Nancy Pelosi has meltdown on CNN

[Patrick Chewing]

This is amazing video. Watch the whole thing. The Left is starting to eat itself.


https://youtu.be/gqPltMpWIwo

She actually accuses Wolf and CNN of being apologists for the Republican Party :roll:

[Doomsday Dallas]

watching this 13 minute video... let me see

[Doomsday Dallas]

Yea... I just can't watch this stuff anymore.

Football has been very good to me the past 5 weeks.

Print out 50 trillion and make everybody equal already.

[tpols]

we need term limits on congress asap. 8 year max. these old devils have way too much power and security and they dont do anything but squabble with each other in life long fueds and get jack shit done. Make it happen Trump.

[diamenz]

good on woof for calling her out on her bullshit. that's something you don't see on msm everyday.

btw, the video in the op leaves out the end out of the segment @ 9:20.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tpe5jmJtG10

meanwhile, andrew yang is being labeled as a sexist by nancy's daughter and nancy's spokesperson for also calling her out on her bs.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmzyEF6GP20

[jstern]

It's a shame that this is what Trump has to deal with, on top of the fake news media. Yet, he keeps winning and accomplishes so much. Not just in the US, but gets countries who are bitter enemies to agree to peace.

[starface]

good on woof for calling her out on her bullshit. that's something you don't see on msm everyday.

btw, the video in the op leaves out the end out of the segment @ 9:20.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tpe5jmJtG10

meanwhile, andrew yang is being labeled as a sexist by nancy's daughter and nancy's spokesperson for also calling her out on her bs.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmzyEF6GP20


It's amazing that they still play this card, given that using it in such an utterly irrelevant and inapplicable context as this basically makes a mockery of feminism and equality etc. I mean at least save it for a SEMI-credible opportunity. To resort to using it HERE? It's a tremendous indictment of how obvious a political hack she's willing to be.

But the crazy thing?

ItsMillerTime and the gang will gobble it up.

[Gruppenführer]

She is a menace and must be devoured.

[RRR3]

Let’s start the revolution and guillotine this old hag already. She legit gets off on poor people starving. Despicable

[ItsMillerTime]

It's amazing that they still play this card, given that using it in such an utterly irrelevant and inapplicable context as this basically makes a mockery of feminism and equality etc. I mean at least save it for a SEMI-credible opportunity. To resort to using it HERE? It's a tremendous indictment of how obvious a political hack she's willing to be.

But the crazy thing?

ItsMillerTime and the gang will gobble it up.

You're once again proving how much of a fvcking idiot you are.

Pelosi is also an enemy of the people, much like Mitch McConnell is. The system is rigged, you're obsessed, and I live rent-free inside your head.

[tpols]

You're once again proving how much of a fvcking idiot you are.

Pelosi is also an enemy of the people, much like Mitch McConnell is. The system is rigged, you're obsessed, and I live rent-free inside your head.

But I thought it was all Trump's fault?

[Long Duck Dong]

Let’s start the revolution and guillotine this old hag already. She legit gets off on poor people starving. Despicable

There's so many to put down before her in California if you're the mob/revolutionary justice type. Maxine Waters for example lives in a working class Hispanic and black district but lives outside her district in a 6 million dollar mansion.


https://i.gifer.com/QjL.gif

[Patrick Chewing]

good on woof for calling her out on her bullshit. that's something you don't see on msm everyday.

btw, the video in the op leaves out the end out of the segment @ 9:20.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=tpe5jmJtG10

meanwhile, andrew yang is being labeled as a sexist by nancy's daughter and nancy's spokesperson for also calling her out on her bs.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmzyEF6GP20


Wow, I saw the ending on Twitter. That was insane. She's lost it. She comes off as a bully and not putting the American people first. But everyone with a brain knew how wretched and demonic the Democrats were already.

[starface]

You're once again proving how much of a fvcking idiot you are.

Pelosi is also an enemy of the people, much like Mitch McConnell is. The system is rigged, you're obsessed, and I live rent-free inside your head.


https://bwc-www-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/2018/02/MeltdownBlog2.png

[bladefd]

You're once again proving how much of a fvcking idiot you are.

Pelosi is also an enemy of the people, much like Mitch McConnell is. The system is rigged, you're obsessed, and I live rent-free inside your head.

Starface is a waste of oxygen who only sees issues on one side of the political aisle and not the other. Not even worth responding to that partisan hack..

[RRR3]

There's so many to put down before her in California if you're the mob/revolutionary justice type. Maxine Waters for example lives in a working class Hispanic and black district but lives outside her district in a 6 million dollar mansion.


https://i.gifer.com/QjL.gif
I’m sure Waters is bad (which is distressing as back in the 80s she was an activist getting praised by Angela Davis...I guess money convinced her to give up on her values?) but Pelosi is truly one of the most cancerous people in Washington to any real change happening.

[RRR3]

Wow, I saw the ending on Twitter. That was insane. She's lost it. She comes off as a bully and not putting the American people first. But everyone with a brain knew how wretched and demonic the Democrats were already.
Neither party cares about us. The Democrats are just better at pretending to.

[ItsMillerTime]

But I thought it was all Trump's fault?

Except that's never been my stance, regardless of how loud that dumbfvck Starface screams it. Term limits are a MUST and every single establishment politician that has been in office for decades and hasn't done shit with it other than getting personally rich has gotta go. We live in the richest country in the world in the richest era OF ALL TIME. Why do millions of people live in poverty? Why are children going hungry? Why is our education system ranked 30th worldwide in most polls? Our gov is filthy fvcking corrupt

Trump isn't the root cause of the problem, he took advantage of the system, but he's also a morally corrupt psychopath that must be stopped.

[starface]

Except that's never been my stance, regardless of how loud that dumbfvck Starface screams it. Term limits are a MUST and every single establishment politician that has been in office for decades and hasn't done shit with it other than getting personally rich has gotta go. We live in the richest country in the world in the richest era OF ALL TIME. Why do millions of people live in poverty? Why are children going hungry? Why is our education system ranked 30th worldwide in most polls? Our gov is filthy fvcking corrupt


:roll:

People live in poverty because:

A) Many of them CHOOSE to do drugs and live recklessly instead of obtaining useful skills and knowledge.
B) The low skill labor they might still be qualified to do pays peanuts thanks to the immigrant influx YOU have welcomed.
C) SJW try-hards like you are too busy rioting over political correctness instead of addressing financial policy manipulation of banks and politicians



Trump isn't the root cause of the problem, he took advantage of the system, but he's also a morally corrupt psychopath that must be stopped.

:roll:

https://images.theconversation.com/files/12061/original/myg3ykzj-1340326348.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=754&fit=clip

"We must stop the Orange Man bc Orange Man Bad!!!!!"


Stop him from WHAT?

"He wants to do a Holocaust!!!!!!"

:facepalm


Shrill hysterics and copious swearing do not compensate for your lack of ACTUAL intellectual substance. You are an extremely high strung, neurotic, self loathing angry dweeb. Low testosterone and low brain capacity.

If you actually "cared" about America's issues, you would stop using politics as an excuse for venting your frustration over your own lack of masculinity.

You have NO substance or manhood whatsoever.

Dweeb :lol

[ItsMillerTime]

^ you try too hard and you're an idiot. didn't read.

[starface]

^ you try too hard and you're an idiot. didn't read.

Hey Siri. Translate It’sMillerTime’s post.


OK. Translating ItsMillerTimes post.

“I read every single word and can’t refute a thing because it’s all true. I am a eunuch male robot programmed by an emotional feminazi to do her political bidding. I cannot attract females unless I submissively adopt their emotionally charged views on politics and society. I am not programmed to think outside of these paramters.”

Thanks Siri.

Open iTunes and play some Parliament Funkadelic.

[Patrick Chewing]

^ you try too hard and you're an idiot. didn't read.

