If you combined the rosters of Knicks, Cavs and Bulls

[Marchesk]

Would the team make the playoffs in the East?

[Kiddlovesnets]

Instant title favorite, the rosters depth will be even better than the top contenders.

[Marchesk]

Instant title contender.

Lebron would leave LA to join?

[marz]

Would the team make the playoffs in the East?

The better question is, what would the roster look like if you combined the Knicks and Nets?

And the answer is that the roster would simply just be the Nets.

The Knicks don't have a single player who would make Brooklyn's rotation.

RJ Barrett is young and has some potential, but potential does not win games and Barrett's skillset at this point would not be more valuable to winning basketball games than the spacing that Landry Shamet provides.

Mitchell Robinson has some potential as well, although he is wildly over-rated by Knicks fans. Jarrett Allen is simply better (and three weeks younger FYI) than Robinson. Knicks fans need to understand that you are what you are, not what you could be, and what Mitchell Robinson is....is a scrub who cannot play more than 10 minutes against legitimate NBA competition without fouling out.

Julius Randle is the most accomplished and probably has the best case for making the Nets' rotation, but he is a low IQ, ball-dominant player with questionable fit. In a vacuum he is certainly a good enough player, but basketball games aren't played in a vacuum and fit must be taken into consideration. Jeff Green's veteran savvy and versatility would likely be more valuable on the bench than Randle's bully ball.

The rest of the Knicks' roster is not worth mentioning for obvious reasons.

[Xiao Yao You]

Is Dolan the owner?

[lilteapot]

The better question is, what would the roster look like if you combined the Knicks and Nets?

And the answer is that the roster would simply just be the Nets.

The Knicks don't have a single player who would make Brooklyn's rotation.

RJ Barrett is young and has some potential, but potential does not win games and Barrett's skillset at this point would not be more valuable to winning basketball games than the spacing that Landry Shamet provides.

Mitchell Robinson has some potential as well, although he is wildly over-rated by Knicks fans. Jarrett Allen is simply better (and three weeks younger FYI) than Robinson. Knicks fans need to understand that you are what you are, not what you could be, and what Mitchell Robinson is....is a scrub who cannot play more than 10 minutes against legitimate NBA competition without fouling out.

Julius Randle is the most accomplished and probably has the best case for making the Nets' rotation, but he is a low IQ, ball-dominant player with questionable fit. In a vacuum he is certainly a good enough player, but basketball games aren't played in a vacuum and fit must be taken into consideration. Jeff Green's veteran savvy and versatility would likely be more valuable on the bench than Randle's bully ball.

The rest of the Knicks' roster is not worth mentioning for obvious reasons.

You're a complete dumbass if you don't think Mitch or RJ wouldn't make the Nets' rotation, even off the bench.

[Marchesk]

Is Dolan the owner?

Committee of Dolan, Gilbert and Reinsdorf.

[DoctorP]

No. These teams are ying

[RRR3]

Instant title favorite, the rosters depth will be even better than the top contenders.
Are you on meth? You combine all 3 teams and they still miss the playoffs easily.

[dirkdiggler41]

Collin Sexton
Zach Lavine
RJ Barrett
Kevin Love
Andre Drummond


Plus one hell of a bench

[FireDavidKahn]

Collin Sexton
Zach Lavine
RJ Barrett
Kevin Love
Andre Drummond


Plus one hell of a bench

That really isn't that good of a starting 5.

[Axe]

Depends. Who's going to coach them?