Biden is now Complicit in Gov. Cuomo’s Nursing Home Coverup

[diamenz]

no surprise here really. team blue protecting their own like they always do (and to be fair, team red does the same thing... just the establishment in general).

if you're not familiar with the story, last year around the beginning of the pandemic, cuomo signed an order that stated that new york nursing homes HAVE to take back elderly folk that had been tested covid positive. covid then as u can imagine tore through those homes and killed countless old folk (literally thousands). so now biden and his doj is denying an investigation into those deaths. cuomo is however still under investigation by the fbi and the brooklyn us attorney's office. let's hope something comes of those investigations. this motherf***er made a decision that led to the deaths of thousands of elderly people and then turned around and wrote his memoirs about how he saved new york from covid19... and made millions of of it! lol. political corruption at its finest, huh?


Today, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik released the following statement regarding President Biden's Department of Justice's decision to reject the New York delegation's request that they investigate Governor Cuomo for his COVID-19 nursing home coverup.

“This decision from President Biden’s Department of Justice makes President Biden complicit in the criminal corruption scandal and coverup of deaths of thousands of vulnerable seniors,” said Congresswoman Stefanik. “New Yorkers deserve answers and accountability. I was the first member of Congress to call for an investigation into Governor Cuomo’s corrupt criminal coverup and I will continue to fight for the families who lost loved ones because of the cruelty and corruption of our Governor.

“I call on the DOJ Inspector General to look into this matter. What did Governor Cuomo promise President Joe Biden in his White House meeting? And how can the DOJ not investigate such a blatantly criminal coverup?

“Tens of thousands of heartbroken New Yorkers are counting on us to deliver justice for their loved ones. We will never give up.”

https://stefanik.house.gov/2021/7/stefanik-biden-is-now-complicit-in-gov-cuomo-s-nursing-home-coverup

https://www.cnn.com/2021/07/24/politics/nursing-home-deaths-covid-justice-department-no-investigation/index.html

[diamenz]

not to mention the sexual assault allegations that cuomo just let ride out until the media got bored with it.

[FultzNationRISE]

I’m just gonna throw a question out there:

What if it was a scientific fact the world was critically overpopulated? Not saying lets have the debate, I’m asking a hypothetical question where we accept that premise. What if it was a FACT that current population levels threatened immediate, irreversible damage to the natural environment? Damage that would last literally thousands of years (or more).

IF that was true... what would be a justifiable course of action? Keep in mind youre not gonna find any GOOD solutions here. But you have to pick one. It’s in your hands. You have to decide.

Youd probably pick most logical option, right? What do you suppose that would that be?

Do you think anything you choose would be publicly acceptable?

And if not... how might you circumvent culpability for making such a tough and unpopular decision?

[jstern]

I’m just gonna throw a question out there:

What if it was a scientific fact the world was critically overpopulated? Not saying lets have the debate, I’m asking a hypothetical question where we accept that premise. What if it was a FACT that current population levels threatened immediate, irreversible damage to the natural environment? Damage that would last literally thousands of years (or more).

IF that was true... what would be a justifiable course of action? Keep in mind youre not gonna find any GOOD solutions here. But you have to pick one. It’s in your hands. You have to decide.

Youd probably pick most logical option, right? What do you suppose that would that be?

Do you think anything you choose would be publicly acceptable?

And if not... how might you circumvent culpability for making such a tough and unpopular decision?

In such a case, things like hospitals wouldn't be able to meet the demands of the sick. Good hearted old people, as well as good hearted young and sick good people, would feel guilty and feel like a burden. At the same time, like you saw during the Tzunami back in 2002, where that was an absolute lack of clean water, and this high ranking police guy with a smirk had his people use the available clean water to wash his car, house, etc. The latter type of person is an incredible burden on society. There's no clean water, but he just didn't care.

So in such scenarios, we have to euthanize all criminals, and work our way down. Millions of them. By the time we reach old people, those who are being kept alive due to technology, you determine if they want the hospital to continue keeping them alive, or let them die. If they're the type that don't care, then you let those people die first. But I'm sure that if we get rid of all criminal types first, we would never be in such a position of letting the old die.

But yeah, there are millions of people who are a negative to society, who only use up natural resources, making society as a whole expend more energy. Before we get to old people, we can get through them.

Look at it through this logic. The world could sustain say 40 billion people in a world without bad people, and 6 billion with criminal types.

There's this group of ants who take all of their waste and use it to cover the entrance to the nest of another type of ants. That extra energy that this other group uses up to clear the entrance keeps their numbers down. They don't thrive as much, their population stays low, and the other group doesn't have to use up energy fighting them.

[SATAN]

You are a sociopath.

[ZenMaster]

No investigation, no media and it's like it never happened. Cumo said it was their own fault, and that is that.


"Any nursing home could just say, ‘I can’t handle a COVID person in my facility,’” he said, although the March 25 order didn’t specify how homes could refuse, saying that ”no resident shall be denied re-admission or admission to the (nursing home) solely based” on confirmed or suspected COVID-19.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/new-yorks-nursing-homes-ship-empty/

[MaxPlayer]

I’m just gonna throw a question out there:

What if it was a scientific fact the world was critically overpopulated? Not saying lets have the debate, I’m asking a hypothetical question where we accept that premise. What if it was a FACT that current population levels threatened immediate, irreversible damage to the natural environment? Damage that would last literally thousands of years (or more).

IF that was true... what would be a justifiable course of action? Keep in mind youre not gonna find any GOOD solutions here. But you have to pick one. It’s in your hands. You have to decide.

Youd probably pick most logical option, right? What do you suppose that would that be?

Do you think anything you choose would be publicly acceptable?

And if not... how might you circumvent culpability for making such a tough and unpopular decision?

Maybe Chauvin should have used this defense