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/MajorUntidyDolphin-small.gif

[rawimpact]

https://thumbs.gfycat.com/MajorUntidyDolphin-small.gif

More west virginia than indiana but still funny

[RRR3]

I challenge some of you to read The Communist Manifesto as well as Value, Price and Profit by Karl Marx and come away thinking dude doesn’t make good points. Capitalism enables ghouls like Pelosi. For what it’s worth I disagree with Marx’s methods of achieving communism, although we have the same goal.

[Luka Doncic]

I challenge some of you to read The Communist Manifesto as well as Value, Price and Profit by Karl Marx and come away thinking dude doesn’t make good points. Capitalism enables ghouls like Pelosi. For what it’s worth I disagree with Marx’s methods of achieving communism, although we have the same goal.

https://c8.alamy.com/comp/C3YEGE/a-spotty-faced-young-man-teenager-youth-with-acne-bad-skin-complexion-C3YEGE.jpg

[BigKobeFan]

I challenge some of you to read The Communist Manifesto as well as Value, Price and Profit by Karl Marx and come away thinking dude doesn’t make good points. Capitalism enables ghouls like Pelosi. For what it’s worth I disagree with Marx’s methods of achieving communism, although we have the same goal.

I have. How about you read free to choose by friedman

[bladefd]

I challenge some of you to read The Communist Manifesto as well as Value, Price and Profit by Karl Marx and come away thinking dude doesn’t make good points. Capitalism enables ghouls like Pelosi. For what it’s worth I disagree with Marx’s methods of achieving communism, although we have the same goal.

Marx makes good points, but the solution need not be communism. You can solve the issues with capitalism by not letting it run away to its extremes. Communism has never worked and never will because it leads to totalitarianism or at least authoritarianism. Whoever is in power pretty much has absolute power and almost always corrupts when put to practice. The only way it would work is if the person in power is very fair, intelligent, very high character to uphold morals/ethics and not prone to corruption. Maybe it might work under leadership of Gandhi or Buddha or Jesus, but anyone else would most likely corrupt in practice. You also don't want complete centralization because it leaves you at the mercy of those in power, which might be corrupt authoritarian. You want diversified companies and means of production rather than centralizing everything.

So communism is not the answer.

[KennyPowers]

1 minute it in and my hearing is having a meltdown. Did this witch previously have a stroke? Sounds like someone smashed her across the face with a 2 by 4.

I'd love to see the Hacksaw Jim Duggan beat her with a 2 by 4. Then hacksaw her to pieces.




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x6XwpuWORJ8



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLwbz-peegw

[RRR3]

Marx makes good points, but the solution need not be communism. You can solve the issues with capitalism by not letting it run away to its extremes. Communism has never worked and never will because it leads to totalitarianism or at least authoritarianism. Whoever is in power pretty much has absolute power and almost always corrupts when put to practice. The only way it would work is if the person in power is very fair, intelligent, very high character to uphold morals/ethics and not prone to corruption. Maybe it might work under leadership of Gandhi or Buddha or Jesus, but anyone else would most likely corrupt in practice. You also don't want complete centralization because it leaves you at the mercy of those in power, which might be corrupt authoritarian. You want diversified companies and means of production rather than centralizing everything.

So communism is not the answer.
You also don’t know what communism is. Sad.

[Phong]

You also don’t know what communism is. Sad.
No government to compel the populace by force and you expect a nation of millions to sing kumbaya and share everything equally? Communism might work in a very small setting like within a family or tribe and only if every single person is hard working and altruistic.

Look at yourself. You're too lazy to work for your own self-interest yet you want others to work hard to provide for you. In any country that tried to achieve communism, you'd either be sent to the gulag for being a lazy bum or you'd try to weasel your way to a position of power to tell others what to do.

[RRR3]

No government to compel the populace by force and you expect a nation of millions to sing kumbaya and share everything equally? Communism might work in a very small setting like within a family or tribe and only if every single person is hard working and altruistic.

