Who was better at their peak: Amar'e Stoudemire or Chris Webber?

[Im Still Ballin]

Title.

[John8204]

Oh that is a really good question....I lean towards Webber because he did more as he was a 20ppg/10rb/5assists over Amare who was a .500 scorer and The Suns felt like they were a better team

[Xiao Yao You]

Webber. Not close

[HoopsNY]

Webber. Not close

Why is that?

[KNOW1EDGE]

I’d say Webber, just from the eye test. Not sure how comparable their statistics are.

Webber was more well-rounded, Amare was an athletic freak.

[L.Kizzle]

Webber avg more points, rebs, assist, steals and blocks compared to Amare. And Amare was nice too, don't get me wrong.

[SATAN]

Webber was more skilled. Always felt Stoudemire was slightly overrated.

[PP34Deuce]

Prime Stoudemire was a dominant scorer and clutch.

Webber was more talented better overall but shit the bed crunch times.

[Im Still Ballin]

Good answers. I'd go with Webber too. I like his passing on offense and his better defense. I feel like it'd be easier to build a team around Webber. Him operating out of the elbow, shooting, slashing, setting screens, and passing to cutters and shooters.

Amar'e's efficiency was boosted tremendously by playing with Nash. I think he got a 4-6% FG the stats showed. He showed in NYC that he could hold his own, but his shooting percentages dropped off.

Even with Amar'e's superior finishing, I'd still take Webber's sick passing game. Better for the team offense as a whole.

[HoopologyPhD]

At first glance they seem somewhat comparable, but I think Webber is quite a bit better.

[Red Pill Sports]

Webber was a bit more rounded due to his passing ability but otherwise they were pretty similar.

[PeroAntic]

I love Amare but Webber was a better defender, rebounder and passer so its not really close tbh.

[NBA 90s]

Amare was more exciting but Webber was a more complete player.

[SaltyMeatballs]

Webber was a lot more skilled