SF votes to ban Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln...& Feinstein

[Long Duck Dong]

In addition to previously banned names off all city institutions the following names will be added to the ban by the city of San Francisco

George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Abraham Lincoln
Francis Scott Key
William McKinley
James Garfield
James Monroe
Herbert Hoover
Paul Revere
Robert Louis Stevenson
... and US Senator Diane Feinsten :roll:

These people are all now considered racists

Apparently Feinsten replaced damaged old Confederate Flag that was placed at a city building in 1984. Her detractors said she should have thrown it away and never replaced it. Keep in mind the Confederate Flag was pretty mainstream back then. It was even on the car in the long running series Dukes of Hazard.

The new woke eating up the old woke. :lol

Since there are already schools in SF with the names Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln it will cost the city a minimum of $1 million to replace signs on the buildings and uniforms.

[FultzNationRISE]

In addition to previously banned names off all city institutions the following names will be added to the ban by the city of San Francisco

George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Abraham Lincoln
Francis Scott Key
William McKinley
James Garfield
James Monroe
Herbert Hoover
Paul Revere
Robert Louis Stevenson
... and US Senator Diane Feinsten :roll:

These people are all now considered racists

Apparently Feinsten replaced damaged old Confederate Flag that was placed at a city building in 1984. Her detractors said she should have thrown it away and never replaced it. Keep in mind the Confederate Flag was pretty mainstream back then. It was even on the car in the long running series Dukes of Hazard.

The new woke eating up the old woke. :lol

Since there are already schools in SF with the names Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln it will cost the city a minimum of $1 million to replace signs on the buildings and uniforms.


These kinds of movements are basically consolation prizes for people who hate themselves. It makes them feel like they've 'won' something.

For instance every time bladefd faces the fact he's a virgin living with his parents and still can't afford a hundred bucks a month for unlimited family internet, he gets more and more anxious to see Donald Trump take some kind of a loss. Even though he gains nothing from it. He wants to see a 'winner' like Trump humiliated, in order to feel like he's not the only one losing.

Matter fact, there are gimmick accounts on ISH who follow me around the internet with the same purpose :oldlol: We as normal people tend to underestimate how much psychological anguish there is out there among society's most severe irl betas.

People wanna see things taken away from guys like Washington and Jefferson, simply because those guys are celebrated, and the eternally un-celebrated of society demand company for their misery. Even if it's dead company :lol

Such is the way it goes.

[BigKobeFan]

I still dont get how abraham lincoln is racist

[Overdrive]

In addition to previously banned names off all city institutions the following names will be added to the ban by the city of San Francisco

George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
Abraham Lincoln
Francis Scott Key
William McKinley
James Garfield
James Monroe
Herbert Hoover
Paul Revere
Robert Louis Stevenson
... and US Senator Diane Feinsten :roll:

These people are all now considered racists

Apparently Feinsten replaced damaged old Confederate Flag that was placed at a city building in 1984. Her detractors said she should have thrown it away and never replaced it. Keep in mind the Confederate Flag was pretty mainstream back then. It was even on the car in the long running series Dukes of Hazard.

The new woke eating up the old woke. :lol

Since there are already schools in SF with the names Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln it will cost the city a minimum of $1 million to replace signs on the buildings and uniforms.

Best way to fight present-day racism is to demonize people from the past.

[JohnnySic]

And then they wonder why we think libtards are, well , libtards.

[FultzNationRISE]

Best way to fight present-day racism is to demonize people from the past.


https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS9br9pCrOI/mqdefault.jpg

Do you consider this woman racist?

In case you can't read the caption well, it says "Dutch guys are very feminine. And I'm just... not so fond of that."

What do you think?

[Overdrive]

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TS9br9pCrOI/mqdefault.jpg

Do you consider this woman racist?

In case you can't read the caption well, it says "Dutch guys are very feminine. And I'm just... not so fond of that."

What do you think?

What does it have to do with what I said? You understand that I'm actually agreeing with OP? But you're asking me about that pic for the 4th time already.

I don't care, because itxs her opinion and she's entitled to it. Changing it doesn't make sense and if she said she isn't into blackn because she doesn't like their skin colour I wouldn't give a shit either. That's her preference. The problem about racism isn't that people don't hang out with ethnicity x or y, date them or whatever, but when they treat them as subhumansn when they change basic human interaction because of their ethnicity.

A damnatio memoriae won't fix that either. Not naming a school Lincoln High School won't help any böack guy in the US.

[FultzNationRISE]

What does it have to do with what I said? You understand that I'm actually agreeing with OP? But you're asking me about that pic for the 4th time already.

I don't care, because itxs her opinion and she's entitled to it. Changing it doesn't make sense and if she said she isn't into blackn because she doesn't like their skin colour I wouldn't give a shit either. That's her preference. The problem about racism isn't that people don't hang out with ethnicity x or y, date them or whatever, but when they treat them as subhumansn when they change basic human interaction because of their ethnicity.

A damnatio memoriae won't fix that either. Not naming a school Lincoln High School won't help any böack guy in the US.


Perhaps the sarcasm was lost in the medium of type then. It seemed like you were being serious about focusing on the demonization of yesterday’s racists to “fight teh racisms” of today.

But as far as your response. She didnt just say she prefers black guys. She said “Dutch. Men. ARE. FEMININE.” Then she stated a lack of preference for it.

She asserted an entire group of men were something less or different, than another group. Which is what you just is over the line, right? Calling you an effeminate pansy just because youre Dutch isnt EXACTLY calling you subhuman, but it’s the same idea right?

If a white male had done that about another group, many of your ilk would be at his doorstep with pitch forks. White men would literally be doxing, harassing, even assaulting one of their own kind for that kind of talk.

But theyll literally pardon THEIR OWN COUNTRYWOMEN for doing it in order to put THEM down :roll:

Do you see the irony in this?

You boys simp because you think it will gain you the approval of women, who are perfectly fine using you as a friend and helpful white knight, while making hay with someone else. Theyll applaud you for being woke, since as long as they have a full spectrum of options, what do they care? But deep down the woman in them will never respect you.

O, Henry!

[Overdrive]

Perhaps the sarcasm was lost in the medium of type then. It seemed like you were being serious about focusing on the demonization of yesterday’s racists to “fight teh racisms” of today.

But as far as your response. She didnt just say she prefers black guys. She said “Dutch. Men. ARE. FEMININE.” Then she stated a lack of preference for it.

She asserted an entire group of men were something less or different, than another group. Which is what you just is over the line, right? Calling you an effeminate pansy just because youre Dutch isnt EXACTLY calling you subhuman, but it’s the same idea right?

If a white male had done that about another group, many of your ilk would be at his doorstep with pitch forks. White men would literally be doxing, harassing, even assaulting one of their own kind for that kind of talk.

But theyll literally pardon THEIR OWN COUNTRYWOMEN for doing it in order to put THEM down :roll:

Do you see the irony in this?

You boys simp because you think it will gain you the approval of women, who are perfectly fine using you as a friend and helpful white knight, while making hay with someone else. Theyll applaud you for being woke, since as long as they have a full spectrum of options, what do they care? But deep down the woman in them will never respect you.

O, Henry!

If some white dude said he won't date black women, because they're too bossy and masculin I wouldn't give a shit either.

You're still mistaking me for some virtue signaling liberal.

[FultzNationRISE]

If some white dude said he won't date black women, because they're too bossy and masculin I wouldn't give a shit either.

You're still mistaking me for some virtue signaling liberal.


Gotcha.

And if someone said they were of the opinion this or that group didnt have qualities a, b, or c that made them good employees, or neighbors, or anything of that nature, and they didnt wish to live or work with them... you would also respect that?

Yes?

Or would it start making you nervous that you might be publicly condemned by a retarded mob of hypocrites, for being that logically consistent?

