Abortion is so boomer. Who's ready for sterilization?

[Long Duck Dong]

The single greatest threat to climate change, pollution, deforestation, flora and fauna conservation or whatever societal religion you choose to follow, isn't a car's tail pipe, or a smoke stack or a cow's fart, it's human overpopulation. This is one of the reasons I think it's so silly to oppose abortion. This planet doesn't need any more people on it.

Even worse we are incentivizing the wrong people to have children. The dumb, uneducated, people with lack of work ethic, and government dependant should not be given incentives to have more children. We should be sterilizing all criminals, and paying people with low IQs who don't work hard or have any other redeeming benefit to society to get sterilized. People who are educated, have shown a long history of uninterrupted work, those with highly measured IQs, high incomes that were not somehow inherited, and those of elite athletic ability should be the ones incentivized to have children. Also those in other nations that are reluctant to stop pollution, deforestation and the destruction of nature around them should be as highly encouraged as possible to terminating pregnancies and given incentives in exchange for sterilization.

If you care about the environment, you should be solidly behind incentivized sterilization around the world

[Off the Court]

None of the posters in here actually care about young minority fetuses.

They're just tribal sheep who support what they're told.

Everyone knows the planet is better off with legal abortion.

[Lakers Legend#32]

'Murica is now the only first world nation where women don't have access to reproductive rights.

[Long Duck Dong]

'Murica is now the only first world nation where women don't have access to reproductive rights.

It's kinda racist to assume only white nations are first world nations. Otherwise this statement is not true and it's much easier to get an abortion in the US than virtually any part of the world including your first world white nations.

[FultzNationRISE]

The single greatest threat to climate change, pollution, deforestation, flora and fauna conservation or whatever societal religion you choose to follow, isn't a car's tail pipe, or a smoke stack or a cow's fart, it's human overpopulation. This is one of the reasons I think it's so silly to oppose abortion. This planet doesn't need any more people on it.

Even worse we are incentivizing the wrong people to have children. The dumb, uneducated, people with lack of work ethic, and government dependant should not be given incentives to have more children. We should be sterilizing all criminals, and paying people with low IQs who don't work hard or have any other redeeming benefit to society to get sterilized. People who are educated, have shown a long history of uninterrupted work, those with highly measured IQs, high incomes that were not somehow inherited, and those of elite athletic ability should be the ones incentivized to have children. Also those in other nations that are reluctant to stop pollution, deforestation and the destruction of nature around them should be as highly encouraged as possible to terminating pregnancies and given incentives in exchange for sterilization.

If you care about the environment, you should be solidly behind incentivized sterilization around the world

It’s a double edged sword, and either direction we go is going to have its positives and pitfalls. There are a lot of dominoes to work thru when it comes to modeling the future.

Would be happy to discuss it in a bit more detail here (Patreon.com/tofp)

[BigKobeFan]

'Murica is now the only first world nation where women don't have access to reproductive rights.

You are an idiot

[Patrick Chewing]

None of the posters in here actually care about young minority fetuses.

They're just tribal sheep who support what they're told.

Everyone knows the planet is better off with legal abortion.

What you fail to understand or what you fail to see because you are blinded by blind partisanship is that the Right and Left both don't care about these humans. Yes, someone is being born right now this very second as we speak and we will never know that person or interact with them, so they are not important to us and they will never cross our minds. Just like I don't care about you. I interact with you on a message board, but I don't know you. You are not in my life. If you were to die tomorrow, I frankly wouldn't care. Just as I'm sure you wouldn't care if I died tomorrow.

However, the difference between our way of thinking and your way of thinking is crucial to understanding both our positions here. While we know that we both don't care for this human, it is what happens to this human that sets us apart. The reason why the Left has no problem with a baby being killed at the request of the mother (an abortion) is because you don't care about that human. And then, to justify that position so that you don't come across as heartless, you lump the Right in there as well and say that the Right doesn't care about them either. Which again, we've established, this is correct. However, the Right sees an abortion as murder. We see an abortion as a primitive way to eliminate a human just because this human might be a burden or might be a "mistake" which most babies who are aborted are. And let's face it, abortions due to rape and incest are like less than one percent, so you can't make that argument hold any weight. We live in a 21st century society where this barbaric act still takes place and is still defended and that's where the Right differs from the Left. Our solutions to abortions is simple. Don't get pregnant. Have some accountability. But to continuously kill a human being because you are careless and reckless, nope, that should never get a pass. It should never be normalized.

[RRR3]

It's kinda racist to assume only white nations are first world nations. Otherwise this statement is not true and it's much easier to get an abortion in the US than virtually any part of the world including your first world white nations.
The reason most “first world” nations are predominantly white is because of an incredibly long history of European imperialism and colonialism, it’s hardly racist to point that out.

[RRR3]

Overpopulation is a myth, we have plenty of resources to support everyone, the problem is people at the top hoarding shit. Abortion should obviously be legal though.

[FultzNationRISE]

The reason most “first world” nations are predominantly white is because of an incredibly long history of European imperialism and colonialism, it’s hardly racist to point that out.

There werent empires and slavery in the Americas, Africa, and Asia...?

