Bill Cooper called out the Socialist(Democrat) mob decades ago

[KennyPowers]

Calls them a mob that only votes for themselves and the government giving them free stuff. Refers to them as scared little children afraid of trying to stand on their own two feet. Says they take one look at the world, decide it's too hard and demand the government take care of them. Says they are so stupid they vote themselves into a dictatorship by depending on the government only to end up having those benefits taken away under the dictatorship.

Hahaha....

Dude nailed it. Even says it's ridiculous that socialists call conservatives Nazis because the right wing are actually anarachist, while Nazis literally were socialists. Hilarious.

It's blatantly obvious that the majority of Biden voters are delusional anti-christ schizoids. Don't even know the difference between male and female while actively encouraging mental illness. These people are freaks.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9kw5gutTeQ


He also nailed the Roman Circus in another deleted video. YouTube has deleted most of his videos. They are scared of a dead guy from 30 years ago. Pathetic.

[JohnnySic]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvHDtqVXAAkiMU_?format=jpg&name=900x900

[RRR3]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EvHDtqVXAAkiMU_?format=jpg&name=900x900
First good post you ever made although it becomes a bad post if you actually think the other party doesn’t do it too.

[RRR3]

Did you just say anarchists are right wing? You’re actually retarded.

[RRR3]

Also anyone who thinks the Nazis were socialist is a true moron.

[bladefd]

1) Who?
2) why is it my business?
2) who gives a sh!t?

[FultzNationRISE]

Also anyone who thinks the Nazis were socialist is a true moron.

:facepalm

Literally the entire point of WWII was fighting for socialism. Hitler wanted lebensraum (living space) throughout Europe for the German people to live in his version of a socialist paradise.

Otherwise he would have had no problem with jewish business interests in Germany, he would have kept open borders and welcomed cheap migrant labor. He would have developed self serving international agreements as Fuhrer, at the expense of the German worker.

He didnt do any of those things. He fought to gain land for German workers, created state programs for German people, increased the size of the state bureaucracy, he seized ownership of private business so he could dole out “rations” to the public.

The whole point of the Nazis was NATIONALIST SOCIALISM.


Can you think for yourself homie?? Or when some wiki article with an agenda tells you “nah, see like, the party was called socialist bc he just wanted to make people to think that, but he was just kidding!!!” it makes you feel relieved you arent on Mustache Man Bad’s side, so you gobble it up without any intellectual scrutiny?

Im tellin you bro, this life shit aint for you. You keep doing cringey try hard shit, and you keep whiffing on it over and over.

It might be time.

[Patrick Chewing]

RRR3 is an idiot. :facepalm

[Doomsday Dallas]

Also anyone who thinks the Nazis were socialist is a true moron.

Well the fact remains... left is more government and right less.

A government with very little power has a very little chance to be oppressive.

Essentially leftists have given up on the idea that people can take care of themselves... so yes, Bill Cooper is right in comparing leftists to children.

Good video.

[bladefd]

Rrr3 is correct here.

Hitler's ultimate enemy was communists (i.e. Soviet Union) once he was done killing or working to death jews/gypsies/blacks/etc in labor camps (concentration camps too) and taking control of the west (Britain, USA). He was always opposed to communism, which is extreme socialism.

To think he wanted Nazi Germany to be a socialist nation is completely false, utterly nonsense and misunderstood. Hitler went as far as stating multiple times in mein kampf that he wanted to exterminate Marxism/communism altogether from existence. That would mean he was opposed to the workers controlling production/distribution/etc of goods, which is a very crucial concept to a socialist state. Without that quality, you have no socialism. Hitler wanted the Nazi party to control the means of production/distribution/etc under the direct oversight of the Fuhrer. It bypassed the working class altogether so that destroys the argument that Hitler was a socialist. He was anything but a socialist.

[FultzNationRISE]

Rrr3 is correct here.

Hitler's ultimate enemy was communists (i.e. Soviet Union) once he was done killing or working to death jews/gypsies/blacks/etc in labor camps (concentration camps too) and taking control of the west (Britain, USA). He was always opposed to communism, which is extreme socialism.

To think he wanted Nazi Germany to be a socialist nation is completely false, utterly nonsense and misunderstood. Hitler went as far as stating multiple times in mein kampf that he wanted to exterminate Marxism/communism altogether from existence. That would mean he was opposed to the workers controlling production/distribution/etc of goods, which is a very crucial concept to a socialist state. Without that quality, you have no socialism. Hitler wanted the Nazi party to control the means of production/distribution/etc under the direct oversight of the Fuhrer. It bypassed the working class altogether so that destroys the argument that Hitler was a socialist. He was anything but a socialist.


