is rape possible in marriage

[John_Connor]

before hunter got banned he brought up a good point. then satan replied to him with



marriage isn't a job and there's nothing there that states "spread your legs whenever I can't resist blowing a load into you". That's immoral and not how the real world works. You seem to expect obedience.





i'm on hunters side. theres specific laws in marriage contracts where if you commit adultery you have grounds for a divorce and compensation. rights to the other person sexually is literally implied. if having sex with other people was made aware of through their lawyers then the woman could file rape charges or sexual assault because there wouldn't be any kind of obligation or possession involved

to only reward women in divorce settlements for their sexual entitlement and possession over a mans body is completely one sided and goes against their personal rights and freedoms as an individual.

[Kblaze8855]

This is the kind of thing that is probably easier to think before you have life experience. I know women who are legally married and haven’t seen their husbands in years. Obviously he can’t just have sex with her against her will if he sees her. Millions of people are legally married and stay in different rooms. Not all marriages have much physical interaction. The piece of paper on file doesn’t mean two people are or should be required to be sexually active against the will of one of them. It’s amazing it even needs to be said.

[John_Connor]

This is the kind of thing that is probably easier to think before you have life experience. I know women who are legally married and haven’t seen their husbands in years. Obviously he can’t just have sex with her against her will if he sees her. Millions of people are legally married and stay in different rooms. Not all marriages have much physical interaction. The piece of paper on file doesn’t mean two people are or should be required to be sexually active against the will of one of them. It’s amazing it even needs to be said.

in those cases its usually made aware through their lawyers or publically with evidence backed through messages/emails/texts that they're separated. i'm talking about a healthy couple with zero conflict.

its very serious if you are a high profile couple and you cheat. you can basically lose everything. theres stipulations in marriage contracts to protect men from women that are gold diggers just looking for any reason to leave them. a mans money is literally put on the line in exchange for his and her rights to their sexual monogamy and availability. to just suddenly stop having sex would break their marriage contract and give the man grounds for a divorce with no division of assets. she would be left with no alimony. and if the man cheated it would give the woman grounds for a divorce and equal division of assets and 5 to 10 years of alimony.

sex is literally written into marriage contracts. it makes no sense for there to be a rape charge unless they were separated

[SATAN]

OP's ideal marriage:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/d2mLJ4Vu6cGGfDnbinJt62Dm--Q40vRtixR33Wf4voqzLjoIZUFVSRMdkkuDR3TzSHe7SuL_JBSB 8dK698iF5oVVCiM-__NB7aKjF-Cs_zuqU-G04pr2kHON4JigFS9xt-ogqrXrBVa_7e_FbLciI8FOhNyAr1y4aehJSwPr9DGMEVEfdbf-OGY=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu

[John_Connor]

OP's ideal marriage:

https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/proxy/d2mLJ4Vu6cGGfDnbinJt62Dm--Q40vRtixR33Wf4voqzLjoIZUFVSRMdkkuDR3TzSHe7SuL_JBSB 8dK698iF5oVVCiM-__NB7aKjF-Cs_zuqU-G04pr2kHON4JigFS9xt-ogqrXrBVa_7e_FbLciI8FOhNyAr1y4aehJSwPr9DGMEVEfdbf-OGY=w1200-h630-p-k-no-nu

wrong. thats not sex. how is that a sexual advance? i'm talking about a husband going up to his wife and kissing her, holding her in a comforting manner, massaging her, taking her to bed and undressing her, inserting into her and thrusting. if she resists and accuses him of rape she is utterly insane and the marriage should be voided with zero division of assets or alimony payments. obviously it could only go so far till theres basically an imminent separation and she would have to voice her intentions in order to avoid further advancements against her wishes. she can't just say "no" ... that would break their marriage contract for monogamy and availability. she would have to say "its over. we're through. i'm getting a divorce or i wanna be separated for a while" and in that case he would be able to seek sexual release elsewhere with another female without worrying about losing everything in a divorce battle.

for women to be able to just hold a mans sexual activity over their heads in a captive/reward/extortion type of way is basically a form of marriage slavery

[SATAN]

wrong. thats not sex. how is that a sexual advance? i'm talking about a husband going up to his wife and kissing her, holding her in a comforting manner, massaging her, taking her to bed and undressing her, inserting into her and thrusting. if she resists and accuses him of rape

If she resists and the guy just says **** it and forces himself inside her then that is indeed rape. Marriage doesn't guarantee you can use someone's hole whenever you feel like it.