Not that I really wanna have a debate with you at this point. Your nature is what it is, and discussion wont change it.

You lost every single drawing in the genetic lottery EXCEPT being born in America (not that thats technically genetic, but it’s your one advantage over most of the world) and youve been tricked by billionaires into trading that in for the illusion of superiority in other regards, like “wokeness.”

Youre basically the litter box for every other human on earth right now, and you embrace it and just keep sticking to the same copes.

Everything about your existence is a giant L for you, yet at the same time a giant step ladder for wealthy billionaires and third world kids with flies on their face.

Everyone eats off pansy rrr3 except himself :lol

[Long Duck Dong]

Overpopulation is a myth, we have plenty of resources to support everyone, the problem is people at the top hoarding shit. Abortion should obviously be legal though.

A myth? :lol

I don't think even the staunchest anti climate change Republican would state this. To put things into perspective the only mammal that has numbers that come anywhere close to our own is the brown rat. Those huge islands of plastic bottles in the ocean, huge swaths of forests still being cut down, toxins from rechargeable batteries leaking into our ground water etc isn't getting better and it's not the rich doing most of it.

[RRR3]

A myth? :lol

I don't think even the staunchest anti climate change Republican would state this. To put things into perspective the only mammal that has numbers that come anywhere close to our own is the brown rat. Those huge islands of plastic bottles in the ocean, huge swaths of forests still being cut down, toxins from rechargeable batteries leaking into our ground water etc isn't getting better and it's not the rich doing most of it.
Yeah albeit a pretty widespread myth. Would the environment be less bad with less humans? Sure in theory but that’s kind of a genocidal way to look at it. and like I said we have the means of feeding everyone stuff just isn’t distributed even remotely fairly. As for the environmental problems the number of people would be fine if climate conscious values were widespread. They aren’t and that’s because the governments don’t want them to be.

[FultzNationRISE]

A myth? :lol

I don't think even the staunchest anti climate change Republican would state this. To put things into perspective the only mammal that has numbers that come anywhere close to our own is the brown rat. Those huge islands of plastic bottles in the ocean, huge swaths of forests still being cut down, toxins from rechargeable batteries leaking into our ground water etc isn't getting better and it's not the rich doing most of it.


His existence is pain. Everything he says is an angry, selfish cope. You cant reason with him and you cant work with him toward any sensible goals for society.

If you wanna really get down to brass tacks and talk about whats ahead and how we can influence society, you know where to find me. If you wanna keep having the same old useless debates with rr3, be my guest.

[Patrick Chewing]

RRR3's entire family line should be sterilized. People as stupid as him should not procreate. Existence is pain.

[oldtimer28]

What you fail to understand or what you fail to see because you are blinded by blind partisanship is that the Right and Left both don't care about these humans. Yes, someone is being born right now this very second as we speak and we will never know that person or interact with them, so they are not important to us and they will never cross our minds. Just like I don't care about you. I interact with you on a message board, but I don't know you. You are not in my life. If you were to die tomorrow, I frankly wouldn't care. Just as I'm sure you wouldn't care if I died tomorrow.

However, the difference between our way of thinking and your way of thinking is crucial to understanding both our positions here. While we know that we both don't care for this human, it is what happens to this human that sets us apart. The reason why the Left has no problem with a baby being killed at the request of the mother (an abortion) is because you don't care about that human. And then, to justify that position so that you don't come across as heartless, you lump the Right in there as well and say that the Right doesn't care about them either. Which again, we've established, this is correct. However, the Right sees an abortion as murder. We see an abortion as a primitive way to eliminate a human just because this human might be a burden or might be a "mistake" which most babies who are aborted are. And let's face it, abortions due to rape and incest are like less than one percent, so you can't make that argument hold any weight. We live in a 21st century society where this barbaric act still takes place and is still defended and that's where the Right differs from the Left. Our solutions to abortions is simple. Don't get pregnant. Have some accountability. But to continuously kill a human being because you are careless and reckless, nope, that should never get a pass. It should never be normalized.

Good post. I was pro abortion when younger buy now see the harm.

It should be an option of last resort.

[iamgine]

However, the difference between our way of thinking and your way of thinking is crucial to understanding both our positions here. While we know that we both don't care for this human, it is what happens to this human that sets us apart. The reason why the Left has no problem with a baby being killed at the request of the mother (an abortion) is because you don't care about that human. And then, to justify that position so that you don't come across as heartless, you lump the Right in there as well and say that the Right doesn't care about them either. Which again, we've established, this is correct. However, the Right sees an abortion as murder. We see an abortion as a primitive way to eliminate a human just because this human might be a burden or might be a "mistake" which most babies who are aborted are. And let's face it, abortions due to rape and incest are like less than one percent, so you can't make that argument hold any weight. We live in a 21st century society where this barbaric act still takes place and is still defended and that's where the Right differs from the Left. Our solutions to abortions is simple. Don't get pregnant. Have some accountability. But to continuously kill a human being because you are careless and reckless, nope, that should never get a pass. It should never be normalized.

I thought the difference is whether one think this is a human being or not.

