Would you trade Ja Morant for Mikal Bridges, Cam Johnson and Patty Mills?

[RachlNicholsazz]

Would you do it if you are Brooklyn?
Would you do it if you were the Grizz?

Less butts in the seats maybe but it doesn't seem like the Grizzlies miss Ja when he's out, so could this be a win-win?

[AlternativeAcc.]

Probably... but mainly because Ja Is incredibly overrated as a player on top of being a nutcase.

Bridges is a 4th option guy so being behind Bane and JJJ would be much better than relying on him as 1st option like in BKN. We saw how that worked. He's just a role player

[GimmeThat]

without picks, nothing about this is better than losing him to free agency

[Airupthere]

No, from Nets' standpoint. They had just gotten rid of Kyrie and KD. I don't think they'd want to deal with difficult personalities again.

[HoopologyPhD]

I'd take a 40 of my choice and a pack of phillies

[SouBeachTalents]

I would take that deal in a heartbeat if I was Memphis, while the Nets would be pretty moronic to bring in a player like Ja after all the nonsense they just went through with KD & Kyrie.

[tontoz]

If I'm the Nets i wouldn't trade Bridges for Ja straight up. Watching him with the Suns i didnt realize he had so much game off the dribble.

[TAZORAC]

If I was the Nets NO...if I was Memphis YES

[bison]

Hell no. Those are solid role players. The way the current top teams play, teams should be loading up on depth, not stars.

[Mask the Embiid]

Yes, because ja has an addiction that’s hurts the team. That’s the only reason. At least I could rely on bridges + the others. Sometimes you gotta cut bait even if it hurts in the moment

[Manny98]

No I wouldn't even do Bridges for Morant straight up

Bridges is already better than Morant and brings less drama to the team

Had to put of Kyries bullshit for 3 years, I'm good with another one like that

[RachlNicholsazz]

WTH with all these opinions. Ja is a young franchise star player. Bridges was a 3 or 4th option just a year ago. Has he fallen THAT far off? :biggums: