AKA_AAP
09-14-2024, 05:05 AM
In the 2024 election year, not 2023, not 2025, not 2025 1/2, or 2026, but 2024! The year 2024, an election year, where people supposedly elect the next president. That's why it's an election year, in 2024. A year that's 366 days, for the 2024 election year. I, AKA_AAP, would like to endorse, for the 2024 presidential election year, not next year, not last year, or next year in a half, but this year, I am endorsing Kamala Harris, for 2024, in this year's election year of the presidential election!
https://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2019/10/02/931/524/694940094001_6091427107001_6091428463001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
I, AKA_AAP, will admit that this endorsement, in the election year, this year, of 2024, is a 4D chess move for selfish reasons. Not a 2D, or a 3D chess move, but a 4D chess move...meaning 4-dimensional, in the game of chess. Not checkers, rather chess, it's a game, but I'm playing it in advance, 4D to be exact where the D stands for dimension or the you know the thing that Kamala Harris likes to suck.
As much as I, AKA_AAP like a good economy, which is an economy that is not bad but good...I do realize that a bad economy is also a good thing, it's not really a bad thing. But it can be a bad thing, "it" as in a bad economy - yes, it can be a bad thing. But it is a good thing, for certain people, which means not everyone, but for a few people. Let me explain in as little words as possible, not many words, because it's not good to be overly verbose. A bad economy can be good, but not for all. A bad economy creates a bigger wealth gap between the top one or 2% and the other 98%, which is good for the top 1-2% of income earners, like me, AKA_AAP. But a bad economy, an economy that is not good, is bad for the suckers and losers of ISH, like...ObeseAxe, CopyPasteLegend32, LowIQoffTheCourt, FascistRRR3, RacistJasper, AlwaysWrongBladefd, and DemBotJohn8204. I, AKA_AAP, would like to see these suckers and losers suffer and struggle through life with TREMENDOUS financial burden for the next 4 years, which is 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028! That is 4 years. 4 years of them suffering is 4 years of me being happy. :pimp: That is the #1 reason why I, AKA_AAP endorses Kamala Harris even though I'm a high IQ independent voter. I repeat, a bad economy is a GOOD thing, for the top 1-2% of income earners. Kamala Harris 2024! and Kamala Harris 2028! Let's give ObeseAxe, CopyPasteLegend32, LowIQoffthecourt, FascistRRR3, RacistJasper, AlwaysWrongBladefd, and DemBotJohn8204 economic and financial hell for not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7, but for the next 8 years! Minimum. Each year being 365 days or 366 days. But let's start off with 4 years of Kamala Harris first.
Kamala Harris 2024!
https://a57.foxnews.com/media2.foxnews.com/BrightCove/694940094001/2019/10/02/931/524/694940094001_6091427107001_6091428463001-vs.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
I, AKA_AAP, will admit that this endorsement, in the election year, this year, of 2024, is a 4D chess move for selfish reasons. Not a 2D, or a 3D chess move, but a 4D chess move...meaning 4-dimensional, in the game of chess. Not checkers, rather chess, it's a game, but I'm playing it in advance, 4D to be exact where the D stands for dimension or the you know the thing that Kamala Harris likes to suck.
As much as I, AKA_AAP like a good economy, which is an economy that is not bad but good...I do realize that a bad economy is also a good thing, it's not really a bad thing. But it can be a bad thing, "it" as in a bad economy - yes, it can be a bad thing. But it is a good thing, for certain people, which means not everyone, but for a few people. Let me explain in as little words as possible, not many words, because it's not good to be overly verbose. A bad economy can be good, but not for all. A bad economy creates a bigger wealth gap between the top one or 2% and the other 98%, which is good for the top 1-2% of income earners, like me, AKA_AAP. But a bad economy, an economy that is not good, is bad for the suckers and losers of ISH, like...ObeseAxe, CopyPasteLegend32, LowIQoffTheCourt, FascistRRR3, RacistJasper, AlwaysWrongBladefd, and DemBotJohn8204. I, AKA_AAP, would like to see these suckers and losers suffer and struggle through life with TREMENDOUS financial burden for the next 4 years, which is 2025, 2026, 2027, and 2028! That is 4 years. 4 years of them suffering is 4 years of me being happy. :pimp: That is the #1 reason why I, AKA_AAP endorses Kamala Harris even though I'm a high IQ independent voter. I repeat, a bad economy is a GOOD thing, for the top 1-2% of income earners. Kamala Harris 2024! and Kamala Harris 2028! Let's give ObeseAxe, CopyPasteLegend32, LowIQoffthecourt, FascistRRR3, RacistJasper, AlwaysWrongBladefd, and DemBotJohn8204 economic and financial hell for not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7, but for the next 8 years! Minimum. Each year being 365 days or 366 days. But let's start off with 4 years of Kamala Harris first.
Kamala Harris 2024!