The Grizzlies are simply a different team without Ja

[ArbitraryWater]

Cant forget all the idiots who think they're as good with him: full court, smooch_m8, pero antic, etc.

[Spurs m8]

Seems we have this kid in a spin, AGAIN.

[ImKobe]

This take is going to age well..

[ArbitraryWater]

This take is going to age well..

what exactly do you figure will happen for this to look badly aged?

[Axe]

Don't forget RogueBorg.


Cant forget all the idiots who think they're as good with him: full court, smooch_m8, pero antic, etc.
:roll:

[Bronbron23]

Cant forget all the idiots who think they're as good with him: full court, smooch_m8, pero antic, etc.

Funny thing is I bet you think if these guys were on Lakers with Bron they'd still be this good:oldlol:

[PeroAntic]

yep, now that the main obstacle to success is gone, Dillon Brooks gonna finally win that FMVP :oldlol:

[Full Court]

Cant forget all the idiots who think they're as good with him: full court, smooch_m8, pero antic, etc.

You sound very upset.

Things that trigger Bronies:

1. Michael Jordan
2. Wilt Chamberlain
3. 3ball
4. Steph Curry
5. Ja Morant

:lebroncry:

[ArbitraryWater]

what exactly do you figure will happen for this to look badly aged?

paging ImKobe

[ImKobe]

what exactly do you figure will happen for this to look badly aged?

Idk, they go on to lose without him in the next game, which is most likely the case?

You do realize that they're able to field a team as deep as they currently are because Ja's only making ~10 million & Desmond Bane is at 2 million this season, right? That's what deep teams do. Once the great young players hit their primes and start getting paid like all the other superstars in the league, the depth goes away. So yes, they can be really good without Ja right now because him, Desmond Bane & JJJ only combine for about 21 million total in salary this season, but once all 3 are on a max or at least a 30m+ contract, it's not going to be the same.

It's such a simple concept, but you're either braindead or just desperate for my replies with your low IQ ass takes.

[hold this L]

You sound very upset.

Things that trigger Bronies:

1. Michael Jordan
2. Wilt Chamberlain
3. 3ball
4. Steph Curry
5. Ja Morant

:lebroncry:

Why would Lebron fans care about Ja?

[ArbitraryWater]

Idk, they go on to lose without him in the next game, which is most likely the case?

You do realize that they're able to field a team as deep as they currently are because Ja's only making ~10 million & Desmond Bane is at 2 million this season, right? That's what deep teams do. Once the great young players hit their primes and start getting paid like all the other superstars in the league, the depth goes away. So yes, they can be really good without Ja right now because him, Desmond Bane & JJJ only combine for about 21 million total in salary this season, but once all 3 are on a max or at least a 30m+ contract, it's not going to be the same.

It's such a simple concept, but you're either braindead or just desperate for my replies with your low IQ ass takes.

which would kill the premise of this thread, how?

They already fared better without Ja than with, lol.

You think losing game 6 would mean this thread is not aging well?

Boy you better hope they lose game 6, cause you'd look like a retard if they don't.

[ImKobe]

which would kill the premise of this thread, how?

They already fared better without Ja than with, lol.

You think losing game 6 would mean this thread is not aging well?

Boy you better hope they lose game 6, cause you'd look like a retard if they don't.

If they're better without him, they should be able to win the next 2 with Game 7 at home, right?

[ArbitraryWater]

If they're better without him, they should be able to win the next 2 with Game 7 at home, right?

https://media.tenor.com/images/995dd6e4a5e420303d1c4f550d44c6cd/raw



Just,

WHY, dude?


Do you ever ask yourself if you are retarded?

[RRR3]

Why would Lebron fans care about Ja?
We don't, he thinks people pointing out Ja is overrated is "hating". I'm not sure why he thinks we care about someone who has nowhere near the playoff resume of LeBron either (Wilt). He's not very smart.

[RRR3]

https://media.tenor.com/images/995dd6e4a5e420303d1c4f550d44c6cd/raw



Just,

WHY, dude?


Do you ever ask yourself if you are retarded?
One of the stupidest posters on here. All he ever thinks about is Kobe's ****.

[ImKobe]

Just,

WHY, dude?


Do you ever ask yourself if you are retarded?

So if they're better without Ja and just had one of the greatest blowout wins in Playoff history, they can win this series with Game 7 on their home court, right?

If this goes to 7, they're favorites to beat GS without him, right?

Answer me.

