How big is your IQ?

[TheCorporation]

Discuss

[HunterSThompson]

https://www.iq-test.cc/

I dunno I guess this is OK


https://i.ibb.co/3R4zM3n/Screenshot-20220104-125818-Gallery.jpg

[Patrick Chewing]

https://www.iq-test.cc/

I dunno I guess this is OK


https://i.ibb.co/3R4zM3n/Screenshot-20220104-125818-Gallery.jpg

Man that shit was hard.

https://i.ibb.co/rZVXF7T/myiq.png

[j3lademaster]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/316079809253867520/928010015246258186/unknown.png

I think it's moreso practice with pattern recognition for me than actually being smart. I think I'm realistically around where Chewing's at, maybe lower in the sub 110's. I know enough people who are actually smart to insult them by passing myself off as on their level.

[hiphopanonymous]

Any app or online IQ tests are generally BS just structured to throw out numbers moderately to significantly higher than 100 by default to make you and any other takers feel good. Reality is, unless you took one in a controlled environment that is actually the standard peer reviewed test with peer reviewed criteria and data to cross compare your results with you won't know your IQ.

One random observation I've had since being a teenager is among friends or family I've seen probably a dozen peoples online/app based IQ test results taken for fun over the years and some people took multiple different tests.

Lowest number I've EVER seen was 112. Highest I've seen was like upper 140's. Most numbers were between 118 and 135. If online IQ tests were real wouldn't we see numbers ranging between 80 and 120 not 112 and 148 or whatever? It's supposed to be a representative of you vs everyone else so clearly these tests skew the numbers randomly upwards. And inconsistently so as well, a person taking multiple tests I recall would get like a 118 on one, but 124 or 128 on another.

[j3lademaster]

Any app or online IQ tests are generally BS just structured to throw out numbers moderately to significantly higher than 100 by default to make you and any other takers feel good. Reality is, unless you took one in a controlled environment that is actually the standard peer reviewed test with peer reviewed criteria and data to cross compare your results with you won't know your IQ.Even then if you take someone who has practiced pattern recognition(for example, has taken SAT cram classes), you're going to get inflated scores.

[HunterSThompson]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/316079809253867520/928010015246258186/unknown.png

I think it's moreso practice with pattern recognition for me than actually being smart. I think I'm realistically around where Chewing's at, maybe lower in the sub 110's. I know enough people who are actually smart to insult them by passing myself off as on their level.

this is quite an impressive troll post. it's humble and insulting at the same time since you said you're nowhere near as smart as other people you know but then you say 138 is actually a 110 to 119.

so my 126 is actually 98 to 107

and Chewing 117 is actually 89 to 98

[j3lademaster]

this is quite an impressive troll post. it's humble and insulting at the same time since you said you're nowhere near as smart as other people you know but then you say 138 is actually a 110 to 119.

so my 126 is actually 98 to 107

and Chewing 117 is actually 89 to 98I've taken a lot of cram classes in high school and college and had a lot of practice with pattern recognition, so my IQ score is highly inflated. I don't think I'm stupid. I think I do deserve a 110ish realistically which would be higher than a lot of people. 138 is basically a genius, and I've met enough smart people to know I'm not one.

And no that doesn't mean you're 107 and chewing is 98. Like I said before, anyone who has practiced pattern recognition is going to have a huge advantage.

I tried to take the test again but it's the same questions.

[FultzNationRISE]

Any app or online IQ tests are generally BS just structured to throw out numbers moderately to significantly higher than 100 by default to make you and any other takers feel good. Reality is, unless you took one in a controlled environment that is actually the standard peer reviewed test with peer reviewed criteria and data to cross compare your results with you won't know your IQ.

One random observation I've had since being a teenager is among friends or family I've seen probably a dozen peoples online/app based IQ test results taken for fun over the years and some people took multiple different tests.

Lowest number I've EVER seen was 112. Highest I've seen was like upper 140's. Most numbers were between 118 and 135. If online IQ tests were real wouldn't we see numbers ranging between 80 and 120 not 112 and 148 or whatever? It's supposed to be a representative of you vs everyone else so clearly these tests skew the numbers randomly upwards. And inconsistently so as well, a person taking multiple tests I recall would get like a 118 on one, but 124 or 128 on another.


I agree online tests are not reliable, altho your anecdotal reasoning is flawed. Higher IQ people may be more inclined to take the tests to begin with, and people who get above average scores are more inclined to share. So of course higher scores will be over reported. That doesnt mean the test is faulty.

The average dick size is said to be 5.5 inches, yet you never hear of anyone with less than 7.

I’m packin 10 btw. With a 185 IQ ;)

[FultzNationRISE]

Lowest number I've EVER seen was 112. Highest I've seen was like upper 140's. Most numbers were between 118 and 135. If online IQ tests were real wouldn't we see numbers ranging between 80 and 120 not 112 and 148 or whatever? It's supposed to be a representative of you vs everyone else so clearly these tests skew the numbers randomly upwards. And inconsistently so as well, a person taking multiple tests I recall would get like a 118 on one, but 124 or 128 on another.

This also has nothing to do with the validity of the test. You think people get the exact same score when they take the SAT multiple times?

Test results can be influenced by a ton of factors, including iron levels, time of day, random margins of error etc.

There’s no test you can take once that will just “tell you your IQ.”

[jstern]

I was given an IQ test as a kid. Very awesome experience because the person who administered the test.

And then Internet IQ tests came out and they kind of triggered me. Because so many aspects of the real test that was given to me cannot be replicated on a computer screen. Yet so many people think that they have a legit score for their IQ.

Don't get me wrong, getting a good score on these online IQ tests might be very inaccurate, but it can also be a good sign that a person is not stupid. As well as many real life situations. For example I know this lady. If you met her in public she might seem normal, but knowing her better you realize that she's dumb. One day she says that the latch of a door is damaged, I go take a look and what was damages was one of the hinges, causing the latch not to lineup.

A person like that would not be able to do most of the problems on an online IQ tests. Those tests are inaccurate, but they are worth something.

People continuously give off such clues.

Of the ISH members Fultz or Akrozotile is pretty up there, while Bladefd is the polar opposite. In terms of the signs they give off.

[HunterSThompson]

I've taken a lot of cram classes in high school and college and had a lot of practice with pattern recognition, so my IQ score is highly inflated. I don't think I'm stupid. I think I do deserve a 110ish realistically which would be higher than a lot of people. 138 is basically a genius, and I've met enough smart people to know I'm not one.

And no that doesn't mean you're 107 and chewing is 98. Like I said before, anyone who has practiced pattern recognition is going to have a huge advantage.

I tried to take the test again but it's the same questions.

maybe you have autism. theyre pretty retarded too and have insane genius level pattern recognition. and even you yourself admit you're dim compared to your friends. theyre probly average or slightly above average intelligence. if they're all geniuses then I doubt they would hang out with you unless it was out of pity

quick. drop a box of matches and try to count them in under 5 seconds. then count them individually and see how close you came

[Nanners]

https://youtu.be/M4yXW-JWbSE

[Patrick Chewing]

https://youtu.be/M4yXW-JWbSE

https://reactiongifs.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/sad-kid-reaction-gif.gif

[j3lademaster]

maybe you have autism. theyre pretty retarded too and have insane genius level pattern recognition. and even you yourself admit you're dim compared to your friends. theyre probly average or slightly above average intelligence. if they're all geniuses then I doubt they would hang out with you unless it was out of pity

quick. drop a box of matches and try to count them in under 5 seconds. then count them individually and see how close you cameThat's a lot of assumptions. I never said I exclusively hung out with geniuses, I've just met a lot of smart people throughout my life: professors, colleagues, classmates, people from study groups etc. Some of them are smarter than me, some aren't it's that simple.

[HunterSThompson]

professors, colleagues, classmates, people from study groups etc.

shoulda stopped at professor's.. the rest kind of dilutes your point

[diamenz]

How big is your IQ?

eight inches.

[Chuckbe]

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/316079809253867520/928010015246258186/unknown.png

I think it's moreso practice with pattern recognition for me than actually being smart. I think I'm realistically around where Chewing's at, maybe lower in the sub 110's. I know enough people who are actually smart to insult them by passing myself off as on their level.

Why are you still using Windows 7 and ABP?

[warriorfan]

Op has a small d.ick

[j3lademaster]

Why are you still using Windows 7 and ABP?yeah, I needed to update. It’s a gaming pc I haven’t used for a few years since my daughter was born. Few of my friends convinced me to play the new Diablo 2 remake with them so I fired it up and went down a rabbithole of exploring some old saves on games I used to play.

[hiphopanonymous]

The one with the link provided got me 135 which proceeds to claim "better than 99 percent" which in the real world is not true based simply on knowing myself interacting with a random 100 people and why I feel these tests are generous because if I'm in a room with 100 people I certainly don't have this impression that I'm smarter than literally all 99 of the others. I feel like I'm clever to an extent but that's it. You'd think I should've been a rocket scientist if you put any weight behind these tests. I'd also done a timed mensa one in the past where I get like 128. As j3lademaster said these are just puzzle solving skill tests and even then I doubt a rating of "100" on these tests is actually what human average is, I bet it's 110-120 ballpark but idk. The number of results we've gotten back (all over 115) says it all right there, some of us should've been at the average or maybe even some below right? Or are we not part of an "average"?

[Off the Court]

The one with the link provided got me 135 which proceeds to claim "better than 99 percent" which in the real world is not true based simply on knowing myself interacting with a random 100 people and why I feel these tests are generous because if I'm in a room with 100 people I certainly don't have this impression that I'm smarter than literally all 99 of the others. I feel like I'm clever to an extent but that's it. You'd think I should've been a rocket scientist if you put any weight behind these tests. I'd also done a timed mensa one in the past where I get like 128. As j3lademaster said these are just puzzle solving skill tests and even then I doubt a rating of "100" on these tests is actually what human average is, I bet it's 110-120 ballpark but idk. The number of results we've gotten back (all over 115) says it all right there, some of us should've been at the average or maybe even some below right? Or are we not part of an "average"?

Social interactions aren't a great gauge of IQ. Having a high IQ correlates more toward problem solving, logic, arithmetic and science minded individuals. There are people with genius level IQ who are socially inept. And this forum is a poor gauge of IQ and regardless of anyone's IQ in here this place has a rock bottom maturity level. If Einstein were a poster in here he'd be called out as a virgin cuck socialist.

[Patrick Chewing]

Social interactions aren't a great gauge of IQ. Having a high IQ correlates more toward problem solving, logic, arithmetic and science minded individuals. There are people with genius level IQ who are socially inept. And this forum is a poor gauge of IQ and regardless of anyone's IQ in here this place has a rock bottom maturity level. If Einstein were a poster in here he'd be called out as a virgin cuck socialist.

And how come you can't solve the problem of obtaining a job and moving out of your parent's house, RRR3? Just curious.


I'll try to help.


The Problem: You still live with your parents and are unemployed

The solution: Get a job and move out on your own


Tools you need: Logic and arithmetic to understand that the more you work, the more money you will have. The more money you have, the better likelihood you have of affording your own place

[Off the Court]

And how come you can't solve the problem of obtaining a job and moving out of your parent's house, RRR3? Just curious.


I'll try to help.


The Problem: You still live with your parents and are unemployed

The solution: Get a job and move out on your own


Tools you need: Logic and arithmetic to understand that the more you work, the more money you will have. The more money you have, the better likelihood you have of affording your own place
If you still think I am RRR3 at this point that is a decent sign of a below average IQ :oldlol:

Also lacking the wisdom to realize that it doesn't even matter who I am in here.

[Patrick Chewing]

If you still think I am RRR3 at this point that is a decent sign of a below average IQ :oldlol:

Also lacking the wisdom to realize that it doesn't even matter who I am in here.

You are indeed RRR3 and the gimmick is getting old and stale. Just stick to one account.

Who you are though as a person is irrelevant to me so long as you don't spread your radical Communist propaganda out there. Sure, sure if we met in person I would probably curb stomp you first. But if you survived, I would gladly help you as best I could to become a successful and honorable human being. My first job ever was being a bus boy in high school. Now, I own my own business and house. While I'm sure there are other ISH'ers out there that make more money than me, the point that I'm trying to make is that you shouldn't hate the world and want other people's money just because you feel that you're an unfortunate beta cuck male. You and me are both minorities. We can make it.

[ELITEpower23]

If you still think I am RRR3 at this point that is a decent sign of a below average IQ :oldlol:

Also lacking the wisdom to realize that it doesn't even matter who I am in here.

You're that liberal cuck J to the Izzo that always got owned by FultzRise, aren't you? Come out of the closet already.

[Off the Court]

You are indeed RRR3 and the gimmick is getting old and stale. Just stick to one account.

Who you are though as a person is irrelevant to me so long as you don't spread your radical Communist propaganda out there. Sure, sure if we met in person I would probably curb stomp you first. But if you survived, I would gladly help you as best I could to become a successful and honorable human being. My first job ever was being a bus boy in high school. Now, I own my own business and house. While I'm sure there are other ISH'ers out there that make more money than me, the point that I'm trying to make is that you shouldn't hate the world and want other people's money just because you feel that you're an unfortunate beta cuck male. You and me are both minorities. We can make it.
Another sign that you're low-IQ is that you allow me to make you absolutely furious :oldlol:

[Axe]

If you still think I am RRR3 at this point that is a decent sign of a below average IQ :oldlol:

Also lacking the wisdom to realize that it doesn't even matter who I am in here.
Very true lol

[FKAri]

https://www.iq-test.cc/

Guess it only goes up to 145.
https://www.iq-test.cc/test_result/203560








btw, the website code simply states:

pId=((122131/90)*iq_result)+(122119/18)

With iq_result min/max range capped at 55-145. Then plug pId in the below link:

https://www.iq-test.cc/test_result/pId



Of course I didn't do this to get my result. Nonsense. I'm an honest man who would much rather sit through an online IQ test for half an hour.