PDA

View Full Version : 1986 Celtics vs. 1987 Lakers



dankok8
02-14-2024, 02:39 PM
The apex versions of the two historic 80's dynasties...

Who wins a 7-game series between them?

1986 Celtics are more revered historically but I think it's a coin toss.

Im Still Ballin
02-14-2024, 02:41 PM
Probably like either the 1984 or 1985 Finals. Like you said: a coin toss. I'm biased toward Boston because I like their size and passing game.

SouBeachTalents
02-14-2024, 02:53 PM
I'd go with Boston, they had a lot of injuries to key players in '87 and still gave the Lakers a tough Finals, one they could have possibly won if not for Magic's baby hook. If they get a run at them fully healthy like they were in '86, they'd be my pick.

mr4speed
02-14-2024, 07:15 PM
The apex versions of the two historic 80's dynasties...

Who wins a 7-game series between them?

1986 Celtics are more revered historically but I think it's a coin toss.

I would have to pick the 86 Celtics. If I remember correctly, Boston that year beat LA both times in the regular season and in the game in LA = McHale did not play due to injury and Boston still won. Walton was healthy the whole year for the 86 Celtics and he had a big impact. In the 87 Finals Parish had an ankle sprain, McHale was playing with a broken bone in his foot, Walton tried to play but his feet were a mess. Even Ainge had a sore knee from a knee to knee collision in the previous series. Also Wedman was on the 86 Celtics but gone in 87? That 86 Celtics team had great ball movement and a lot of size!

NBAGOAT
02-15-2024, 09:46 AM
kareem is too past his prime by 87. 86 celtics are also a step above any of their other teams that were neck and neck with showtime with walton off the bench.

dankok8
02-15-2024, 12:26 PM
Wow really surprised how one-sided it is for Boston so far. I think LA matches up well with them and they were one or two Tragic Johnson plays in 1984 away from going 3-0 against the Celtics in the Finals. Voted LA to even out the polling lol

JohnnySic
02-15-2024, 01:13 PM
I would have to pick the 86 Celtics. If I remember correctly, Boston that year beat LA both times in the regular season and in the game in LA = McHale did not play due to injury and Boston still won. Walton was healthy the whole year for the 86 Celtics and he had a big impact. In the 87 Finals Parish had an ankle sprain, McHale was playing with a broken bone in his foot, Walton tried to play but his feet were a mess. Even Ainge had a sore knee from a knee to knee collision in the previous series. Also Wedman was on the 86 Celtics but gone in 87? That 86 Celtics team had great ball movement and a lot of size!

The '87 Celtics were an injury riddled mess and still took the Lakers to 6 games. The '86 Celtics would have swept the '87 Celtics easily. This should answer the question.

mr4speed
02-15-2024, 01:13 PM
Wow really surprised how one-sided it is for Boston so far. I think LA matches up well with them and they were one or two Tragic Johnson plays in 1984 away from going 3-0 against the Celtics in the Finals. Voted LA to even out the polling lol

Point taken about the 84 Celtics but the 86 team was much better. For the starters Henderson was replaced with Ainge = a much better shooter and Maxwell was replaced with McHale = a much better offensive threat and a better defender. Also in 86 Walton was healthy and won the 6th man of the year award. Walton's passing and size were an inspiration to his teammates. Also off the bench ( and not on the 84 team) was Jerry Sichting = another good outside shooter. The 86 team had great chemistry both on and off the court.

RogueBorg
02-15-2024, 01:20 PM
The '87 Celtics were an injury riddled mess and still took the Lakers to 6 games. The '86 Celtics would have swept the '87 Celtics easily. This should answer the question.

The '86 Celtics didn't even sweep the '86 Rockets, they're not sweeping the '87 version of themselves.

JohnnySic
02-15-2024, 01:21 PM
The '86 Celtics didn't even sweep the '86 Rockets, they're not sweeping the '87 version of themselves.

That Rockets team was no joke. If they kept it together and stayed away from the crack, they may have won a couple of chips.

RogueBorg
02-15-2024, 01:23 PM
What gets in all this is that Len Bias would have been on that '87 Celtics squad.

RogueBorg
02-15-2024, 01:25 PM
That Rockets team was no joke. If they kept it together and stayed away from the crack, they may have won a couple of chips.

Would the '86 Rockets beat the '87 Celtics?

JohnnySic
02-15-2024, 01:38 PM
Would the '86 Rockets beat the '87 Celtics?

Probably yes. With Walton out and Parish less than 100%, Hakeem would have feasted, and Sampson would have been a problem too.

