Megyn Kelly Supports Trump's Pedophilia

[Lakers Legend#32]

The aging bimbo said on her podcast today that the Epstein story was a nothing burger because the victims of Epstein/Trump were 15-16 year-olds and not five to eight year olds.

She said it was OK because these teens could have passed for older.

So it's not really pedophilia.

Kelly has a 14 year-old daughter.

Are we to assume she is fine with her having sex with Donald Trump?

[Lakers Legend#32]

C'mon MAGA Fatties, she's giving you a talking point.

Run with it.

[Lakers Legend#32]

Megyn Kelly in 2018: " There's no consenting for a 14 or even a 17 year old."

Megyn Kelly today: "Jeffrey Epstein…was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…There's a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old."

[FultzNationRISE]

Whoa!

This will definitely have Poopsie shitting!


Right? Or no?

You tell me OP, youre the expert on Poopsie's shits.

[1987_Lakers]

Whoa!

This will definitely have Poopsie shitting!


Right? Or no?

You tell me OP, youre the expert on Poopsie's shits.

:roll:

[SouBeachTalents]

Yikes, the pathetic double bump several hours later, only to be ridiculed in the first response. OP is a walking L.

The sad part is they're just going to create another thread later today :lol

[Bill Gates]

She is getting hammered over this. And rightfully so.

[BurningHammer]

https://ew.com/megyn-kelly-says-jeffrey-epstein-was-not-a-pedophile-11849343

https://twitter.com/AccountableGOP/status/1989014083274952746


Megyn Kelly (https://ew.com/person/megyn-kelly/) has waded into the discourse around convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein (https://ew.com/the-view-ana-navarro-slams-white-men-protecting-epstein-files-11848790) with a creative new take.


On Wednesday's episode of The Megyn Kelly Show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-T5Hp2WldFk), the conservative political commentator referenced "somebody very, very close to this case" who knows "virtually everything" about the late financier's troubling private dealings that helped her form her own views on the matter. "Jeffrey Epstein, in this person's view, was not a pedophile," Kelly said. "This is this person's view, who was there for a lot of this, but that he was into the barely legal type. Like, he liked 15-year-old girls."

Kelly reflected, "I realize this is disgusting."



Not that I like Megyn Kelly as a person, but the part that people are picking up isn't incorrect, technically. She was paraphrasing and didn't sound supportive to either pedophilia or ephebophilia (sexual interest in mid-to-late teen). It's indifferent at worst.


Megyn Kelly today: "Jeffrey Epstein…was not a pedophile…He was into the barely legal type, like he liked 15 year old girls…There's a difference between a 15 year old and a 5 year old."

Those "..."s :oldlol:

[Baller234]

She's right. Everyone should be able to draw a line between an older teenager and pre-pubescent child.

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/2158227-barely-legal-cover-2024-december-5-issue.jpg

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/1387637-barely-legal-cover-2024-june-6-issue.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irc5j1gkihY

If you're telling me it's cool and acceptable to sing about having sex with 17 year old girls, and have magazines featuring girls who were 17 just a few weeks ago... then don't tell me it's just the same as pedophilia.

Should a father want their 16-17 year old daughter out there getting plowed by older adults? No. But I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that if you're 17 years old and at a Jeffrey Epstein party... there's a solid chance your father isn't in your life to begin with. She's just some whore at that point. If you're at one of these parties and these girls are throwing themselves at you, and you're this famous rich person who's used to having girls throw themselves at you... then you might not think twice. I doubt any of the rock bands we grew up listening to knew the ages of the girls backstage, and I'm sure a lot of them looked young. There are also plenty of 16-17 year old girls who could pass for older. So no, I'm not giving these people a total pass, but Megyn is 100% right to draw the line between that and harming a small child. They are not the same.

Like I said, let me know how many of the left's favorite woke celebrity mascots ever attended a Diddy party.

[BurningHammer]

She's right. Everyone should be able to draw a line between an older teenager and pre-pubescent child.

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/2158227-barely-legal-cover-2024-december-5-issue.jpg

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/1387637-barely-legal-cover-2024-june-6-issue.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irc5j1gkihY

If you're telling me it's cool and acceptable to sing about having sex with 17 year old girls, and have magazines featuring girls who were 17 just a few weeks ago... then don't tell me it's just the same as pedophilia.

