Why do people want teams to be TERRIBLE when their best player is out?
I mean, I know why (for hater purposes). But what does it prove? Lots of people to pull the, "his team is terrible without him" or "they would still win 55 games without him" card, but what does that matter? That reflects on the coaching and the rest of the team, not the player. If you root for a team, don't you want the team to be great AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE no matter what the circumstances?
Re: Why do people want teams to be TERRIBLE when their best player is out?
Yeah. Usually Lebron stans putting Kyrie and Love down or saying Warriors would win 60 without Curry.
Lebron would be 0-82 without his team. Just sayin
Re: Why do people want teams to be TERRIBLE when their best player is out?
Most people would rather tear down than build up