Look at yourself. You're too lazy to work for your own self-interest yet you want others to work hard to provide for you. In any country that tried to achieve communism, you'd either be sent to the gulag for being a lazy bum or you'd try to weasel your way to a position of power to tell others what to do.
How much did you cry when LeBron won?

[Phong]

How much did you cry when LeBron won? Not a single tear :confusedshrug:

Now back to the topic you brought up. How are you going to provide for the community in your Communist utopia when you can't even provide for yourself?

[bladefd]

You also don’t know what communism is. Sad.

Explain your counter-argument with counterpoints and make your case.

[BigKobeFan]

How much did you cry when LeBron won?

How can you be a communist when you joined an NBA forum?

[RRR3]

Explain your counter-argument with counterpoints and make your case.
Bro, my counter argument is to read Marx and comprehend what the definition of communism is before you make empirically false claims. You actually don’t know what you’re talking about.

[RRR3]

Not a single tear :confusedshrug:

Now back to the topic you brought up. How are you going to provide for the community in your Communist utopia when you can't even provide for yourself?
The last 3 times LeBron won you disappeared for years, so I find that hard to believe. Remember when you told us he wasn’t a winner? How’d that work out for you?

[Phong]

The last 3 times LeBron won you disappeared for years, so I find that hard to believe. Remember when you told us he wasn’t a winner? How’d that work out for you?I laughed at him for saying he was a winner after losing. He finally won. Good for him. I've addressed it many times but you've been so butthurt by it, you can't stop bringing it up over and over again. You probably brought it up 4-5 times in the post 6 months and I answered every single time. You'll probably deflect to this again next time you have nothing else to say.

Now that I've answered your questions, answer mine. How are you going to convince people to embrace communism and work hard to provide for someone like you? Unlike your parents, they won't feel the guilt of having brought up a loser into this world. Furthermore, how is the community supposed to expect any contribution from you when you can't provide for yourself?

"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"

Let me guess.. You have no abilities or skills. You're so pathetic that laughing at you or using you as a punching bag wouldn't even provide amusement to anyone. On the other end, you have a ton of needs because you're a retard and needs to be provided for.

[bladefd]

Bro, my counter argument is to read Marx and comprehend what the definition of communism is before you make empirically false claims. You actually don’t know what you’re talking about.

All property (and wealth too) is publicly owned, publicly produced/distributed based on need. There would be no private property, no gaps in income, necessities of life are guaranteed to all. Centralized power means there has to be the center of power somewhere, which usually tends to be an individual or party. That centerpiece would work initially, but it always tends to corrupt. The worker class is the one controlling party, which can also corrupt because individuals will oversell their personal/family need over others.

What am I missing? I don't need to read the Communist Manifesto to understand that.

[Phong]

All property (and wealth too) is publicly owned, publicly produced/distributed based on need. There would be no private property, no gaps in income, necessities of life are guaranteed to all. Centralized power means there has to be the center of power somewhere, which usually tends to be an individual or party. That centerpiece would work initially, but it always tends to corrupt. The worker class is the one controlling party, which can also corrupt because individuals will oversell their personal/family need over others.

What am I missing? I don't need to read the Communist Manifesto to understand that. He's talking about a stateless pipedream in which the entire population is fully dedicated to the community. Everybody will work their asses off with no reward but the satisfaction of having contributed. There will be no need for government and government coercion. Everybody will be happy even when some aren't pulling their own weight.

[BigKobeFan]

He's talking about a stateless pipedream in which the entire population is fully dedicated to the community. Everybody will work their asses off with no reward but the satisfaction of having contributed. There will be no need for government coercion. Everybody will be happy even when some aren't pulling their own weight.

Hahahah. You will always have a lazy bum in the group who gets kicked out of a commune for being too lazy

[Phong]

Hahahah. You will always have a lazy bum in the group who gets kicked out of a commune for being too lazy That's why he was such a fervent Bernie supporters. But now he's lazier and has gone beyond Bernie.

[starface]

Bro, my counter argument is to read Marx and comprehend what the definition of communism is before you make empirically false claims. You actually don’t know what you’re talking about.

:lol

When youre losing an argument BADLY to bladefd...