[Jasper]

there you go : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-bLf4F0PM4

[Nanners]

What you fail to understand or what you fail to see because you are blinded by blind partisanship is that the Right and Left both don't care about these humans. Yes, someone is being born right now this very second as we speak and we will never know that person or interact with them, so they are not important to us and they will never cross our minds. Just like I don't care about you. I interact with you on a message board, but I don't know you. You are not in my life. If you were to die tomorrow, I frankly wouldn't care. Just as I'm sure you wouldn't care if I died tomorrow.

However, the difference between our way of thinking and your way of thinking is crucial to understanding both our positions here. While we know that we both don't care for this human, it is what happens to this human that sets us apart. The reason why the Left has no problem with a baby being killed at the request of the mother (an abortion) is because you don't care about that human. And then, to justify that position so that you don't come across as heartless, you lump the Right in there as well and say that the Right doesn't care about them either. Which again, we've established, this is correct. However, the Right sees an abortion as murder. We see an abortion as a primitive way to eliminate a human just because this human might be a burden or might be a "mistake" which most babies who are aborted are. And let's face it, abortions due to rape and incest are like less than one percent, so you can't make that argument hold any weight. We live in a 21st century society where this barbaric act still takes place and is still defended and that's where the Right differs from the Left. Our solutions to abortions is simple. Don't get pregnant. Have some accountability. But to continuously kill a human being because you are careless and reckless, nope, that should never get a pass. It should never be normalized.

:applause:

Well said, I agree 100%.

I think theres an argument for abortion to be permitted in the ~1% of instances where there are special circumstances like a true rape (regretting it after the fact doesnt count) or incest or something... but it absolutely should not be used as a last ditch form of contraception for lazy/irresponsible women - if you dont want a baby there are a million ways you can avoid getting pregnant.

It appalling to me that so many broads are so cavalier in the way they talk/think about abortion, its not rare to see these witches say things like "a fetus is basically just a tumor until its born"... calling any human a tumor is pretty dark, especially when its your own unborn child. Its also tragic that so many western women have been tricked into thinking that "womens rights" means being able to kill your unborn baby, despite the fact that from both scientific and religious perspectives human females were designed specifically for the role of creating/growing new humans... truly a great example of the satanic inversions that are increasingly common in modern western society.

[Jasper]

:applause:

Well said, I agree 100%.

I think theres an argument for abortion to be permitted in the ~1% of instances where there are special circumstances like a true rape (regretting it after the fact doesnt count) or incest or something... but it absolutely should not be used as a last ditch form of contraception for lazy/irresponsible women - if you dont want a baby there are a million ways you can avoid getting pregnant.

It appalling to me that so many broads are so cavalier in the way they talk/think about abortion, its not rare to see these witches say things like "a fetus is basically just a tumor until its born"... calling any human a tumor is pretty dark, especially when its your own unborn child. Its also tragic that so many western women have been tricked into thinking that "womens rights" means being able to kill your unborn baby, despite the fact that from both scientific and religious perspectives human females were designed specifically for the role of creating/growing new humans... truly a great example of the satanic inversions that are increasingly common in modern western society.

right wingers still believe all rapes are woman's faults.

[theman93]

right wingers still believe all rapes are woman's faults.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/AKaEfzaLlr0yI/giphy-downsized-large.gif

[Lakers Legend#32]

Poopsie does not give a damn about the "babies."

This is about getting back at all the women who won't have sex with him because he's a conservative.

[Nanners]

right wingers still believe all rapes are woman's faults.

because unlike lefties, right wingers are at leastcapable of acknowledging reality - most of them are womens faults

[Patrick Chewing]

https://media1.giphy.com/media/AKaEfzaLlr0yI/giphy-downsized-large.gif

:oldlol:

[ShawkFactory]

What you fail to understand or what you fail to see because you are blinded by blind partisanship is that the Right and Left both don't care about these humans. Yes, someone is being born right now this very second as we speak and we will never know that person or interact with them, so they are not important to us and they will never cross our minds. Just like I don't care about you. I interact with you on a message board, but I don't know you. You are not in my life. If you were to die tomorrow, I frankly wouldn't care. Just as I'm sure you wouldn't care if I died tomorrow.

However, the difference between our way of thinking and your way of thinking is crucial to understanding both our positions here. While we know that we both don't care for this human, it is what happens to this human that sets us apart. The reason why the Left has no problem with a baby being killed at the request of the mother (an abortion) is because you don't care about that human. And then, to justify that position so that you don't come across as heartless, you lump the Right in there as well and say that the Right doesn't care about them either. Which again, we've established, this is correct. However, the Right sees an abortion as murder. We see an abortion as a primitive way to eliminate a human just because this human might be a burden or might be a "mistake" which most babies who are aborted are. And let's face it, abortions due to rape and incest are like less than one percent, so you can't make that argument hold any weight. We live in a 21st century society where this barbaric act still takes place and is still defended and that's where the Right differs from the Left. Our solutions to abortions is simple. Don't get pregnant. Have some accountability. But to continuously kill a human being because you are careless and reckless, nope, that should never get a pass. It should never be normalized.

Lol how does that look for you?