[Kblaze8855]

in those cases its usually made aware through their lawyers or publically with evidence backed through messages/emails/texts that they're separated. i'm talking about a healthy couple with zero conflict.

its very serious if you are a high profile couple and you cheat. you can basically lose everything. theres stipulations in marriage contracts to protect men from women that are gold diggers just looking for any reason to leave them. a mans money is literally put on the line in exchange for his and her rights to their sexual monogamy and availability. to just suddenly stop having sex would break their marriage contract and give the man grounds for a divorce with no division of assets. she would be left with no alimony. and if the man cheated it would give the woman grounds for a divorce and equal division of assets and 5 to 10 years of alimony.

sex is literally written into marriage contracts. it makes no sense for there to be a rape charge unless they were separated

Lawyers and evidence?

Again….live in the real world for a while. A huge number of people are broken up but technically married. A huuuuuge number. And even more are married but living like roommates. I know a woman who had her husband come home with an std and have to admit an affair. Not broken up but she intends to never sleep with him again(supposedly). He should just be able to walk in and have sex against her will?

This is real simple for non maniacs. The paper does not give you the right to have sex with anyone who doesn’t want to. The end. You shouldn’t be anymore able to rape your wife than punch her in the face. Don’t touch people who decline to be touched. It’s not very complicated.

[Kblaze8855]

And I don’t know why you’re trying to pretend not to be Kenny on another name. You don’t even hide it usually.

[highwhey]

And I don’t know why you’re trying to pretend not to be Kenny on another name. You don’t even hide it usually.

:oldlol:

[John_Connor]

If she resists and the guy just says **** it and forces himself inside her then that is indeed rape. Marriage doesn't guarantee you can use someone's hole whenever you feel like it.

obviously IT IS RAPE according to current laws. my point is about whether or not it should be and if women who aren't separated should have the ability to deny sex. if you've been reading anything i've been posting then you should have gotten the point by now. go back and read the parts where i talk about the legalities of marriage contracts and cheating/adultery being against the rules of marriage. for a woman to have power over a man and a man not to have power over a woman is completely one sided. why should a woman get paid off for years because he looked for sex elsewhere. if shes not providing it then why is he obligated to be monogamous

use your brain. stop being a total cuck

[Axe]

Kobe after marrying vanessa way back in 2001 raped a 19-year old hotel employee bt. He tried denying it tho because it was consensual.

[John_Connor]

Lawyers and evidence?

Again….live in the real world for a while. A huge number of people are broken up but technically married. A huuuuuge number. And even more are married but living like roommates. I know a woman who had her husband come home with an std and have to admit an affair. Not broken up but she intends to never sleep with him again(supposedly). He should just be able to walk in and have sex against her will?

This is real simple for non maniacs. The paper does not give you the right to have sex with anyone who doesn’t want to. The end. You shouldn’t be anymore able to rape your wife than punch her in the face. Don’t touch people who decline to be touched. It’s not very complicated.

again you're referring to complicated marriages where people are separated or one of them already cheated so theres already a breach of contract. i'm talking from a healthy standpoint where the man provides for her and is an obedient monogamous respectful husband in every way. to deny him of sex would go against their marriage agreement. it all goes back to cheating. if marriages were legally polyamorous then there wouldn't be a problem. but women have the ability to control a mans sexual activity. if they can say no then a man should be able to commit adultery without repercussion


and i'm not kenny. i'm john

[SATAN]

obviously IT IS RAPE according to current laws. my point is about whether or not it should be and if women who aren't separated should have the ability to deny sex.

Whether it should be? What are you gonna change the meaning of words now? Maybe you should ask women how they feel about being forced to spread their legs on demand. Oh wait, that discussion has already been had decades ago, you sociopath.

