would chris paul have won the title in place of isiah thomas?

i think so

No.

no way cp3 not nearly alpha enough

Another teenager that has no idea what Zeke was all about.

:roll: :roll:

[url]http://www.nba.com/video/channels/nba_tv/2013/08/26/isiah-thomas-1988-finals-game-6.nba/[/url]


let me know when cp3 does that

Zeke was under enormous pressure to win those titles as he was being blackmailed over his homosexual relationship with magic.

Zeke was a better playoffs performer than CP3. And dude kept playing even when he was injured.

OP cant be serious right????? :roll:

He's definitely good enough to.

The Pistons didn't face one decent team in 1989 and they won with Thomas shooting 48 TS% in the playoffs.

CP3 is better than that version of Thomas at almost every facet of the game and is far more productive on the court.

Regular season CP3 is as good as regular season IT, but IT was much better in the playoffs. It is similar to the difference between Karl Malone and Duncan.

Mentality is the only thing Isiah has over Paul imo. CP3 is a better basketball player, plain and simple.

[QUOTE=24-Inch_Chrome]Mentality is the only thing Isiah has over Paul imo. CP3 is a better basketball player, plain and simple.[/QUOTE]

CP3's flopping bullshit doesn't fly in Isiah's era. He isn't putting up the numbers he did in today's game if he replaced Isiah on the Pistons.

Chris Paul is the most overrated player of all time.

[QUOTE=24-Inch_Chrome]Mentality is the only thing Isiah has over Paul imo. [B]CP3 is a better basketball player, plain and simple.[/B][/QUOTE]
Location: Canada

[QUOTE=dazzer87]Location: Canada[/QUOTE]

:roll:

Thomas/Dumars > CP3/Dumars

Dumars offensive game would've suffered, and he'd be relegated to a defensive specialist at best. That or he would have knocked CP3 out cold.

Definitely would've won in 89....

Maybe not 90.

Laimbeer would crack his head open for yapping too much way before the playoffs even started.

Plus he doesn't have the playoff composure of IT. For a point guard, Paul lacks a lot of leadership qualities. I feel like this lack is THE huge flaw in his makeup, but it is never really touched upon on this board or by NBA analysts in general.

The Flop Boys 30 for 30.

[QUOTE=dazzer87]Location: Canada[/QUOTE]

Canada is ranked as a better country to live in than the United States by just about everyone. Not like it's unique in that facet though. :confusedshrug:

no zeke scoring game is better than paul

Hell no. Chris Paul doesn't have what it takes to lead the 'Bad Boys'.

Would he made the 3rd round (title equivalent for CP 0) probably not

Paul IS a better basketball player, gets zero appreciation though :facepalm

Paul is a better overall basketball player than Thomas, but he would not have had the same success with the teammates.

TBH, a lot of these hypothetical questions are quite silly. Good teams are almost always good because of how well they were built around their star. So unless the two stars in question play a near-identical style/game, the answer will inevitably be No.

And, in this particular comparison (as with most, honestly), the two stars are notably different players.

Yeah.

It's funny that the most unappreciated PG in league history is all of a sudden godly figure when compared to a modern day superstar.

This is what the Pistons faced in the 1989 NBA Finals.

[CODE] Tota Shoo Per
Rk Player Age G GS MP FG FGA 3P 3PA FT FTA ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS FG% 3P% FT% MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK
1 James Worthy 27 4 4 170 39 81 2 3 22 31 7 10 17 14 2 6 7 10 102 .481 .667 .710 42.5 25.5 4.3 3.5 0.5 1.5
2 Michael Cooper 32 4 4 163 17 45 9 27 5 6 1 5 6 27 7 2 2 14 48 .378 .333 .833 40.8 12.0 1.5 6.8 1.8 0.5
3 A.C. Green 25 4 4 134 11 25 0 3 13 19 11 26 37 2 4 1 6 15 35 .440 .000 .684 33.5 8.8 9.3 0.5 1.0 0.3
4 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 41 4 4 104 20 46 0 0 10 12 5 15 20 7 2 3 8 11 50 .435 .833 26.0 12.5 5.0 1.8 0.5 0.8
5 Mychal Thompson 34 4 0 103 13 30 0 0 14 22 12 7 19 3 1 2 2 12 40 .433 .636 25.8 10.0 4.8 0.8 0.3 0.5
6 Orlando Woolridge 29 4 0 87 11 18 0 0 16 19 5 16 21 6 0 2 6 11 38 .611 .842 21.8 9.5 5.3 1.5 0.0 0.5
7 Tony Campbell 26 4 1 83 15 24 1 3 13 17 3 7 10 4 3 0 6 19 44 .625 .333 .765 20.8 11.0 2.5 1.0 0.8 0.0
8 Magic Johnson 29 3 3 75 12 26 1 5 10 11 3 8 11 24 3 0 5 4 35 .462 .200 .909 25.0 11.7 3.7 8.0 1.0 0.0
9 David Rivers 24 3 0 26 4 12 0 2 4 5 0 3 3 5 0 0 4 6 12 .333 .000 .800 8.7 4.0 1.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
10 Jeff Lamp 29 4 0 11 2 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 .667 .500 2.8 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 Mark McNamara 29 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[/CODE]

What elite PG wouldn't win that Finals matchup?

[QUOTE=warriorfan]no way cp3 not nearly alpha enough[/QUOTE]

I don't think that word means what you think it means....

Other than KG, probably the most underrated superstar in recent memory.

[QUOTE]


[B]today's defender can't sag off 3-point shooters as much as previous eras could, causing more packed paints for Isiah
[/B]

[/QUOTE]
[IMG]http://lookingforamerica.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nba-Basketball-Court-Dimensions-300x300.jpg[/IMG]


In today's game, if a defender's man is behind the 3-point line (with or without the ball), the defender can sag off an unlimited amount, even all the way to the baseline, [I][COLOR="Navy"]BUT ONLY IF[/COLOR][/I] the paint doesn't get in the way.

Unfortunately, as the diagram shows, almost nowhere on the 3-point arc can a defender sag off and not eventually meet the paint - in these instances, the defender only has 3 seconds in the paint, which is the same as previous eras, who were also allowed to sag into the paint for 3 seconds.

However, defenders in previous eras had an advantage specifically when sagging off [I][COLOR="Navy"]corner/sideline[/COLOR][/I] 3-point shooters - they were allowed to paint-camp "[I]with no time limits[/I]" in the "outside" lane, which is the outer partition running up the sides of the paint, shown above.. Today's defenders can't do this - they have 3 seconds in the "outside" lane, just like they do in the inside lane.. Given this disadvantage in sagging off on corner/sideline 3-point shooters, today's defender has less freedom in sagging off shooters than previous eras.

^ This place is seriously so much better without you

lol @ cp3 hate. Cp3 > Isiah

[QUOTE=JohnFreeman]Chris Paul is the most overrated player of all time.[/QUOTE]

Yup, and it seems like the guy always gets a pass. Isiah all day

[QUOTE=kshutts1]Paul is a better overall basketball player than Thomas, but he would not have had the same success with the teammates.

[B]TBH, a lot of these hypothetical questions are quite silly. Good teams are almost always good because of how well they were built around their star. So unless the two stars in question play a near-identical style/game, the answer will inevitably be No. [/B]

And, in this particular comparison (as with most, honestly), the two stars are notably different players.[/QUOTE]
Excellent point and thats why I also think these threads are kinda silly, no offense to the OP...I just figure, whats the point? Nobody knows for sure what would've or could've been. Would Jordan win in the 00's? Would Lebron win in the 80's? I dunno, who cares? It can never be answered so why waste time debating over it?

Now just a player to player comparison? I think Isaiah is a better scorer, I think both are equally good playmakers, both are good defenders although I'd probably give CP3 the edge there, talking just on ball defense really. Leadership? Both great leaders but probably take Isaiah there just based on the team he was leading. Toughness goes to Isaiah, clutch play goes to Isaiah. Ballhandling? You could say equal but I may give Isaiah the edge there too because he wasn't able to carry, and palm the ball all over the place. Not saying CP3 does but he does play in a more generous era as far as traveling calls, palming, and even assists stat tracking. If they tracked Isaiah's assists like they do CP3's, he would've averaged even more assists.

