Trump fires a prosecutor for not committing fraud

[Real Men Wear Green]

For the foreseeable future it will now be the job of federal prosecutors to bring charges to court against whoever the President is mad at. I am sure that there are posters that will defend this abuse of power. Whatever.


https://www.axios.com/2025/09/20/trump-virginia-siebert-us-attorney-letitia-james


Understand that Trump originally chose this man for this job. So he looked at the facts of the case and even though his boss wanted him to prosecute and he knew not prosecuting would cost him his job, he did not prosecute. Why? No, not because he's a Democrat in disguise or any other such stupid theory. He didn't prosecute because his honest analysis of the law and the facts told him that there is no crime here to prosecute. That really should be a good reason to not waste everyone's time.

[Yes or No]

Is this about Letitia James?

Where was your outrage about her basically campaigning to "get Donald Trump" and saying she was going to get him the moment she was elected?

Tit for tat, they're both retards, and so are you.

[Real Men Wear Green]

Is this about Letitia James?

Where was your outrage about her basically campaigning to "get Donald Trump" and saying she was going to get him the moment she was elected?

Tit for tat, they're all retards, and so are you.And I'm guessing you would also call the judge that cinvicted him stupid as well? Your false equivalence is what's really stupid here.

[Yes or No]

And I'm guessing you would also call the judge that cinvicted him stupid as well? Your false equivalence is what's really stupid here.

I don't care about that judge or the outcome of the trial.

There is no false equivalence. They're both weaponizing the law for political reasons. To satiate idiots like yourself and or personal spite. It's a disgrace.

[Real Men Wear Green]

You pretend that the trials outcome is unimportant because to continue your dolly campaign of false equivalence you have to ignore inconvenient things like facts. In the case that Trump lost a judge ruled against him. In this case instead the prosecutor that Trump himself appointed deemed the case so unwinnable that he accepted getting fired. Somehow you see the same thing.

It is fine to view all politicians' motives as suspect. We generally should. That does not make it right to ignore facts. It just makes you intentionally stupid. You're basically Norcaliblunt.

[Yes or No]

You pretend that the trials outcome is unimportant because to continue your dolly campaign of false equivalence you have to ignore inconvenient things like facts. In the case that Trump lost a judge ruled against him. In this case instead the prosecutor that Trump himself appointed deemed the case so unwinnable that he accepted getting fired. Somehow you see the same thing.

It is fine to view all politicians' motives as suspect. We generally should. That does not make it right to ignore facts. It just makes you intentionally stupid. You're basically Norcaliblunt.

My point is that presidents and politicians break the law all the time and it is extremely rare that anyone goes after them. Whether or not they should is immaterial to the point. Whether or not he's guilty is immaterial to the point.

The point is that the practice is that these people get away with shit and we have someone (her) openly campaigning that she's going to weaponize her position to go after a president, which she did. He said the same dumb shit with Hillary but didn't actually do anything. And now he's also actively going after her and throwing a fit when he doesn't get his way. He's looking for a reason. Just as she was.

It's not a false equivalence. I can't lay it out any more for you. I literally put the spoon in your mouth. It's up to you now.

She didn't go after him because it was valid and just to do so. She went after him because of the political climate. You are a moron.

[Real Men Wear Green]

Which one of us is ignoring the actual facts of the case vs. the non-case? You don't have a real point. Let me know what was factually flawed about James prosecuting him and we can get back to calling each other stupid.