Don't care for your other generalizations.

[SATAN]

OP's ideal wife:

https://www.safesexdolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/67.jpg

[John_Connor]

Whether it should be? What are you gonna change the meaning of words now? Maybe you should ask women how they feel about being forced to spread their legs on demand. Oh wait, that discussion has already been had decades ago, you sociopath.

Don't care for your other generalizations.

its like you're not even reading anything i say. the problem isn't women saying no. the problem is current marriage contracts. you being so concerned with woman not being able to say no/not "spreading their legs" but at the same time being ok with them being able to tell men they can't go elsewhere to have another woman spread their legs when they don't and IF they do that woman is awarded with half a million dollars in assets and another 10 years of alimony as payment for emotional pain and suffering for being left with no source of income because she committed herself to him for a lifetime of cuckery is a completely 1 sided bullsh*t liberal cucked way of looking at things

[SATAN]

You're coming at it wrong in the first place, calling guys slaves and generalizing, acting like two wrongs make a right...

It's ****ing stupid.

[John_Connor]

OP's ideal wife:

https://www.safesexdolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/67.jpg




wrong...the women i'm into wouldn't turn down sex... they're called conservatives. they don't have a shred of feminist bullsh*t in them and love pleasing their men

https://live.staticflickr.com/793/41022248072_0d2ed6fa3c_b.jpg

https://c.tenor.com/SeoDJS8irooAAAAC/blain-predator.gif

[John_Connor]

You're coming at it wrong in the first place, calling guys slaves and generalizing, acting like two wrongs make a right...

It's ****ing stupid.

how are married men not slaves. they have to provide financially. be monogamous and still have absolutely no right to sexual availability from their partners. makes zero sense. why would a woman have control over a mans ability to have sex with other people when he has no control over his ability to have sex with her

[iamgine]

Rape is simply sexual activity/intercourse against a person's will.

Under that definition then marriage has no bearing. Only the person's willingness does.

[John_Connor]

Rape is simply sexual activity/intercourse against a person's will.

Under that definition then marriage has no bearing. Only the person's willingness does.

and that willingness should be ever available. if not then marriage contracts shouldn't include monogamy

humans have bodily functions and to deny someone of them is a human rights violation. a man should have the right to commit adultery if he is denied sex by his wife without being held accountable

especially if the person is religious and self pleasure is against their religion

[SATAN]

how are married men not slaves. they have to provide financially.

You got some guys being stay at home parents these days, both parents working etc..You could argue everyone (except yourself apparently) are slaves anyway but that would also be a generalization.


why would a woman have control over a mans ability to have sex with other people when he has no control over his ability to have sex with her

Does this not go both ways? I feel like you're just thinking of worst case situations.

[SATAN]

and that willingness should be ever available. if not then marriage contracts shouldn't include monogamy



No one has to get married if they don't want to. Why are you so irritated?

[TheCorporation]

This is the kind of thing that is probably easier to think before you have life experience. I know women who are legally married and haven’t seen their husbands in years. Obviously he can’t just have sex with her against her will if he sees her. Millions of people are legally married and stay in different rooms. Not all marriages have much physical interaction. The piece of paper on file doesn’t mean two people are or should be required to be sexually active against the will of one of them. It’s amazing it even needs to be said.

As we both know this is a Kenny Griffin alt which leads to low IQ, alt-right stone age thoughts 11 out of 10 times.

[John_Connor]

You got some guys being stay at home parents these days, both parents working etc..You could argue everyone (except yourself apparently) are slaves anyway but that would also be a generalization.



thats like saying everyone should get disability payments because 2% of people are retards. i guarantee 90%+ of marriages men are the primary source of income for their families. and 90% or more of the time the person denying sex is the female and they're almost always contributing next to nothing except the very thing they're denying the man of. you can say they cook the food he pays for or washes the clothes he also provides with the appliances he donates to their shared living arrangement but thats hardly equal. as for taking care of kids we all know neither parent is able or willing to do that anymore which is why todays kids are out of control and sensitive/entitled brats. and the ones growing up in house holds where the women are equally successful are usually raised by nannies or day care workers. and yet still the women is awarded custody and financial support regardless in every divorce case. its gotten to a point where marriage is basically castration and legalized prostitution except in this case you can pay and half the time not even get anything in return and if you try its rape...




