Anthony Weiner Has a Meltdown When Asked About Clinton's Kill List

[jstern]

https://youtu.be/g2Io-U0-94k

It's a great video.

[1987_Lakers]

Bro, I was just gonna make a thread on this. :oldlol:

[1987_Lakers]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kp7FkLBRpKg

[jstern]

Here's the rest.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8sKo4KQO-E

The only person that I find more shameless than Anthony Weiner is Joe Biden. In fact, Weiner, Joe Biden, and Hunter Biden all feel as though they were cut from the same cloth.

They all lack the embarrassment emotion, because other people are just objects to them. A pure lack of self awareness. It's hard not to draw parallels between their behavior. Joe Biden making female Secret Service uncomfortable, by getting naked when going out for a swim (2014), with his white pubes, bending over and exposing his asshole. Anthony Wiener texting his junk to minors. And we've all seen Hunter Biden's obsession with the naked selfies, and walking around naked in front of his niece. Doing coke in the White House.

Can you imagine all three of them in the same room together? Absolutely disgusting.

Then you have people like Jasper who wants to vote for Joe Biden because Joe read a nice speech.


Bro, I was just gonna make a thread on this. :oldlol:

I'm just waiting for Off the Court to come and defend Weiner. (I just wanted to quote).

[iamgine]

https://youtu.be/g2Io-U0-94k

It's a great video.

Whichever way you lean, when I look at the substance of the argument in that video, I think that host lost.

Host: *list names Clinton supposedly killed

Wiener: That is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. You got any proof?

Host: If these are lies then how come other presidential candidates don't have these against them? Only Clintons?

Wiener: How come others don't get asked for birth certificate? Only Obama.

The rest are just shouting match nonsense.

[Wardell Curry]

Whichever way you lean, when I look at the substance of the argument in that video, I think that host lost.

Host: *list names Clinton supposedly killed

Wiener: That is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. You got any proof?

Host: If these are lies then how come other presidential candidates don't have these against them? Only Clintons?

Wiener: How come others don't get asked for birth certificate? Only Obama.

The rest are just shouting match nonsense.

It wouldn't surprise me at all if the Clintons had some of that list killed, but you're right. If you get past the emotion in the video this is basically what it boils down to. PBD did nothing but sling shit and Weiner did nothing but overreact. Notice how he didn't deny the sexting up a minor accusations though, lol.

[ArbitraryWater]

Why did he get on there?


lmao

[ArbitraryWater]

Whichever way you lean, when I look at the substance of the argument in that video, I think that host lost.

Host: *list names Clinton supposedly killed

Wiener: That is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. You got any proof?

Host: If these are lies then how come other presidential candidates don't have these against them? Only Clintons?

Wiener: How come others don't get asked for birth certificate? Only Obama.

The rest are just shouting match nonsense.


Well, PBD listed a huge sample of people associated to Clinton that were killed, and from then on Weiner started the shouting match and tried to debunk it by saying its a conspiracy and going on about the website and its ads.

And he made a logical error by claiming researching these deaths would dishonor these people, when it would in fact honor them.

So that kind of defensiveness and logical flaw, makes him seem deceitful.

[jstern]

Whichever way you lean, when I look at the substance of the argument in that video, I think that host lost.

Host: *list names Clinton supposedly killed

Wiener: That is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. You got any proof?

Host: If these are lies then how come other presidential candidates don't have these against them? Only Clintons?

Wiener: How come others don't get asked for birth certificate? Only Obama.

The rest are just shouting match nonsense.

The point of the kill list is that there's a statistically abnormal number of deaths related to the Clinton's. Whether is by suicides or plane crashes. The number is statistically significant. That list of death is not a conspiracy, it's real and utterly abnormal. Statistically speaking, not all the people on the kill list died due to nefarious reasons, because people do die naturally. But statistically speaking, there's such an abnormal number of deaths that signals that it's not simply a coincidence.

The "host" did a bad job in saying how come other Presidential candidates don't have these against him, when he should have said, how come other Presidential candidates don't have these many deaths associated with them.

The mention of the Obama birth certificate, that's pure whataboutism. It's completely an utterly irrelevant to anything else. If you have something abnormal in this coincidence list, something that should rise a person't curiosity. How stupid would it be to simply dismiss it because 12 years ago there was a birth certificate conspiracy.

[Baller234]

Whichever way you lean, when I look at the substance of the argument in that video, I think that host lost.

Host: *list names Clinton supposedly killed

Wiener: That is unsubstantiated conspiracy theory. You got any proof?

Host: If these are lies then how come other presidential candidates don't have these against them? Only Clintons?

Wiener: How come others don't get asked for birth certificate? Only Obama.

The rest are just shouting match nonsense.

I usually enjoy listening to PBD, but yea he definitely has some odd quirks about him.

For example he's reading off this list but he actually felt it was necessary to read every single name. I thought that was very weird. You're in the middle of a heated discussion and you've made your point... you don't have to list off every single name. I don't like Wiener at all but I could understand why he would be frustrated in that moment.

It's like you're shutting down the entire discussion just so you can finish reading these random names. Seemed unnecessary.