And he wanted all of Europe to BE the Nazi party. Otherwise he would have let the jews, gypsies, slavs, etc. STAY in Germany, and exploit them for the benefit OF the Nazi party.

Instead he tried to kick them out or exterminate them because he wanted GERMANS to control everything FOR GERMANS.

Aka SOCIALISM.

"Y0 he called it Nationalist Socialism buT he only meAnt the Nationalist part, the Socialist part WAs juSt for lulz bc he waS tryiN to Make u think the opposite, 5-D chess!"


You are an utter parrot for whatever the 'thinkers' on your side tell you, even when it's in direct contradiction to evidence and logic and simple common sense, because you have absolutely no intuitive or analytical ability of your own.

[Im Still Ballin]

Rrr3 is correct here.

Hitler's ultimate enemy was communists (i.e. Soviet Union) once he was done killing or working to death jews/gypsies/blacks/etc in labor camps (concentration camps too) and taking control of the west (Britain, USA). He was always opposed to communism, which is extreme socialism.

To think he wanted Nazi Germany to be a socialist nation is completely false, utterly nonsense and misunderstood. Hitler went as far as stating multiple times in mein kampf that he wanted to exterminate Marxism/communism altogether from existence. That would mean he was opposed to the workers controlling production/distribution/etc of goods, which is a very crucial concept to a socialist state. Without that quality, you have no socialism. Hitler wanted the Nazi party to control the means of production/distribution/etc under the direct oversight of the Fuhrer. It bypassed the working class altogether so that destroys the argument that Hitler was a socialist. He was anything but a socialist.

I agree.

[FultzNationRISE]

I agree.

Oh, well, WHAT A SURPRISE.


https://media.giphy.com/media/l0HU3UpYqHp68mK64/giphy.gif


HEY EVERYBODY, ISB AGREES!!

DID YOU HEAR THE NEWS??

ISB AGREES!!!!!!!

[Overdrive]

The fascists had a pretty hierachic system which is basically against anything anarchism or socialism stands for. Seizing production also doesn't mean ir's automatically mean communism. The Nazi fidn't have a 5 year planned economy like soviet russia. Also most companies stayed privately owned, but their owners became partymembers.

[FultzNationRISE]

The fascists had a pretty hierachic system which is basically against anything anarchism or socialism stands for. Seizing production also doesn't mean ir's automatically mean communism. The Nazi fidn't have a 5 year planned economy like soviet russia. Also most companies stayed privately owned, but their owners became partymembers.

Hierarchies are fundamentally a part of any human social structure. That's reality.

Anarchists and Socialists can 'stand' for whatever they want, that doesn't mean it's viable. Hence they always resort to "Germany wasn't REAL socialism! USSR, China, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Seattle CHAZ wasn't REAL communism!" etc.

The fairy world of perfect socialism that you and R3 and bladefd dream about is not what socialism looks like in the actual human experience. Nazi Germany is what an attempt at socialism looks like in practice. You revolt and call yourself socialist, then when the leaders want better production they privatize it, then when the private sector succeeds the government usurps or co-opts it, ruins it, then privatizes it again. Repeat ad infinitum.

But a social and economic hierarchy ALWAYS remains. There is no 'workers paradise.' That's just a song by Coolio.

So yes, the Nazis were an example of REAL LIFE socialism.

It just wasn't "rRr3 SoCIaLisMs" because that does not exist.

[Overdrive]

Hierarchies are fundamentally a part of any human social structure. That's reality.

Anarchists and Socialists can 'stand' for whatever they want, that doesn't mean it's viable. Hence they always resort to "Germany wasn't REAL socialism! USSR, China, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Seattle CHAZ wasn't REAL communism!" etc.

The fairy world of perfect socialism that you and R3 and bladefd dream about is not what socialism looks like in the actual human experience. Nazi Germany is what an attempt at socialism looks like in practice. You revolt and call yourself socialist, then when the leaders want better production they privatize it, then when the private sector succeeds the government usurps or co-opts it, ruins it, then privatizes it again. Repeat ad infinitum.

But a social and economic hierarchy ALWAYS remains. There is no 'workers paradise.' That's just a song by Coolio.

So yes, the Nazis were an example of REAL LIFE socialism.

It just wasn't "rRr3 SoCIaLisMs" because that does not exist.

Honestly, I'll give up talking to you. Read some history books. Maybe that helps.

[FultzNationRISE]

Honestly, I'll give up talking to you. Read some history books. Maybe that helps.

You've yet to say anything useful. You're a sissy.

[SATAN]

You're a ****ing loser.

[LAL]

Why do i have a bronsexual as my favourite poster? Crazy world.

[coin24]

1) Who?
2) why is it my business?
2) who gives a sh!t?