Does this not go both ways? I feel like you're just thinking of worst case situations.

yes it does but women don't have prostates that fill up daily which activates their sex drive to release the seminal fluid. its a natural bodily cycle that happens daily. a mans body is built for evacuating its sperm every 24 hours. its human biology. when you don't you're left feeling tense and confused. unable to perform basic tasks etc... women can go far longer without sex and thats why they can use it as a tool to force men to do as they're told. this is sort of common sense in most marriages. its silly to argue this

[John_Connor]

No one has to get married if they don't want to. Why are you so irritated?

this is basically the vaccinated response to things. "nobodies forcing you to get vaccinated. you have the right to go die alone in your house away from society alone without ever having children. nobodies forcing you to adhere to our current extremist liberal ideology"


typical

[SATAN]

thats like saying everyone should get disability payments because 2% of people are retards. i guarantee 90%+ of marriages men are the primary source of income for their families. and 90% or more of the time the person denying sex is the female and they're almost always contributing next to nothing except the very thing they're denying the man of. you can say they cook the food he pays for or washes the clothes he also provides with the appliances he donates to their shared living arrangement but thats hardly equal. as for taking care of kids we all know neither parent is able or willing to do that anymore which is why todays kids are out of control and sensitive/entitled brats. and the ones growing up in house holds where the women are equally successful are usually raised by nannies or day care workers. and yet still the women is awarded custody and financial support regardless in every divorce case. its gotten to a point where marriage is basically castration and legalized prostitution except in this case you can pay and half the time not even get anything in return and if you try its rape...

Like it or not, guys are choosing to get married and live that life. Yeah some of stuff that can happen is stupid but they are hardly the victims you make them out to be.



yes it does but women don't have prostates that fill up daily which activates their sex drive to release the seminal fluid. its a natura mean, how many women end up getting abused if not murdered l bodily cycle that happens daily. a mans body is built for evacuating its sperm every 24 hours. its human biology. when you don't you're left feeling tense and confused. unable to perform basic tasks etc... women can go far longer without sex and thats why they can use it as a tool to force men to do as they're told. this is sort of common sense in most marriages. its silly to argue this

There's nothing stopping a guy from jerking off.


this is basically the vaccinated response to things. "nobodies forcing you to get vaccinated. you have the right to go die alone in your house away from society alone without ever having children. nobodies forcing you to adhere to our current extremist liberal ideology"

Completely ridiculous comment.

[John_Connor]

Like it or not, guys are choosing to get married and live that life. Yeah some of stuff that can happen is stupid but they are hardly the victims you make them out to be.



it depends on what your qualification is for being a victim. see you have a beta mindset and probably advocate for feminist equal pay/equality overall in every day life and sympathize with them in most ways. you probably even see them as a victim of the patriarchy and advocate for progressive movements that provide an affirmative action style of forced equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity. forcing more women to get hired and paid more even when they don't have the same qualifications.

so you probably don't have a problem with women getting preferential treatment. even though in todays first world countries women still have it pretty good compared to the rest of the world. you're looking at men in marriages the way conservatives look at women in todays society. like "be thankful for what you have because you could be living in dirt. you could be an oppressed muslim. "you could be a single man eating canned food." - you its just a typical biased form of viewing one side in a hypocritical way cause you can't see men as a victim in a case where they're the lesser of 2 individuals. in marriages women DO have more power than men. they are by far more in control of what married couples buy. where they live. who they're friends with. how much sex they have and if things end the women is given most of the assets. not just half. and custody. and alimony. this is by far more oppressive than the current patriarchal differences in regular society between men and women






There's nothing stopping a guy from jerking off.