Should a father want their 16-17 year old daughter out there getting plowed by older adults? No. But I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that if you're 17 years old and at a Jeffrey Epstein party... there's a solid chance your father isn't in your life to begin with. She's just some whore at that point. If you're at one of these parties and these girls are throwing themselves at you, and you're this famous rich person who's used to having girls throw themselves at you... then you might not think twice. I doubt any of the rock bands we grew up listening to knew the ages of the girls backstage, and I'm sure a lot of them looked young. There are also plenty of 16-17 year old girls who could pass for older. So no, I'm not giving these people a total pass, but Megyn is 100% right to draw the line between that and harming a small child. They are not the same.

Like I said, let me know how many of the left's favorite woke celebrity mascots ever attended a Diddy party.

:roll::roll::roll:

[Hey Yo]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_in_the_United_States

[Bill Gates]

Older men into "barely legal" porn are creepy as hell, that is for pedos to get as close to the edge as the can without breaking the law.


The Winger 17 song is also creepy but at least they were in their 20s when they wrote it.

[Baller234]

:roll::roll::roll:

I noticed that when right leaning posters respond with laugh emojis, it's because the person they're quoting genuinely said something retarded. Usually the part that's retarded is bolded or highlighted. But when woke left wing retards respond with laughing emojis, it's because they're trapped in a corner and can't refute your arguments with facts and logic. Which is why you couldn't point to the part of my post that's false or untrue.

If you're prepared to equate statutory with pedophilia, and pretend as if they are one in the same, then you're the weirdo.

[SouBeachTalents]

She's right. Everyone should be able to draw a line between an older teenager and pre-pubescent child.

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/2158227-barely-legal-cover-2024-december-5-issue.jpg

https://www.discountmags.com/shopimages/products/extras/1387637-barely-legal-cover-2024-june-6-issue.jpg


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irc5j1gkihY

If you're telling me it's cool and acceptable to sing about having sex with 17 year old girls, and have magazines featuring girls who were 17 just a few weeks ago... then don't tell me it's just the same as pedophilia.

Should a father want their 16-17 year old daughter out there getting plowed by older adults? No. But I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that if you're 17 years old and at a Jeffrey Epstein party... there's a solid chance your father isn't in your life to begin with. She's just some whore at that point. If you're at one of these parties and these girls are throwing themselves at you, and you're this famous rich person who's used to having girls throw themselves at you... then you might not think twice. I doubt any of the rock bands we grew up listening to knew the ages of the girls backstage, and I'm sure a lot of them looked young. There are also plenty of 16-17 year old girls who could pass for older. So no, I'm not giving these people a total pass, but Megyn is 100% right to draw the line between that and harming a small child. They are not the same.

Like I said, let me know how many of the left's favorite woke celebrity mascots ever attended a Diddy party.
You'll never convince me 15, which is what she specified, isn't fvcking creepy, you're still essentially a child at that age and have no business having sex with an adult.

[Baller234]

Older men into "barely legal" porn are creepy as hell, that is for pedos to get as close to the edge as the can without breaking the law.


The Winger 17 song is also creepy but at least they were in their 20s when they wrote it.

What's creepy about it? What's creepy about a 20 year old rock star having sex with a 17 year old groupie? Sounds pretty normal to me. I'm betting it happened all the time.

I'm also betting you don't give a fukk.

[warriorfan]

:roll::roll::roll:

If we google your post history we will find hundreds of posts of you thirsting over young women :roll:

[Bill Gates]

You'll never convince me 15, which is what she specified, isn't fvcking creepy, you're still essentially a child at that age and have no business having sex with an adult.

18 year old porn stars dressing up and pretending to be 15 for older men is also insanley creepy.

Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it should be ignored. Older men into that stuff are pedos.

[warriorfan]

18 year old porn stars dressing up and pretending to be 15 for older men is also insanley creepy.

Just because it's legal, doesn't mean it should be ignored. Older men into that stuff are pedos.

You’re creepy and gay.

[Baller234]

You'll never convince me 15, which is what she specified, isn't fvcking creepy, you're still essentially a child at that age and have no business having sex with an adult.

Ok, and? The question isn't whether or not it's appropriate.

