Kblaze8855
12-01-2024, 08:28 PM
https://www.hostpic.org/images/2412020547340340.jpeg
We are all well aware of the reason. Bigs Without much skill are expected to do nothing but dunk the ball now.
You hear players talk they refer to a “dunker” Position which is usually one of these garbage(relatively speaking) bigs who catch lobs or occasionally a wing placed in a similar position on the baseline to duck in when someone doubles off them.
Rest assured there were bums in previous decades who could’ve dunked everything if asked to do nothing else. But most of them played when it was generally understood you give the big man the ball when traditionally deemed appropriate. A mismatch or maybe just at the start of the game to keep him involved. My question is….
Should people who weren’t good one on one have always been disregarded and only allowed to dunk or try putbacks?
Desagana Diop shot 43% over 600 games. I promise you he could dunk.
Is there any reason he should ever have touched the ball to do anything else?
are you a believer in the philosophy of occasionally giving your good effort most there for defense big the ball out of respect and to keep him engaged? Or in retrospect should they have told most of those seven footers they better play hard even if they get no touches or they can sit on the bench?
We are all well aware of the reason. Bigs Without much skill are expected to do nothing but dunk the ball now.
You hear players talk they refer to a “dunker” Position which is usually one of these garbage(relatively speaking) bigs who catch lobs or occasionally a wing placed in a similar position on the baseline to duck in when someone doubles off them.
Rest assured there were bums in previous decades who could’ve dunked everything if asked to do nothing else. But most of them played when it was generally understood you give the big man the ball when traditionally deemed appropriate. A mismatch or maybe just at the start of the game to keep him involved. My question is….
Should people who weren’t good one on one have always been disregarded and only allowed to dunk or try putbacks?
Desagana Diop shot 43% over 600 games. I promise you he could dunk.
Is there any reason he should ever have touched the ball to do anything else?
are you a believer in the philosophy of occasionally giving your good effort most there for defense big the ball out of respect and to keep him engaged? Or in retrospect should they have told most of those seven footers they better play hard even if they get no touches or they can sit on the bench?