17 of the top 20 states for Job Recovery since the pandemic began are Republican led

[Patrick Chewing]

https://i.ibb.co/x6xjn3s/FG0o-NAl-X0-Aozlor.png


Discuss.

[Off the Court]

I wonder if Matthew Perry has recovered his job loss from being fat. :(

[Chick Stern]

data source?

[bladefd]

Does that mean that Republican states also suffered more?? Bigger recovery means they probably had a bigger hole to dig out of that they drove themselves into. Show me the source, and I will take a look for you to verify whether I'm right or wrong.

I would rather be a state that suffered less in the first place so I don't have to wait for a major recovery down the road.

[Long Duck Dong]

Not surprising. Following the housing crisis recession, Texas by itself had half the job growth for the entire nation for 6 quarters straight

[BigKobeFan]

Does that mean that Republican states also suffered more?? Bigger recovery means they probably had a bigger hole to dig out of that they drove themselves into. Show me the source, and I will take a look for you to verify whether I'm right or wrong.

I would rather be a state that suffered less in the first place so I don't have to wait for a major recovery down the road.

Because they are not retarded and opened up the economy sooner than later. Unlike california, who's trying to lock it down for the 15th time from omnicron

[Lakers Legend#32]

First Chewing blows off Biden's job recovery.
Now he gives credit to all the Republicans who opposed it.

[Patrick Chewing]

Because they are not retarded and opened up the economy sooner than later. Unlike california, who's trying to lock it down for the 15th time from omnicron

Bingo.

Here's the link for the truth-deniers: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/laus.nr0.htm

[Off the Court]

This thread has made me realize that if Matthew Perry wants to regain his old Chandler from Friends body frame it's probably going to require him to move to a red state.

[bladefd]

Because they are not retarded and opened up the economy sooner than later. Unlike california, who's trying to lock it down for the 15th time from omnicron

I still need to see the rest of that list to compare the number of jobs lost in the first place, and how the numbers compare. As I said, recovery numbers by themselves don't tell the full story. If a state(s) had fewer job losses then ofc the recovery will be smaller. It's not rocket science and should be pretty easy to determine if you have the data.

[AKA_AAP]

bladefd probably lives in a Republican State. He wouldn't make it out here in California. :lol

[Patrick Chewing]

I still need to see the rest of that list to compare the number of jobs lost in the first place, and how the numbers compare. As I said, recovery numbers by themselves don't tell the full story. If a state(s) had fewer job losses then ofc the recovery will be smaller. It's not rocket science and should be pretty easy to determine if you have the data.

I gave you the source and the numbers don't lie. I know this is hard for you because you want Democrat run states to look like shining beacons of progress, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

[AKA_AAP]

I gave you the source and the numbers don't lie. I know this is hard for you because you want Democrat run states to look like shining beacons of progress, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

He's quite the idiot to not even know that lockdown states, all ran by communist democrats, would obviously have the highest number of lost jobs.

[bladefd]

I gave you the source and the numbers don't lie. I know this is hard for you because you want Democrat run states to look like shining beacons of progress, but that couldn't be further from the truth.

The data in your link differs vastly from the data from OP image.. I believe the OP image might not be accurate.

If you want a map of current unemployment: https://www.bls.gov/charts/state-employment-and-unemployment/state-unemployment-rates-map.htm#
High remaining unemployment in California, NY, NJ, CT.. But how about all of the other liberal states with lower unemployment than Texas, Florida? Do we exclude those because they don't fit the narrative??

I don't quite see much of a correlation between (governor) party and jobs recovery, but perhaps it considers some other timespan in OP image. That's why I asked for rest of the source for OP image. Then I would be able to compare apples to apples.

Here's a change map, but again I don't see a correlation based on party.. Unemployment change looks fairly significant in Florida/Texas but equally as significant in California/NJ/Washington too so do we exclude that since it doesn't fit the narrative??: https://www.bls.gov/charts/state-employment-and-unemployment/change-in-nonfarm-employment-by-state-map.htm