It might be time to stop looking for every excuse in the book to stick to your beta ideology which you hope will one day rescue all the betas so that you can remain a beta instead of doing anything to improve.

Hit the gym. Hit the barber. Hit the books.

Or sit and wait for never, and remain a wanting, wimpy beta soyboy.

[RRR3]

All property (and wealth too) is publicly owned, publicly produced/distributed based on need. There would be no private property, no gaps in income, necessities of life are guaranteed to all. Centralized power means there has to be the center of power somewhere, which usually tends to be an individual or party. That centerpiece would work initially, but it always tends to corrupt. The worker class is the one controlling party, which can also corrupt because individuals will oversell their personal/family need over others.

What am I missing? I don't need to read the Communist Manifesto to understand that.
Stop trying to explain what Soviet Russia was to me :facepalm

Communism is a classless, stateless, moneyless society based upon the maxim “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs”. You keep talking about socialist states when Communism can’t even exist with a state. Literally the only person in this thread who knows what communism is besides me is Phong, apparently.

[RRR3]

:lol

When youre losing an argument BADLY to bladefd...

It might be time to stop looking for every excuse in the book to stick to your beta ideology which you hope will one day rescue all the betas so that you can remain a beta instead of doing anything to improve.

Hit the gym. Hit the barber. Hit the books.

Or sit and wait for never, and remain a wanting, wimpy beta soyboy.
He literally doesn’t know what communism is, and I doubt you do either since you accuse Bernie friggin Sanders of being a Communist (absolutely laughable considering he doesn’t want to abolish capitalism).

[bladefd]

Stop trying to explain what Soviet Russia was to me :facepalm

Communism is a classless, stateless, moneyless society based upon the maxim “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs”. You keep talking about socialist states when Communism can’t even exist with a state. Literally the only person in this thread who knows what communism is besides me is Phong, apparently.

Yes, I know Marxism is classless, stateless, moneyless. Everyone takes only what they need, so who determines who needs what and how much? What if some greedy bastard like Trump or Clinton decide to take more than they need?

You still need leadership and someone (or a committee) to oversee everything so someone doesn't try to cheat the system. If humans can be unselfish, moral beings and 'good' by nature, it would work but alas humans are not.

Humans are easily corrupted, greedy and dangerous creatures. It simply would not last. It might last perhaps a week, a month, maybe a few months if I'm being very generous and giving the community a benefit of the doubt. Jealousy, envy, selfish behavior on the side of a few will eventually lead to anger and friction between people. Anger leads to hatred and grudges among people. Hatred and grudge leads to an endless cycle of violence that continues for generations (like between America and Middle-Eastern terrorists).

You obviously have to punish people who break the rules. That leads to anger and the desire for revenge. It eventually leads to hate.

Also, if you go against the majority grain (worker class), you will be seen as a threat to the system. What do you think happened in America when blacks rose against the majority for civil rights in the 50s/60s and civil rights were passed? Many whites saw it as a threat against their way of living even though it was not to take away their power. Civil rights were passed just to put blacks on equal grounds, or at least attempt to. MLKjr was seen as a threat. If you go against the majority grain, you will be seen as a threat. I realize Marxism is for AFTER the classes are disintegrated, but humans carry grudges from generation to generation & develop grudges along the path.

Finally, people are motivated to work with the belief that they will have a surplus left after they pay their bills and the belief that they are working for the benefit of that surplus rather than surviving just for the sake of surviving. Communism takes any idea of surplus, profit and dream out of your life. People would lose the motivation to work at their hardest. Think of profit as a carrot in front of a donkey - the donkey will push harder if he thinks he will get that carrot if he pushes himself. Remove the carrot and eventually the donkey will lose motivation to push himself.

A better system is one that has a healthy balance. You want some capitalism that is not overpowered but just enough to keep the ceiling high. You want some socialism as a safety net and to keep the floor high. Keep a balance and you have a system. Communism goes to the extreme and so does corporatism (I also call it runaway capitalism. You don't want either communism or corporatism but rather something in between, such as social democracy that FDR/Bernie are close to on a political scale.

