dankok8
06-25-2025, 11:48 AM
So I've been thinking about this team, the way they played on the court, and their legacy.
I took the period from 2012-2016 when the team was a contender.
https://i.postimg.cc/sfYM5nPR/Statline-Shift-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/rsNzcmyp/WOWY-Combo-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/nrJM67J5/Lineups-Analysis-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
Both stars' volume stats dropped a lot when they were on the court together and efficiency dropped as well.
In terms of the success of the lineups, the Thunder were marginally better with both on the court (+9.8) than with just Durant on the court (+8.4).
Although it's interesting that with both on the court, they got very little help from the rest of the supporting cast. And the rest of the cast actually had a negative impact on offense (-1.2). It's not that surprising IMO when considering that Ibaka was nothing special on offense and apart from one season of pre-prime Harden in 2012 and an old Derek Fisher who was a fringe rotation player by that point, they had no one who could shoot the ball when they passed it out.
So here are some questions that I've been pondering:
1) How many positive impact players did that team have outside of Durant and Westbrook? I'm only certain about 2012 Harden and Ibaka. Maybe Adams for a couple of seasons.
2) How well did the pieces fit? Talking about Durant and Westbrook fit but also the lack of shooting and potentially other factors.
3) Did this team ultimately underachieve all things considered?
I took the period from 2012-2016 when the team was a contender.
https://i.postimg.cc/sfYM5nPR/Statline-Shift-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/rsNzcmyp/WOWY-Combo-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/nrJM67J5/Lineups-Analysis-Durant-and-Westbrook-2012-2016.jpg
Both stars' volume stats dropped a lot when they were on the court together and efficiency dropped as well.
In terms of the success of the lineups, the Thunder were marginally better with both on the court (+9.8) than with just Durant on the court (+8.4).
Although it's interesting that with both on the court, they got very little help from the rest of the supporting cast. And the rest of the cast actually had a negative impact on offense (-1.2). It's not that surprising IMO when considering that Ibaka was nothing special on offense and apart from one season of pre-prime Harden in 2012 and an old Derek Fisher who was a fringe rotation player by that point, they had no one who could shoot the ball when they passed it out.
So here are some questions that I've been pondering:
1) How many positive impact players did that team have outside of Durant and Westbrook? I'm only certain about 2012 Harden and Ibaka. Maybe Adams for a couple of seasons.
2) How well did the pieces fit? Talking about Durant and Westbrook fit but also the lack of shooting and potentially other factors.
3) Did this team ultimately underachieve all things considered?