1. for some religious people there is actually
2. why would someone get married and pay through the ass and put in time and effort for decades of their life so they can jack off
3. if that truly is good enough for you then you wouldn't need to sign your life away for marriage unless you're just some mamas boy that needs coddling and structure. not everyones a libcuck mamas boy like you sorry lol



Completely ridiculous comment.


false

[SATAN]

it depends on what your qualification is for being a victim. see you have a beta mindset and probably advocate for feminist equal pay/equality overall in every day life and sympathize with them in most ways. you probably even see them as a victim of the patriarchy and advocate for progressive movements that provide an affirmative action style of forced equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity. forcing more women to get hired and paid more even when they don't have the same qualifications.

so you probably

Blah blah blah resorting to baseless attacks. Good luck with your culture war nonsense. We are done here, brainwashed incel.

[John_Connor]

Blah blah blah resorting to baseless attacks. Good luck with your culture war nonsense. We are done here,

Signed - brainwashed incel.



https://c.tenor.com/vvkfybI8Z3QAAAAM/wwe-scott-hall.gif

https://i.makeagif.com/media/3-07-2017/QPLEdW.gif

https://i.makeagif.com/media/5-29-2015/ygLcOD.gif

[ThRRR3tardSatan]

OP's ideal wife:

https://www.safesexdolls.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/67.jpg

Hotter... one time payment... doesn't waste a man's time or syphon a man's resources.

A woman has access to a man's wallet during divorce and post divorce, but a man doesn't deserve access to his wife's hole while married?

Richest women in the world, Melinda and MacKenzie, only have that wealth through marriage and spreading their legs.

MGTOW - never marry

[iamgine]

and that willingness should be ever available. if not then marriage contracts shouldn't include monogamy

humans have bodily functions and to deny someone of them is a human rights violation. a man should have the right to commit adultery if he is denied sex by his wife without being held accountable

especially if the person is religious and self pleasure is against their religion
Whether willingness should or should not be ever available is another matter.

But rape is simply sexual activity/intercourse against a person's will.

[warriorfan]

How do you guys keep falling for op’s obvious bait? :lol

[Norcaliblunt]

OP has obviously never been in one of those relationships where the bitch doesn’t ever want to stop ****ing. Nymphomaniacs who wanna *** 24/7. He’d be singing a different tune if every time he was trying to watch the game his bitch wouldn’t leave him alone.

[John_Connor]

OP has obviously never been in one of those relationships where the bitch doesn’t ever want to stop ****ing. Nymphomaniacs who wanna *** 24/7. He’d be singing a different tune if every time he was trying to watch the game his bitch wouldn’t leave him alone.

ummmmmmmm...thats almost every relationship before marriage lmao. wtf all I've ever known is women that just wanna **** and do drugs. this discussion is clearly about married people. and it's common knowledge that sex goes from every day you see them to once a week and after 5 or 10 years it becomes once a year. then after 20 years you never touch your spouse ever again.

there are the rare conservative giving wives that make it their daily mission to never stop giving their husband's pleasure. it's usually a couple that never has children or a religious couple and they have a ton of kids. those are rare though.

to tell you the truth I was in a few relationships where the woman actually demanded too much. both had addictions to giving blow jobs. it became too much. I actually got bored of them. I wanna be the one that goes at them. and like once a day is fine. not every time people go for smoke breaks. we would sneak into my bedroom and have a 5 minute session then come back out and laugh when people came back inside. it's fun for a while but too much of any good thing can become boring.

couples should put aside a date to have sex or perform oral at least once every 3 days. that's a good common ground. every day can be too much. once a week can be too little

[highwhey]

ummmmmmmm...thats almost every relationship before marriage lmao. wtf all I've ever known is women that just wanna **** and do drugs. this discussion is clearly about married people. and it's common knowledge that sex goes from every day you see them to once a week and after 5 or 10 years it becomes once a year. then after 20 years you never touch your spouse ever again.

there are the rare conservative giving wives that make it their daily mission to never stop giving their husband's pleasure. it's usually a couple that never has children or a religious couple and they have a ton of kids. those are rare though.

to tell you the truth I was in a few relationships where the woman actually demanded too much. both had addictions to giving blow jobs. it became too much. I actually got bored of them. I wanna be the one that goes at them. and like once a day is fine. not every time people go for smoke breaks. we would sneak into my bedroom and have a 5 minute session then come back out and laugh when people came back inside. it's fun for a while but too much of any good thing can become boring.

couples should put aside a date to have sex or perform oral at least once every 3 days. that's a good common ground. every day can be too much. once a week can be too little

you're a mouthbreather but i agree with some of your main points.

