MJ's stats called into question even further due to "soft rims" prior to 1994

[RRR3]

https://x.com/MythNix/status/1681537900738125824

[SATAN]

Holy shit. MJ might not even be a certified top 5 player by the time 2025 is here! :lebronamazed:

[SATAN]

5 stars.

[BarberSchool]

This n!gga and his ALTS (as seen here replying to each other) all need an intervention.
Your a$$ has at least two different types of mental illness.

This ain’t what you want it to be, you sad weird MF.

This type of language (soft rims), is immediately understood by anyone who played at a high level, as meaning:

… Any old breakaway rim (only breaks away to the front, not the sides), that has been dunked on >5 thousand times, “softens up” and some older than that, even have a tiny bit, like 1-1.5mm of the front of the rim being just barely out of level, bent slightly down in front but not in any percievable way to a spectator who didn’t play at a high level themselves.

So free throws and top of the key might have a 0.1-0.2% better chance of going in, especially from shooters without Steve Nash arc. More line drive like Tmac arc.

Nothing significant, and certainly even less softness than these modern 180 breakaway rims, which really help corner shooters, way more than the old front-breakaways, which had NO GIVE at all from the sides. Baseline J’s on those had zero chance if they were short or long, but since the new rims debut’d around the time of the bubble, baseline and corner shots HAVE occasionally gifted a make, due to their increased malleability from those angles.

Thread entire concept aims to say the older rims were somehow a significant statistical advantage, due to words you misunderstood, and missapplied, in your quest to fellate your modern heroes by diminishing the actual goat. Conceptual fail, execution fail, alt fail, all around, a total embarrassing offering, showcasing how inferior your understanding of different rim types are, and how pathetic, disingenuous, and sad/embarrassing your tactics in making such a case are.

Like when Rick Moranis (as Louis Tulley) attempted to defend the Ghostbusters in front of Judge Scagliafucci or whatever the fu@k. Almost Unfathomable levels of self-unaware failure.

[warriorfan]

Looks like Op got tucked into bed

Nighty night

[SATAN]

*Desperately struggling to defend MJ's legacy*

:roll:

[ImKobe]

This n!gga and his ALTS (as seen here replying to each other) all need an intervention.
Your a$$ has at least two different types of mental illness.

This ain’t what you want it to be, you sad weird MF.

This type of language (soft rims), is immediately understood by anyone who played at a high level, as meaning:

… Any old breakaway rim (only breaks away to the front, not the sides), that has been dunked on >5 thousand times, “softens up” and some older than that, even have a tiny bit, like 1-1.5mm of the front of the rim being just barely out of level, bent slightly down in front but not in any percievable way to a spectator who didn’t play at a high level themselves.

So free throws and top of the key might have a 0.1-0.2% better chance of going in, especially from shooters without Steve Nash arc. More line drive like Tmac arc.

Nothing significant, and certainly even less softness than these modern 180 breakaway rims, which really help corner shooters, way more than the old front-breakaways, which had NO GIVE at all from the sides. Baseline J’s on those had zero chance if they were short or long, but since the new rims debut’d around the time of the bubble, baseline and corner shots HAVE occasionally gifted a make, due to their increased malleability from those angles.

Thread entire concept aims to say the older rims were somehow a significant statistical advantage, due to words you misunderstood, and missapplied, in your quest to fellate your modern heroes by diminishing the actual goat. Conceptual fail, execution fail, alt fail, all around, a total embarrassing offering, showcasing how inferior your understanding of different rim types are, and how pathetic, disingenuous, and sad/embarrassing your tactics in making such a case are.

Like when Rick Moranis (as Louis Tulley) attempted to defend the Ghostbusters in front of Judge Scagliafucci or whatever the fu@k. Almost Unfathomable levels of self-unaware failure.

:roll: OP is a casual and has 0 response to this btw

[SATAN]

He hasn't been online since making the thread...Probably busy having a threesome with a couple beautiful blondes or something.