[RRR3]

Yes, I know Marxism is classless, stateless, moneyless. Everyone takes only what they need, so who determines who needs what and how much? What if some greedy bastard like Trump or Clinton decide to take more than they need?

You still need leadership and someone (or a committee) to oversee everything so someone doesn't try to cheat the system. If humans can be unselfish, moral beings and 'good' by nature, it would work but alas humans are not.

Humans are easily corrupted, greedy and dangerous creatures. It simply would not last. It might last perhaps a week, a month, maybe a few months if I'm being very generous and giving the community a benefit of the doubt. Jealousy, envy, selfish behavior on the side of a few will eventually lead to anger and friction between people. Anger leads to hatred and grudges among people. Hatred and grudge leads to an endless cycle of violence that continues for generations (like between America and Middle-Eastern terrorists).

You obviously have to punish people who break the rules. That leads to anger and the desire for revenge. It eventually leads to hate.

Also, if you go against the majority grain (worker class), you will be seen as a threat to the system. What do you think happened in America when blacks rose against the majority for civil rights in the 50s/60s and civil rights were passed? Many whites saw it as a threat against their way of living even though it was not to take away their power. Civil rights were passed just to put blacks on equal grounds, or at least attempt to. MLKjr was seen as a threat. If you go against the majority grain, you will be seen as a threat. I realize Marxism is for AFTER the classes are disintegrated, but humans carry grudges from generation to generation & develop grudges along the path.

Finally, people are motivated to work with the belief that they will have a surplus left after they pay their bills and the belief that they are working for the benefit of that surplus rather than surviving just for the sake of surviving. Communism takes any idea of surplus, profit and dream out of your life. People would lose the motivation to work at their hardest. Think of profit as a carrot in front of a donkey - the donkey will push harder if he thinks he will get that carrot if he pushes himself. Remove the carrot and eventually the donkey will lose motivation to push himself.

A better system is one that has a healthy balance. You want some capitalism that is not overpowered but just enough to keep the ceiling high. You want some socialism as a safety net and to keep the floor high. Keep a balance and you have a system. Communism goes to the extreme and so does corporatism (I also call it runaway capitalism. You don't want either communism or corporatism but rather something in between, such as social democracy that FDR/Bernie are close to on a political scale.
Social Democracy is for cowards who are too afraid to try something bold.

[Patrick Chewing]

Stop trying to explain what Soviet Russia was to me :facepalm

Communism is a classless, stateless, moneyless society based upon the maxim “from each according to his ability to each according to his needs”. You keep talking about socialist states when Communism can’t even exist with a state. Literally the only person in this thread who knows what communism is besides me is Phong, apparently.

Do your parents know how polluted your brain has become? Do they support the same warped ideology??


Otherwise, shame on them for harboring a traitorous Commie.

[Phong]

Social Democracy is for cowards who are too afraid to try something bold.It takes a lot of courage and boldness to sit on your unemployed ass and pray to be rescued by Communism. :facepalm

[BigKobeFan]

Do your parents know how polluted your brain has become? Do they support the same warped ideology??


Otherwise, shame on them for harboring a traitorous Commie.

His parents reinforces, caters, and encourages this. Why else would his dad let him live in the basement and not get a job.

[Nanners]

:oldlol: :oldlol:

any politician who is so stupid and useless that a clown like brolf can easily dunk on them needs a one-way ticket to behind the woodshed

[west_tip]

we need term limits on congress asap. 8 year max. these old devils have way too much power and security and they dont do anything but squabble with each other in life long fueds and get jack shit done. Make it happen Trump.

That was my takeaway. I'm 4 minutes and 40 seconds in and she just said Obama when she meant Trump.

The likes of Pelosi, Feinstein, Schumer and Biden have been in DC for 30+ years. They are old and out of touch and their minds have gone.

[Mr. Woke]

Trump has had plenty of meltdowns.

I'm so glad that I didn't vote for him.