PDA

View Full Version : Is the future of 'humanity' worth caring about, or nah?



FultzNationRISE
06-23-2022, 03:47 PM
Curious what people think about this. There's no right or wrong answer.

I think for most of us the instinctive response is "sure, of course" because it's kind of a social norm to view concern for the future as a virtue. On the other hand, our actions as a species often indicate that the abstract idea of "the future of humanity" isnt really such a priority in our lives when it comes right down to it. And who's to say it should be?

I'm just wondering how everyone sees it. Is it something we should be more consciously focused on, or is it simply better to let whatever will happen happen, without any particular emphasis on directing society toward one way or another? Why or why not?

Also, I understand this discussion is likely to go absolutely nowhere on ISH and will probably peter out at under two pages. But figured I'd post the poll/question anyway.

Im Still Ballin
06-23-2022, 03:54 PM
Of course. The most honourable deed in life is servitude: giving back. To others, to humanity, to civilisation. You got to leave Mother Earth better off than when you found her.

We're here today because of the works, contributions, and sacrifices of the generations before us. A continual effort of improving the shared lexicon of our species.

Im Still Ballin
06-23-2022, 03:55 PM
So, with that in mind, I voted 'yay.'

Off the Court
06-23-2022, 03:56 PM
When dealing with the future of humanity we must first ask ourselves about the weight of anyone with a 4XL NBA Jersey collection. How much weight are we dealing with exactly? 300 lbs? 400 lbs?

So many Xs.

Im Still Ballin
06-23-2022, 04:13 PM
Is climate change maybe perhaps exaggerated? Sure. But from a fundamental perspective, it's a reasonable concern. The sooner we get a handle on it and find more sustainable energy sources, the better the world will be in the future.

Shooter
06-23-2022, 05:00 PM
I think it's an obvious yes but to what degree, correct? Where do you draw the line is what I'm assuming you're focusing on.

I think we should all be conscious about our impact on the future and its resources but at the same time I don't need a tree hugging fakkit telling me to stop eating meat :lol

Axe
06-23-2022, 05:10 PM
When dealing with the future of humanity we must first ask ourselves about the weight of anyone with a 4XL NBA Jersey collection. How much weight are we dealing with exactly? 300 lbs? 400 lbs?

So many Xs.
:milton

warriorfan
06-23-2022, 05:23 PM
We are too far gone.

Time to let the apes have their shot.

tpols
06-23-2022, 06:00 PM
Of course. The most honourable deed in life is servitude: giving back. To others, to humanity, to civilisation. You got to leave Mother Earth better off than when you found her.

We're here today because of the works, contributions, and sacrifices of the generations before us. A continual effort of improving the shared lexicon of our species.

I hate to break it to you buddy, but humans have been the most destructive species to other life and mother nature to ever exist.

tpols
06-23-2022, 06:05 PM
Curious what people think about this. There's no right or wrong answer.

I think for most of us the instinctive response is "sure, of course" because it's kind of a social norm to view concern for the future as a virtue. On the other hand, our actions as a species often indicate that the abstract idea of "the future of humanity" isnt really such a priority in our lives when it comes right down to it. And who's to say it should be?

I'm just wondering how everyone sees it. Is it something we should be more consciously focused on, or is it simply better to let whatever will happen happen, without any particular emphasis on directing society toward one way or another? Why or why not?

Also, I understand this discussion is likely to go absolutely nowhere on ISH and will probably peter out at under two pages. But figured I'd post the poll/question anyway.

What can any individual do to "direct society"? Were not in control bro. We could be if we all collectively resisted, but there's way too many people that are easily tricked and misled.

Im Still Ballin
06-23-2022, 06:15 PM
I hate to break it to you buddy, but humans have been the most destructive species to other life and mother nature to ever exist.

It's the intent. We got to try; we can start with climate change and renewable energy.

red1
06-23-2022, 06:20 PM
we live in a time of comfort and excess, in the epicenter of comfort of and excess. the fact that you see human moral decay around every corner should not be a surprise. we are the softest and most ungrateful generation of all time. and this is a global trend, all possible because of the wonders of technology and advancement.


previous generations were forced to work hard to support families, and quite literally, to survive.


hard work strengthens character.


the human spirit is only revealed in the face of adversity.


we would all be amazed at what we could achieve, if we only pushed ourselves.


and sticking to the subject and considering character, the greatest joy that a human being can achieve is helping others. and this is coming from an aggressive man that has everything that he wants, and took it himself. dominating his surroundings - its a dopamine-related mental sickness, a desire to win at everything.


but yet the best joy in my life is helping others, picking them up when they cant do it themselves. because they aren't as strong as you. I have the desire to be kind and help people, its literally a part of my DNA. that makes me think there is an undeniable positive underlying aspect to this universe. a god if you will.


human beings are naturally gentle and kind. we take care of other animals. we take care of our surroundings. we are peaceful and wise apes. considering the fact that we live in cities with millions of people and have this little violence - I would vote yes on humanity.

Bill Gates
06-23-2022, 06:30 PM
What can any individual do to "direct society"? Were not in control bro. We could be if we all collectively resisted, but there's way too many people that are easily tricked and misled.
It doesn't matter who is leading or which political leanings society chooses to live by. Science and technology will continue to advance and civilization will advance with it. That is the natural progression of humanity and any other advanced species out there. Our standard of living and our life expectancy will slowly increase over the years no matter who is in charge.

AlternativeAcc.
06-23-2022, 07:01 PM
I think most people lack the discipline to follow through with methods that could potentially help the future of the planet/species. But it's obviosuly natural to be empathetic to humankind in general and want it to prosper. I don't think there's any grand purpose or meaning to our species, but I care about our future