[sdot_thadon]

What's fun is to see how fiercely stans defend terrible things lol.

[RRR3]

What's fun is to see how fiercely stans defend terrible things lol.
It’s like seeing little kids when they discover Santa isn’t real. They can’t argue against it logically so they just shriek emotionally.

[Overdrive]

https://x.com/MythNix/status/1681537900738125824

That's nice, but singling out one player is worthless when it comes to form a statistical analysis. Did other Bulls have higher numbers what about visiting teams? Did they shoot better in Chicago?

[ShawkFactory]

I mean..there’s not legacy ruining aspect here but it IS a thing.

I remember Tmac complaining about the rims in Houston his first couple years there and the home/road splits, particularly with 3s, was drastic. The first year he shot 28% at home and 37% on the road.

[Real Men Wear Green]

If both teams and all players are playing on the same rim there's nothing unfair about it when it comes to winning or losing a game. It may have a small effect on stats compared across eras but when you consider the massive difference caused by things like the style and scores enforced by Ewing's Knicks vs the offensive explosions we see in the pace and space era, what's really important?

[Patrick Chewing]

This n!gga and his ALTS (as seen here replying to each other) all need an intervention.
Your a$$ has at least two different types of mental illness.



He gave himself 24 minutes this time before replying.

[warriorfan]

What's fun is to see how fiercely stans defend terrible things lol.

Glad you can make light of getting completely shit on, on a routine basis :roll:


“Oh damn these guys shit all over us again. That is SO funny. lol!”

[ArbitraryWater]

Noticing a trend here

[gengiskhan]

Looks like Op got tucked into bed

Nighty night

:roll:

Klutch nigers master bating all night after Balco Juice shots.

[FilmyCogTurner]

This n!gga and his ALTS (as seen here replying to each other) all need an intervention.
Your a$$ has at least two different types of mental illness.

This ain’t what you want it to be, you sad weird MF.

This type of language (soft rims), is immediately understood by anyone who played at a high level, as meaning:

… Any old breakaway rim (only breaks away to the front, not the sides), that has been dunked on >5 thousand times, “softens up” and some older than that, even have a tiny bit, like 1-1.5mm of the front of the rim being just barely out of level, bent slightly down in front but not in any percievable way to a spectator who didn’t play at a high level themselves.

So free throws and top of the key might have a 0.1-0.2% better chance of going in, especially from shooters without Steve Nash arc. More line drive like Tmac arc.

Nothing significant, and certainly even less softness than these modern 180 breakaway rims, which really help corner shooters, way more than the old front-breakaways, which had NO GIVE at all from the sides. Baseline J’s on those had zero chance if they were short or long, but since the new rims debut’d around the time of the bubble, baseline and corner shots HAVE occasionally gifted a make, due to their increased malleability from those angles.

Thread entire concept aims to say the older rims were somehow a significant statistical advantage, due to words you misunderstood, and missapplied, in your quest to fellate your modern heroes by diminishing the actual goat. Conceptual fail, execution fail, alt fail, all around, a total embarrassing offering, showcasing how inferior your understanding of different rim types are, and how pathetic, disingenuous, and sad/embarrassing your tactics in making such a case are.

Like when Rick Moranis (as Louis Tulley) attempted to defend the Ghostbusters in front of Judge Scagliafucci or whatever the fu@k. Almost Unfathomable levels of self-unaware failure.

Thanks for the knowledge breakdown on the rim differences, and the ether.

[1987_Lakers]

We done with the 90's!!

[SATAN]

Noticing a trend here

Quite alarming if you ask me.

[gengiskhan]

rims are "soft" :roll:

penes is not "hard" enough :oldlol:

penetration is not "satisfying"

phunani is too "dry" :pimp:

ejaculation is too "little" :facepalm

Balls are too "small" :mad:

The stuff Klutch Media has to deal with after PEDs, LeEPO has to inject in his testicles.