[Full Court]

So if they're better without Ja and just had one of the greatest blowout wins in Playoff history, they can win this series with Game 7 on their home court, right?

If this goes to 7, they're favorites to beat GS without him, right?

Answer me.

Lol at all these low-IQ morons. Grizzlies had the second best record in the league if I recall correctly. With Morant injured, they should be a sure lock for the title if they're better without him.

[Shogon]

Lol at all these low-IQ morons. Grizzlies had the second best record in the league if I recall correctly. With Morant injured, they should be a sure lock for the title if they're better without him.

Your logic is so undeniably bad at this point that... while you have not reached asshole troll status just yet, I can't anymore. It's a waste of energy. There is no amount of explaining or reasonable discussion that is ever going to get through to you. Good luck in life.

To the graveyard you go.

[ArbitraryWater]

So if they're better without Ja and just had one of the greatest blowout wins in Playoff history, they can win this series with Game 7 on their home court, right?

If this goes to 7, they're favorites to beat GS without him, right?

Answer me.

They could, but it's not a necessity in order to prove they're better without Morant.


Are you retarded my man?


Did you forget how you estimated this series to be with Morant?


Here, reminder:

https://i.gyazo.com/f614f49948ef9e3f93156509e1a68d8b.png


****ing retard

[Kawhi_Why_Not]

Role players were able to dominate warriors more then our fatshit fake mvp ever did. That's a tragedy.

We'll see if Grizzles can ever close a game without ja, they already choked in game 4

[Full Court]

Your logic is so undeniably bad at this point that... while you have not reached asshole troll status just yet, I can't anymore. It's a waste of energy. There is no amount of explaining or reasonable discussion that is ever going to get through to you. Good luck in life.

To the graveyard you go.

I haven't seen much in the way of "reasonable discussion" out of you anyway.

Of course my logic is bad...I was demonstrating the bad logic of those that say the Grizzlies are better without Morant. That shouldn't have been hard to pick up on.

[Full Court]

Ya'll can think what you want, but with or without Morant, I'm hoping the Grizzlies can pull off the comeback against the warriors.

[GimmeThat]

to be fair, there's another Murray State guy named Cameron Payne getting some meaningful minutes in this playoff on the Suns.

Ja has no Duke lineage, which means maybe he hasn't had the time to completely adjusted to the 8-9 men rotation Jenkin employs, but to say there isn't 1 or 2 5-man unit where he's a clear plus, is absurd.

[SATAN]

Your logic is so undeniably bad at this point that... while you have not reached asshole troll status just yet, I can't anymore. It's a waste of energy. There is no amount of explaining or reasonable discussion that is ever going to get through to you. Good luck in life.

To the graveyard you go.

:roll:

[2much_knowledge]

Ya'll can think what you want, but with or without Morant, I'm hoping the Grizzlies can pull off the comeback against the warriors.

Thats it. Nothing more needs to be said

[ImKobe]

They could, but it's not a necessity in order to prove they're better without Morant.


Are you retarded my man?


Did you forget how you estimated this series to be with Morant?


Here, reminder:

https://i.gyazo.com/f614f49948ef9e3f93156509e1a68d8b.png


****ing retard

Welp, they got smoked after a fools' gold win at home.


At least you tried.

[PeroAntic]

So will the stains explain how did the greatest team in history (Grizzlies without Morant) lose against the GSW?

[CelticBaller]

you have to be really dumb to think this team is better without him lol. Morant has a really good team around, and he makes them better

[Cold soul]

The Grizzlies really miss Ja offense and scoring late in games he gives Memphis a extra push if healthy this series goes 7 games.

[AlternativeAcc.]

The Grizzlies really miss Ja offense and scoring late in games he gives Memphis a extra push if healthy this series goes 7 games.

Yeah bro them getting smoked by 40 with morant to go down 2-1 on the road painted a clear picture of a 7 game series

[PeroAntic]

Yeah bro them getting smoked by 40 with morant to go down 2-1 on the road painted a clear picture of a 7 game series

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

[AlternativeAcc.]

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

Saying they're better without morant doesn't imply they're goat level

Thanks for the retarded question though

[PeroAntic]

Saying they're better without morant doesn't imply they're goat level

Thanks for the retarded question though

You said that because they were 20-2 without Morant and then won by 50 points the last game. Idiot.

[AlternativeAcc.]

You said that because they were 20-2 without Morant and then won by 50 points the last game. Idiot.