[ArbitraryWater]

wrong. thats not sex. how is that a sexual advance? i'm talking about a husband going up to his wife and kissing her, holding her in a comforting manner, massaging her, taking her to bed and undressing her, inserting into her and thrusting. if she resists and accuses him of rape she is utterly insane and the marriage should be voided with zero division of assets or alimony payments. obviously it could only go so far till theres basically an imminent separation and she would have to voice her intentions in order to avoid further advancements against her wishes. she can't just say "no" ... that would break their marriage contract for monogamy and availability. she would have to say "its over. we're through. i'm getting a divorce or i wanna be separated for a while" and in that case he would be able to seek sexual release elsewhere with another female without worrying about losing everything in a divorce battle.

for women to be able to just hold a mans sexual activity over their heads in a captive/reward/extortion type of way is basically a form of marriage slavery



:biggums::biggums::biggums:



what if she isnt in the mood bre?

[John_Connor]

:biggums::biggums::biggums:



what if she isnt in the mood bre?

1. if you can't get a woman "in the mood" then how are you married in the first place. that should set off alarms and red flags immediately and should tell you that she's only into you for your money if you don't turn her on

2. I've eaten p*ssy at least 500 times in my life or more and not one single time was I having fun. it tasted like a battery. I had to use watermelon lube at times to hide the stench and taste. it's taxing on your neck, jaw and tongue. your fingers get crushed. you're putting yourself at risk of being choked to death. you're making a complete fool out of yourself and she's closing her eyes thinking of other men most likely. then you're getting pissed on or in your mouth and your beds covered in ice cold wet spots. and sucking on loose skin like something off a rotisserie thigh. its never appealing.

neither is getting pubic hair stuck in your teeth. but I did it. every single time I went down because I wanted to please the woman I was with and show I had value and talent. it's work. even more so than sex sometimes. the minute someone doesn't wanna do this for their partner is when they've lost interest and are just coasting through life taking advantage of you and your money. they married you for stability. women want a man that can take care of them financially. and men want a woman that can take care of them like their mothers.

it's pretty much a fact that most married people are mamas boy cucks. they're the only people that can put up with not having sex for weeks and months at a time and still be happy coming home to the same woman every day. they want that coddling mommy feeling if comfort knowing she's there to make everything alllll better. if you have a tough day she will give you a hug and say "there there. mommy's here"

that's why so many conservative males and black people have kids with many different women. we can't be locked down. we only value women for sex

[ArbitraryWater]

1. if you can't get a woman "in the mood" then how are you married in the first place. that should set off alarms and red flags immediately and should tell you that she's only into you for your money if you don't turn her on

2. I've eaten p*ssy at least 500 times in my life or more and not one single time was I having fun. it tasted like a battery. I had to use watermelon lube at times to hide the stench and taste. it's taxing on your neck, jaw and tongue. your fingers get crushed. you're putting yourself at risk of being choked to death. you're making a complete fool out of yourself and she's closing her eyes thinking of other men most likely. then you're getting pissed on or in your mouth and your beds covered in ice cold wet spots. and sucking on loose skin like something off a rotisserie thigh. its never appealing.

neither is getting pubic hair stuck in your teeth. but I did it. every single time I went down because I wanted to please the woman I was with and show I had value and talent. it's work. even more so than sex sometimes. the minute someone doesn't wanna do this for their partner is when they've lost interest and are just coasting through life taking advantage of you and your money. they married you for stability. women want a man that can take care of them financially. and men want a woman that can take care of them like their mothers.

it's pretty much a fact that most married people are mamas boy cucks. they're the only people that can put up with not having sex for weeks and months at a time and still be happy coming home to the same woman every day. they want that coddling mommy feeling if comfort knowing she's there to make everything alllll better. if you have a tough day she will give you a hug and say "there there. mommy's here"

that's why so many conservative males and black people have kids with many different women. we can't be locked down. we only value women for sex



you made the argument that she should be up for sex at any time basically lol.

if she isnt in the mood and tells you and you still **** her, thats rape.

[John_Connor]

you made the argument that she should be up for sex at any time basically lol.

if she isnt in the mood and tells you and you still **** her, thats rape.

I also made the argument that whether you're up for it or not sometimes you should just put out so your partner feels wanted. that will prevent them from cheating and losing everything in divorce. like I said many times in this thread why the hell is monogamy written into marriage if people can be turned down for sex weeks/months/years at a time for some people. the courts should take this into consideration. if you're denied sex you should legally be able to go elsewhere for it. if not then spread your legs or open your mouth. this isn't about choice anymore cause men lose that when they put that ring on for literally every other major decision going forward. can they at least get laid. they've been robbed of most of their money. can they at least get a blow job

[John_Connor]

https://youtu.be/ph-5cuJgVRs

[Gohan]

I also made the argument that whether you're up for it or not sometimes you should just put out so your partner feels wanted. that will prevent them from cheating and losing everything in divorce. like I said many times in this thread why the hell is monogamy written into marriage if people can be turned down for sex weeks/months/years at a time for some people. the courts should take this into consideration. if you're denied sex you should legally be able to go elsewhere for it. if not then spread your legs or open your mouth. this isn't about choice anymore cause men lose that when they put that ring on for literally every other major decision going forward. can they at least get laid. they've been robbed of most of their money. can they at least get a blow job

You make a good point where christian women need to follow. If you dont give it to me enough imma have wandering eyes simple as that

[Jasper]

I believe it was 1960 (prior to it , a marriage rape was legal) since then it is unlawful .

[John_Connor]

I believe it was 1960 (prior to it , a marriage rape was legal) since then it is unlawful .

and what happened in the 60s... the liberal progressive women's rights movement and it went away for a man protecting the sanctity of marriage and his/her honor to women making a mockery of unions under god turning men into embarrassing worthless cucks that have no power or say in anything. and thus the downfall of society ensued

[ArbitraryWater]

isnt this one of these things that when you have to argue it, it shows you youre wrong?


say your wife disagrees with you and you try to argue with her on this lmao... the fact she tells you you cant just stick it in while she sleeps or whatever, already tells you what it is.

also your arguments make no sense here.

"if you can't get a woman "in the mood" then how are you married in the first place" is not an argument and not pertaining to this issue

[John_Connor]

isnt this one of these things that when you have to argue it, it shows you youre wrong?


say your wife disagrees with you and you try to argue with her on this lmao... the fact she tells you you cant just stick it in while she sleeps or whatever, already tells you what it is.

also your arguments make no sense here.

"if you can't get a woman "in the mood" then how are you married in the first place" is not an argument and not pertaining to this issue

another guy that didn't read anything ITT before posting


my argument isn't whether or not NO MEANS NO ( of course it does ) but realistically it shouldn't because based on marriage contracts/divorce settlements a woman is in possession of a mans body and sexual activity due to monogamy being a part of their agreement and if adultery is committed its grounds for a divorce and alimony. if however men could look elsewhere for sex and not be punished for it then it would mean their spouse is NOT in control of their husbands sexual activity and they could cry rape. but as it stands a man should theoretically be allowed to have sex when he wants if hes legally bound to only f*cking her and nobody else. you asked for it honey. its in writing. "now bend over youuuu stupid b*tch!"

https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BY2EyZWJkNjUtNzQxMC00OGQyLWFhM2YtNmFhMjc0MGI5NT BlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjUyNDk2ODc@._V1_.jpg

[Jasper]

I sense a lot of hate here


I also sense little Johnny Connor was raped by his bitch:yaohappy:

[John_Connor]

http://d279m997dpfwgl.cloudfront.net/wp/2017/08/0831_they-live-1-1000x563.jpg

https://bloody-disgusting.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/they-live.jpg

