Possible reasons for the severe vaccine side effects that many people are having

[jstern]

https://youtu.be/nBaIRm4610o


Unfortunately the following videos are banned from YouTube, so I can't embed them, but they are of pro vaccine people who developed these issues right after getting vaccinated.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/kOXlX3Vn9qT7

https://www.bitchute.com/video/AdBfVczzaAGp

And this one is of a baby whose mother was coerced into getting a vaccinated, else they would not perform a c section.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/ZrYoJmKVrPgO Mother ****ers.

It's just my theory, but it's quite possible that these people were injected directly into a blood vessel, with the mRNA spike protein ending up in the brain, heart, etc.

[Chick Stern]

Many people are not having severe side effects.

[Jasper]

Many people are not having severe side effects.

JStern has can't you see the mental fog ??
(This is the same guy when millions have successfully done something , he will talk about the 100 people that failed at something )

[jstern]

Many people are not having severe side effects.

Is this Bladef?

How do you know if they literally censor any negative talk about side effects, media wide?

How would you know if they dismissed Maddie De Garay as simply having anxiety, with no mention of her reaction to the vaccine in Pfizer's final paper about the safety. (As well as other cases.) Keep in mind that her mother was probably a bigger vaccine person than you.

If the mRNA spike protein is toxic to other parts of the body, particularly the brain, the heart and the ovaries, then is it not reasonable to assume that if gets into the blood stream because you have tens of thousands of basically amateurs injecting the vaccines, then it's going to cause these problems.

But the bigger question why do you care more about defending the vaccines to the death, rather than considering every possibility?

If you were in power, would you automatically censor threads like these? Instantly, because the vaccines warm your heart, and nothing negative can be said about them. Or let people talk and try to get closer to the bottom of what's going on.

And this for a virus that kills something like 1 out ever 120,000 children who get Covid.

[tpols]

Is this Bladef?

How do you know if they literally censor any negative talk about side effects, media wide?

How would you know if they dismissed Maddie De Garay as simply having anxiety, with no mention of her reaction to the vaccine in Pfizer's final paper about the safety. (As well as other cases.) Keep in mind that her mother was probably a bigger vaccine person than you.

If the mRNA spike protein is toxic to other parts of the body, particularly the brain, the heart and the ovaries, then is it not reasonable to assume that if gets into the blood stream because you have tens of thousands of basically amateurs injecting the vaccines, then it's going to cause these problems.

But the bigger question why do you care more about defending the vaccines to the death, rather than considering every possibility?

If you were in power, would you automatically censor threads like these? Instantly, because the vaccines warm your heart, and nothing negative can be said about them. Or let people talk and try to get closer to the bottom of what's going on.

And this for a virus that kills something like 1 out ever 120,000 children who get Covid.

Youtube is banning any videos or comments that report side effects.

Its pure censorship. (https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2021/09/29/technology/youtube-anti-vaxx-ban.amp.html)

I remember several prominent posters here cheerleading Twitter banning trump saying private censorship is perfectly fine and they said to create your own site if you don't like it. Like the average citizen can compete with billion dollar conglomerates like youtube, google, and twitter. :oldlol:

[Chick Stern]

Is this Bladef?

How do you know if they literally censor any negative talk about side effects, media wide?

How would you know if they dismissed Maddie De Garay as simply having anxiety, with no mention of her reaction to the vaccine in Pfizer's final paper about the safety. (As well as other cases.) Keep in mind that her mother was probably a bigger vaccine person than you.

If the mRNA spike protein is toxic to other parts of the body, particularly the brain, the heart and the ovaries, then is it not reasonable to assume that if gets into the blood stream because you have tens of thousands of basically amateurs injecting the vaccines, then it's going to cause these problems.

But the bigger question why do you care more about defending the vaccines to the death, rather than considering every possibility?

If you were in power, would you automatically censor threads like these? Instantly, because the vaccines warm your heart, and nothing negative can be said about them. Or let people talk and try to get closer to the bottom of what's going on.

And this for a virus that kills something like 1 out ever 120,000 children who get Covid.

They do not literally censor it. I have read about it. You have read about it.
They have banned individuals spouting myth, with out evidence.
The reality is any vaccine has occasional bad results, and these vaccines are no different.
The reality is at this stage, the bad results from these results are LESS in volume, than the results from older vaccines.
The reality is you focus on anecdotes, because you don’t have any volume of evidence, and you want to cling to your conspiracy belief that the vaccines are a new world order nefarious plot.
The reality is that Cons have not provided ANY alternative, aside from “la-la-la I’m not listening, my fingers are in my ears”

[Kobe_Bryant]

Many people are not having severe side effects.

i don't know anyone that died from covid. i do however know multiple people that have had heart problems and blood clots since getting the vaccine

[ArbitraryWater]

Many people are not having severe side effects.

