Smart move by Skeletor... she lost her mind awhile ago. Her meltdowns were easily triggered as of late.
Good riddance to that bitch.
[url]https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/politics/nancy-pelosi-congress-retirement[/url]
Printable View
Smart move by Skeletor... she lost her mind awhile ago. Her meltdowns were easily triggered as of late.
Good riddance to that bitch.
[url]https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/politics/nancy-pelosi-congress-retirement[/url]
[QUOTE=Hey Yo;15041379]Smart move by Skeletor... she lost her mind awhile ago. Her meltdowns were easily triggered as of late.
Good riddance to that bitch.
[url]https://www.cnn.com/2025/11/06/politics/nancy-pelosi-congress-retirement[/url][/QUOTE]
For once we agree on something
This bitch did some serious shady inside dealings. Regardless who the person is, you'd think that these constant positive returns would be looked into.
____________
Nancy Pelosi made $130M in stock profits during Congress career — a return of 16,930%
Before first taking Congressional office in 1987, the then-47-year-old freshman and her hubby, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported between $610,000 and $785,000 in stocks in their portfolio, according to a copy of her “hand delivered” 1987 financial disclosure form.
They held a dozen stocks, including CitiBank, and in many companies no longer publicly traded.
That portfolio has soared to $133.7 million today, according to the latest estimates from Quiver Quantitative.
That represents an eye-watering profit of 16,930% — compared to 2,300% for the Dow Jones over those years.
Even with the power of compound interest, the windfall represents a staggering 14.5% average annual return — beating out the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones performances over those years, around 7% to 9%.
Last year, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return, more than double the S&P 500’s 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg’s end-of-year tally.
The Pelosis are worth an estimated $280 million today – compared to around $3 million when the Golden State lawmaker joined Congress.
[url]https://nypost.com/2025/11/08/us-news/nancy-pelosi-made-130-million-in-stock-profits-in-her-37-years-in-congress-a-profit-of-16930/[/url]
[QUOTE=Hey Yo;15041744]This bitch did some serious shady inside dealings. Regardless who the person is, you'd think that these constant positive returns would be looked into.
____________
Nancy Pelosi made $130M in stock profits during Congress career — a return of 16,930%
Before first taking Congressional office in 1987, the then-47-year-old freshman and her hubby, venture capitalist Paul Pelosi, reported between $610,000 and $785,000 in stocks in their portfolio, according to a copy of her “hand delivered” 1987 financial disclosure form.
They held a dozen stocks, including CitiBank, and in many companies no longer publicly traded.
That portfolio has soared to $133.7 million today, according to the latest estimates from Quiver Quantitative.
That represents an eye-watering profit of 16,930% — compared to 2,300% for the Dow Jones over those years.
Even with the power of compound interest, the windfall represents a staggering 14.5% average annual return — beating out the S&P 500, NASDAQ and Dow Jones performances over those years, around 7% to 9%.
Last year, their investment portfolio pulled in an estimated 54% return, more than double the S&P 500’s 25% gain — and beating every large hedge fund, according to numbers in Bloomberg’s end-of-year tally.
The Pelosis are worth an estimated $280 million today – compared to around $3 million when the Golden State lawmaker joined Congress.
[url]https://nypost.com/2025/11/08/us-news/nancy-pelosi-made-130-million-in-stock-profits-in-her-37-years-in-congress-a-profit-of-16930/[/url][/QUOTE]
Can you imagine what an absolute shiite businessman you would have to be to have SIX bankruptcies when others are seeing returns like this?
[QUOTE=Chick Stern;15041792]Can you imagine what an absolute shiite businessman you would have to be to have SIX bankruptcies when others are seeing returns like this?[/QUOTE]
I'm just glad that someone ls finally pointing out all the grift going down in Washington. I mean, a powerful elected official abusing his office to line his own pockets would just be absolutely terrible.
Someone tell MAGAS that Pelosi has not been relevant for the last few years.
[QUOTE=Real Men Wear Green;15041815]I'm just glad that someone ls finally pointing out all the grift going down in Washington. I mean, a powerful elected official abusing his office to line his own pockets would just be absolutely terrible.[/QUOTE]
Absolutely because it would make them the swamp and absolute corrupt jackass. Especially if foreigners were able to give tens of billions into a fund, say a cryptocoin, with zero accountability of where that money comes from. Or ran their own organization that defrauds people. Boy, if such a person existed, wouldn't that person be considered a con-artist? It's fortune that such a person doesn't exist in our government.