, Stockton 15
1998: Smits 16, Stockton 10 (Hornacek 11 if you want to use him)

Only two guys at 20+--both in the same year. This is why they don't post this info--by their own standard this is horrendous scoring (remember, 20-21 PPG is trash so what is 15, 10, 16, or 13?). :lol In this era if your third or even fourth option (for certain teams, e.g., if Harrell scores 10 that's a problem) scores that little you are in trouble but that was fine for 90's 2nd options--from all-stars (each player on this list was an all-star) and even a few HOF'ers. I suppose if you are embarrassed by the comp, just hide their performance.

[SouBeachTalents]

Here is the scoring data for the Bulls' ECF's/Finals #2 options:

1991: Dumars 13, Worthy 19
1992: Daughtery 18, Porter 16
1993: Starks 15, Johnson 17
1996: Penny 26, Kemp 23
1997: Mourning 16, Stockton 15
1998: Smits 16, Stockton 10 (Hornacek 11 if you want to use him)

Only two guys at 20+--both in the same year. This is why they don't post this info--by their own standard this is horrendous scoring (remember, 20-21 PPG is trash so what is 15, 10, or 13?). :lol
https://media.giphy.com/media/RJAjTowsU0K1a/giphy.gif

And 3ball is always bitching about Pippen :oldlol:

[Roundball_Rock]

https://media.giphy.com/media/RJAjTowsU0K1a/giphy.gif

And 3ball is always bitching about Pippen :oldlol:

:lol

They should love Pippen since without Pippen their hero wouldn't have the 6 rings we always hear about it.

[Shooter]

Here is the scoring data for the Bulls' ECF's/Finals #2 options:

1991: Dumars 13, Worthy 19
1992: Daughtery 18, Porter 16
1993: Starks 15, Johnson 17
1996: Penny 26, Kemp 23
1997: Mourning 16, Stockton 15
1998: Smits 16, Stockton 10 (Hornacek 11 if you want to use him)

Only two guys at 20+--both in the same year. This is why they don't post this info--by their own standard this is horrendous scoring (remember, 20-21 PPG is trash so what is 15, 10, 16, or 13?). :lol In this era if your third or even fourth option (for certain teams, e.g., if Harrell scores 10 that's a problem) scores that little you are in trouble but that was fine for 90's 2nd options--from all-stars (each player on this list was an all-star) and even a few HOF'ers. I suppose if you are embarrassed by the comp, just hide their performance.

And that's the end of that :lol Great proof as to why every Jordan fan disappears as soon as you ask him what was his best Finals win :lol I can't believe I had MJ cemented top 3. He didn't beat ANYBODY it seems.

[light]

AD will be an enormous success if he can have the same effect on a playoff game as Scottie Pippen.

Everything Pippen did was meaningful and useful.

Sometimes guys like Bosh, Love or even AD put up empty statistics.

[Roundball_Rock]

Parse it another way, the difference between the Chicago #2 option and the other team's in the ECF and finals. ECF listed first. For our purposes here, I am listing Pippen as the #2 for all the 98' finals, not Kukoc after Pippen got hurt (Kukoc 23 PPG in the final two games).

1991: Pippen +10, Pippen +2
1992: Pippen +2, Pippen +5
1993: Pippen +8, Pippen +4
1996: Penny +7, Kemp +7
1997: Pippen +1 (Pippen played only 7 minutes in Game 5, +5 in full games), Pippen +5
1998: =, Pippen +6 (Pippen injured Games 5-6)

Pippen gets hurt in series and still outscores the other #2 option. All this and they are always bitching about MJ being the one with no help, not the other guys. :lol

One note on Kemp: he was the #2 option but outscored Payton 23-18 in the series.

[GimmeThat]

OP demonstrating a very injury forward thinking, no, my method does not make me zen. by the way, OP is the anti-King Arthur and lives in a world where manufacture is used to counter the goods of what nature provides.

[Axe]

OP demonstrating a very injury forward thinking, no, my method does not make me zen. by the way, OP is the anti-King Arthur and lives in a world where manufacture is used to counter the goods of what nature provides.
:roll: