ISH, let's get political: Barack or Mitt?

Who ya got? I'll count them, and whoever wins is the president of ISH.


(will only take votes for either Barack or Mitt)

Obama: 10
Mitt Romney: 5





dumb nba players: a couple

wrong section eh

Both are puppets to the Banks.

I'll vote for Metta World Peace.

three responses, all snide comments. ish working hard tonight

PresidentBe.

[QUOTE=DStebb716]three responses, all snide comments. ish working hard tonight

sometimes i question if it's possible for people to be mature on the internet. the answer is clearly no tonight[/QUOTE]

why you put in wrong section?

attention whoring.

[QUOTE=9erempiree]why you put in wrong section?

attention whoring.[/QUOTE]

yes. this thread has attention whore all over it. :facepalm

i've posted outside of the nba forum about once in my life. i've seen threads just as unrelated to the nba in this section many many times. lay down.

[QUOTE=DStebb716]yes. this thread has attention whore all over it. :facepalm

i've posted outside of the nba forum about once in my life. i've seen threads just as unrelated to the nba in this section many many times. [B]lay down[/B].[/QUOTE]


:biggums:

wow a bunch of whiny little b*tches on here. I'll be a man and actually say something relevant.


OBAMA. :coleman:

8 posts and not even 1 vote. make that 9.

all of 15% of the NBA forum is actually of voting age. thread's moot.

[QUOTE=InspiredLebowski]all of 15% of the NBA forum is actually of voting age. thread's moot.[/QUOTE]

i doubt this, but for the sake of eliminating that problem: the voting age in the state of This Thread is 10

that should raise it to at least 35%, right?

[QUOTE=DStebb716]i doubt this, but for the sake of eliminating that problem: the voting age in the state of This Thread is 10

that should raise it to at least 35%, right?[/QUOTE]

failed thread.

lol @ letting 10 year olds vote.

thread is pointless now.

Gary Johnson. The libertarians have it right.

Gary Johnson.

jill stein, if by some crazy mormon miracle romney makes it close in california i'll vote for obamer

but who cares about this election, just remember to vote JAVALE MCGEE/CHIPOTLE BURRITO in 2024

[QUOTE=1987_Lakers]Both are puppets to the Banks.[/QUOTE]
Essentially. I dislike both. I disagree with more of Obama's policies, but I don't like Mitt much either. If I had to pick one I'd go with Mitt.

I still wish Ron Paul was the Republican nominee.

Eh, Obama has already been selected for a second term. There is no way in hell he looses.. he's already looking like the "peace" candidate in contrast to Romney, and the perceived peace candidate almost always wins.

But iff I had to choose between the two, I'd go with the Mormon.

Reason 1: Chuck Schumer's comment [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=M4tuSbqHViA#t=34s[/url]

[QUOTE] And I've said this to a couple of Romney supporters who agree, that if the sanctions fail, and military action is warranted, a re-elected President Obama is far more likely to launch that kind of military action, probably in concert with Israel than would Mitt Romney. Because Mitt Romney will be new, he'll have a whole domestic agenda.[/QUOTE]

Reason 2: The Mormon wouldn't last more than a term

2.1: especially if he starts another global war


Reason 3: Obama is the guy to beat that the establishment wants. Mitt is no different but he'll make the process a bit more difficult for them.

Obama because I'm in favor of Obamacare.
Other reasons: death of Bin Laden, withdrawing troops from Iraq, housing crisis and unemployment seemed to have improved (not 100%).

I'm not political so I don't know too much but those are the few good things I've noticed.

EDIT: Maybe I should cast my vote on this result: [url]http://imgs.isidewith.com/results-image/158445136.jpg[/url] :lol

Ron Paul

[QUOTE=AK47DR91]Obama because I'm in favor of Obamacare.
Other reasons: death of Bin Laden, withdrawing troops from Iraq, housing crisis and [B]unemployment seemed to have improved (not 100%).[/B]

I'm not political so I don't know too much but those are the few good things I've noticed.

EDIT: Maybe I should cast my vote on this result: [url]http://imgs.isidewith.com/results-image/158445136.jpg[/url] :lol[/QUOTE]

Unemployment hasn't improved, but it never will no matter the dreams the politicians will sell.

[QUOTE=Rowe]Unemployment hasn't improved, but it never will no matter the dreams the politicians will sell.[/QUOTE]

right on the first, terribly wrong on the second. of course it will improve. why wouldn't it? these things go down, but they also go up. obama has the stuff to help it go up.

Bob Saget.

the lesser of 2 evils...

obama

[QUOTE=Rowe]Unemployment hasn't improved, but it never will no matter the dreams the politicians will sell.[/QUOTE]

unemployment has gone down the last 3 years from just over 10percent to under 8 percent last month :facepalm

[QUOTE=nathanjizzle]unemployment has gone down the last 3 years from just over 10percent to under 8 percent last month :facepalm[/QUOTE]
Yeah, that's what I thought because there were articles about how skeptical Republicans were about the result.

Obama. Not because I'm a huge Obama fan, but I agree with his policies moreso than I agree with Mitt's policies.

Obama.

lol at people saying Gary Johnson and Ron Paul. Shows a severe lack of intellect, because I seriously doubt you'd support them if you really broke down their positions. Ex: No FDA, no FAA.

[QUOTE=WesWelkerACL]lol at people saying Gary Johnson and Ron Paul. Shows a severe lack of intellect, because I seriously doubt you'd support them if you really broke down their positions. Ex: No FDA, no FAA.[/QUOTE]

Just because I support a candidate doesn't mean I support everything they believe.

You show a severe lack of intellect by assuming that I do.

[url]http://www.isidewith.com[/url] see who you really side with.

Mitt Romney

Lesser of 2 evils

Obama

I don't see much of a difference between the two to be honest. Someone could break it down if you like but I doubt you're going to two completely different worlds with one or the other as President.

[QUOTE=GreatGreg]Gary Johnson. The libertarians have it right.[/QUOTE]

I 2nd that, him or Ron Paul would do but not Ran Paul.
Hell in fact i wold take Jessie the body over the 2 sell out puppets we have to vote for now.

I say 3rd parties should be allowed. But some would wold send their family death treats just like Ross Parow when he was ahead in votes.

The elections are rigged, just look at the little coverage Ron got, while Gary was completely isolated out of all the media.

[QUOTE=50inchvertical][url]http://www.isidewith.com[/url] see who you really side with.[/QUOTE]
I side with Gary Johnson on most issues in the 2012 Presidential Election.

They are different, and most importantly they'd operate in different contexts.

Romney, while more of a a moderate himself, would have to deal with the Republican base of angry white males. He would soon be perceived as untrustworthy, as he'll have been elected by people whose beliefs he doesn't really share.
He would also be surrounded by more Bush-style neocons.
Finally, lobbyists would regain influence, as would Wall Street.

[QUOTE=Kobe 4 The Win]Mitt Romney

Lesser of 2 evils[/QUOTE]

Im voting for Obama cos i believe he is the lesser of two evils.

Anyways it doesnt matter I live in a deep red state, and Obama is going to get 270 electoral votes easily.

[QUOTE=MavsSuperFan]Im voting for Obama cos i believe he is the lesser of two evils.

[B]Anyways it doesnt matter I live in a deep red state, and Obama is going to get 270 electoral votes easily[/B].[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't say he'll get 270 electoral votes easily, but he does have much easier path to those 270 electoral votes than Romney.