[iamgine]

I usually enjoy listening to PBD, but yea he definitely has some odd quirks about him.

For example he's reading off this list but he actually felt it was necessary to read every single name. I thought that was very weird. You're in the middle of a heated discussion and you've made your point... you don't have to list off every single name. I don't like Wiener at all but I could understand why he would be frustrated in that moment.

It's like you're shutting down the entire discussion just so you can finish reading these random names. Seemed unnecessary.

Yeah that and the "your reaction is saying everything". :lol The host did come off as a bully.

I don't disagree that Clintons probably has killed many people, but if you're gonna bully Anthony Wiener about it, you better have some sort of proof. Not unsubstantiated theory and insults.

[┌∩┐(﹒︠益﹒︡)┌∩┐]

PBD took the L here. Must be tough being embarrassed by a sex offender

[ArbitraryWater]

I usually enjoy listening to PBD, but yea he definitely has some odd quirks about him.

For example he's reading off this list but he actually felt it was necessary to read every single name. I thought that was very weird. You're in the middle of a heated discussion and you've made your point... you don't have to list off every single name. I don't like Wiener at all but I could understand why he would be frustrated in that moment.

It's like you're shutting down the entire discussion just so you can finish reading these random names. Seemed unnecessary.


I thought it was pretty funny that he went on and read every single name tbh :lol


it also drove him his point and gave an identity to those people

[jstern]

I finally saw the full podcast.


I usually enjoy listening to PBD, but yea he definitely has some odd quirks about him.

For example he's reading off this list but he actually felt it was necessary to read every single name. I thought that was very weird. You're in the middle of a heated discussion and you've made your point... you don't have to list off every single name. I don't like Wiener at all but I could understand why he would be frustrated in that moment.

It's like you're shutting down the entire discussion just so you can finish reading these random names. Seemed unnecessary.

That's his style from what I've seen. Very detailed about the process behind his questions. Which is very good. He doesn't leave any stone unturned. Leaves very little ambiguity. (Very early into the podcast, Weiner kind of rudely, told Patrick that he didn't listen to Jeffry Toobin's answer, because of the 11 minute question.)

That's PBD's style, very detailed questions. But people in this thread are latching on to Weiner saying that he shouldn't list all of the names.

Anthony Weiner is a pathological liar. If you watch the whole interview, his ability is in a way masterful. The way he tries to redirect. Which as a politician should work very, very well with the average person. And the absolute best thing to do with such people, people with such a character, is to bluntly turn up that pressure.

Look at how the corporate media treats Trump. All politicians should be treated like this. With Trump, it's much worse than this because it's a continuous twisting and turning of facts and straight out lying, by people wearing nice suits, pretending to be serious journalists. With the, "What ice cream did you buy?" type of questions to all the Democrats. Ignoring news and scandals that might make Democrats look bad. Pushing agendas. That is much worse and evil than simply coming across as rude. While in contrast, PBD just goes long stating every detail in the questions.

Look at how Weiner is misleading and redirecting during the entire podcast, like a very skilled conman. And people are going to complain that it was rude to read all the names? When that's the absolute best thing to do with all these politicians.

I would have named every single name on that list. (Which would have blown Axe's little fat coated brain.)

[iamgine]

I finally saw the full podcast.



That's his style from what I've seen. Very detailed about the process behind his questions. Which is very good. He doesn't leave any stone unturned. Leaves very little ambiguity. (Very early into the podcast, Weiner kind of rudely, told Patrick that he didn't listen to Jeffry Toobin's answer, because of the 11 minute question.)

That's PBD's style, very detailed questions. But people in this thread are latching on to Weiner saying that he shouldn't list all of the names.

Anthony Weiner is a pathological liar. If you watch the whole interview, his ability is in a way masterful. The way he tries to redirect. Which as a politician should work very, very well with the average person. And the absolute best thing to do with such people, people with such a character, is to bluntly turn up that pressure.

Look at how the corporate media treats Trump. All politicians should be treated like this. With Trump, it's much worse than this because it's a continuous twisting and turning of facts and straight out lying, by people wearing nice suits, pretending to be serious journalists. With the, "What ice cream did you buy?" type of questions to all the Democrats. Ignoring news and scandals that might make Democrats look bad. Pushing agendas. That is much worse and evil than simply coming across as rude. While in contrast, PBD just goes long stating every detail in the questions.

Look at how Weiner is misleading and redirecting during the entire podcast, like a very skilled conman. And people are going to complain that it was rude to read all the names? When that's the absolute best thing to do with all these politicians.

I would have named every single name on that list. (Which would have blown Axe's little fat coated brain.)
Yes, of course everyone knows Anthony Wiener is not to be trusted.

But listing all those names proves nothing. It's not rude, just unnecessary. So did all the insults and shouting match and the bully style. It didn't get him to admit anything. Just obfuscate things.

[Patrick Chewing]

That is not PBD's regular style, so I can only assume he did that to piss off that scumbag Weiner and it made for interesting watching. Most of PBD's interviews are extremely informative. I prefer him over Rogan and I really like Rogan.