2qr3
09-14-2023, 11:22 PM
https://youtu.be/vq3RsJ35LKU
I don't often find myself employing profanity, if ever. But it's quite intriguing to hear someone from the year 1885, in 1885 using such a term. I hadn't anticipated that it would have been a widely accepted vernacular choice during that era.
From Wikipedia
"In 2015, Dr. Paul Booth argued he had found "(possibly) the earliest known use of the word '****' that clearly has a sexual connotation": in English court records of 1310–11, a man local to Chester is referred to as "Roger ****ebythenavele", probably a nickname. "Either this refers to an inexperienced copulator, referring to someone trying to have sex with the navel, or it's a rather extravagant explanation for a dimwit, someone so stupid they think that this is the way to have sex", says Booth."
I don't often find myself employing profanity, if ever. But it's quite intriguing to hear someone from the year 1885, in 1885 using such a term. I hadn't anticipated that it would have been a widely accepted vernacular choice during that era.
From Wikipedia
"In 2015, Dr. Paul Booth argued he had found "(possibly) the earliest known use of the word '****' that clearly has a sexual connotation": in English court records of 1310–11, a man local to Chester is referred to as "Roger ****ebythenavele", probably a nickname. "Either this refers to an inexperienced copulator, referring to someone trying to have sex with the navel, or it's a rather extravagant explanation for a dimwit, someone so stupid they think that this is the way to have sex", says Booth."