If you're a famous and powerful person who's used to getting any girl they want, and they throw themselves at you on the regular, and you attend this party and here's this girl who was associated with a "friend" of yours, and she looks like she might be old enough... you probably aren't thinking too much about it.

And that is beside the point because at this moment we have no evidence or proof that Trump actually did anything. The victim herself even said that Trump didn't abuse her or do anything with her.

[Bill Gates]

Ok, and? The question isn't whether or not it's appropriate.

If you're a famous and powerful person who's used to getting any girl they want, and they throw themselves at you on the regular, and you attend this party and here's this girl who was associated with a "friend" of yours, and she looks like she might be old enough... you probably aren't thinking too much about it.

And that is beside the point because at this moment we have no evidence or proof that Trump actually did anything. The victim herself even said that Trump didn't abuse her or do anything with her.
Yes but what you are doing is trying to excuse Trump if he did.

"It's okay that he raped a teen, because look at the Winger song!"

[Bill Gates]

If we google your post history we will find hundreds of posts of you thirsting over young women :roll:

You're projecting your own "barely legal" search history, which is gross considering that you're in your 40s.

[Baller234]

You're projecting your own "barely legal" search history, which is gross considering that you're in your 40s.

Dude no offense but you sound gay as fukk.

I'll admit that as I get older my taste in women has become more refined, but you don't just automatically stop being attracted to beautiful young females. It's not like you get older and all of a sudden you're only interested in chicks your own age.

I don't even know wtf you're trying to say.

[Baller234]

Yes but what you are doing is trying to excuse Trump if he did.

"It's okay that he raped a teen, because look at the Winger song!"


I'm not excusing it if he did, I'm saying it's somewhat understandable and not in the same plane or universe as pedophilia.

[Bill Gates]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2ZQbutthaoBjMpX163pDNlBP69nBrs FYm8Q&s


It's crazy that MAGA went from demanding the Epstein files to becoming pro-pedo. Trump's command over thier thoughts is so powerful.

[Baller234]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS2ZQbutthaoBjMpX163pDNlBP69nBrs FYm8Q&s


It's crazy that MAGA went from demanding the Epstein files to becoming pro-pedo. Trump's command over thier thoughts is so powerful.

Why are you lying?

You can throw the word "pedo" around all you want out of desperation, it doesn't make it true.

[warriorfan]

You're projecting your own "barely legal" search history, which is gross considering that you're in your 40s.

You are projecting because you are a gay pedofile.

[BurningHammer]

You’re creepy and gay.


You are projecting because you are a gay pedofile.

Meth Hominem at work as always :roll::roll::roll:

[BurningHammer]

I noticed that when right leaning posters respond with laugh emojis, it's because the person they're quoting genuinely said something retarded. Usually the part that's retarded is bolded or highlighted. But when woke left wing retards respond with laughing emojis, it's because they're trapped in a corner and can't refute your arguments with facts and logic. Which is why you couldn't point to the part of my post that's false or untrue.

If you're prepared to equate statutory with pedophilia, and pretend as if they are one in the same, then you're the weirdo.

Nah I just :roll: at you.

:roll::roll::roll:

[warriorfan]

Meth Hominem at work as always :roll::roll::roll:

https://i.postimg.cc/VLDLpMVQ/IMG-0198.jpg

BurningPedo

[Lakers Legend#32]

There are some MAGAS here who seriously hate women.

[Off the Court]

Meth Hominem at work as always :roll::roll::roll:

yeah that's about as witty as he is capable of. "you're gay" :roll:

If you want to know why you shouldn't do hard drugs you can just point to him. F@#ks your brain up, makes you dumb.

[BurningHammer]

yeah that's about as witty as he is capable of. "you're gay" :roll:

If you want to know why you shouldn't do hard drugs you can just point to him. F@#ks your brain up, makes you dumb.

And now he is a pedo expert too. :roll:

[Baller234]

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRp33-q9CwbH8E5MWyEEaB-I-R2_Tish3oS5A&s

[John8204]

I mean their is an argument to be made that what Epstein did was worse than pedophilia. I think we all kinda agree that people who are sexually attracted to prepubescent children didn't choose it. On the other hand targeting teenagers to prostitute them because power and money makes it easier is worse.