They were 20-2 without morant? They won by 50 without him in a playoff game against a team with 5 all star caliber players?

God damn :oldlol:

[PeroAntic]

They were 20-2 without morant? They won by 50 without him in a playoff game against a team with 5 all star caliber players?

God damn :oldlol:

GOAT team, right?

[AlternativeAcc.]

GOAT team, right?

MVP right? That was the original conversation about Morant.

You went from saying he's the MVP to failing to argue they're even better with him on the team. :roll: that's hilarious. You're such a preposterous retard. :oldlol:

[PeroAntic]

MVP right? That was the original conversation about Morant.

You went from saying he's the MVP to failing to argue they're even better with him on the team. :roll: that's hilarious. You're such a preposterous retard. :oldlol:
How did the goat team lose against GSW you pathetic turd? Is that too complicated of a question to answer?

[AlternativeAcc.]

How did the goat team lose against GSW you pathetic turd? Is that too complicated of a question to answer?

If you can find a post where I said they're the GOAT team and they'd best the warriors (who I said before the playoffs were the title favorites after becoming healthy) then I'll concede this one to you.

Until then you're still the forums perpetual jazz rag bitch with the worst takes of all time. :oldlol:

[Full Court]

So how come this goat level team lost last night? They were without Morant, should have been a guarantee to win

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

[AlternativeAcc.]

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.' :roll:

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though :roll::roll:

[PeroAntic]

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.' :roll:

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though :roll::roll:

Yes, that he should be MVP is a horrible take, but that he should be their sixth man is a great take:facepalm

You seem incapable of answering the question why did this team which is apparently so amazing without Morant lose... without Morant???

Is the question unclear? Are you illiterate? You might be based on the 'jazz rag' bit :oldlol:

[AlternativeAcc.]

Yes, that he should be MVP is a horrible take, but that he should be their sixth man is a great take:facepalm

You seem incapable of answering the question why did this team which is apparently so amazing without Morant lose... without Morant???

Is the question unclear? Are you illiterate? You might be based on the 'jazz rag' bit :ol:

In the 3 games Morant played they got outscored by 26.

In the 3 games he DIDNT play they outscored the Warriors by 22.

MVP :roll::roll::roll:

Get on your knubs and swallow my c*m. That'd be less humiliating than what I'm doing to you with words. :oldlol:

[Spurs m8]

Exactly. The Morant haters appear to be just a bunch of dumb Bronies. They draw the simplest of conclusions from single data points that don't take context into account, and then they double down on stupid when they're proven wrong.

Are the Grizzlies good with out Morant? Absolutely. Do they play better defense without Morant? Arguably so. Are they BETTER without Morant? That's just moronic.

Yep.

Bron stans :roll::roll::roll:

[Full Court]

You were campaigning for him to win MVP, which is a laughably horrible take considering you can't even make a convincing argument that they're even better with him on the team. The convo went from 'he's MVP' to 'theyre better with him on the team.' :roll:

He's literally the only 'superstar' I can think of in history where there's an argument that his team is better without him.

MVP though :roll::roll:

Nominating Morant for MVP literally put you in tears. :roll:

"Waaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh somebody praised Morant! I CAN'T HANDLE IT!!!!"

:lebroncry:

You should try grief counseling.

[PeroAntic]

In the 3 games Morant played they got outscored by 26.

In the 3 games he DIDNT play they outscored the Warriors by 22.

MVP :roll::roll::roll:

Get on your knubs and swallow my c*m. That'd be less humiliating than what I'm doing to you with words.

This mongoloid seems to think the winner of a series is decided by total points not games won:roll: fk it Im out:oldlol:

[AlternativeAcc.]

This mongoloid seems to think the winner of a series is decided by total points not games won:roll: fk it Im out:oldlol:

Another pathetic strawman argument concocted out of thin air, looks like I win in a landslide..

Have fun at the ball pit at Chuck e cheese you down syndrome mfer :oldlol:

[Spurs m8]

Best part is, Morants here for another 10 years

The pain for bron stans is real :roll:

[Full Court]

Best part is, Morants here for another 10 years

The pain for bron stans is real :roll:

Yep! It's going to be fun.

:hammertime:

[Spurs m8]

Yep! It's going to be fun.

:hammertime:

I also meant to type 15 years lol

Keep the suffering coming

[imdaman99]

Until Ja improves from being a traffic cone on defense, he will not become a championship level player. He can do it, just become serviceable and put up a fight. He's gotta put on weight for that though.