Players who won chips with multiple teams in the 00s

[FultzNationRISE]

Big Shot
James Posey
Shaq Diesel
Ray Allen
King LePerfect
Klaw
KCP
Caruso

Am I forgetting anyone or is that the list?

[SouBeachTalents]

Rondo, JR & McGee thanks to LeBron.

Danny Green & Jrue too.

[Phoenix]

As an aside, I just looked up Ray Allen's basketball ref page, I didn't realize he only made 2 all-NBA teams. That seems low somehow but then you remember the 00s decade was a crazy period for guards.

[3ba11]

if Lebron could've won multiple chips with 2 different teams, then that would be impressive... But instead, he formed his dream teams and then mostly lost - barely 1 chip at each stop among a sea of bad losses - anyone can do that.. he's the only guy that perennially lost and losing Finals record with multiple teams

[FultzNationRISE]

Rondo, JR & McGee thanks to LeBron.

Danny Green & Jrue too.

Good catch.

Dunno how I forgot about Jrue or all those stooges Lebron dragged.

[Nowoco]

As an aside, I just looked up Ray Allen's basketball ref page, I didn't realize he only made 2 all-NBA teams.

Kevin McHale only made one All-NBA team.

[Phoenix]

Kevin McHale only made one All-NBA team.

Yep, that topic came up very recently on another thread here. You'd think based on how he's talked about that he had a decade run of all-nba type numbers but it was really only between 85-90, and that period was stacked with really good forwards.

[Full Court]

You know what's way more impressive than winning with multiple teams? Three-peating with the same team.

[Gudo]

You know what's way more impressive than winning with multiple teams? Three-peating with the same team.

Nah. Now that you mentioned it, rings are a team achievement.

[3ba11]

Kevin McHale only made one All-NBA team.


exactly.. All-NBA is the group-think of a few dozen journalism majors - it means nothing

[Full Court]

Nah. Now that you mentioned it, rings are a team achievement.

Of course they are. That's why winning a ring with the team you've got means a whole lot more than jumping over to a stacked team to win one.

[sdot_thadon]

You know what's way more impressive than winning with multiple teams? Three-peating with the same team.

Nah, its more impressive to succeed multiple times in completely different scenarios with completely different casts, coaches, and systems and rebuild championship chemistry each time with your leadership. Also be the driviing force no matter the scenario. Don't get me wrong 3peating is cool and a great achievement but there's not as high a degree of difficulty to just being that much better than everyone as a team that you dont have to change a thing to keep winning against hopeless challengers. I was more impressed that they were able to reinvent and 3peat a 2nd time for sure.

[Wally450]

Patrick McCaw