4) if it was anything orange man related you would be all over it

[Cleverness]

:facepalm

Literally the entire point of WWII was fighting for socialism. Hitler wanted lebensraum (living space) throughout Europe for the German people to live in his version of a socialist paradise.

Otherwise he would have had no problem with jewish business interests in Germany, he would have kept open borders and welcomed cheap migrant labor. He would have developed self serving international agreements as Fuhrer, at the expense of the German worker.

He didnt do any of those things. He fought to gain land for German workers, created state programs for German people, increased the size of the state bureaucracy, he seized ownership of private business so he could dole out “rations” to the public.

The whole point of the Nazis was NATIONALIST SOCIALISM.


Can you think for yourself homie?? Or when some wiki article with an agenda tells you “nah, see like, the party was called socialist bc he just wanted to make people to think that, but he was just kidding!!!” it makes you feel relieved you arent on Mustache Man Bad’s side, so you gobble it up without any intellectual scrutiny?

Im tellin you bro, this life shit aint for you. You keep doing cringey try hard shit, and you keep whiffing on it over and over.

It might be time.

:applause:

[RRR3]

I think starface is actually retarded. Poor fella.

[Doomsday Dallas]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9kw5gutTeQ


https://i.imgur.com/SXtQDQc.jpg

[Doomsday Dallas]

^ That is the correct political spectrum.




But you will often see this:

https://live.staticflickr.com/7202/6883046573_d6b573bf92_c.jpg


or this:

https://i.redd.it/y2ktgp0dxlm21.jpg


or this:

https://media-temporary.preziusercontent.com/frames-public/5/9/e/e/6/86118e84a66bf6f72a397dff5e2380.jpeg

[bladefd]

That guy in the video is completely clueless and ignorant. He says anarchy is far on the right, which is completely idiotic. He claims republic is not a democracy, which is completely idiotic thing to say. He says democracy is far left. Complete moron. But then again KennyPowers/akrazotile/mrsbutthurt/other alts cited it so you throw anything he posts out the window.

[Doomsday Dallas]

That guy in the video is completely clueless and ignorant. He says anarchy is far on the right, which is completely idiotic.


Are you kidding me? That's exactly what it is.

https://pics.me.me/the-real-political-spectrum-communism-anarchy-tyranny-liberty-total-socialist-44493353.png

[Doomsday Dallas]

He claims republic is not a democracy, which is completely idiotic thing to say. He says democracy is far left. Complete moron.


This is true as well... Majority Rule vs Individual Freedom

The Federal Government (majority) should have very little power over (individual) States Rights.

Again:

https://i.imgur.com/SXtQDQc.jpg


In a republic, an official set of fundamental laws, like the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, prohibits the government from limiting or taking away certain “inalienable” rights of the people, even if that government was freely chosen by a majority of the people. In a pure democracy, the voting majority has almost limitless power over the minority.

The United States, like most modern nations, is neither a pure republic nor a pure democracy. Instead, it is a hybrid democratic republic.

https://www.thoughtco.com/republic-vs-democracy-4169936

a pure republic would be far right, pure democracy far left... he's right again.

[bladefd]

This scale is much more accurate : https://www.politicalcompass.org/analysis2

It splits economics and politics, which is the best way to do it. It's idiotic to combine economics politics on a single dimension left-right scale.

Anarchy is very libertarian, which would not be anything close to fascism. An anarchist would have quite much in common economically with a marxist but have very little in common politically with a fascist. You have to consider the dimensions separately rather than mix them all into a single dimension scale.

[bladefd]

Nazism is very fascist but has absolutely no business being listed alongside communism economically. Nazism still had private businesses along with private production, distribution of goods and has private ownership too (pro-capitalism). Does that sound like a system to you that you put right next to communism?

Anarcho-communism would be the exact opposite of nazism. Anarcho-communism is very libertarian (aka not fascist) but also no private production/distribution/ownership (aka anti-capitalism). This has no government/central leadership.

Marxist communism is fascist politically but no private production/distribution/ownership (aka anti-capitalism) economically. This has a powerful government/central leadership.

National anarchy is libertarian politically (aka anti-fascist) but pro-capitalism. This has never been practiced before and I don't think this would last for long. It might work initially through shared ideals (i.e. race) but fall apart quickly. This has no government/central leadership.

It would be idiotic to put all 4 corners on the same side.

[Doomsday Dallas]

Nazism is very fascist but has absolutely no business being listed alongside communism economically. Nazism still had private businesses along with private production, distribution of goods and has private ownership too (pro-capitalism). Does that sound like a system to you that you put right next to communism?


Doesn't matter... How dominate is Big Bro in that system is the only question you should be asking.

https://quotes.thefamouspeople.com/images/quotes/ron-paul-46746.jpg

[Mr. Woke]

The fascist mob is the real problem.

Fascism is a disease.