And many have.

What purpose does your comment serve?

Lol

[Chick Stern]

And many have.

What purpose does your comment serve?

Lol
Unlike jstern, my post is factual. There are not many people with severe side effects.
There are a few. And there is no data to suggest otherwise.

[highwhey]

Unlike jstern, my post is factual. There are not many people with severe side effects.
There are a few. And there is no data to suggest otherwise.

are you stupid? all data is false unless it fits our narrative, we believe YouTube videos and Facebook posts over empirical evidence unless of course, it fits the narrative.

[PistonsFan#21]

What would you define by not many people (are we talking hundreds, thousands, tens of thousands? ) and what site did you use to check for these few vaccines adverse events?

[jstern]

It's getting talked about, just not on TV.


https://youtu.be/nw08zWJQ2m8


They do not literally censor it. I have read about it. You have read about it.
They have banned individuals spouting myth, with out evidence.
The reality is any vaccine has occasional bad results, and these vaccines are no different.
The reality is at this stage, the bad results from these results are LESS in volume, than the results from older vaccines.
The reality is you focus on anecdotes, because you don’t have any volume of evidence, and you want to cling to your conspiracy belief that the vaccines are a new world order nefarious plot.
The reality is that Cons have not provided ANY alternative, aside from “la-la-la I’m not listening, my fingers are in my ears”

I really cannot spend mental energy on emotional people who can't follow the simple logic of an opposing point of view. You seem to have very little understanding of why people with an opposing point of view on the vaccines think the way they do. For example Facebook removing any negative mentions of the vaccine. Including a support group started by other vaccine cucks who were left with severe side effects. A group specifically created to help each other figure out what they could do.


What have you read and where? Perhaps it's delusion. You seem to be convinced that the nightly news, CNN actually talk about any side effects. I posted three videos in the OP that would literally get deleted on YouTube because it would paint the Covid vaccine in a negative light. Yet you think you've read about it, and thus the whole world has read about it?


This is a thread that should make vaccine cucks happy, because of the possibility that the reason why the vaccine can spread throughout the body is because of an easily correctable mistake that can happen say 1 out of 1000 times. And not because of the vaccine itself. But if you're an emotional person who cares more about putting this vaccine in a good light, and couldn't even care any less about a newborn having neurological problems. Cannot logically comprehend the opposing point of views. Then it's not worth me spending energy on one person who's like a criminal.

Can you comprehend why parents might not want to vaccinate their children for something that kills something like 1 out of 120,000 children who get Covid. Risking any potential unknown side effects? No, because the warm feeling in your heart that you have for the vaccine blocks any concept of risk versus reward.

I mean, if I show you a video of Madie De Garay, and how she was simply deleted from the trial results, then it's not even going to register in your head. Because your love of the vaccine, and probably not being that bright of a person will simply make it impossible for you to comprehend. You're left all smug feeling that you're smart, because you simply dismiss anything that goes against what you love, and comprehend things only in a way that justifies what you do love.

I mean this thread is supposed to be something positive. A possible solution to the possible side effects that has many people hesitant of getting the shot. The sight of that newborn shaking uncontrollably should, if you're not a criminal, get you angry and do anything you can to avoid that from happening to anyone else. But your feelings are closer to get that ****ing baby off. Censor it, we can't have people thinking any bad about my precious vaccines. That makes you a criminal.

[highwhey]

It's getting talked about, just not on TV.


https://youtu.be/nw08zWJQ2m8



I really cannot spend mental energy on emotional people who can't follow the simple logic of an opposing point of view. You seem to have very little understanding of why people with an opposing point of view on the vaccines think the way they do. For example Facebook removing any negative mentions of the vaccine. Including a support group started by other vaccine cucks who were left with severe side effects. A group specifically created to help each other figure out what they could do.


What have you read and where? Perhaps it's delusion. You seem to be convinced that the nightly news, CNN actually talk about any side effects. I posted three videos in the OP that would literally get deleted on YouTube because it would paint the Covid vaccine in a negative light. Yet you think you've read about it, and thus the whole world has read about it?


This is a thread that should make vaccine cucks happy, because of the possibility that the reason why the vaccine can spread throughout the body is because of an easily correctable mistake that can happen say 1 out of 1000 times. And not because of the vaccine itself. But if you're an emotional person who cares more about putting this vaccine in a good light, and couldn't even care any less about a newborn having neurological problems. Cannot logically comprehend the opposing point of views. Then it's not worth me spending energy on one person who's like a criminal.

