View Full Version : If the Bulls won the 1995 title, would MJ stans count it as legit?
Hey Yo
03-01-2022, 07:17 PM
Those homo's call 2020 a shit ring but guarantee they'd call a 95 title a legit ring for MJ.
Spurs m8
03-01-2022, 07:26 PM
Of course they would....you never see MJ stans playing mental gymnastics, you inbred d1ckhead
RogueBorg
03-01-2022, 07:26 PM
Those homo's call 2020 a shit ring but guarantee they'd call a 95 title a legit ring for MJ.
" There needs to be a soundproof wall or something. I would even consider having no fans in the arena. Anything that will help us players avoid these verbal altercations. I just cant take it"
2much_knowledge
03-01-2022, 07:30 PM
Why not? Super pippen was struggling, under 500. Until he begged the goat to come back and they started winning again
Baller789
03-01-2022, 08:16 PM
Op why wouldn't it?
Hey Yo
03-01-2022, 08:50 PM
Anyone with a legit arguement??
Full Court
03-01-2022, 08:51 PM
That would have been the legitest and most impressive ring in the history of the sport.
Nice straw man argument, OP. Lol. Moron.
On the other hand, the 2020 Minnie Mouse ring was the biggest asterisk in the history of the sport.
Full Court
03-01-2022, 08:55 PM
Bronie "intelligence" on full display in this thread.
And OP gets completely toe-tagged and body-bagged. :roll:
Baller789
03-01-2022, 09:43 PM
Anyone with a legit arguement??
What is your argument on why it wouldn't count?
You made the thread.
3ba11
03-01-2022, 09:44 PM
Why not? Super pippen was struggling, under 500. Until he begged the goat to come back and they started winning again
Exactly - Pippen destroyed a 3-peat dynasty to lottery in less than 18 months before Jordan returned to restore 3-peat caliber in his first full season back
How is this an apples to apples comparison?:oldlol:
Airupthere
03-01-2022, 09:59 PM
The mickey bubble league was a tailor fit situation for lebron. MJ returning in 95 is not the same situation.
Full Court
03-01-2022, 11:00 PM
Well this thread went over like a pregnant chick in a pole-vaulting contest.
theman93
03-01-2022, 11:34 PM
OP proving to be a moron yet again.
Baller789
03-01-2022, 11:46 PM
What is your argument on why it wouldn't count?
You made the thread.
How is this an apples to apples comparison?:oldlol:
The mickey bubble league was a tailor fit situation for lebron. MJ returning in 95 is not the same situation.
Well this thread went over like a pregnant chick in a pole-vaulting contest.
OP proving to be a moron yet again.
OP went awfully quiet.
Full Court
03-01-2022, 11:49 PM
OP went awfully quiet.
I'm sure he was typing out the OP, saying to himself, "I've got 'em now! Hehehehehehe!" :roll:
AirBonner
03-01-2022, 11:49 PM
2020 was prison bubble ring
Op, despite being a moronic gop fanboy, still got these anti-kong freaks sobbing itt.
ImKobe
03-02-2022, 02:08 AM
How does '95 compare to '20 exactly? Was there a global pandemic that shut down the season for 5 months? Did they have 0 crowds and no traveling?
If you think it's the same thing because MJ missed most of the season, it's not. He was NOT in basketball shape as he was a full-time baseball player, so he wasn't resting at home and gearing up for a Playoff run for 5 months like Bran, and the Orlando Magic team that they faced alone was better than anything the Lakers played in 2020.
and the Orlando Magic team that they faced alone was better than anything the Lakers played in 2020.
:whatever:
TheGoatest
03-02-2022, 02:20 AM
Those homo's call 2020 a shit ring but guarantee they'd call a 95 title a legit ring for MJ.
None of the rings won in that weak era are legit. Meanwhile, we have players on record saying that when the bubble started, the 2020 championship would be the toughest ever. :applause:
ImKobe
03-02-2022, 03:14 AM
:whatever:
Prime Shaq & Penny with 3PT shooters & Grant, who was an All-Star in '94. That team was loaded. The 2020 Heat come close but 2 of their best 3 players were injured in the Finals so yeah.
Baller789
03-02-2022, 03:21 AM
Prime Shaq & Penny with 3PT shooters & Grant, who was an All-Star in '94. That team was loaded. The 2020 Heat come close but 2 of their best 3 players were injured in the Finals so yeah.
That young Magic was pretty good. Even if they were swept in their first finals, in theory they should have improved. Even if Grant was healthy I couldn't see them beating the Bulls. The defense they played was too good.
ImKobe
03-02-2022, 03:28 AM
That young Magic was pretty good. Even if they were swept in their first finals, in theory they should have improved. Even if Grant was healthy I couldn't see them beating the Bulls. The defense they played was too good.
