Whose ring/s was worth more: 2000, 2001, 2002 Kobe or 2012 Wade?

[Im Still Ballin]

Title.

[HunterSThompson]

this is easy

#1 Kobe 2001
#2 Kobe 2002
#3 Kobe 2000
#4 Wade 2012

i would have maybe put wade above kobes 1st title if it had come in a real season. sadly it was like a bubble ring with 66 games i think. plus the whole collusion thing

[Axe]

this is easy

#1 Kobe 2001
#2 Kobe 2002
#3 Kobe 2000
#4 Wade 2012

i would have put wade above kobes 1st title if it had come in a real season. sadly it was like a bubble ring with 66 games i think
No shaq, no early 00s chip.

[HunterSThompson]

No shaq, no early 00s chip.

not necessarily true. no 2000 ring? ok. but 2001 kobe and 2002 kobe could just as easily won a title with a solid boarderline sidekick like he did with pau

shaq without kobe comes nowhere near beating the spurs... kobe is always money vs them... and its not like the lakers NEEDED shaq to go ape sh*t in the finals vs bums like rick smits/todd macculloch

[kawhileonard2]

Wade

[SouBeachTalents]

Wade
You actually think Wade's ring is worth more than '01 Kobe's? That's retarded :lol

[1987_Lakers]

1. 2001 Kobe
2. 2002 Kobe
3. 2012 Wade
4. 2000 Kobe

[ScottieQuitting]

1) 2001 / 2002 Kobe - Co Alpha
2) 2012 Wade - Co Alpha
3) 2000 Kobe - Sidekick

[000]

You actually think Wade's ring is worth more than '01 Kobe's? That's retarded :lol

Kobes shaq rings arent worth anything. He was just carried. Actually Id say they count as negative rings. Nay, double negative rings.

[Gudo]

1. 2001 Kobe
2. 2002 Kobe
3. 2012 Wade
4. 2000 Kobe

This is fair