Can you comprehend why parents might not want to vaccinate their children for something that kills something like 1 out of 120,000 children who get Covid. Risking any potential unknown side effects? No, because the warm feeling in your heart that you have for the vaccine blocks any concept of risk versus reward.

I mean, if I show you a video of Madie De Garay, and how she was simply deleted from the trial results, then it's not even going to register in your head. Because your love of the vaccine, and probably not being that bright of a person will simply make it impossible for you to comprehend. You're left all smug feeling that you're smart, because you simply dismiss anything that goes against what you love, and comprehend things only in a way that justifies what you do love.

I mean this thread is supposed to be something positive. A possible solution to the possible side effects that has many people hesitant of getting the shot. The sight of that newborn shaking uncontrollably should, if you're not a criminal, get you angry and do anything you can to avoid that from happening to anyone else. But your feelings are closer to get that ****ing baby off. Censor it, we can't have people thinking any bad about my precious vaccines. That makes you a criminal.

Interesting, can you further elaborate on this topic?

[Chick Stern]

It's getting talked about, just not on TV.


https://youtu.be/nw08zWJQ2m8



I really cannot spend mental energy on emotional people who can't follow the simple logic of an opposing point of view. You seem to have very little understanding of why people with an opposing point of view on the vaccines think the way they do. For example Facebook removing any negative mentions of the vaccine. Including a support group started by other vaccine cucks who were left with severe side effects. A group specifically created to help each other figure out what they could do.


What have you read and where? Perhaps it's delusion. You seem to be convinced that the nightly news, CNN actually talk about any side effects. I posted three videos in the OP that would literally get deleted on YouTube because it would paint the Covid vaccine in a negative light. Yet you think you've read about it, and thus the whole world has read about it?


This is a thread that should make vaccine cucks happy, because of the possibility that the reason why the vaccine can spread throughout the body is because of an easily correctable mistake that can happen say 1 out of 1000 times. And not because of the vaccine itself. But if you're an emotional person who cares more about putting this vaccine in a good light, and couldn't even care any less about a newborn having neurological problems. Cannot logically comprehend the opposing point of views. Then it's not worth me spending energy on one person who's like a criminal.

Can you comprehend why parents might not want to vaccinate their children for something that kills something like 1 out of 120,000 children who get Covid. Risking any potential unknown side effects? No, because the warm feeling in your heart that you have for the vaccine blocks any concept of risk versus reward.

I mean, if I show you a video of Madie De Garay, and how she was simply deleted from the trial results, then it's not even going to register in your head. Because your love of the vaccine, and probably not being that bright of a person will simply make it impossible for you to comprehend. You're left all smug feeling that you're smart, because you simply dismiss anything that goes against what you love, and comprehend things only in a way that justifies what you do love.

I mean this thread is supposed to be something positive. A possible solution to the possible side effects that has many people hesitant of getting the shot. The sight of that newborn shaking uncontrollably should, if you're not a criminal, get you angry and do anything you can to avoid that from happening to anyone else. But your feelings are closer to get that ****ing baby off. Censor it, we can't have people thinking any bad about my precious vaccines. That makes you a criminal.
So, to be clear, you don’t have any volume of evidence


and pretty sure infants have not gotten approval for any of the vaccines, but you go on

[PistonsFan#21]

So, to be clear, you don’t have any volume of evidence


and pretty sure infants have not gotten approval for any of the vaccines, but you go on

Where is your evidence for not many people having severe side effects? You claimed that your post is factual so can you give us the source you used to check on the reported adverse events from vaccination?

[Axe]

Is the unwanted effect of watching too much fox news? :(

[Axe]

Interesting, can you further elaborate on this topic?
Lol

[n00bie]

"Off the Court Lounge" needs to be renamed to "Conspiracies Lounge"

[Chick Stern]

Where is your evidence for not many people having severe side effects? You claimed that your post is factual so can you give us the source you used to check on the reported adverse events from vaccination?
Do you have any empirical evidence to back you delusion?
Of course you dont

[highwhey]

so, did OP ever post possible reasons for the alleged severe vaccine side effects that allegedly many people are allegedly having?

[jstern]

So, to be clear, you don’t have any volume of evidence


and pretty sure infants have not gotten approval for any of the vaccines, but you go on

I just saw this post now. But did you not read my OP that said that the mother was forced to get the experimental Covid shot, else she would not be allowed into the hospital for the c-section?

When I read the comment I assumed it was Bladedf, because his personality (http://www.insidehoops.com/forum/showthread.php?483529-Kyle-Rittenhouse&p=14479020&viewfull=1#post14479020) is such that he doesn't look into things, and takes his split second assumptions as undeniable, absolute fact. Kind of a little bit like Off the Court.