[Overdrive]

Gotcha.

And if someone said they were of the opinion this or that group didnt have qualities a, b, or c that made them good employees, or neighbors, or anything of that nature... you would also respect that?

Yes?

Depends. I think saying that group x doesn't have quality y so they should't work in field z is retarded, because there are experts of any ilk in any field, but it's your business if you don't want to hire an ethnicity.

Neighbour? If you can't veto anything who cares if you don't want a chinese or latino neighbour. Problem starts when people harass well behaving neighbours, just because they don't like their "race".

Also I think this woman and your scenario is generalizing and I don't agree with either, but I wouldn't fight either opinion and I wouldn't get upset by it either.

[FultzNationRISE]

Depends. I think saying that group x doesn't have quality y so they should't work in field z is retarded, because there are experts of any ilk in any field, but it's your business if you don't want to hire an ethnicity.

Neighbour? If you can't veto anything who cares if you don't want a chinese or latino neighbour. Problem starts when people harass well behaving neighbours, just because they don't like their "race".

Also I think this woman and your scenario is generalizing and I don't agree with either, but I wouldn't fight either opinion and I wouldn't get upset by it either.


Ok, so then we more or less agree that people who are neurotically obsessed with conformity to political correctness, *cough ItsMillerTime cough,* are pathetic rejects whove been shrieking like effeminate retards about shit that makes no sense, and is even counter productive to their own interests.

Glad we had this talk.

[Long Duck Dong]

I still dont get how abraham lincoln is racist


According to the article, it's over his treatment of Native Americans

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/san-francisco-board-votes-rename-schools-named-after-washington-lincoln-n1255836

[tpols]

I still dont get how abraham lincoln is racist

>literally abolishes slavery
>is a racist

Yup.....

[FultzNationRISE]

>literally abolishes slavery
>is a racist

Yup.....

:lol

I mean he definitely WAS a racist, just like Lyndon Johnson, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, etc. who all clearly had no genuine respect for black people, but whose political ambitions simply led them to use blacks as political tools. Lincoln was always very clear in his own writings before becoming President he didn't think the races belonged in the same society together. Lincoln, as President, simply had to do the social will of the woke North in order to maintain their favor, just as today Joe Biden is OBVIOUSLY going "wtf is wrong with the world" deep down, every time he smiles to the camera while signing a piece of "transgender rights" legislation.

So in that sense, they're definitely right Lincoln was a racist on a personal level. 99.99999% of people in that era were, including the vast majority of abolitionist christians who comprised the Union north. They didn't oppose slavery because they cared about the welfare of blacks. They cared about how other white christians shouldnt be allowed to do something they considered wrong. The issue was ALWAYS about righteously policing the morals of other whites. NEVER the welfare of blacks. The finger of morality perpetually points outward, not inward.

[tpols]

:lol

I mean he definitely WAS a racist, just like Lyndon Johnson, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, etc. who all clearly had no genuine respect for black people, but whose political ambitions simply led them to use blacks as political tools. Lincoln was always very clear in his own writings before becoming President he didn't think the races belonged in the same society together. Lincoln, as President, simply had to do the social will of the woke North in order to maintain their favor, just as today Joe Biden is OBVIOUSLY going "wtf is wrong with the world" deep down, every time he smiles to the camera while signing a piece of "transgender rights" legislation.

So in that sense, they're definitely right Lincoln was a racist on a personal level. 99.99999% of people in that era were, including the vast majority of abolitionist christians who comprised the Union north. They didn't oppose slavery because they cared about the welfare of blacks. They cared about how other white christians shouldnt be allowed to do something they considered wrong. The issue was ALWAYS about righteously policing the morals of other whites. NEVER the welfare of blacks.

