Im Still Ballin
08-29-2021, 10:34 AM
They went 56-26 in 1996-1997, and 61-21 in 1997-1998.
Magic played 32 games in 1995-1996; the team went 22-10 with him: that's a 56.4 win-pace. Without him, they went 31-19: good for a 50.8 win-pace. Overall, they went 53-29.
Individually, here's how he played:
- He -- in 29.9 minutes per game -- put up an average of 14.6 points, 5.9 rebounds, and 6.9 assists.
- He led the team with a 61.2 TS%. Also led the team with a 5.2 BPM.
- In the playoffs, he was 2nd (on the team) in TS% and BPM.
Conclusion: he was still Magic: a hugely impactful all-time great.
Now, let's say they, hypothetically speaking, get Shaq and Kobe, and Magic stays on.
How much better are they? Could they beat Utah and/or Chicago in 97 or 98? What about San Antonio in 99?
I think it's likely they face the Bulls in 97 or 98. Magic was still awesome; could you imagine how well he'd play with Shaq? Like he did with Kareem -- awesome.
I'm not sure if they beat Chicago though.
Magic played 32 games in 1995-1996; the team went 22-10 with him: that's a 56.4 win-pace. Without him, they went 31-19: good for a 50.8 win-pace. Overall, they went 53-29.
Individually, here's how he played:
- He -- in 29.9 minutes per game -- put up an average of 14.6 points, 5.9 rebounds, and 6.9 assists.
- He led the team with a 61.2 TS%. Also led the team with a 5.2 BPM.
- In the playoffs, he was 2nd (on the team) in TS% and BPM.
Conclusion: he was still Magic: a hugely impactful all-time great.
Now, let's say they, hypothetically speaking, get Shaq and Kobe, and Magic stays on.
How much better are they? Could they beat Utah and/or Chicago in 97 or 98? What about San Antonio in 99?
I think it's likely they face the Bulls in 97 or 98. Magic was still awesome; could you imagine how well he'd play with Shaq? Like he did with Kareem -- awesome.
I'm not sure if they beat Chicago though.