Actual data from the link if someone wants to compare OP image to the actual data. Here's an issue : OP image doesn't show what timespan it considers while the official data considers November 2020 to November 2021 period. Narrative in OP image simply doesn't fit the data in the link so the sources/data are different and that raises questions for the validity of the OP image.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | | Over-the-year change(p)
State | November | November |---------------------------
| 2020 | 2021(p) | Level | Percent
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama ......................| 2,009,000 | 2,054,100 | 45,100 | 2.2
Alaska .......................| 304,500 | 309,900 | 5,400 | 1.8
Arizona ......................| 2,862,200 | 2,998,000 | 135,800 | 4.7
Arkansas .....................| 1,252,900 | 1,280,700 | 27,800 | 2.2
California ...................| 16,013,300 | 16,835,100 | 821,800 | 5.1
Colorado .....................| 2,647,900 | 2,765,400 | 117,500 | 4.4
Connecticut ..................| 1,575,400 | 1,624,200 | 48,800 | 3.1
Delaware .....................| 442,100 | 452,600 | 10,500 | 2.4
District of Columbia .........| 733,600 | 757,800 | 24,200 | 3.3
Florida ......................| 8,474,600 | 8,960,200 | 485,600 | 5.7
| | | |
Georgia ......................| 4,426,100 | 4,618,800 | 192,700 | 4.4
Hawaii .......................| 532,700 | 577,500 | 44,800 | 8.4
Idaho ........................| 771,400 | 787,900 | 16,500 | 2.1
Illinois .....................| 5,646,500 | 5,876,700 | 230,200 | 4.1
Indiana ......................| 3,017,200 | 3,098,200 | 81,000 | 2.7
Iowa .........................| 1,509,000 | 1,539,900 | 30,900 | 2.0
Kansas .......................| 1,356,100 | 1,391,500 | 35,400 | 2.6
Kentucky .....................| 1,856,500 | 1,891,000 | 34,500 | 1.9
Louisiana ....................| 1,830,700 | 1,865,300 | 34,600 | 1.9
Maine ........................| 602,100 | 613,100 | 11,000 | 1.8
| | | |
Maryland .....................| 2,602,700 | 2,694,900 | 92,200 | 3.5
Massachusetts ................| 3,365,000 | 3,561,000 | 196,000 | 5.8
Michigan .....................| 4,095,700 | 4,240,500 | 144,800 | 3.5
Minnesota ....................| 2,772,400 | 2,884,400 | 112,000 | 4.0
Mississippi ..................| 1,122,200 | 1,145,800 | 23,600 | 2.1
Missouri .....................| 2,790,000 | 2,863,300 | 73,300 | 2.6
Montana ......................| 475,600 | 485,400 | 9,800 | 2.1
Nebraska .....................| 993,300 | 1,023,400 | 30,100 | 3.0
Nevada .......................| 1,273,400 | 1,367,500 | 94,100 | 7.4
New Hampshire ................| 644,800 | 666,200 | 21,400 | 3.3
| | | |
New Jersey ...................| 3,871,000 | 4,060,900 | 189,900 | 4.9
New Mexico ...................| 785,600 | 821,100 | 35,500 | 4.5
New York .....................| 8,753,600 | 9,049,200 | 295,600 | 3.4
North Carolina ...............| 4,414,300 | 4,554,800 | 140,500 | 3.2
North Dakota .................| 407,300 | 421,200 | 13,900 | 3.4
Ohio .........................| 5,292,300 | 5,391,100 | 98,800 | 1.9
Oklahoma .....................| 1,613,300 | 1,650,300 | 37,000 | 2.3
Oregon .......................| 1,825,700 | 1,897,900 | 72,200 | 4.0
Pennsylvania .................| 5,637,800 | 5,781,800 | 144,000 | 2.6
Rhode Island .................| 463,600 | 482,100 | 18,500 | 4.0
| | | |
South Carolina ...............| 2,104,400 | 2,158,500 | 54,100 | 2.6
South Dakota .................| 429,600 | 437,400 | 7,800 | 1.8
Tennessee ....................| 3,021,100 | 3,108,900 | 87,800 | 2.9
Texas ........................| 12,299,500 | 12,998,200 | 698,700 | 5.7
Utah .........................| 1,559,600 | 1,633,300 | 73,700 | 4.7
Vermont ......................| 287,100 | 295,800 | 8,700 | 3.0
Virginia .....................| 3,888,100 | 3,970,700 | 82,600 | 2.1
Washington ...................| 3,272,200 | 3,448,200 | 176,000 | 5.4
West Virginia ................| 675,100 | 692,900 | 17,800 | 2.6
Wisconsin ....................| 2,816,600 | 2,893,400 | 76,800 | 2.7

[Patrick Chewing]

It's not accurate because blade said so.

[Lakers Legend#32]

Republican congress members who voted against the Built Back Better plan are now touting all the money that is coming into their district.

[iamgine]

https://i.ibb.co/x6xjn3s/FG0o-NAl-X0-Aozlor.png


Discuss.
I had heard that republican led states are doing much better than dems but where's the data from?

[Axe]

I have always had a knack for mathematics, but there are instances when the teacher is unable to answer the problem. In such cases, I resort to https://onlinefreelancejobs.net/math-job/. Now that I am studying to become a mathematics teacher and working part-time here, it is a great opportunity to get practice and life experience.
/thread