What people don't get is that everybody was a racist before the advent of globalization and mass travel. Back in the day... you had to stick to your people. If you ran up on some foreign culture that lived a totally different way, and spoke a different language... you we're liable to get murdered on the spot. It's like two predators encountering each other in the wild. You're going to fight. And of course once people did start to integrate.. recently.. we notice that different groups of people look and behave differently, because... shocker, they came from totally different circumstances. All of these clowns crying racism would be "racists" in the year 1700. To not be a racist was an extreme outlier. These fellas in the OP literally founded this country. All of the minorities that are complaining would still be living in mud huts and teepee's if not for what these guys provided them. We live in the softest era of all time thanks to them yet they still complain.

[FultzNationRISE]

In fact after the war there were all sorts of "Sundown Town's" popping up in the Woke Abolitionist North.


Sundown towns, also known as sunset towns, gray towns, or sundowner towns, are all-white municipalities or neighborhoods in the United States that practice a form of racial segregation by excluding non-whites via some combination of discriminatory local laws, intimidation, and violence.

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51qfZOAkk5L.jpg



Basically the Woke North fought an immensely devastating war for the sole purpose of making southerners accept a set of values ultimately fed to the average person by newspaper tycoons and woke northern preachers.

But when it was time for the average Woke Northerner to live by the creed he demonized the Hillbilly South for refusing?

Then it was a little different.

And as always, history continues to repeat itself.

[tpols]

In fact after the war there were all sorts of "Sundown Town's" popping up in the Woke Abolitionist North.



https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/51qfZOAkk5L.jpg



Basically the Woke North fought an immensely devastating war for the purpose of making southerners accept a set of values newspaper tycoons and woke northern preachers fed them from the soapbox.

But when it was time for the average Woke Northerner to live by the creed he demonized the Hillbilly South for refusing?

Then it was a little different.

And as always, history continues to repeat itself.

I'd imagine once slaves got their freedom, they had no economic opportunity. So they had to rob. You or I would have done the same to survive so it is what it is. We see the stats show it still goes on today, even when they're taken care of by the government on a big scale. Just patterns repeating.

[FultzNationRISE]

I'd imagine once slaves got their freedom, they had no economic opportunity. So they had to rob. You or I would have done the same to survive so it is what it is. We see the stats show it still goes on today, even when they're taken care of by the government on a big scale. Just patterns repeating.

No doubt.

Same with illegal immigrants, I never blame THEM for moving here. I blame desperate, wannabe-hip contrarians who think it's woke to give strangers from a different society priority over our OWN country and communities.

It's clear the RMWGs and the ItsMillerTimes and these sorts of bottom feeders of the social food chain are looking for some kind of alternate reality, where natural laws can be surmounted (conveniently to their benefit). Perhaps these are the guys we really should be sending to war, so at least the technological advantage they'd have would allow them to kick some ass and have some pride. Here in America they have no choice but to measure themselves up against other Americans. And it requires a tremendous amount of mental gymnastics to convince themselves they stack up favorably.

[Norcaliblunt]

:lol

I mean he definitely WAS a racist, just like Lyndon Johnson, Hillary Clinton, Joe Biden, etc. who all clearly had no genuine respect for black people, but whose political ambitions simply led them to use blacks as political tools. Lincoln was always very clear in his own writings before becoming President he didn't think the races belonged in the same society together. Lincoln, as President, simply had to do the social will of the woke North in order to maintain their favor, just as today Joe Biden is OBVIOUSLY going "wtf is wrong with the world" deep down, every time he smiles to the camera while signing a piece of "transgender rights" legislation.

So in that sense, they're definitely right Lincoln was a racist on a personal level. 99.99999% of people in that era were, including the vast majority of abolitionist christians who comprised the Union north. They didn't oppose slavery because they cared about the welfare of blacks. They cared about how other white christians shouldnt be allowed to do something they considered wrong. The issue was ALWAYS about righteously policing the morals of other whites. NEVER the welfare of blacks. The finger of morality perpetually points outward, not inward.

Sorta like abortion now. No one really gives a shit about the babies.

[KennyPowers]

The great reset.

[BigKobeFan]

The great reset.

Its coming.