View Full Version : Lebron sucks
3ba11
05-23-2023, 08:46 AM
The most losses ever for an all-timer (16) including numerous lotteries, 4-0 sweeps, record losses, massive upset losses, and he was locked up a bunch, while also having weak clutch stats & efficiency compared to his peers...
He did all of this while team-hopping around and hand-picking super-teams for a decade!!
What a fraud
TheMan
05-23-2023, 08:50 AM
1-9
Piece of shit
:milton
Foster5k
05-23-2023, 09:00 AM
The most losses ever for an all-timer (16) including numerous lotteries, 4-0 sweeps, record losses, massive upset losses, and he was locked up a bunch, while also having weak clutch stats & efficiency compared to his peers...
He did all of this while team-hopping around and hand-picking super-teams for a decade!!
What a fraud
You told us that the 2023 Lakers were a stacked team. You said that the team had been designed to facilitate an easy championship for LeBron. You asserted that AD would be the one to carry LeBron to the chip. You stated the NBA wanted LeBron to win.
Nevertheless, the Lakers ended up getting swept.
Your initial narrative has proven incorrect, and now you seem to be formulating another. You're a delusional stan of Jordan who has yet to achieve anything of note in your woefully lackluster existence. Continue to share your thoughts on ISH, but keep in mind that what you write is likely to hold significance for no one other than yourself.
3ba11
05-23-2023, 09:03 AM
You told us that the 2023 Lakers were a stacked team. You said that the team had been designed to facilitate an easy championship for LeBron. You asserted that AD would be the one to carry LeBron to the chip. You stated the NBA wanted LeBron to win.
Nevertheless, the Lakers ended up getting swept.
Your initial narrative has proven incorrect, and now you seem to be formulating another. You're a delusional stan of Jordan who has yet to achieve anything of note in your woefully lackluster existence. Continue to share your thoughts on ISH, but keep in mind that what you write is likely to hold significance for no one other than yourself.
The Lakers were the most stacked team in the league but Lebron could only average 22 ppg off-ball - his off-ball game was allowing Reaves and company to play great, but Lebron could only add 22 ppg on top of that.
That was the problem. This season confirmed that Lebron wasn't capable of being a dominant off-ball player.
If he could add 30-35 off-ball like Curry or MJ, then these Lakers would've been the dominant, dynasty favorite that they were supposed to be.. But Lebron isn't capable of having a dominant dynasty and consistent favorite or having a team that mostly wins titles - 2 decades has confirmed that.. It's because he isn't dominant off-ball, and otherwise his abormal ball-dominance for his size/position imposes spot-up roles that stall young players, thereby needing ready-made stars to win.. And he's the worst clutch player of any all-time great
Foster5k
05-23-2023, 09:06 AM
The Lakers were the most stacked team in the league but Lebron could only average 22 ppg off-ball - his off-ball game was allowing Reaves and company to play great, but Lebron could only add 22 ppg on top of that.
That was the problem. This season confirmed that Lebron wasn't capable of being a dominant off-ball player.
If he could add 30-35 off-ball like Curry or MJ, then these Lakers would've been the dominant, dynasty favorite that they were supposed to be.. But Lebron isn't capable of having a dominant dynasty and consistent favorite or having a team that mostly wins titles - 2 decades has confirmed that.. It's because he isn't dominant off-ball, and otherwise his abormal ball-dominance for his size/position imposes spot-up roles that stall young players, thereby needing ready-made stars to win
:facepalm
3ba11
05-23-2023, 09:09 AM
:facepalm
When did Lebron have a dominant dynasty that was a consistent favorite and mostly won titles each year?
He isn't capable of having a team that mostly win and is a perennial favorite - 20 seasons confirmed that he's only capable of having perennial underdogs and losers REGARDLESS OF CAST..
this bum had a veteran super-team that was underdog to baby Westbrick in 2012 - this is just the tip of the iceberg on how Lebron's teams were never as good as they were supposed to be.. "not 6, not 7" turned into being an underdog to Westbrick and 2/4 including the goat choke and record loss.. then lottery with Ingram/Kuzma.. his hand-picked super-team and preseason favorites turned to underdog or loser for 6 straight years (11-16').. the underachievement is UNENDING
Wally450
05-23-2023, 09:46 AM
Michael Jordan was ass too.
Wardell Curry
05-23-2023, 10:17 AM
lol this board sucks
90sgoat
05-23-2023, 10:18 AM
:roll:
3ba11
05-23-2023, 10:19 AM
Michael Jordan was ass too.
In 7 less full seasons, Jordan won:
2 more chips
2 more FMVP's
1 more MVP
1 more DPOY
9 more scoring titles
4 more game-tying or winning shots in the Finals (0-10 for lebron)
^^^ that's a HOF career
bdonovan
05-23-2023, 10:38 AM
You told us that the 2023 Lakers were a stacked team. You said that the team had been designed to facilitate an easy championship for LeBron. You asserted that AD would be the one to carry LeBron to the chip. You stated the NBA wanted LeBron to win.
Nevertheless, the Lakers ended up getting swept.
Your initial narrative has proven incorrect, and now you seem to be formulating another. You're a delusional stan of Jordan who has yet to achieve anything of note in your woefully lackluster existence. Continue to share your thoughts on ISH, but keep in mind that what you write is likely to hold significance for no one other than yourself.
Good catch.
3ba11
05-23-2023, 10:45 AM
You told us that the 2023 Lakers were a stacked team.
* 2011 Heat were stacked
* 2014 Heat were stacked
* 2017 Cavs were stacked
* 2023 Lakers were stacked
* 2012 Heat were stacked but still underdog to Westbrick
* 2010 Cavs were an 8-year organic juggernaut and the league favorite
So Lebron has always lost with stacked teams because his skillset of abnormal ball-dominance for his size/position imposes spot-up roles that doesn't develop teammates, chemistry or strategy/coaching, thereby needing more help than other brands of ball and losing with stacked teams and favorites
See your problem is that you think that whenever Lebron loses, it's because he didn't have enough help, while if Jokic or anyone else loses, it's because they aren't good enough - this is the hypnosis that the media and Klutch Sports put on everyone (except me)
sdot_thadon
05-23-2023, 11:04 AM
The most losses ever for an all-timer (16) including numerous lotteries, 4-0 sweeps, record losses, massive upset losses, and he was locked up a bunch, while also having weak clutch stats & efficiency compared to his peers...
He did all of this while team-hopping around and hand-picking super-teams for a decade!!
What a fraud
Now list his mile long list of accolades in the same style.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2025 vBulletin Solutions Inc. All rights reserved.