Log in

View Full Version : Are un V more a danger than 2 V?



oldtimer28
11-04-2021, 04:45 AM
Simple question but complicated answer.


Any views supported by scientific studies.

Eg this is biased in my view and a media interpretation but it says yes, non v get sick more often and are contagious for longer.

https://www.factcheck.org/2021/09/covid-19-the-unvaccinated-pose-a-risk-to-the-vaccinated/

Meanwhile, this credible scientific journal paper says both non v and 2 v carry the same viral load when infected (but non v more likely to be infected).

No idea how it is rationalised that non v are more likely to be infected without relying on the base rate fallacy in old data and behaviours?

29 Oct
Vaccination reduces the risk of delta variant infection and accelerates viral clearance. Nonetheless, fully vaccinated individuals with breakthrough infections have peak viral load similar to unvaccinated cases and can efficiently transmit infection in household settings, including to fully vaccinated contacts. Host–virus interactions early in infection may shape the entire viral trajectory.

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(21)00648-4/fulltext?fbclid=IwAR29ANhDB2oRchNin9HUINo6McDDAkPF v4BKqNiVWBMbKZD1Q9IWvS8PiXI#seccestitle160

oldtimer28
11-04-2021, 05:14 PM
no one able to comment, with legitimate sources (not videos) on the essential question that is a major consideration for V mandates politically?

Off the Court
11-04-2021, 05:20 PM
It's about god d#@m motherf$@#king time someone made a thread about the vaccine!