Would have been a completely different team. So, probably not.




.

[QUOTE=Mike Armstrong]Regular season CP3 is as good as regular season IT, but IT was much better in the playoffs. It is similar to the difference between Karl Malone and Duncan.[/QUOTE]
Well put.

Isiah as a competitor was a level higher than CP3. Isiah was very clutch, and could carry the offensive load better. His toughness completed what the Pistons were trying to do. Isiah was the victim of some crazy aggression that CP3 never came close to experiencing. Gasol would have never thought to rub Isiah's head even with his Piston enforcers not around. I could think of other scenarios where CP3 could be better than Isiah, but not on that team. No way.

Isiah was one of the THE most cold blooded killers that ever laced them up. I would go to war with a guy like that any day. And guys followed him because he was all about WE and not ME. He played the game the right way and just wanted to win.

At the same time, as many have already said, CP3 is one of the most underrated greats ever.

As for the question, who knows.

[QUOTE=kshutts1]Paul is a better overall basketball player than Thomas, but he would not have had the same success with the teammates.

TBH, a lot of these hypothetical questions are quite silly. Good teams are almost always good because of how well they were built around their star. So unless the two stars in question play a near-identical style/game, the answer will inevitably be No.

And, in this particular comparison (as with most, honestly), the two stars are notably different players.[/QUOTE]
:applause:

[QUOTE=Fallen Angel]This is what the Pistons faced in the 1989 NBA Finals.

[CODE] Tota Shoo Per
Rk Player Age G GS MP FG FGA 3P 3PA FT FTA ORB DRB TRB AST STL BLK TOV PF PTS FG% 3P% FT% MP PTS TRB AST STL BLK
1 James Worthy 27 4 4 170 39 81 2 3 22 31 7 10 17 14 2 6 7 10 102 .481 .667 .710 42.5 25.5 4.3 3.5 0.5 1.5
2 Michael Cooper 32 4 4 163 17 45 9 27 5 6 1 5 6 27 7 2 2 14 48 .378 .333 .833 40.8 12.0 1.5 6.8 1.8 0.5
3 A.C. Green 25 4 4 134 11 25 0 3 13 19 11 26 37 2 4 1 6 15 35 .440 .000 .684 33.5 8.8 9.3 0.5 1.0 0.3
4 Kareem Abdul-Jabbar 41 4 4 104 20 46 0 0 10 12 5 15 20 7 2 3 8 11 50 .435 .833 26.0 12.5 5.0 1.8 0.5 0.8
5 Mychal Thompson 34 4 0 103 13 30 0 0 14 22 12 7 19 3 1 2 2 12 40 .433 .636 25.8 10.0 4.8 0.8 0.3 0.5
6 Orlando Woolridge 29 4 0 87 11 18 0 0 16 19 5 16 21 6 0 2 6 11 38 .611 .842 21.8 9.5 5.3 1.5 0.0 0.5
7 Tony Campbell 26 4 1 83 15 24 1 3 13 17 3 7 10 4 3 0 6 19 44 .625 .333 .765 20.8 11.0 2.5 1.0 0.8 0.0
8 Magic Johnson 29 3 3 75 12 26 1 5 10 11 3 8 11 24 3 0 5 4 35 .462 .200 .909 25.0 11.7 3.7 8.0 1.0 0.0
9 David Rivers 24 3 0 26 4 12 0 2 4 5 0 3 3 5 0 0 4 6 12 .333 .000 .800 8.7 4.0 1.0 1.7 0.0 0.0
10 Jeff Lamp 29 4 0 11 2 3 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 5 .667 .500 2.8 1.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0
11 Mark McNamara 29 2 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[/CODE]

What elite PG wouldn't win that Finals matchup?[/QUOTE]

stop fuccing posting