[Bronbron23]

wrong. thats not sex. how is that a sexual advance? i'm talking about a husband going up to his wife and kissing her, holding her in a comforting manner, massaging her, taking her to bed and undressing her, inserting into her and thrusting. if she resists and accuses him of rape she is utterly insane and the marriage should be voided with zero division of assets or alimony payments. obviously it could only go so far till theres basically an imminent separation and she would have to voice her intentions in order to avoid further advancements against her wishes. she can't just say "no" ... that would break their marriage contract for monogamy and availability. she would have to say "its over. we're through. i'm getting a divorce or i wanna be separated for a while" and in that case he would be able to seek sexual release elsewhere with another female without worrying about losing everything in a divorce battle.

for women to be able to just hold a mans sexual activity over their heads in a captive/reward/extortion type of way is basically a form of marriage slavery

Of course it's rape dude wtf kind of question is this?

[CelticBaller]

yes

[John_Connor]

Of course it's rape dude wtf kind of question is this?

my bad I shoulda started this thread by saying "is rape possible in a real marriage"


obviously if you're a liberal cuck that settled down with the first woman that showed you any attention this would be the outcome of your sexual advances

https://voca.ro/1otfXxFNGfBn

https://i.ibb.co/1Gysdr5/unhappy-couple-having-argument-home-260nw-1906629268.jpg






this however is how an alpha forces himself upon his willing and ready bombshell wife


https://voca.ro/18cMlBxxnTtO

https://i.ibb.co/5LMZBHy/Girl-Guy-Abs-Shrt.jpg

[Norcaliblunt]

ummmmmmmm...thats almost every relationship before marriage lmao. wtf all I've ever known is women that just wanna **** and do drugs. this discussion is clearly about married people. and it's common knowledge that sex goes from every day you see them to once a week and after 5 or 10 years it becomes once a year. then after 20 years you never touch your spouse ever again.

there are the rare conservative giving wives that make it their daily mission to never stop giving their husband's pleasure. it's usually a couple that never has children or a religious couple and they have a ton of kids. those are rare though.

to tell you the truth I was in a few relationships where the woman actually demanded too much. both had addictions to giving blow jobs. it became too much. I actually got bored of them. I wanna be the one that goes at them. and like once a day is fine. not every time people go for smoke breaks. we would sneak into my bedroom and have a 5 minute session then come back out and laugh when people came back inside. it's fun for a while but too much of any good thing can become boring.

couples should put aside a date to have sex or perform oral at least once every 3 days. that's a good common ground. every day can be too much. once a week can be too little

Hypothetical scenario. After years of marriage woman still wants to **** but man has developed ED and physically can’t. What is she entitled to do?

We just need to think all angles through before we get any homies out here raped.

[John_Connor]

Hypothetical scenario. After years of marriage woman still wants to **** but man has developed ED and physically can’t. What is she entitled to do?

sit on his face

[Norcaliblunt]

sit on his face

What if your bitch blows up to Shamu? We need a loophole where you dont have to **** her if you don’t want.

[Norcaliblunt]

Oh and you can’t stick your dick in conservative girls because they are pro life and anti birth control. Sorry I’m not trying to have kids every time I ****. In fact anyone who is pro life is basically anti sex. You have whole states like Texas that are anti sex.

[John_Connor]

What if your bitch blows up to Shamu? We need a loophole where you dont have to **** her if you don’t want.

stop feeding her or giving her money. go through the drive through on the way home from work and buy some carrots and celery for her to nibble on at the grocery store. say you demand to be with her when shes grocery shopping. buy a treadmill. keep buying her clothes that dont fit. yell at her every time she starts munching on chips and cupcakes. call her a fatass. be a f*cking man

[John_Connor]

Oh and you can’t stick your dick in conservative girls because they are pro life and anti birth control. Sorry I’m not trying to have kids every time I ****. In fact anyone who is pro life is basically anti sex. You have whole states like Texas that are anti sex.

only about 7% of conservatives are religious fanatics lol. you watch way too much cnn. most of them use birth control and are for abortion if it's rape or defective at most. it isn't a life till it has a heart beat