Im Still Ballin
02-16-2024, 12:19 AM
Ralph Sampson was playing the best basketball of his life in the '86 Western Conference Playoffs. He averaged 22.1 ppg, 11.3 rpg, 4.3 apg, 1.7 spg, 2.1 bpg on 54.8% FG, 72.8% FT, and 59.3% TS. Not enough praise is given to McHale for locking him up like he did. Held him to 14.8 ppg, 9.5 rpg, 3.3 apg, 1.0 spg, 0.8 bpg on 43.8% FG and 48.7% TS.

dankok8
02-16-2024, 12:59 AM
Point taken about the 84 Celtics but the 86 team was much better. For the starters Henderson was replaced with Ainge = a much better shooter and Maxwell was replaced with McHale = a much better offensive threat and a better defender. Also in 86 Walton was healthy and won the 6th man of the year award. Walton's passing and size were an inspiration to his teammates. Also off the bench ( and not on the 84 team) was Jerry Sichting = another good outside shooter. The 86 team had great chemistry both on and off the court.

Good post.

And no doubt the 86 Celtics were better than in 84 but the 87 Lakers were also the best Lakers team of the 80's.

1987_Lakers
02-16-2024, 01:05 AM
Good post.

And no doubt the 86 Celtics were better than in 84 but the 87 Lakers were also the best Lakers team of the 80's.

Depends on who you ask. The '85 team is right there, Kareem felt that was their best team. I've heard Magic & Worthy say their '87 team was their best. '85 had better depth and a better Kareem, '87 had a peak Magic & Worthy.

I would personally go with '87 because they had better bigs. A.C. Green was an upgrade over Rambis & Mychal Thompson provided better defense and was a better overall player than '85 McAdoo/Kupchak, that somewhat made up for Kareem's decline while Magic, Worthy, & Scott all improved as players.

dankok8
02-16-2024, 02:03 AM
Depends on who you ask. The '85 team is right there, Kareem felt that was their best team. I've heard Magic & Worthy say their '87 team was their best. '85 had better depth and a better Kareem, '87 had a peak Magic & Worthy.

I would personally go with '87 because they had better bigs. A.C. Green was an upgrade over Rambis & Mychal Thompson provided better defense and was a better overall player than '85 McAdoo/Kupchak, that somewhat made up for Kareem's decline while Magic, Worthy, & Scott all improved as players.

What you said it true and...

The 85 team is only close on paper. If you look at performance metrics, the 87 team clears them by a significant margin.

mr4speed
02-16-2024, 12:52 PM
Good post.

And no doubt the 86 Celtics were better than in 84 but the 87 Lakers were also the best Lakers team of the 80's.

I agree. I think Magic has said the 87 team was their best. LA added Mychal Thompson that year and I believe LA won both regular season games vs Boston. Walton only played in like 10 games in the regular season. Walton did not play vs LA in either regular season game and Walton always got pumped up to play vs Kareem. I think a healthy Walton had a big impact. Too bad we missed out on what could have been a great career if his feet had been healthy. Big Bill was fun to watch play!

Xiao Yao You
02-16-2024, 01:37 PM
I agree. I think Magic has said the 87 team was their best. LA added Mychal Thompson that year and I believe LA won both regular season games vs Boston. Walton only played in like 10 games in the regular season. Walton did not play vs LA in either regular season game and Walton always got pumped up to play vs Kareem. I think a healthy Walton had a big impact. Too bad we missed out on what could have been a great career if his feet had been healthy. Big Bill was fun to watch play!

if they hadn't shot him up with pain killers to play on broken feet. No load management in those days

mr4speed
02-16-2024, 04:34 PM
if they hadn't shot him up with pain killers to play on broken feet. No load management in those days

Yes!!! Walton finally caved to all the pressure and regretted it forever. I highly recommend reading "The Breaks of the Game" by David Halberstam. Terrific insight into Walton and the Portland team in Walton's early years!!

kawhileonard2
02-16-2024, 10:45 PM
87 Lakers didn't play a team that good until the finals. 37 wins, 42 wins, 39 wins.

dankok8
02-17-2024, 02:10 AM
I agree. I think Magic has said the 87 team was their best. LA added Mychal Thompson that year and I believe LA won both regular season games vs Boston. Walton only played in like 10 games in the regular season. Walton did not play vs LA in either regular season game and Walton always got pumped up to play vs Kareem. I think a healthy Walton had a big impact. Too bad we missed out on what could have been a great career if his feet had been healthy. Big Bill was fun to watch play!

Yea Walton was on a top 20 trajectory maybe even higher. I got a hold of quite a few 1977 Blazers games so will watch these days.

Walton and Kareem had a great rivalry. Kareem hated Walton because both went to UCLA and some thought Walton was the best UCLA center ever and it drove Kareem mad. Their first head to head, Kareem dropped a 50-point triple double on him!