Rockets had a really good team that year as well. Magic choked in that series, it wasn't a 4 - 0 stomping with all blowout losses, those games were all tough. Clyde doesn't get enough credit as the #2 option who put up 22/10/7 in the Finals and they had shooters around Hakeem. Horry as the 3rd option averaged 18/10/4/3/2 with ~38%3PT at 7.2 attempts per game. They were built like a modern NBA team. Both the Magic and Rockets would translate really well to this era.
Baller789
03-02-2022, 03:31 AM
Rockets had a really good team that year as well. Magic choked in that series, it wasn't a 4 - 0 stomping with all blowout losses, those games were all tough. Clyde doesn't get enough credit as the #2 option who put up 22/10/7 in the Finals and they had shooters around Hakeem. Horry as the 3rd option averaged 18/10/4/3/2 with ~38%3PT at 7.2 attempts per game. They were built like a modern NBA team. Both the Magic and Rockets would translate really well to this era.
Both centers would annihilate any modern big.
I think any of those two teams have a shot at the Championship today.
TheGoatest
03-02-2022, 03:41 AM
Prime Shaq & Penny with 3PT shooters & Grant, who was an All-Star in '94. That team was loaded.
Not loaded enough not to get swept in the finals by a 6th seed though. :oldlol:
But at least you're acknowledging that a team who had early-to-mid 90s Horace Grant was loaded.
ImKobe
03-02-2022, 03:45 AM
Not loaded enough not to get swept in the finals by a 6th seed though. :oldlol:
But at least you're acknowledging that a team who had early-to-mid 90s Horace Grant was loaded.
They had 3 All-Star caliber players and good 3PT shooters around them. Rockets also traded for Drexler mid-season. They were also 3 - 7 in games Hakeem missed that year. Rockets were the #2 seed and won it all in '94 & added Drexler so it's not like it was a huge upset lmao.
Both centers would annihilate any modern big.
I think any of those two teams have a shot at the Championship today.
Agreed. While Shaq is a worse all-around player than Embiid, there's no way Embiid could stop Shaq inside the paint without fouling him. Shaq was like 30-50 pounds heavier in his prime.
TheGoatest
03-02-2022, 03:55 AM
They had 3 All-Star caliber players and good 3PT shooters around them. Rockets also traded for Drexler mid-season. They were also 3 - 7 in games Hakeem missed that year. Rockets were the #2 seed and won it all in '94 & added Drexler so it's not like it was a huge upset lmao.
Funny how you mention the Rockets record without Hakeem in 1994-95 while also mentioning that their addition of Drexler, while conveniently not mentioning that their record in the 47 games prior to acquiring Clyde Drexler that season was better than their record in the 35 games with Drexler.
The contrast between what happened in 1994-95 and 1995-96 is indisputable proof that the Bulls winning throughout the 90s was entirely a team effort and had nothing to do with Jordan's performance:
Jordan's averages in the 1995 2nd round LOSS against the Magic: 31.0 ppg on .477, 6.5 rpg, 3.7 apg, 2.5 spg and 1.8 bpg
Jordan's averages in the 1996 Finals WIN against the Sonics: 27.3 ppg on .415, 5.3 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.7 spg and 0.2 bpg
Explain that. You can't! The only explanation is that (in addition to The Great Scott Pippen) he also needed all-defenders Rodman/Grant. And a stacked team overall.
And you dare to talk about the subject of "empty stats". :oldlol:
Funny how you mention the Rockets record without Hakeem in 1994-95 while also mentioning that their addition of Drexler, while conveniently not mentioning that their record in the 47 games prior to acquiring Clyde Drexler that season was better than their record in the 35 games with Drexler.
The contrast between what happened in 1994-95 and 1995-96 is indisputable proof that the Bulls winning throughout the 90s was entirely a team effort and had nothing to do with Jordan's performance:
Jordan's averages in the 1995 2nd round LOSS against the Magic: 31.0 ppg on .477, 6.5 rpg, 3.7 apg, 2.5 spg and 1.8 bpg
Jordan's averages in the 1996 Finals WIN against the Sonics: 27.3 ppg on .415, 5.3 rpg, 4.2 apg, 1.7 spg and 0.2 bpg
Explain that. You can't! The only explanation is that (in addition to The Great Scott Pippen) he also needed all-defenders Rodman/Grant. And a stacked team overall.
And you dare to talk about the subject of "empty stats". :oldlol:
Well, you keep on crying about how the 90s were a weak and watered-down era but for the bulls sans baldan who you couldn't stop whining about daily with your monetized troll account, it didn't result to any rings for them when he was absent for that period. They should have, given that they had joke competition throughout their dynasty days.
Anyway, you're lame and gay. Get a life and stfu. ./.
Baller789
03-02-2022, 04:22 AM
Explain that. You can't! The only explanation is that (in addition to The Great Scott Pippen) he also needed all-defenders Rodman/Grant. And a stacked team overall.
And you dare to talk about the subject of "empty stats". :oldlol:
Is this the same Great Scott Pippen who shot 40%fg in 95? Just askin'.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.